. Students were evaluated on performance of the design (based onquantitative results), cost, creativity of design, and craftsmanship and aesthetics. Deliverables forthis project included a project schedule, project definition and requirements, a design proposalpresentation and report, design prototype presentation with demonstration, and a final designreport.ResultsThe first three questions in the survey instrument requested information about the academic statusof the student population, and their level of college experience. Figure 1 shows that the surveyedpopulation is primarily composed of students with freshman level academic standing and fewupper level students. 200 180
engineeringdesign processes to solve the problem. The community-based problems selected by theparticipants in the first year of the study are shown in Table 1. All the names are pseudonyms toprotect the identity of the participants.The community-based problems were characterized as ill-structured problems because they were“not constrained by the content domains being studied in classrooms.” 21 For example, thecommunity-based problems selected by the students were dynamic, required collaboration,involved multiple solutions, and the constraints, both engineering and non-engineering, wereidentified by the students themselves.21, 22 The main objective was to observe how students usedengineering design processes, how they perceived engineering, how those
, 2016 From Problem Solvers to Problem Seekers: The Necessary Role of Tension in Engineering EducationIn this paper it is proposed that the current focus on problems in engineering education andtechnological literacy may be more constructively reframed by focusing on tensions. PriyanDias claims engineering has an identity crisis that arises from tensions inherent in: 1) theinfluence of the profession on society, 2) the role engineers play, and 3) what constitutes validknowledge in engineering. These are ethical, ontological, and epistemological tensionsrespectively, which Dias frames as a tension between identities of homo sapiens and homo faber.Beyond the tensions in engineering there are additional tensions that arise
as theirAmerican counterparts,” Grasso questioned whether it is wiser to close all the expensiveengineering colleges in the U.S. and “simply import all the engineering we need.”1 As a lifetimeengineering professor and administrator, Grasso was certainly not proposing laying off thousandsof American engineering educators. Instead, he urged his colleagues in the U.S. to pursue “afresh start” and to educate “[a] growing and increasingly diverse number of domestically trainedengineers—equipped with the broad insight and critical thinking skills the world needs” through“[the] study of the human condition, the human experience, [and] the human record.” Doing so,Grasso suggests, would give the engineers educated in the U.S. “a competitive advantage
prototype to solve the design problem. Therewas a set of general requirements that applied to all the three problems, for example, all designsneeded to be creative, aesthetically pleasing, well crafted, and the total cost should be as little aspossible and it should not exceed $100. Each problem had some specific requirements inaddition to the general requirements: in the first design problem, students were provided with asolar set-up, shown in Figure 1, which has a light bulb, simulating the “sun” that travels from“east” to “west” during a “day” at a constant rate. A solar power plant needed to be designed sothat consistent and maximum power be generated throughout the day. Only two types of solarcells could be used and all of them must be placed
material. This way, the authors did not know whichstudents chose to participate and which did not. This teamwork agreement was then changedappropriately to gain consent and converted into a document that students could completeelectronically.After gaining approval of the IRB, results of this experience were studied quantitatively in thespring semester. Approximately 110 students registered for the spring semester. These werebroken into 9 sections for undergraduates, some visiting high school students also take thecourse, but in special sections. Six sections were designated as treatment sections. A surveyusing Qualtrics was distributed to the class immediately before the teamwork skit. As seen inFigure 1, survey questions addressed several aspects
propagate documentedinnovations. Those papers emphasize three critical areas: Learning in and out of the classroom; The pathways to studying engineering, retention, and diversifying learning community; and Using technology to enhance learning and engagement.The NSF is committed to establishing and the engineering education community is in need of aresearch agenda focused on propagating documented innovations. To most effectivelyaccomplish this, it is necessary to capture needs and potential solutions through a number ofdifferent approaches that actively involve the larger engineering education community. As suchthis work addresses four major questions.1. What accomplishments have been produced to date? What new innovations have occurred over
, particularly amongunderrepresented groups, and considers their effectiveness in enhancing students’ self -efficacy asengineers.IntroductionAs a land grant university [1] and Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI), The University of Arizonaaims to serve a diverse student population and to engage the community in programs thatincrease awareness and access to post-secondary programs. The College of Engineering (COE)’slong-running dual enrollment and summer camp programs, Engineering 102 in High School(ENGR 102HS) and Summer Engineering Academy (SEA), focus on pre-college access toengineering with the goal of inspiring students to pursue Science, Technology, Engineering andMath (STEM) careers after high school.In this paper, we examine ENGR 102HS and SEA. We
engage in biweeklymeetings that offer time to reflect and analyze their experiences in classrooms and discusspedagogical strategies and maneuvers that advance student learning. Ongoing training includesstructured planning meetings that prepare facilitators for their instructional work in engineeringclassrooms. These meetings happen typically a week in advance of a scheduled session, allowingtime to process information and prepare for facilitation activities. The assigned graduatefacilitators (two co-facilitators) join the center’s staff for an hour-long meeting that covers fourcore components of a facilitation experience: 1) the context of the course in which the sessionwill take place, 2) the goals and components of the educational session, 3
education which is ubiquitous to this day. This has led to theidentification of the Grinter Report with these changes and the perception that it recommended a one-size-fits-all curriculum that was impractical and inflexible. This paper will reexamine the report and show howit considers many of the same problems we are still debating today. A case for reconsidering the GrinterReport will be made through three points. 1) The current engineering curriculum is at most superficiallyrelated to the Grinter Report. It will be argued that curricular changes rarely coincided with the intentionsof the report and were rather motivated by other factors. 2) The Grinter Report focuses on principles ofengineering education, not a particular curriculum. It will be
. This project seeks to improve the Coast Guard’s experience with the control systemsput in place to integrate hydrogen power with other sources of energy, as well as a desired load.Setting the goal of fabricating a remote-operated vessel that uses an autonomous power system,this project embarks on the path to bring a more ‘intelligent’ design into power management forhybrid maritime vessels.When hydrogen power is mentioned in today’s world, the first thing that comes to mind is thetragedy of the Hindenburg, a blimp filled with hydrogen gas that exploded and cost dozens oflives [1]. However, as the world turns to alternative energy sources, the stigma toward hydrogenis beginning to change.In July 2024, the world’s first hybrid hydrogen-powered
inengineering.IntroductionUnderrepresented minorities (URMs), especially women, remain significantly underrepresentedamong tenured and tenure-track faculty in engineering departments, despite earning more PhDsin these fields. Women often lack role models due to small faculty representation, and URMfaculty percentages remain far below their presence in the general population, with female URMfaculty nearly absent in some engineering departments [1]. Women engineering faculty faceisolation and lack networking opportunities [2]. Therefore, efforts to promote DEI in theengineering professoriate have gained increased attention, with higher education institutionsrecognizing the need to cultivate a more representative and inclusive academic workforce. Overthe last five years, support for
engineering, she brings extensive expertise to her role. Maintaining an active research agenda, her work primarily revolves around enhancing the efficiency, safety, and eco-friendliness of the construction industry. Additionally, she is dedicated to integrating cutting-edge technologies into her teaching methods to elevate the overall educational experience. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Comparing East Carolina University’s Green Building Program and LEED Certification: A Case Study with Implications for the Future of Sustainable Construction Education Shahrooz Ghorbani 1 & Tianjiao Zhao2
a diversity of consulting,academic, and industrial sources. The factors that drive the adoption, use, and ongoing success ofthese tools are not well understood and are likely driven by a complex interaction of human,organizational, and economic factors. This paper investigates innovation method and tooladoption in industry through semi-structured interviews with individuals from a Fortune 500company. This work explores three resulting themes 1) individual incentives and motivation foradoption, (2) the appropriateness of tool selection for the organizational product domain andcompatibility with existing processes, and (3) executive and management support for adoption.The implications for engineering education are also discussed.Keywords
withpractitioners in other fields to solve sociotechnical problems, create economically viableproducts, and guide effective policies. Advanced teamwork skills are necessary to collaboratewith diverse partners, often spread around the globe. In the workplace, teamwork consists ofmany behaviors, including engaging in feedback. Giving and receiving feedback through annualreviews, mentorship, or peer review are common practices in the workplace [1]. Unlike theacademic environment, engineers do not receive grades with which to measure performance,rather, they must seek out information via feedback. Thus, the ability to give, receive, process,and act on feedback is essential for continuous improvement of engineers in industry. Theunderstandings, capacities, and
-lastingnegative outcomes. These negative outcomes include degraded participation within theenvironment and negative evaluations of the self (e.g. imposterism) and the environment (e.g.mistrust).Keywords: graduate education; masters’ students, navigation; barriersIntroduction and Literature ReviewIssues in graduate-level attrition [1–5] and well-being [6–12] have been well documented fordecades, and while interest in graduate-level education research has increased recently, there isstill a dearth of literature pointing towards the root-cause of these issues. With attrition inengineering estimated to be at least 24% (higher for women and minorities) [13] and rates ofdepression and anxiety between 4 and 6 times that of non-graduate peers [6], the
teaching and learning of STEM subjects can be enhanced withthe incorporation of IKS [1]. Incorporating a local knowledge system within engineeringeducation will not only help engineering students from non-Western societies to learnengineering better, but they will also be able to use their engineering skills in the localcontext more efficiently.Background of Engineering Education in IndiaThe origin of engineering education in India dates back to the British, majorly forinfrastructural development [2]. During the colonial rule, ‘the superintending engineers weremostly recruited from Britain from the Cooper's Hill College, and this applied as well toforemen and artificers; but this could not be done in the case of lower grades - craftsmen,artisans
, encouraging students to consider howdesigns and technologies meet human needs. This emphasis on empathy empowered studentsto see themselves as problem-solvers capable of making a difference in their communities.For many, the program was their first introduction to engineering, sparking new careeraspirations and showing them that STEM is not only accessible but also an exciting avenue forcreativity and innovation.A Brief Outline of the ActivitiesWeek 1: Electrical Circuits and Electrical EngineeringActivity: Students built simple circuits using batteries, wires, and light bulbs.Purpose: This activity introduced the basics of electricity and the role of electrical engineers indesigning the systems that power our modern lives. It helped students
learning. These foundational topics provide students with a basic level oftheoretical knowledge needed to effectively apply ML tools and techniques in practicalscenarios.An example of one of the foundational topics is where students download wine quality data fromthe University of California Irvine’s Machine Learning Repository (Cortez, 2009). UsingMATLAB’s Regression Learner Toolbox, they employ supervised learning techniques, such asregression, to predict wine quality. A key feature of MATLAB is its ability to simultaneouslycompare multiple models, enabling users to select the most effective one (see Figure 1).Figure 1: Screenshot of Matlab Regression Learner Toolbox (The MathWorks Inc., 2023).Following this introduction, the majority of the
provides students with a strong foundation in applyingmathematical concepts to real-world scenarios. As they progress, students can take on moreadvanced challenges, such as modifying object properties, further deepening their understandingof computer vision algorithms like OpenCV. By combining hands-on experience with effectiveteaching strategies, this approach accelerates learning and prepares students for higher-levelopportunities in computer vision research. By sharing both technical insights and teachingmethodologies, this paper empowers instructors to introduce undergraduates to computer vision,paving the way for impactful contributions to autonomous technologies. 1. Introduction Along with the rise of natural language processing
response [5]. Figure 1 provides a visual overview of the ISEAGEenvironment used during the competition.Figure 1. ISEAGE environmentISEAGE creates a controlled virtual environment replicating the Internet, allowing participantsto design, secure, and defend networks without impacting real-world systems. With its advancedcapabilities, ISEAGE supports remote access, which enables participants and administratorsfrom different locations, including international sites, to engage seamlessly in the competition.This feature is especially critical for events like the International Cyber Defense Challenge,where teams from multiple countries participate simultaneously.ISEAGE facilitates secure and limited Internet access through its air-gap gateway and
aims to build a more comprehensive understanding ofdoctoral-level ethics education.Research Aims and QuestionsThe primary goal of this study is to illuminate how doctoral students interpret and applyethical principles in engineering and to identify critical gaps in ethics education. Theinvestigation is guided by the following research questions: 1. How do doctoral engineering students at the Thayer School of Engineering conceptualize ethics within the context of their training and future careers? 2. In what ways do these conceptualizations shape their approach to professional decision-making? 3. What challenges and gaps in ethics education are perceived by doctoral students, and where might curricular or
further developed their teamwork and leadership skills. Lastly, the multiple benefits thatengineering students reported on leadership development by participating in these types ofprojects could help change the current engineering curricula, benefiting students in their role asfuture professionals.Background The first hint of an engineering contest dates to the 19th century when the Army Corps ofEngineers improved inland river navigation by considering suggestions from the public [1].Later, in 1932, the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) was created tooversee the education, accreditation, regulation, and professional development of engineeringprofessionals and students in the United States [2]. With the creation of
highly digitalized and mediated [1].Recent research highlights the link between the increasing dependence of Gen Z females on digitaldevices and the rising rates of neurological conditions such as ADHD and autism spectrumdisorders [2]. Prolonged exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) emitted by these devices maycontribute to these developments, with studies suggesting potential disruptions to neuraldevelopment and cognitive functioning. These findings are also relevant to broader societalchallenges, including the decline in birth rates observed in the U.S. and globally. As youngergenerations experience higher incidences of neurological and mental health issues, there may be afurther effect on future generations, potentially leading to
. The project culminates in Week 10 with a multi-media presentation evaluating aspects of the cumulative impacts of 150 years of developmentand alteration of an engineered shoreline. For the history portion, students do original research atthe regional archives to identify changes to the landscape over time and evaluate historicalsources to determine the causes of these alterations. In the process, students develop historycourse outcomes, including (1) analyzing primary and secondary sources to evaluate historicalarguments for credibility, position, perspective, and relevance; (2) locating sources in theirhistorical context; and (3) identifying the ways political economy have shaped land and resourceuse in the region. The blending of
programs, etc.) haveimpacted the success of these women, it was important to have distinct research sites so that Icould examine the effects of various policies and procedures on the careers of the researchparticipants within the context of each institution’s programs and policies.Population and Sample I interviewed women faculty who have their primary appointment in the engineeringschool each campus (since some faculty have dual appointments). The objective for each site was to interview at least fifty percent of the faculty so that my sample would reflect the variedexperience of tenured women faculty at each site. Table 1-1 describes the population and sampleat each research site and Table 1-2 provides employment and demographic
literacies on the part ofemployees and employers. The use of communication technology can be found among thefour ‘mega trends’ that Shuman et al.[1] specifically identify for the field of engineering,alongside changes forced by the fragile world economy, student and professional mobility,and the increasingly loud voice of the social imperative. This poses challenges foreducational institutions which, beyond helping students become subject experts, need to takethe responsibility for preparing them to ‘deal with global communicative practices online, inall their complexity’[2]. This trend toward developing skills needed to fully operate in highlyglobalised and cross-cultural settings as a necessary top-up to ‘technical core competencies’[3]has become
engineering. Rather, the vastmajority of the engineering student population at University of Calgary, where this is the mostpopular course out of three courses that fulfills a degree requirement, is exposed to thismethodology. The other two courses are in the process of being phased out and this will be theonly course to fulfill the requirement in the near future.I.Course DesignThe course consisted of two 75-minute lectures a week for the entire class, with the class brokenup into three 75-minute weekly sections of between 29 to 51 students over the course of a 13-week semester. The goals, or learning outcomes, of the course are to increase the student’sability to 1) evaluate the impact of technology on multiple facets of society such as
Learn how things work. Aladdin Effect reverse engineering. Oral and Logbook, meetings, written Good communication skills. innovation contests. communication Table 1. Approach used in the Para didactic Laboratory.Failure managementThe typical student comes to university from a school tradition that penalizes mistakes andfailures, and this is a heavy burden on his/her ability to take risks. It is an interesting paradox, thestudent
decades (or longer) to help performers develop their skills. This training canembody a range of formats, many resembling schoolyard games4; but nearly all successfulimprov training activities are united by a common thread of providing a scaffolded opportunityfor creative, interactive and unscripted performance within a safe and supportive environment(figure 1). Figure 1: “Yes, And”, a classic improv activity There are many variations to this game, but the essential rules are that one player starts a story or scene: “There was a giant slug outside our house.” The other players must add another sentence to the story, beginning with “Yes, and”: “Yes, and it was bigger than the man who was holding its leash!” “Yes, and the man