Conference Session

NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Emily Ann Marasco, University of Calgary; Sepideh Afkhami Goli, University of Calgary; Ehsan Mohammadi, University of Calgary; Fatemeh Sharifi, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #27563Collaborative Autoethnographic Study of a Large-Scale Flipped ClassroomImplementation with Multiple InstructorsRobyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn Paul PhD student at the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary where she also works as the Program Evaluation and Planning Specialist. She is the team lead for the faculty on all matters related engineering education including teaching and learning, curriculum development, Capstone design and engineering accreditation. Robyn just completed master’s degree in engineering education where she is looking at the impact of engineering leadership

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Douglas Muir, University of Virginia; Elizabeth P. Pyle, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

criteria. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship 6(2), 44-57. 7. Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H.B., & Christensen, C.M. (2009). The innovator’s DNA. Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 60-67. 8. Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Kristensen, C. M. (2011). The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. 9. Gardner, H. (1983), Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books. 10. Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books. 11. Jones, G., and Wadhwani, R.D. (2007). Entrepreneurship and business history: Renewing

Conference Session

Dissecting the Nuances that Hinder Broad Participation in Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Paper ID #16310Capturing Our Stories in Our Voices: Constructing a Narrative AnalysisStudy of African-American STEM MentorsDr. Joi-Lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa is a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Industrial & Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan–Ann Arbor and holds a PhD in Engineering Education, an MS in Industrial Engineering, an MBA, and a BS in General Engineering. She researches mentoring as intergroup support relations management; STEM mentoring experiences in higher education; and mentoring intervention programs in higher education

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; Alyssa J. Harris, Florida Atlantic University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

why you are using it.Although some skeptics will continue to ask the question, “why do we even need estimationwhen nowadays, we can write programs to calculate nearly anything?”. In some instances,usually when working in teams, estimating is about creating a shared understanding of a givenrequirement, and keeping the big picture in mind. By keeping things simple, and not gettingcaught up in precise details of the final results; estimation puts everyone on the same page towork toward a common goal. Although the estimates will not always be exactly right, they willbe consistent.5. Future WorkThis paper is part of an ongoing work that includes additional estimation techniques andexamples that are relevant to engineers and entrepreneurship. Some

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ordel Brown, West Virginia University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

synergetic instructor and student assessments that result from awell-crafted and strategic approach to the use of ARS in the classroom.References 1. Roselli, R.J., and S.P. Brophy. 2006. Experiences with formative assessment in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 95(4): 311–24. Page 26.675.122. Chen, J.C., D.C. Whittinghill, and J. A. Kadlowec. 2010. Classes That Click: Fast, Rich Feedback to Enhance Student Learning and Satisfaction. Journal of Engineering Education 99(2): 159-168.3. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school

Conference Session

Shaping the Future: Structured Mentoring for Today's Diverse Engineering Student Populations

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joi-lynn Mondisa, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Cordelia M. Brown, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

person embodied and significant others in affecting the protagonist’s actions and goals. 4. Recognize that the cultural setting, body, and others provide limits and context. 5. Consider the historical continuity of the characters. 6. Keep in mind that the narrative analysis outcome is the generation of a story. 7. Remember the narrative analysis must make the research plausible and understandable.Narrative ResultsThe following paragraphs detail examples about the personal, professional, and mentoringexperiences and relationships of “Dr. Laura James”.Personal and Professional ExperiencesIn her personal and professional experiences, Dr. James saw her family members’ influence ontheir students as educators. As an undergraduate engineering

Conference Session

Cultivating Engineering Scholarship and Research Mindsets Among URM Students

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Homero Murzi, Virginia Tech; Thomas Martin, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech; Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

findings. However, we improved the survey based on the responses andexpanded it outside engineering majors.Literature ReviewHofstede [2] defines culture as patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting that every human beingcarries. He analogizes culture as the “software of the mind” in that culture is a mental programthat is developed by social interactions and experiences collected across an individual’s lifetime.In his words, “the programming starts within the family; it continues within the neighborhood, atschool, in youth groups, at the workplace, and in the living community” (p. 6). In order tounderstand this culture, Hofstede developed a series of dimensions to characterize the commontraits and beliefs every individual has, with each dimension

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Kim, Bucknell University; R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Erin Jablonski, Bucknell University; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University; Nathan P. Siegel P.E., Bucknell University; Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

 courses in Section 4 and discuss these results briefly in Section 5.  2​         ​ IDEAS Studio Courses The IDEAS Studio courses are elective courses taught through the College of Engineering at Bucknell University and are designed to engage students in authentic, project­based work with students in multiple disciplines. A core goal of the IDEAS studio courses is to grow students in an entrepreneurial mindset, while students are encouraged to learn new skills that they have not yet acquired through coursework or other experiences. Entrepreneurially minded topics within the courses span opportunity recognition, ideation, creativity, fabrication, business models, value creation, and market analysis. All courses have elements of engineering

Conference Session

New Tools for Teaching Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Lawrence Technological University; Heidi Lynn Morano, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

“The 3 C’s” - curiosity, connections, and creating value. Specificexample behaviors of curiosity, connections, and creating value as described by KEEN may beseen in Figure 1​2​. The campus wide effort at LTU to foster an entrepreneurial mindset in our graduates isfocused on three areas. These are faculty engagement, curriculum development, and studentengagement. With regard to curriculum development, we intentionally weave a continuousthread of entrepreneurially minded learning through our core engineering curriculum. In thefreshman year, we lay the foundation of entrepreneurial mindset development in our EGE 1001Introduction to Engineering Design Projects. EGE 1001 is an active and engaging course thatdemonstrates the many aspects of

Conference Session

Exploring the Entrepreneurial and Innovation Mindset

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Miles J, Mabey, Arizona State University; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Micah Lande, Arizona State University; Steven Weiner, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

entrepreneurially-minded engineers. The four corners making up this pyramid are Societal Values, Business Acumen, Technical Fundamentals, and Customer Awareness. The KEEN organization seeks to spread the entrepreneurial

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristin E. Sherwood, Stony Brook University; Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University; Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Paper ID #22107Peer Mentoring of Undergraduate Women in Engineering as a Mechanismfor Leadership DevelopmentMs. Kristin E. Sherwood, Stony Brook University Kristin E. Sherwood is a doctoral student in Science Education at the Stony Brook University. She is focusing her research on the representation of women in engineering and other STEM related fields.Dr. Angela M Kelly, Stony Brook University Angela M. Kelly is an Associate Professor of Physics and the Associate Director of the Science Education Program at Stony Brook University, New York. She attended La Salle University, Philadelphia, Pennsyl- vania, where she

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University; Vinit Kishor Agham; Vediya Sitaram Raghuvanshi, R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur; Jayantrao Bhaurao Patil, R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur; Pramod Jagan Deore

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Engineering Pune (COEP) as the founder head of the innovation Center. Dr Waychal earned his Ph D in the area of developing Innovation Competencies in Information System Organizations from IIT Bombay and M Tech in Control Engineering from IIT Delhi. He has presented keynote / invited talks in many high prole international conferences and has published papers in peer- reviewed journals. He / his teams have won awards in Engineering Education, Innovation, Six Sigma, and Knowledge Management at international events. His current research interests are engineering edu- cation, software engineering, and developing innovative entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs. He was chosen as one of the five outstanding engineering educators by

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, and Y. Ma, “Gender Differences in Publication Productivity Among Academic Scientists and Engineers in the U.S. and China: Similarities and Differences,” Minerva, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 459–484, 2017.[19] S. J. Ceci, D. K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W. M. Williams, “Women in Science: The Path to Progress,” Scientific American Mind, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 2014.[20] E. Judson, L. Ross, J. Middleton, and S. Krause, “Measuring Engineering Faculty Views about Benefits and Costs of Using Student-Centered Strategies,” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), vol. 7, no. 2, p. 65, 2017. Retrieved from http://online- engineering.org/dl/iJEP/iJEP_vol7_no2_2017_S.pdf[21] L. Ross and E. Judson, “Gender-based differences in

Conference Session

Creating a Technology Incubator and Creating a Seed Fund

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas Duening, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

AC 2007-824: DEVELOPING AN ANGEL INVESTOR FORUM TO COMPLEMENTAN ENGINEERING SCHOOL'S ENTREPRENEURSHIP INITIATIVESThomas Duening, Arizona State University Page 12.484.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007Developing an Angel Investor Forum to Complement an Engineering School’s Entrepreneurship Initiatives Page 12.484.2BackgroundAfter two years of decline, entrepreneurial activity in the United States increased from 10.5percent in 2002 to 11.9 percent in 2003. This level of activity ranks the U.S. 7th among 31nations surveyed by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor in Total Entrepreneurial Activity(TEA).1

Conference Session

Using Teams, Seminars & Research Opportunities for Retention

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

De'Jeune Antoine, Xavier University of Louisiana; Mica Hutchison, Purdue University; Deborah Follman, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

2006-1389: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE AS IT RELATESTO RESEARCH EFFICACY BELIEFS AND THE IMPOSTER PHENOMENONDe'Jeune Antoine, Xavier University of Louisiana De'Jeune S. Antoine is a dual-degree Physics and Biomedical Engineering major. She actively participates in several clubs and organizations, including National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., and youth mentoring. De'Jeune's research interests include cardiovascular instrumentation and engineering education.Mica Hutchison, Purdue University Mica A. Hutchison is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department Engineering Education and the Department of Chemistry with research interests focused on engineering

Conference Session

Visualization tools and uses in graphics

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas Delahunty, University of Limerick; Niall Seery, University of Limerick; Raymond Lynch Dr., University of Limerick; Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

Paper ID #8176An exploratory study of students’ approaches to generating, maintaining andcommunicating visual-mental imagesMr. Thomas Delahunty, University of LimerickDr. Niall Seery, University of LimerickMr. Raymond Lynch Dr., University of LimerickDr. Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Dr. Diarmaid Lane received his B.Tech. in Education and Ph.D. in Technology Education from the University of Limerick in 2008 and 2011, respectively. He spent six years in the metal fabrication in- dustry developing engineering craft based skills prior to pursuing his studies in technology education. He currently holds a faculty position

Conference Session

New Research and Trends for Minorities in Engineering

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Presentacion Rivera-Reyes, Utah State University; Raymond Edward Boyles, Utah State University; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

students to pursue an engineering career in similar numbers as male students.The last intention of this curriculum activity is to increase the percentage of women in the fieldof engineering in the U.S. As Neal Lane, a former Assistant to the President for Science andTechnology noted at the Summit on Women in Engineering [8] stated, ―. . . we simply needpeople with the best minds and skills, and many of those are women.‖References 1. Adams, C.J. (1994). Bringing peace home: A feminist philosophical perspective on the abuse of women, children, and pet animals. Hypatia, 9: 63-84. 2. Aquaponics Gardening Blog spot. Retrieved from http://aquaponic-gardening.blogspot.com/ 3. Backyard aquaponics. Retrieved from: http://www.backyard

Conference Session

Spatial Ability & Visualization Training II

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University; Olga Stavridis, Ohio State University; Lisa A. Barclay M.S., The Ohio State University ; Lisa Abrams, The Ohio State University; Sheryl A. Sorby, Ohio State University; Jessica Thomas, Ohio State University; John A. Merrill, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

First-Year Engineering StudentsAbstractThe impact of spatial visualization skills on retention and performance in undergraduateengineering schools has been studied extensively. The National Science Foundation funded afive-year program called “Engaging Students in Engineering” or ENGAGE. One strategy inENGAGE is to improve students’ spatial visualization skills. With this goal in mind, we havedeveloped an optional one-credit hour non-graded spatial visualization skills intervention courseat The Ohio State University which is offered to incoming first-year engineering students basedon their performance on the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations (PSVT:R). All enteringengineering students have taken this

Conference Session

Faculty Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela M. Shartrand, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA); Ricardo Leon Gomez, National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (NCIIA); Phil Weilerstein, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA)

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Assessment for Entrepreneurial Skill Development: Stage I—Entrepreneurial Leadership course,” presented at the NCIIA 9th Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2005.[24] J. Goldberg, Capstone design courses  : producing industry-ready biomedical engineers. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool, 2007.[25] S. Fredholm, J. Krejcarek, S. Krumholz, D. Linquist, S. Munson, S. Schiffman, and J. Bourne, “Designing an engineering entrepreneurship curriculum for Olin College,” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition, 2002.[26] S. G. Bilén, E. C. Kisenwether, S. E. Rzasa, and J. C. Wise, “Developing and assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-set,” Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

National and Multi-university Initiatives

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University; Timothy J. Kriewall, Kern Family Foundation; Christopher Kitts, Santa Clara University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

-accredited engineering program.For KEEN to flourish on any campus, faculty members are the change agents that need topersonally embrace the KEEN Theory of Change. We have seen that faculty participation goesthrough several phases: They need to know why change is required, They need to know what change is required, They need to know how change is made, They need to know when the change is required.Thus, faculty development is critical. Over the course of each year, KEEN meetings areessential to facilitate this process. They are: The January annual KEEN conference, The October annual principal and co-principal investigators‟ meeting, The Shaping the Entrepreneurially Minded Engineer Workshops held two or

Conference Session

M1B: WIP - Learning Experiences 2

Collection

2019 FYEE Conference

Authors

Brianna L Dorie, Gonzaga University

Tagged Topics

FYEE Conference - Paper Submission

been shown as one of the key indicators forpersistence within academic and professional spaces [2].Professional identity can be broken down into three main processes: acquisition of disciplinaryknowledge, development of social network of like-minded professionals, and sensemaking [3],[4]. While the first two items are self-evident, the third deals with the ability of defining a self-narrative that describes how they fit in the profession.Students in the past decade have been exposed to a variety of informal and formal STEMprogramming, as current efforts toward broadening participation in engineering has been a mainfocus of governmental funding and subsequent research efforts [4], [5]. Experiences such asformal K-12 engineering courses

Conference Session

Teaching Tools for Humanities and Ethics

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Rosalyn Berne

yourself for everlasting life take away the element ofafterlife in the hereafter?Senior:Are some of you students wanting to stop the development of such technologies or areyou anxious to go forward?Engineer:Kurzweil frightens me. Page 7.529.5 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education I am excited. I have less of a connection to my body, not so much of a need for it. To me,it is not so weird that our minds will go into a computer. It is kind of cool, exciting.Senior:Would you down load your subconscious, too

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leon Szeli, Stanford University; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

correlated to Innovation Self Efficacy andEntrepreneurial Learning Experiences. Finally, we draw practical implications of these relationshipsfor Entrepreneurship and Engineering Education, while at the same time keeping in mind that youcannot just “make” someone an Entrepreneur or change his or her personality. This paper is anexplorative starting point that results in various findings that suggest future research. We recommendfocusing on the three personality traits that showed significant results. 1. IntroductionSome of the biggest economic success stories were written by people who had an idea andfounded their own company. An example would be Sergey Brin and Larry Page who foundedGoogle in 1998. Today, the company employs over 72,000 people

Conference Session

Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 1: Student Success and Mentoring

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander V Struck Jannini, Purdue University Library TSS

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education, EBook. Springer, 2019.[11] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013.[12] J. Willink and L. Babin, Extreme Ownership: How U.S. Navy SEALs Lead and Win, 1st ed. Manhattan: St. Martin’s Press, 2015.[13] C. Bouchez, “10 Signs of an Ailing Mind,” WebMD, 2018. https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/features/10-signs-ailing-mind#1 (accessed Feb. 20, 2023).[14] S. R. Covey, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Simon & Schuster, 2020.

Conference Session

Pre-College: Perceptions and Attitudes on the Pathway to Engineering (1)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Osman Yasar, State University of New York, Brockport; Jose Maliekal, State University of New York, Brockport; Peter Veronesi, State University of New York, Brockport; Leigh J. Little, State University of New York, Brockport

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

students’scientific and engineering habits of mind.10,20 We often call these scientific thinking (ST) andengineering thinking (ET) skills.10, 20, 27, 32 The above list indicates that there is indeed a greatdeal of similarities between the practices of scientists and engineers. Other than #1 and #6,they are basically the same. In particular, both include construction of modeling as well asuse of simulation tools to test scientific theories and predict outcomes of engineering designs.While the national framework has been informed by learning theories that students learnbetter if they are engaged in activities closely resembling the way scientists and engineersthink and work, implementing constructivist ST and ET activities in the classroom remains achallenge

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie A. Claussen, Colorado School of Mines; Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder; Alyssa Miranda Boll, Colorado School of Mines; Jenifer Blacklock, Colorado School of Mines; Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

began engineering education research related to social justice in control systems engineering in fall 2014. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Pain and gain: barriers and opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering coursesAbstractThis paper uses narrative analysis to study the barriers and opportunities one research teamencountered as we set out to create a class assignment aimed at developing engineering students’sociotechnical habits of mind. One of the goals of this assignment was for it to be transferableacross multiple course contexts, including different engineering disciplines, course instructors,level of students, and course

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato; L. James, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University; Dan Ewert

Paper ID #37637Laying the Foundation for Education 4.0: Access, Value andAccountabilityJennifer Karlin (Professor)L. Eric James (Adjunct Professor, Engineering Management)Lauren Singelmann Lauren Singelmann earned her Ph.D. from North Dakota State University in Electrical and Computer Engineering and STEM Education in 2022. She is a faculty member for Iron Range Engineering through Minnesota State University, Mankato, and she supports instruction of Innovation-Based Learning courses at multiple institutions. Her research interests include learning analytics, experiential learning, and equitable grading and assessment.Dan

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lizabeth Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Tessa Luzuriaga; Bridget Benson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

initial user base and expand beyond it. With a growing desire to make engineeringmore accessible to a diverse set of individuals, this paper will investigate strategies found in thevideo gaming industry which have captured the minds of millions of 16- to 26-year-olds. We areusing Bartle Player Taxonomy and other reward structures to understand the engagement foundin video games with hope that this can be applied to the engineering classrooms to increasestudent’s intrinsic motivation for learning. Because Bartle’s Taxonomy does not show up inacademic publications, we are also challenging the traditional source of knowledge in academicpublications by encouraging innovative approaches found on blogs and video sharing sites. Weare not only making

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin; Alan Cheville, Bucknell University

short period. Whereas Heywood could be fairly accused of using the terms technologicaland literacy and engineering literacy interchangeably, Krupczak and other members of thedivision made a sharp distinction between engineering and its technological products [2].Thus, engineering was related to the process, and technology to the product. In both casesthere is a more or less hidden attempt to distance the definitions from informationtechnology. Unfortunately, the association of technology with information technology and theinternet has become deeply embedded in the public mind, and particularly in the way that isrelated to the positive and negative impacts that it can have on individual behaviour. It is notabout the technology of the

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aida Ghiaei, University of Connecticut; Alanna Marie Gado; Francesco Rouhana; Tasnim Zaman; Mahjabeen Fatema Mitu; Mayowa Festus Oladele; Adaeze Maduako, University of Connecticut; Suman Kumari, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

are drawn from the university (comprisingfaculty or staff) and industry (UConn Alumni), based on their expertise on the topics. One of themost beneficial aspects of the workshop is the opportunity for group discussion, through whichparticipants, who come from a variety of engineering, cultural, and personal backgrounds, canlearn from one another and exchange ideas through games or case studies. The program also fostersnetworking opportunities across various engineering disciplines and encourages participation incommunity service projects. The JLLA’s investment in Mind Garden’s Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) wasintended to gain an understanding and assess the effectiveness of members’ participation in termsof improving their