infrastructure systems sustainably. Studies have highlighted that there is apressing need for a better foundation of sustainability concepts among the construction andengineering students [7], [8]. Literature has discussed various approaches and challenges toincorporate sustainability in civil engineering capstone design course [9]–[11], teachingsustainable infrastructure through active learning methods [12], [13], integrating sustainabilityconcepts and rating systems into civil engineering curricula [14]–[20]. However, there is a gap inthe literature that explores effective schemes to integrate sustainability throughout four years ofthe Bachelor's program. This study addresses this gap by presenting a comprehensive frameworkalong with best practices
, 2]. Training students to develop design thinking and skills will allow them to enterprofessional practice ready to participate in the challenge of infrastructure re-design. Indeed,ABET requires that students have “an ability to apply engineering design to producesolutions…” upon graduation [3]. Perhaps the most effective way to guide students indeveloping design skills is through engagement in real-world projects. Furthermore, providingauthentic design experiences in a supportive educational environment that encourages successcan build self-efficacy (one’s beliefs in their ability to achieve specific tasks), which in turn fuelsmotivation to succeed as an engineer [4]. Promoting engineering self-efficacy is a promisingstrategy for retaining
2015 taking online courses learning how to construct and deliver online courses. This resulted in a MSEd from Purdue University in Learning Design and Technology (LDT). This widely varied background prepared me well for my next big adventure. Beginning in August 2018 I became the Texas A and M Professor of Practice for the Texas A and M Engineering Academy at Blinn College in Brenham. Texas A and M Engineering Academies are an innovative approach to providing the planet with more Aggie Engineers. My research focus is enhancing the high school through first-year college experience and am an engaged member of the Texas A and M IEEI (Institute for Engineering Education and Innovation). My foundations were set by an
overall procurement effort and operational excellence), and 2011 Silver Award from NASPO (implementation of best value PIPS at the State of Idaho). He also received a Fulbright Scholar award to share state-of-the-art best value research and practices with the people of Botswana, Africa. Dean’s groundbreaking procure- ment model became a graduate program that was practiced at ASU and instrumental in the investment of $100 million in the institution for outsourcing food services. A powerful force in the Greater Phoenix Metropolitan area and Arizona State University, as well as national and international, he has championed programs to advance the engineering profession, and continues to prepare the next generation of
conversion. Economic analysis.Comments: Beside the prerequisites issue, this course seems to be well designed and is offered byone the best faculty in mechanical engineering. This course is an ideal candidate for fulfilling theelective units required by the minor we are going to offer.MSE 415: Product Design (3 Units)Prerequisite: MSE 412/L or graduate status. Engineering principles and practices of productdesign. Applications of process design for manufacturing engineering. Approaches to design formanufacture (DFM) and design for assembly (DFA). (Design units: 2.0)Comments: One of the issues is the prerequisite course required for taking this course. Since theprerequisite is an MSE course not included in the certificate, this will add 3 hidden
Paper ID #7948The State of the Use of Standards in Engineering and Technology EducationDr. Ahmed S. Khan, DeVry University, Addison, IL Dr. Ahmed S. Khan is a Senior Professor in the College of Engineering and Information Sciences at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. Dr. Khan has more than thirty years of experience in research, instruction, curricula design, development, evaluation, implementation and program accreditation, management and supervision. Dr. Khan received an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management., and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University
. Youngman, J.A., and Egelhoff, C.J., “Best practices in Recruiting and Persistence of Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering: A 2002 Snapshot,” Proceedings: Frontiers in Education, 30th Annual Conference, Kansas City, Missouri, October 2000, Session F2D, pp. F2D-11-F2D-16.2. Reyes, M. A., Gotes, M. A., McNeill, B., and Anderson-Rowland, M. R., “MEP Summer Bridge Program: A Model Curriculum Project,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Charlotte, North Carolina, June 1999, CD Rom, 8 pages.3. McGee, M.M. and Fentiman, A.W., “Components of a Year-Long Bridge Program for Minority Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, June 2002, 5 pages. 4
increasing mutually productive interactions between facultyand students of the Clark School and companies in Maryland. The first programs thatbegan operations were: a consulting service to strengthen Maryland manufacturers, anon-campus incubator for technically-oriented start-up companies, and a biotechnologyprogram to help biotech companies through training and productivity enhancement and toscale up processes from research lab levels to commercial scales. In 1987 a technologytransfer program was started which facilitates faculty and graduate students performingcommercially-oriented R&D for Maryland companies. While these programs are notpurely entrepreneurship, the experience gained from interacting with small and startupcompanies laid the
module explains a number of basicconcepts related to the design problem. Students are asked to develop solutions to real-worlddesign problems to explore the specialization areas within the discipline, practice their problem-solving skills on real, sometimes "messy" problems, grow their engineering intuition and learn todistinguish between realistic and improbable solutions. Students will compile a learningportfolio throughout the semester documenting their design solutions for each module, as well asself-reflections on their initial choice of specialization and the impact modules had on theirchoice of specialization (either confirming their initial choice or providing evidence why analternative may be a better fit).The intended advantages of
at a non-‐profit or NGO □ Research assistant □ Teaching assistant □ Work-‐study student □ University-‐sponsored extracurricular activities □ Other (please specify):________________________________ □ Briefly tell how any of these experiences have impacted your perspective in this survey. [text box] 13. Future employment: immediately following graduation, which of the following are you most likely to pursue as your primary position? [Select one] □ Working for a “traditional” engineering company (at least 50% focus on engineering practice within one engineering discipline) □ Working for a
, the program waslaunched with an initial class of approximately 100 first-year students in fall of2016.Building a new school of engineering affords a number of unique opportunities,including the chance to develop a program based on best practices, engineeringeducation research, and the recommendations of national reports such as"Educating the Engineer of 2020,"1 among others. It also provides the opportunityto recruit and graduate a more diverse cohort of engineers, by taking into accountresearch on attracting and retaining a broad spectrum of students. Given the dean’spersonal passion about and expertise in creating a culture of success for a broadspectrum of students, diversity was quickly added to the list of program goals.Those goals
, generally experience these issueswhen they enter the workforce, having to complete on the job training in order to becomecomfortable with power quality matters.A new power quality course was created at the University of Pittsburgh, in the Spring 2018semester. This course uses a novel approach to teaching students power quality concepts byusing an electric power laboratory designed specifically for undergraduate education. Studentswork with real electric motors, transformers, variable frequency drives, and DC powerelectronics to understand the impacts of these loads on a 208Vac, 75kVA rated system. Acustom, 5kW rated work bench featuring compact fluorescent loads, as well as traditional single-phase or three-phase linear resistive, capacitive, and
could impact all the students the educator teaches, undergrads and grad students, research labs and traditional classrooms. One educator decided to attend a teaching-related workshop in order to learn new teaching strategies he could incorporate into his teaching repertoire. 5. All the students in my department. This code captured decision points that could possibly impact all students within the educator’s department. For example, one department chair decided to assist in designing, implementing and modeling mentoring relationships with undergraduates, graduates and junior faculty members. Such an approach would eventually affect all the students in the department. 6. All students in the college. This
also in charge of faculty mentoring in the School of Engineering and Computer Science at OU.Ms. Caymen May Novak, Oakland Unversity Caymen Novak is a current Ph.D. candidate in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan. Her research investigates the influence of mechanical stimulus on ovarian cancer response. She is currently the outreach chair for the Graduate Society of Women Engineers at the University of Michigan where she organizes engineering events for local elementary schools. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 REU programs and K-12 outreach: A natural synergyIntroduction:Since the summer of 2006, the department of Mechanical Engineering at
AC 2012-4902: WORKING COLLABORATIVELY AMONG UNIVERSI-TIES: A DENSE NETWORK APPROACHProf. Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University Cynthia C. Fry is a Senior Lecturer of computer science and Assistant Dean of the School of Engineering and Computer Science, Baylor University.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Sridhar Condoor is a professor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department. He is also the Program Director for Mechanical Engineering, a KEEN fellow, a Coleman Fellow, and the Editor of the Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. Condoor teaches sustainability, product design, and entrepreneurship. His research interests are in the areas of design theory and methodology, technology
.2 in Appendix – A.The program is divided in five conceptual phases: (i) lecture and lab phase: the participants areintroduced in fundamental and some advanced concepts in wireless communications andnetworking; (ii) design phase: the participants inspired by the first phase are called to research onpotential educational NGSS STEM lessons with a hands-on wireless labs (activities) usingcomponents of the ‘COSMOS Educational Toolkit’; (iii) development phase: the teachers co-develop with the researchers their best ideas on how to use the wireless labs for NGSS-alignedSTEM lessons; (iv) implementation phase: teachers and students use the developed lessons in theclass during the school year; (v) feedback phase: teachers provide feedback in order
; andguiding the learner9. However, developing course objectives and consensus based on theseoutcomes was not trivial. The instructional designer was able to coach the team in this process,and the team eventually arrived at the following course objectives: • Identify and describe the function and properties of agents in a business process • Select the correct tool for decision analysis from a product business toolkit • Perform basic market research • Pitch an idea • Practice management of equals in group dynamics • Evaluate product technical constraints and feasibilityUsing these objectives as a guide, we then discussed how we would know if and when thestudents had achieved the objectives. Since the short course is not for credit, we
forces that are democratizing innovation, • Why and how, do they democratize innovation, and • The most relevant forces from the student point of viewPeer Assessment: The last step also includes a peer-assessment about their reflection about Userinnovation module activities as described earlier.Connection with the rest of the course: The set of exercise for the User Innovation moduledescribed are designed to be completed during the first three weeks of the semester. Theformation of teams to work on team projects takes place during week four of the semester.Projects start during week five of the course, and it is used to practice the topics covered duringthe rest of the semester. This is designed to practice on how to launch a startup
service-learning program enables each student team to maintain along-term relationship with its community partner and to successfully design and deliverproducts that have significant technical complexity and significant community impact. Theprogram is implemented as a track of courses, where a team corresponds to a division or labsection of the course. Each team is large – 8 to 20 students – and vertically integrated –composed of freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors. A student may be a member of a teamfor up to four years, registering for 1 to 2 credits each semester. When seniors graduate eachyear, returning students move up a year and new students are added to the team. Many teamshave developed formal training processes for new members
project. The results of the project: hardware, software and documentationare presented to the faculty in the form of a senior thesis. In completing their senior thesisprojects, the students get to interact with each other, with vendors and manufacturers of softwareand hardware components and spend a great deal of time on the internet searching forinformation on manufacturer specifications and the best components and vendors. For thecapstone project, the computer engineering students use the science, engineering and generaleducation backgrounds acquired over the four year period in the design and implementation. Thisexperience enhances the ability of the students to work on teams. It is hoped that the assessmentdata when collected and analyzed for
bioprocessing for conversion of waste into products of value. Adhikari devotes his efforts to teaching and research in the area of bioenergy and bioproducts and circular economy. He teaches Heat and Mass Transfer, Renewable Energy and Biomass and Biofuels courses for both undergraduate and graduate students.Fredricka Saunders, North Dakota State University Fredricka Saunders, M.Ed., is a doctoral candidate at North Dakota State University, specializing in institutional effectiveness in higher education. Her research focuses on underrepresented groups’ experiences, supported by qualitative methods. She’s also managing editor of the Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education and a research assistant
Bachelors Degree in Science in Electrical Engineering. I have interests in renewable energy, and hope that through impor- tant research, I can help impact the world with a more efficient, more environment friendly, and more innovative energy source on which we can fully depend.Dr. Hiram Moya, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley Dr. Hiram Moya earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Engineering from Texas A&M University at College Station, Texas in 1996. After working in Accenture for 5 years, he founded and became the managing Partner of HMGroup LLP. While working in his firm, Dr. Moya was also taking graduate courses from the University of Texas at Dallas, and online courses from Texas A&M
Project-based learning (PBL), recognized as a high-impact practice [1, 2], is an increasingly commonfeature in US engineering programs, with implementations ranging from first-year experiences throughcapstone design projects. The Buck Institute of Education, whose work focuses mostly on K-12 education,has articulated a set of essential elements of “Gold Standard PBL” [3] that are readily applicable to thehigher education context: 1. Key Knowledge, Understanding, and Skills: Make clear the learning goals for PBL assignments. Often these are a combination of disciplinary knowledge and transferrable skills and abilities. 2. Challenging Problem or Question: Engage students with a driving problem or question with a suitable level of
as more modules will be added.This is an area in the future for extensive literature searches to learn about best practices. Thelonger term, out-door option will require more attention with the intent of adding PV solartracking, this increasing power production.The authors intend to document this future work, and present those future efforts at the comingASEE conference in 2020.Student Experience and Knowledge Gained:(The following is a review and the personal thoughts about this project by the student workerwho assisted in the design, build, and testing of the PV cart, and also co-authored this paper.) “I am an undergraduate student assisting in design and building of the portable solar power project. My work on the project
interviews, in addition to counseling sessions to helpstudents discern their vocational aspirations. In terms of unconscious bias training and learningto work with other students with empathy, there is a proposal to do that within the context ofCore curriculum classes for all first-year students in the university. This issue is not peculiar toengineering, but needs to be addressed campus-wide.That said, we are creating a task force to look at the first-year experience of engineering. Thetask force is charged with researching best practices elsewhere and making recommendationsregarding what may work at SCU. 6. Make alterations to syllabiCurrent syllabus statements include several mandatory sections, including on reportingdiscrimination and
supervision for a PhD student studying teamwork in engineering teams aspart of a dissertation.The other end of the spectrum is practice, or leadership development. This refers to theactual skill development and behavioural change involved in improving students’competencies as leaders. A number of programs exhibit this extreme, and one example isTufts’ Masters of Science in Engineering Management, which focuses on integration ofskills and real world application in corporate engineering contexts.The majority of programs are strongly oriented towards the application of leadershiplearning to practice. Very few programs are aiming to produce new research or scholarsin engineering leadership, and most seek to improve the capacity of their graduates tolead
University: The mission of Stanford University’s d school (for design school) or, more formally, the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design, is to enable students to be creative. Graduate students from all of Stanford divisions take courses. “Multi-disciplinary pools of teachers then immerse them in a system of innovative thinking, with specific goals for solving practical problems.”43 Key d school elements include a highly-flexible physical environment, interdisciplinary teams, and emphasis on constructing prototypes, as crude as they may be, in keeping with the “build to think” philosophy. According to David Kelley, the d school’s founder and leader, products created by the six-year old institute have
system protection course with a lab component. Dr. Dolloff received a B.S.E.E. from Tennessee Tech University, an M.S. and a Ph.D. in E.E. from Virginia Tech University, and an M.B.A. from Morehead State University.Dr. Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee M. Clark is a research assistant professor of Industrial Engineering and Director of Assessment in the Swanson School of Engineering and the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC). She received her MS in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western and her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh while working for Delphi Automotive. Her research interests focus on the propagation and assessment of active and experiential learning in
, like civil engineering, are undergoing atremendous transformation with the emergence of newer technological solutions. The majority ofthese solutions require operational convergence, placing a heavy demand on the academiclearning process to ensure that graduates possess the skill transferability required at theworkplace. This study examines the transferability of design skills in undergraduate civilengineering students through a longitudinal study conducted at the Kerala TechnologicalUniversity. In particular, the study analyzes the impact of freshmen Design and Engineeringcourse on the transferability skills demonstrated by the same group of students in a senior-yearGroup Project course in the civil engineering program. The findings show that
and therefore is potentially very useful in careers of the students post graduation. Specific lab activities were developed to help students learn the program. In the firstthree years of the curriculum development (2013 - 2015), an introductory SW lab utilizedtutorials native to SW. Students completed the tutorials in a computer lab with help from theinstructors and teaching assistants (TAs), and then they practiced their new skills by creating apart according to the information provided in an ASTM standard. In 2016, a new SWIntroductory Lab was developed specially to teach the student the key tools and features that theyneed for labs and the design project. The students were also instructed to learn on their own withresources such as