serves as a pipeline for students graduating from the miniGEMSmiddle school programs wishing to continue to explore their intellectual curiosity through hands-on STEM research. Additionally, the students are then encouraged to apply for the 8-weekmegaGEMS High School Internship Program for juniors and seniors [2], [5] upon completion ofthe megaGEMS Unite program.As all of GEMS’ programs are funded through grants, GEMS is privileged to work with theAEOP Consortium. More specifically, GEMS has received funding from the Army EducationOutreach Program High School Apprenticeship Program and through the Technology StudentAssociation through grant submissions.The Army Education Outreach Program (AEOP) offers a collaborative and cohesive portfolioof
focused on critical thinking, time management, and effective communication—skills essential for academic and personal success. Slide 7: Example of Skill Building Workshop • In this skill-building workshop, we focused on three key areas: critical thinking, time management, and effective communication. The session began with an engaging icebreaker where students introduced themselves and shared one personal goal for the semester, fostering a sense of community and collaboration. We then delved into critical thinking, exploring techniques such as questioning assumptions, evaluating evidence, and making well-reasoned arguments. Students participated in group activities that challenged them to analyze
representations to support conceptual design, design for manufacture and assembly, and design retrieval; developing computational representations and tools to support exploration of very complex engineering design spaces; research in solid freeform fabrication, including geometric processing, control, design tools, manufacturing applications; and design and development of energy harvesting systems. Crawford is co-founder of the DTEACh program, a Design Technology program for K-12, and is active on the faculty of the UTeachEngineering program that seeks to educate teachers of high school engineering.Dr. Christina Kay White, University of Texas, AustinDr. Chandra L. Muller, University of Texas, Austin Chandra Muller is
Curriculum, Teaching, and Educational Policy graduate program at Michigan State University in 2010. Her current research focuses on three key areas: (1) de- signing, developing, and conducting validation studies on assessments of content knowledge for teaching (CKT) science; (2) examining and understanding validity issues associated with measures designed to assess science teachers’ instructional quality, including observational measures, value-added measures, student surveys, and performance-based tasks; and (3) extending and studying the use of these knowl- edge and instructional practices measures of science teaching quality as summative assessment tools for licensure purposes and as formative assessment tools
inspired to focus on International engineering education research. Her research interest broadly covers comparative education quality and engineering education innovation. Topics she is currently working on include Student assessment in project-based learning, General Curricula for students of Science and Technology(empirical case study), Standards of Engineering Education Accreditation(ABET), and the International Collaboration of Scholars in Graduate Education.Jennifer M Case (Chair, Engineering Education) Jennifer Case is Professor and Head of the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in the USA. Prior to her appointment in this post she was a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the
lingering sense of dissatisfaction to students,such as low learning motivation, little demonstration of higher order skills, too little autonomyetc. One of the attempts for engineering education reform in Taiwan is to introduce accreditingprograms into colleges. In order to examine the core competence of student defined by ABETEC-2000, we aimed thus to develop a similar methodology under a three-year integrated projectthrough a joint research group from the National Central University, and Yuan Ze University.The cooperation of interdisciplinary expertise is intended to develop a series of guidelines to help Page 10.475.1the faculty to review the
and by inviting all (toddlers to grandparents) to participate in exploration.45, 47, 54, 60 Page 15.501.6 Figure 2: Top reasons for parents’ interest in IridescentEngineers as Teachers: Personalization, Defined Outcomes, and Challenging ContentBy working with engineers at the university level, Iridescent provides families with challengingcontent and college readiness experiences, key components to increasing the participation ofminorities and women in STEM courses and careers6. University engineers also provide accessto the field of engineering that would not normally be accessible to the students at
included if empathy development was amajor component examined or considered in the research. Many that integrated empathy did notdirectly explore its growth or development, it was more of a component considered or as part ofthe curriculum rather than the goal of the research. For example, McDonald and Pan (2020)presented feedback from graduate students on ethical considerations for artificial intelligence[49]. While this work elicited insight into prompting consideration of bias and fairness, fosteringempathy was more of an indirect outcome than the phenomena of focus. Alternatively studiesconducted in other countries were excluded since the interpretation and assessment of empathymay vary by culture depending on the societal norms and preferences
instead exhibited non-cooperative behavior.The author asserted that these individuals thought that collaborative behavior indicatedweakness. As these convictions revealed themselves on projects, expectations were diminished,and distrust then ensued. Consequently, this distrust among project participants eventually led topoor communication, unfruitful conflict, and reduced performance. Many members of theconstruction industry understand this dilemma and attribute the problem to an unwillingness onthe part of the project participants to behave in a collaborative manner and this gives a startingpoint for research regarding how to promote more collaborative attitudes among constructionparticipants within the construction industry.25BackgroundIn 1607
socialresponsibility and sustainability.The IEEE, the IEE and other organizations are steadily gaining experience in the use ofthe tools provided by virtual communities software that includes the ability to post, share,discuss, and review information. The National Science Foundation is already usingvirtual communities for collaboration and is also greatly interested in their use tofacilitate the dissemination of funded projects.At this time, IEEE has a dozen communities, the most active one being the community onPower and Energy. Dozens of communities areplanned and under development, several in cooperation with other professionalassociations. This paper focuses on the costs, issues, opportunities, and challenges basedon the experience of IEEE and other
at Virginia Tech, his research focused on understanding engineering career choice in the Appalachian region of the United States. Matthew is currently employed as an engineer at Bledsoe Telephone Cooperative, a rural telecommunications service provider in Pikeville Tennessee.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech
kinesthetic. Figure 5 shows one section of the controlroom in the Global Classroom. Page 23.1162.11 Figure 5. The Control Room of the Global Classroom3.4. Module Four: Asynchronous ToolsWhile synchronous learning enables students to meet at the same time for discussions,presentations and collaboration, asynchronous learning enables students to learn at differenttimes and locations. Instructors using asynchronous learning methods must think carefully abouthow they want to provide students with learning materials that can be studied at their own pace,when time is available. The environment should also provide a place where the
and learning process. The goal of this project is to explore the educational philosophiesenacted in the most impactful undergraduate classrooms, according to graduate students’perceptions, in order to give the new educator a foundation for their own course design process.Previous ResearchWhy Examine Students’ Perceptions of Learning Environments?At the start of the new semester, students enter a classroom not as “blank slates,” but withparticular conceptions about teaching and learning based on their prior experiences5. As a result,the effects of learning activities and perceptions of classroom interactions among the instructorand the students may differ by student5,8. Further, research has also shown that students’conceptions about teaching
York ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Websites as Gateways to Inclusive Partnerships: Examining diversity representation forenvironmental nonprofits and engineering programs in Buffalo, New YorkAbstractThis research paper, targeting ECSJ-DEED joint session, aims to explore the importance ofdiversity representation on environmental nonprofit websites, particularly in Buffalo, New York.Assessing these websites is crucial when seeking potential partners for engineering programs andcommunity collaborations. By rigorously evaluating websites, we establish a foundation forinformed partnerships that enhance engineering students’ educational experiences. Websitesserve as a vital medium for organizations to
-Implement-Operate (CDIO), while making the key success-enabling principle ofthe Minority Engineering Program model--collaborative learning--an explicit and integrated partengineering curriculum design. The approach involves establishing a model framework foradapting and implementing CDIO so that it: can be generalized for and have programmaticimpact at other predominantly minority institutions similar to CSUN; can contribute to anevolving community of interaction, development and ongoing improvements in the education ofminority engineering students; and can significantly increase the number of minority studentsable to Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate new products and systems. The framework consistsof two components: adaptation and implementation
can be connected with my current idea or solution?” for guiding the generation of new solutions or ideas for generation of ideas ; Elaboration prompts are designed to activate strategies and help students elaborate and articulate their thinking and reasoning process, such as “How can I develop and expand this idea by both using my existing knowledge and understanding or researching more information?” for exploration of more idea or solutions; and Reflective prompts are intended to serve as cues to provoke students’ reflections and elicit self-evaluation on what happen in the past, such as “What did I leads me successfully to the right solution and how can I apply this into other similar
chapters. She is a former board member of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching and past president of the Association for Science Teacher Education.Dr. Elizabeth Ring-Whalen, St. Catherine University Elizabeth A. Ring-Whalen is an Assistant Professor of Education at St. Catherine University in St. Paul, MN. She holds a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction - STEM Education from the University of Min- nesota. Her research focuses on STEM education and what this looks like in PreK-12 classrooms and explores teachers’ beliefs of integrated STEM as well as how these beliefs influence teachers’ practices and student achievement in the classroom. Alongside this research, she has worked to explore the atti
from the University of Victoria in 1987. As a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Waterloo, his research focus is machining, and he is well known for developing innovative 5-axis tool-positioning and flank- milling techniques. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Towards a Multi-Disciplinary Teamwork Training Series for Undergraduate Engineering Students: Development and Assessment of Two First-Year WorkshopsAbstractTeams have become the default work structure in organizations; thus, in work settings thatemphasize teamwork, employees must have knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) tocommunicate and coordinate with their
courses on Computer Security, Be- havioral Cybersecurity, and Applied Computational Cognitive Modeling to undergraduate and graduate students. Dr. Aggarwal has strong interdisciplinary collaborations with various universities and such collaboration will be beneficial for this project. Dr. Aggarwal published her research work in various conferences including HFES, HICSS, ICCM, GameSec, and journals including Human Factors, Topics in Cognitive Science, and Computers & Security. Her papers in HICSS-2020 and GameSec-2020 received ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #39324 the
analytical thinking skills of 80% and 75% for CARE 11 and 10 groups, respectively, and helped the students understand and complete their math and science tasks. Analytical Reasoning- learning by-design activities improved analytical reasoning of over 65% of the students compared to 66% using STEM research projects with faculty. Design projects helped 67% of students explore their potentials (with 61% and 71% for CARE 10 and CARE 11, respectively).The agreement is probably higher one the over 30% students were “not sure” or disagreed. CARE 10 students who took Logic/Problem
to his graduate work in the United States, he obtained his Bachelor’s degree from Malaysia and has participated in research projects involving offshore structures in Malaysia. As a graduate part-time instructor at Texas Tech University, he teaches an intro- ductory course in engineering to freshmen undergraduate students. He has taught at Texas Tech University since the fall of 2013.Mr. Siddhartha Gupta, Texas Tech University Siddhartha Gupta is a third-year PhD student in the department of Chemical Engineering at Texas Tech. He received a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology and subsequently worked as shift engineer for two years with a Fortune 500 chemical company
computer science majors into productive STEM careers. This evaluation report is based on quantitative andqualitative data collected by the external project evaluator and The following overarching goal and four objectives guideshared by the research team from observations during the project as it seeks to broaden the participation ofprofessional learning and dissemination sessions, review of underrepresented students in STEM majors, increasingproject documentation, formal interviews, and informal opportunities for advanced graduate education and promotingdiscussions with the project PI, Co-PIs, students, graduatestudents, mentors, and survey
Enjoyment, Hope,Pride, Anger, Anxiety, Shame, Hopelessness, and Boredom, revealing significant insights into theemotional states of the students, see Figure 2. The median scores, indicated by the lines withineach box, suggest varying central tendencies across these emotions. Notably, Enjoyment and Hopeappear to have higher median scores, indicating a generally positive emotional state among theparticipants. In contrast, emotions like Anxiety and Shame show lower median values, reflectingless intense emotion types. Figure 2: Box plots for Emotion TypesRegression resultsA multiple regression analysis was conducted to explore the predictors of motivation. The modelincluded eight predictors: enjoyment, hope, pride, anger
prevalence and importance of collaboration in engineering research and development cannotbe overstated. Real-world problems are complex and multi-dimensional, thus requiring expertisefrom across multiple domains to problem-solve effectively, calling for training in multi-disciplinary skills as essential for engineering graduates [5]. Outcome-based curriculumdevelopment followed by most universities is aimed at developing engineers better prepared forthe workplace. Several engineering educators [6] - [8] have also strongly advocated for teachingstudents more real-world engineering team operations. However, many students entering theworkforce over the last many decades persistently remain underprepared for and unfamiliar withthe opportunities or
. Correlations among the gender equity items on the attitudes toward STEM survey andgender attribution of engineers in students’ drawing were also examined.IntroductionThe demand for engineers in the United States workforce continues to increase1 but the numberof students studying engineering in college is not increasing enough to meet this demand2-3. Oneof the more significant reasons is the underrepresentation of females in engineering4-5 despite thefact that gender discrimination in engineering wages has been almost eliminated6. To helpencourage female students to study engineering, it is important to eliminate misinformation andnegative impressions about engineers and engineering7-9. Research on engineering recruitmentindicates that many young
concept of failing, iterating, and retrying is near the top ofthe first-year list yet is virtually absent on the Capstone list. This research provides a usefulinvestigative approach for other engineering educators to examine their programs and informs morefocused planning through the curriculum for students’ future success.KeywordsCornerstone, Capstone, Engineering Design, Technical Skills, Professional Competencies, Co-op,Cooperative Education, Work ExperienceIntroductionFor the past few decades, several initiatives have been designed to improve and strengthen students’outcomes in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields at all levels ofthe educational system. For example, the Department of Education published a letter
computer science. The comprehensive goal of this NSF project is to explore when and to whichdegrees these imbalances are greatest and how the imbalances may influence students’opportunities to enter and paths throughout CS undergraduate programs. This poster/paper willpresent a portion of our findings obtained during a pilot qualitative study related to strategiesand support for overcoming obstacles through a variety of actions (policies, programs, pedagogy,culture) toward student success. This paper/poster will focus on the following research question:What are the strategies, structures, and scholarly attributes that support student experiences asper student’s lived experience?We designed the pilot study to validate our study instrument, namely
. Most of these students persist intheir studies, complete their engineering degrees and ultimately reap the benefits of significantlyenhanced employment opportunities. The School also offers a graduate degree of Master ofScience in Engineering with two areas of concentration, Structural/Earthquake Engineering andElectrical/Computer Engineering.The faculty in the School of Engineering is highly regarded for its excellent academicqualifications and strong practical engineering experience. The orientation and specializations of Page 22.624.4the faculty are eclectic and wide-ranging, offering expertise in both basic research anddesign/applied
]). Female Male Motivation Encouragement Challenge Group Interaction Integrated Separated Task Engagement Collaborative Competitive Vision of Success Group Affiliation Individual AchievementThe differential socialization of women and men is particularly relevant to their success in thesciences and engineering, because women are often less confident in and alienated by the cultureof disciplines which do not fit well with their cultural style. That SME education emphasizesindividual competition and offers few opportunities for cooperative and interactive learning, andthereby can be considered "gendered"* , and in particular, to embody a male
Abroad Program Vs. Short Term Abroad ExperiencesSource: IIE, Open Doors: Report on Duration of Study Abroad 2007/08-2017/18Benefits of International Collaboration for StudentsInternational collaborations and experiences, whether short or long durations, provideopportunities for graduating engineering students making them internationally competent,improving their world-mindedness, and increasing their self-confidence. Research shows highergraduation rates and employability with students who pursue study abroad programs [20].International collaboration experiences positively impact the students’ technical skillset,improves career opportunities, and has a long term effect on their personal career promotion andprogression [21].There is a significant