Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO, USA) in 2018. There, she gained experience working as a graduate teaching assistant for computer aided engineering, biomedical engineering capstone design, and biomedical engineering introductory classes. She also served as a Grad- uate Teaching Fellow for the Walter Scott, Jr. College of Engineering during the 2016/2017 academic year. Nicole is currently an instructional post-doctoral fellow in the Transforming Engineering Education Laboratory within the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Michigan. Through this fellowship, she spent the 2019/2020 academic year teaching and assisting in curriculum development at Shantou University (Guangdong Province
CEE PhD fellowship cap for the academic year of 2019-2020 for his research contribution in the field of transportation engineering. Research interest of Mr. Rahman include winter roadway maintenance, shared-use mobility, social-media data analysis, traffic operation at intersection, and connected and au- tonomous vehicle.Dr. Karen E Rambo-Hernandez, Texas A&M University Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez is an associate professor at Texas A and M University in the College of Ed- ucation and Human Development in the department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture. In her research, she is interested in the assessing STEM interventions on student outcomes, measuring academic growth, and evaluating the impact of curricular
Paper ID #29239Aligning the chemical engineering curriculum to a common problem-solvingstrategyProf. Nicolas Hudon, Queen’s University Dr Nicolas Hudon is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Queen’s Uni- versity (Canada) since 2016. His teaching activities are mainly concerned with second-year fundamental courses. He is the recipient of the 2019 Carolyn Small Award for teaching innovation from the Faculty of Applied Sciences and Engineering at Queen’s University.Dr. Louise Meunier P.Eng., Queen’s University Dr. Meunier studied mechanical engineering and worked for twenty years as an
invited four graduate students to work on the project alongside theundergraduates. The number of graduate and undergraduate students working in our lab hasfluctuated somewhat, with students joining and leaving the project according to their academic andpersonal needs. However, three of the graduate students from Fall 2018 persisted with the projectsfor three semesters (through the end of Fall 2019) until their graduation. While we anticipated thatthe graduate students would be able to mentor the undergraduates, we found that some graduatestudents did not have the requisite knowledge to provide leadership roles. In reality, the studentsappeared to function more-or-less as equals, with research experience and skill typically beingmore important
not kill the cyber security minor. We continue to offerthe minor for computer engineering, software engineering, computer science, and managementinformation systems students. We believe the cyber security void is so large that each of thesekinds of students can help fill the gaps we are positioned to see in the next 20 years.Footnote: For those who are interested, all laboratories used in the three core technical courseshave been included in the National Security Agency’s National Cybersecurity CurriculumProgram [15]. Additionally, the ISELab is freely available by request at the ISERink web site[6]Lessons learned and future workThe program started May of 2019 without much advertisement. During the summer 2019orientation we had about 30
Design *,” vol. 24, no. 2, 2008.[20] K. E. Shroyer and T. Sun, “Student experiences in a university makerspace: Design as decision making,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019.[21] R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and decisions : Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley, 1957.[22] M. Klein, “Capturing Design Rationale in Concurrent Engineering Teams,” Computer (Long. Beach. Calif)., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 1993.[23] C. Zannier, M. Chiasson, and F. Maurer, “A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 637–653, 2007.[24] J. Lee, “What ’ s in Design Rationale ?,” vol. 6, pp. 251–280, 1991.[25] J
undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013. Last year he received the ASEE Mike Ashby Outstanding Materials Educator Award.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. He also serves as an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Academic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics
. [4] “Industrial Production: Nondurable Goods: Ice Cream and Frozen Dessert.” FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 14 Dec. 2018, fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPN31152NQ. [5] Aimee T. Ulstad and Yeonsu Ryu. "Using Mentors as Live Case Studies for Teaching Topics in Supply Chain Management ". 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June. ASEE Conferences, 2016. https://peer.asee.org/27151 Internet. 14 Jan, 2019. 10 11 Appendix #1: Business Plan (Color Coded)Business Plan Template for a StartupBusinessNote on Highlighted Colors (Yellow – Final Project – Includes all of it
. 0–5, 2011, doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3710.[17] M. Regan and S. Sheppard, “Interactive Multimedia Courseware and the Hands-on Learning Experience: An Assessment Study,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00221.x.[18] Y. Wang, S. K. Ong, and A. Y. C. Nee, “Enhancing mechanisms education through interaction with augmented reality simulation,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1552–1564, 2018, doi: 10.1002/cae.21951.[19] E. M. Starkey, S. R. Miller, and S. T. Hunter, “Deploying Virtual Product Dissection Lesson Modules in Introductory Engineering Classrooms: A Research Driven-Approach,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019
. Yoon, S., Evans, M. G. and Strobel, J. (2014), “Validation of the Teaching Engineering Self- Efficacy Scale for K-12 Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, 103: 463–485.18. Schrader, P.G. & Lawless, Kimberly. (2004). The knowledge, attitudes, & behaviors approach how to evaluate performance and learning in complex environments. Performance Improvement. 43. 8 - 15. 10.1002/pfi.4140430905.19. Yoon, S. Y., Evans, M. G., & Strobel, J. (2012, June). Development of the teaching engineering self-efficacy scale (TESS) for k-12 teachers. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 25-466).20. Wang, X., & Bowe, A. G., & Kobus, C. J. (2019, June), Board 155
Learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297-306.[8] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S., Molina, S. Implementation of Visual Supplements to StrengthenPedagogical Practices and Enhance the Physical Understanding of Fundamental Concepts inEngineering Mechanics. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl.Paper ID: 24780.[9] Mills, J., Treagust, D. Engineering Education, Is Problem-based or Project-based Learning theAnswer. Aust J Eng Educ. Jan. 1, 2003.[10] Woods, D.R., Issues in Implementation in an Otherwise Conventional Programme. In Boud,D.& Feletti, G.I. (eds.) The challenge of Problem-Based learning, 2nd ed, Kogan Page, London.173-180, (1997).[11] Woods, D. R., Hrymak, A.N., Marshall, R.R., Wood, P.E., Crowe, C.M
and sophomore enrollment experiencedthe biggest jump, resulting in our FTIC (First Time in College) student enrollment rate in the three-targeted programs reaching more than 30% in Fall 2019. While the SETS project leadership team ishappy to see the rising reputation of the targeted ET programs, and the ever-expanding pool ofscholarship applicants, we are challenged by the shift of students population. With more than 30%FTIC students in the programs, student support and services are urgently needed to help themsuccessfully transition from high-school prescribed learning to college-level independent study. Onthe other hand, the student population characteristics and demographics are continuously changing,sometimes due to external circumstances
, M. Royo, J. Gamez-Perez, M. Segarra, and L. Cabedo, "Acquisition of transversal skills through PBL: a study of the perceptions of the students and teachers in materials science courses in engineering," Multidiscip. J. Educ. Social Technol. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 121, 2015.[12] A. Dominguez, M. E. Truyol, and G. Zavala. “Faculty Development Program on Active Learning for Engineering Faculty in Chile: Sharing Step,” in 2018 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo. Available: https://peer.asee.org/30509.[13] A. Dominguez, M. E. Truyol, and G. Zavala. “Professional Development Program to Promote Active Learning in an Engineering Classroom,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 424–433, 2019.[14] A. Dominguez, M. E. Truyol
Resolution Ability, and Cultural Self-Awareness in the Context of System Analysis and Design Teamwork,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[7] A. Jaiswal, T. Karabiyik, L. Jin, and K. Acheson-Clair, “Enhancing Team Communication Skills via Portable Intercultural Module in a Systems Thinking Class,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[8] O. K. Bee and T. S. Hie, “Employers’ emphasis on technical skills and soft skills in job advertisements,” Engl. Teach., vol. 44, no. 1, 2015, Accessed: Jan. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://meltajournals.com/index.php/TET/article/view/87[9] S. Ibrahim, M. A. M. Yunus, and M. T. M. Khairi, “Teaching academic writing for engineering students
performance equationcan be described using Eq.1.ZXA = t A . ZT + iA ZI + eA . ZEA → (Eq.1)Where ZXA is the performance of ratee, ZT is the true ability, ZI are the environmental factors.And ZEA is random error, whereas, t A ,iA , and eA are the weights of the different components.References[1] R. J. Wherry and C. J. Bartlett, “THE CONTROL OF BIAS IN RATINGS: A THEORYOF RATING,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 521–551, Sep. 1982, doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02208.x.[2] Y. Chuang, H. Chiang, and A. Lin, “Helping behaviors convert negative affect into jobsatisfaction and creative performance: The moderating role of work competence,” PR, vol. 48,no. 6, pp. 1530–1547, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1108/PR-01-2018-0038.[3] M. Kilduff, A
, invisible challenges they faceduring promotion and tenure at their respective colleges of engineering. This paper is more thanjust information-sharing, it is a raw, complex look into the stifling that happens to academicmothers of color who are devalued and exploited for their motherhood, their service, empathy,and productivity outputs in systems of higher education that was never made for them.References[1] S. Amsler and S. C. Motta, "The marketised university and the politics of motherhood," Gender and education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 82-99, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09540253.2017.1296116.[2] M. Baker, "Gendered families, academic work and the 'motherhood penalty'," Women's studies journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 11-24, 2012.[3] M
Technology and another in Education, alongside a professional teaching license from the Philippines, Araojo brings a distinct perspective to the challenges and opportunities present at the confluence of technology, education, and sociology. Currently, on the cusp of completing a Master’s degree in Sociology, Araojo is deeply committed to contributing to research that supports underrepresented students across various disciplines, not limited to engineering and technology but extending to other areas as well. Araojo’s academic endeavors are fueled by a steadfast dedication to enhancing educational experiences and outcomes for diverse student populations. At the forthcoming ASEE conference, Araojo eagerly anticipates the
.[2] T. R. Hinkin, "A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires," Organizational Research Methods, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 104-121, 1998, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106.[3] T. R. Hinkin, "Scale Development Measures.," in Research in Organizations, R. A. Swanson and E. F. H. III Eds. San Francisco, California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc, 2005, ch. 10.[4] A. Costello and J. Osborne, "Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis," Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, vol. 10, Article 7, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868.[5] K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific
the United States. John has published on engineering-communication ped- agogy for many years, including papers on engineering ethics and communication; active-learning ped- agogies; and the intersection of engineering and theatre. He has also held multiple leadership roles at the section and national levels, including President of the Southeastern Section and the national Zone II Chair, and he presently serves as the ASEE Campus Representative for the University of Georgia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Bioengineering Professional Persona: A New Communication-Intensive Course for a New Program in a New- ish College of
been rec- ognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of T´achira, Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Temple University, and Engineering
federal commissions strive todefine rigor in the past 70 years”. New Directions for Higher Education, Vol. 181, pp. 25-34,2018.[2] Roig M, Caso M. “Lying and cheating: Fraudulent excuse making, cheating, and plagiarism.”The Journal of Psychology. Vol. 139, No. 6, pp.485-94. 2005.[3] Singham M. “Away from the authoritarian classroom”. Change: The Magazine of HigherLearning. Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 50-7, 2005.[4] Warner J. “Deadlines in the ‘Real World’”. Inside Higher Ed. October 7, 2019.[5] Nickels KM, Uddin M. “The impact on student learning of resubmission of work and flexibledeadlines”. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference. Arlington, TX2003[6] Becker K. “Death to Deadlines: A 21st-Century Look at the Use of Deadlines and
College of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of Engineering degree in Environmental Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success and support, both inside and outside of the classroom.Alexander Steven Victor KrummiArynn J. Lorentz, Iron Range Engineering Arynn Lorentz is a facilitator at the Iron Range Engineering Program, a part of the Integrated Engineering Department at Minnesota State University, Mankato, on the Minnesota North-Mesabi Range College Campus in Virginia, MN. Arynn received her Bachelor of Science in Engineering with a focus in Mechanical Engineering from Minnesota State University, Mankato
-231. 2. Beheshti, B.D., “Strategies for Effective Delivery of Online Engineering Courses: Best Practices, Tips and Toolkits”, IEEE webinar, May 2020. 3. “What is POGIL?”, The POGIL Project, https://www.pogil.org/what-is-pogil (accessed December 16, 2023). 4. Simonson, S.R., editor, POGIL, Stylus Publishing, 2019. 5. Douglas, E.P., “Materials Science and Engineering: A Guided Inquiry”, Pearson, 2014. 6. Phillips, J.N., “Use of POGIL Methodology in Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Courses”, ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference, 2022. 7. Phillips, J.N, Google Shared Folder with Course-Specific Guided Inquiries, https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MU3y9ZLUmLuYCXcnq7Y6HQGMWeahVebZ ?usp=sharing, 2024
, April). Integrating teamsin multidisciplinary project based learning in mechanical engineering. In IEEE EDUCON 2010Conference, (pp. 709-715). IEEE.11. Brunhaver, S. R., Sheppard, S., & Eris, O. (2011, June). Looking at engineering studentsthrough a motivation/confidence framework. In 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.12. Parsons, S., Croft, T., & Harrison, M. (2011). Engineering students’ self-confidence inmathematics mapped onto Bandura’s self-efficacy. Engineering Education, 6(1), 52-61.13. Mohammed, S., Okudan, G., & Ogot, M. (2006, June). Tolerance for ambiguity: Aninvestigation on its effect on student design performance. ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Chicago, IL14. Saarikoski, L., & Rybushkina, S
Paper ID #41992Putting Affect in Context: Meta-Affect, Beliefs, and Engineering IdentityAlyndra Mary Plagge, Trinity University Alyndra Plagge is an undergraduate Psychology student at Trinity University. She is majoring in Psychology and minoring in Education and set to graduate in May 2025. After graduation she plans to pursue her master’s degree.Dr. Emma Treadway, Trinity University Emma Treadway received the B.S. degree in Engineering Science from Trinity University in 2011, and her M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 2017 and 2019, respectively. She
Pennsylvania State University. She is a member of the U.S. White House endorsed initiative Algebra by 7th Grade, the Commission for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion to ASEE MIND, the Smithsonian Science Education Center’s Advisory Committee for ’Zero Barriers in STEM Education,’ board member for the Northeast STEM Starter Academy of Mount Vernon, NY, and the Florida-based STEM Xposure. She earned a BS in Civil Engineering from The Pennsylvania State University, an MBA from the University of Notre Dame, and a Doctor of Education in Organizational Change and Leadership from the University of Southern California. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025
. Sadiq, and T. Husain, “Risk-based process safety assessment and control measures design for offshore process facilities,” J Hazard Mater, vol. 94, pp. 1–36, 2002.[20] R. Srinivasan, B. Srinivasan, M. U. Iqbal, A. Nemet, and Z. Kravanja, “Recent developments towards enhancing process safety: Inherent safety and cognitive engineering,” Comput Chem Eng, vol. 128, pp. 364–383, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.05.034.[21] D. D. Burkey, D. Anastasio, C. Bodnar, and M. Cooper, “Collaborative Research: Experiential Process Safety Training for Chemical Engineers. STEM for All Video Showcase,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 07, 2020.[22] D. C. Hendershot and W. Smades, “Safety culture