. (2016). Undergraduate students' beliefs about engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 560-584.[14] Pan, R. & Strobel, J. (2013). Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Workplace Problem Solving. In 2013 120th ASEE American Society of Engineering Education Conference.[15] Mason, S. (2019, September). Examining faculty perceptions and approaches to problem solving, reflective learning and social learning in a computing education program: An exploratory case study. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 177-182).[16] Phang, F. A., Anuar, A. N., Aziz, A. A., Yusof, K. M., Hassan, S. A. H. S., & Ahmad, Y. (2016). Perception of
interacting with the first-yearstudents. One half of the students in the senior class gave presentations to the freshman classtwice during the semester. The presentations were followed by small group dinners consisting offreshman and these senior design students wherein the students were given time for informal andunstructured interactions. One half of the senior class was not used in the role of a mentor andserved as a negative control for senior cohort in this study. In year two of this project, theinterventions will focus on the sophomore students. Year two’s freshman class will notparticipate in an intervention and serve as a negative control. Fall 2019 Spring 2020 Fall 2020 Spring 2021
, this is the first study thatscales exercise set difficulty from the lower levels to the higher levels of Bloom’s Taxonomywithin AGTs. We study the effects on student learning efficiency, code quality of solutions, andstudent perceptions of their learning experience.MethodsWe ran a field experiment in a CS1 introductory course for non-majors at a large public universityin the Spring of 2019 with 264 enrolled students. This course is primarily taken by undergraduateengineering students, and it is required for their degrees. The course covers typical CS1 topicssuch as variables, plotting data, conditionals, loops, functions, string manipulation, arrays, fileI/O, etc. and the programming language is MATLAB. Students’ learning is assessed via
awarded the ASEE-PSW Section Outstanding Community College Educator Award in 2001.Ms. Terra D. Morris, The RP Group Terra is currently an Independent Contractor for the RP Group working on institutional research projects for the California Community College Chancellor’s Office. Prior to working with the RP Group, Terra worked as an Institutional Research Analyst at Cabrillo College in Aptos, CA and conducted research for a number of grants including the NSF-funded Engineering Abroad Program, the Title III STEM grant, and the NSF STEP grant. Terra’s passion for STEM education research started with her work with the NSF-funded Female Recruits Explore Engineering (FREE) project, the Colorado Coalition for Gender and
teams who helped in datacollection and analysis: Marissa Tsugawa-Nieves, Marisa Swift, Arístides Carillo Fernández, andCamilo Vieira.References [1] H. E. Rodríguez-Simmonds, N.S. Pearson, J.A. Rohde, K.P. Vealey, A. Kirn, and A. Godwin. “Forget Diversity, Our Project is Due,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2017. [2] Applied and Natural Sciences Accreditation Commission Computing Accreditation Commission Engineering Accreditation Commission Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission. “Accreditation Criteria, Policy and Procedure Changes for the 2018-2019 Review Cycle.” Internet: http://www.abet.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/11/A001-18-19-Accreditation-Policy-and
also enjoys teaching qualitative research methods in engineering education in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program at ASU. She is deputy editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Listening to Makers: Exploring Engineering Students’ Recommendations for Creating a Better Makerspace ExperienceAbstractThis paper explores the ways that students experience university-affiliated makerspaces ascaptured in interviews and during observations. Our research questions are focused onunderstanding the ways that engineering students have experienced makerspaces in a variety ofinstitutions and institution-types, and their suggested ways of
demonstrate best practices for his students to model to be successful. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Mini-Hints for Improved Spatial Visualization Training AbstractThe pedagogical approach of Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) is based on the belief thateffective learning occurs when students are challenged just beyond the level they can do on theirown. An expert teacher looking over the shoulder of a student would give just the right amountof help or hints; too much hinting gives away the solution which deprives the student of theproductive struggle that is needed for learning new concepts. Alternatively, no hinting may leavethe student
, V. R. (2019, June), A Comprehensive Term Project for Materials ScienceCourse Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.https://peer.asee.org/27456.[3] A. L. Gerhart and D. E. Melton, “Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: IncorporatingStakeholders, Discovery, Opportunity Identification, and Value Creation into Problem-basedLearning Modules with Examples and Assessment Specific to Fluid Mechanics”, The Journal ofEngineering Entrepreneurship, Volume 8, Number 1 – 2017. [4] Eric G. Meyer and Mansoor Nasir,http://people.cst.cmich.edu/yelam1k/asee/proceedings/2016/tech_program_2016.html [AccessedJan, 30 2018]. [5] Hassan, Firas & LeBlanc, Heath & Al-Olimat, Khalid. (2013). Inculcating an
reference materials (See Figure 1). Classtime is also used for active learning though live events and collaboration such as simple problemsolving, case analysis, or problem-based learning activities that are conducted in the presence ofthe instructor who can intervene where needed to clarify concepts, solve problems, or pose newquestions.In this paper, four modules, one group per distribution, are designed for deployment during thespring semester of 2020 for the university at the United States and during the fall 2019 for theuniversity in Colombia. Each module is composed of three videos, one including a descriptionof each distribution and its properties. Two additional videos, one with basic exercises designedto introduce basic concepts and
Computer Science at the University of Kentucky. His focused area of interests include distributed systems, cloud architecture, and software design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Does Curricular Complexity Imply Program Quality? Gregory L. Heileman† , William G. Thompson-Arjona† , Orhan Abar‡ and Hayden W. Free‡ {greg.heileman, wgthompson, orhan.abar, hayden.free}@uky.edu † Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering ‡ Department of Computer Science University
awards, including the Fahein award for young faculty teaching and educational scholarship, the Corcoran award for best article in the journal Chemical Engineering Education (twice), and the Martin award for best paper in the ChE Division at the ASEE Annual Meeting.Dr. Christy Wheeler West, University of South Alabama c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 How We Teach: ThermodynamicsIntroductionThe AIChE Education Division Survey Committee is a volunteer group that seeks to compile,analyze, and broadly share timely and comprehensive information with the chemical engineeringcommunity on the content, pedagogy, and implementation of undergraduate chemicalengineering courses
interfaces, combined sewer overflows, and improved communication and education of engineering concepts.Dr. Anne Pfitzner Gatling, Merrimack College I taught for 10 years as an elementary teacher in Alaska. I won the Presidential Award for Science Teaching, was an Einstein Fellow in Senator Lieberman’s office where I worked on the teacher quality portion of the Higher Education Reauthorization. Now as a professor, I have been the co-director of the STEM Education program for Early Childhood and Elementary Majors for 8 years.Mrs. Katherine Marie Donell c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engagement in Practice: First Year Engineering Students
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Preliminary Findings: RIEF - Understanding pedagogically motivating factors for under-represented and non-traditional students in online engineering learning modulesAbstractThe quest to incorporate digital games into US classrooms has been pervasive in educationalcommunities over the last two decades. Educational video games have been studied as amechanism for enhancing the engagement and performance of underrepresented groups (UGs) inspatial learning, physics, computer science, general engineering, software and electricalengineering, mechanical engineering (ME) computer aided design, and aerospace engineering.Less than a handful of these studies have
September 2002 to September 2005, he was an Associate Editor for the IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing and was on the Speech Technical Committee for the IEEE Signal Processing society. Since September 2000, he has been on the Editorial Board of the IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine. Since May 2002, he has been on the Digital Signal Processing Technical Committee for the IEEE Circuits and Systems society. His research interests are in digital signal processing, speech processing, biometrics, pattern recognition and filter design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Use of Big Data Analytics in a First Year Engineering ProjectThis paper describes a module on
Paper ID #24725Board 67: Work in Progress: STEM Experiences Designed for STEM Con-stituentsDr. Ramakrishnan Sundaram, Gannon University Dr. Sundaram is a Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Gannon Univer- sity. His areas of research include computational architectures for signal and image processing as well as novel methods to improve engineering education pedagogy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work-in-Progress: STEM Experiences Designed for STEM ConstituentsIntroductionThis paper discusses structured
, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational behavior and human decision processes, vol. 50 no. 2, pp. 179-211, 1991.[7] Z. S. Byrne, J. W. Weston, and K. A. Cave, “Development of a Scale for Measuring Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning Professional (i.e., Soft) Skills,” Research in Science Education, pp. 1-17, June 2018.[8] J. V. Farr and D. M. Brazil, “Leadership skills development for engineers,” IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 110-118, 2010.[9] AAES Diversity & Inclusion Policy Statement, Adopted by the AAES General Assembly, November 2016. [Online]. Available: www.aaes.org/aaes-diversity-inclusion-policy- statement. [Accessed January 29, 2019].[10] T. J. Siller, A
engineering majors. Prior to coming to UT, she independently tutored K12 and undergraduate mathematics and science. Her research interests include engineering education, identity and equity. Address: Engineering and Education Research Center (EER) 2501 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712 Email: apatrick@utexas.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing Methods for Developing an Engineering Identity in the ClassroomAbstractEngineering identity is an attractive lens being used by engineering education researchers to helpunderstand the factors contributing to student retention and persistence in engineering. However,few studies have linked pedagogical
Engineering Education, 2019 Assessment of a University Makerspace Using a Quantitative and Qualitative Student SurveyAbstractThis research paper focuses on the assessment of a makerspace at the University of Pittsburghthrough the use of a student survey designed to answer whether the space is achieving its goalsand how it is impacting users. As the rate of technological and societal change continues toincrease, further emphasis is being placed on training skilled engineers, and calls for changes inengineering education to better prepare engineers for the future have been made.One approach institutions have taken towards achieving this is through the use of makerspaces.Anecdotal and indirect evidence support the
Mechanical Engineering at Northern Arizona University. His educa- tional responsibilities are primarily in Engineering Design and Manufacturing. Dr. Tester has conducted funded research projects in biomechanics and engineering education. Dr. Tester’s scholastic interests frequently integrate Undergraduate Engineering Education topics, typically in the area of the design of interdisciplinary engineering courses and curricula. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Improving Machine Design Instruction by Developing Computational Design ToolsAbstractIn a traditional machine design course, the analysis of machine components and systems involvelengthy, multi
of Delaware, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (2014) from New York University. She is passionate about translational research and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A FRAMEWORK FOR QUANTIFYING STUDENT SELF-CONFIDENCE AND TASK CHOICE IN ENGINEERING DESIGN-RELATED ACTIVITIES Jenni M. Buckley, PhD1,3, Sara Grajeda, PhD2, Amy E. Trauth, PhD1, Dustyn Roberts, PhD4,1 1 University of Delaware, Department of Mechanical Engineering 2 University of Delaware, Center for Research in Education and Science Policy 3 University of Delaware, College of Education and Human Development
at Powerhouse ScienceCenter. Without them none of these projects could have become a reality.References 1. Stearns, Peter N. Educating global citizens in colleges and universities: Challenges and opportunities. Routledge, 2009. 2. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3 3. Slattery, Darina M., and Michael P. O'Brien. "Using Service Learning and Virtual Team Projects to Broaden the Curriculum and Enhance the Student Experience." Currents in Teaching & Learning 6.2 (2014). 4. Jacoby, Barbara. Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. 5. Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette
Policies.” https://carta.fiu.edu/landscape/academics/writing-studio-culture-policies/ (accessed Jan. 13, 2023).[9] School of Architecture, University of Texas at Arlington (UTA), “UTA Studio Culture Policy,” Studio Culture Policy - CAPPA - The University of Texas at Arlington. https://www.uta.edu/academics/schools-colleges/cappa/academics/studio (accessed Jan. 13, 2023).[10] D. Jaiswal, “Resolving Troublesome Knowledge in Engineering Physiology using ICAP framework based Problem-Solving Studio,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. Accessed: Sep. 20, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/resolving-troublesome-knowledge-in-engineering-physiology-using- icap-framework-based
Practice to Prepare Software Engineers With Effective Team Skills," in Proceedings of the IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–12. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3923-0.ch073[3] M. Arvold et al., "Teaching Teamwork: A Training Video Designed for Engineering Students," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015.[4] P. Sancho, J. Torrente, E. J. Marchiori, and B. Fernández-manjón, "Enhancing Moodle to Support Problem Based Learning the Nucleo Experience," in IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, Amman, 2011, pp. 1177–1182. doi:10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773296.[5] D. M. Bowen, M. Alvaro, D. Mejia, and M. Saffi, "Industry Practices for Providing Engineers with Team Skills," in ASEE Annual
Paper ID #49600Designing and Developing Summer K-12 STEM Outreach Programs Througha Tenure-Track Faculty’s PerspectiveDr. Nathan Galinsky, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Dr. Nathan Galinsky is a tenure-track faculty in the chemical engineering department at WVU Tech since 2019. He has been actively involved in outreach within the university running six summer outreach programs since 2021 and being actively involved within the department and university in K-12 outreach, recruitment, and retention efforts. His educational research interests are on K-12 outreach, developing more engaging out of class
degrees in Manufacturing Engineering from Western Illinois University and a B.Sc. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Technology, Jamaica. Her research interest is eliciting conceptual understanding of AC circuit concepts using active learning strategies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Teaching Circuit Concepts Using Evidence-based Instructional Approaches: A Systematic ReviewAbstractAn educational strategy is evidence-based if objective evidence is used to inform the design ofan academic program or guide the instructional practices. Studies show that the unsatisfactoryperformance of engineering graduates in competency
+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Advances in Engineering Education and she serves on the ASEE committee for Scholarly Publications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Illuminating Contexts that Influence Test Usage Beliefs and Behaviors among Instructors of Fundamental Engineering Courses (FECs)Abstract This research paper illuminates the different contexts elicited by seven instructors whotaught fundamental engineering courses (FECs) when discussing their test usage beliefs andbehaviors, beginning to address a gap in engineering education research on instructors’ beliefsand behaviors and
time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students’ performance,” Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2158244018824506, 2019. [6] E. K. Marler, M. J. Bruce, A. Abaoud, C. Henrichsen, W. Suksatan, S. Homvisetvongsa, and H. Matsuo, “The impact of COVID-19 on university students’ academic motivation, social connection, and psychological well-being.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2021. [7] L. A. Gelles and A. Walker, “Return to in-person learning and undergraduate student sense of belonging during the fall 2021 semester,” in 2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference, 2022. [8] D. A. Copp and A. J. Headley, “Test anxiety and its impact on diverse undergraduate engineering students during remote
team: Goalorientation and gender-correlated task division. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference, Washington, DC, 2010, p. F4H–1[17] Buckley, J., Trauth, A., Grajeda, S. B., & Roberts, D. (2019, June). Gender and racialdisparities in students’ self-confidence on team-based engineering design projects. In 2019ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[18] Trauth, A., Headley, M. G., Grajeda, S., Roberts, D., & Buckley, J. (2020, May). IndividualDesign Experiences Improve Students' Self-Efficacy on Team-Based Engineering DesignProjects. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference.[19] Headley, M. G., Trauth, A., Malladi, H., & Buckley, J. (2021, July). Examining the me inteam-based projects: Students’ perceptions
120 secs – Support Chief weekly “hacks”.”https://kahoot.com/blog/2017/02/24/extending-time-limits-beyond-120-secs/, 2017 (Accessed:January 16, 2019).20 Kappers, W. M. and Cutler, S. L. “Poll Everywhere! Even in the classroom: An investigationinto the impact of using PollEverwhere in a large-lecture classroom.” Computers in EducationJournal, vol. 6, no. 20, p.140-145, 2015.21 Sun, L. and Tang, Y. “Enhancing conceptual understanding by using a real-time online classresponse system in engineering courses.” Proceedings of the ASEE 125th Annual Conference andExposition, Seattle, WA, June 14-17, 2015.22 Popescu, O., Chezan, L. C., Jovanovic, V. M. and Ayala, O. M. “The use of Polleverywhere inengineering technology classes to stimulate
Research in the USA.” National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, May 10-11, 2007.[7] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-19,” accessed at http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2018- 2019/, January 15, 2018.[8] A. C. Estes, T. A. Lenox, K. J. Fridley, and R. O. Anderson, “Accreditation Insights and the Next Body of Knowledge,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, June 2016.[9] J. S. Russell, J. M. Rogers, T. A. Lenox, and D. K. Coward, “Civil Engineering Master’s Programs: A Comprehensive Review of Types and Requirements,” Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference of ASEE, June 2011.[10