. His recent research focuses on the cognitive and pedagogical underpinnings of learning with computer-based multimedia re- sources; knowledge representation through interactive concept maps; meta-analysis of empirical research, and investigation of instructional principles and assessments in STEM. He is currently a Senior Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education.Mrs. Olivia Reynolds, Washington State University First year Chemical Engineering doctoral student pursuing research on the development and dissemination of low-cost, hands-on learning modules displaying heat and mass transfer concepts in a highly visual, interactive format. Graduated from Washington State University with a B.S. in Chemical
experiences of the engineering Ph.D.students, be it in a shared or isolated workspace, is influenced by both the equipment aspect andthe research group size aspect.Finally, some engineering Ph.D. students have little access to or need for equipment in theirresearch, beyond standard computers and information technology. This can be due to the size ofthe research group, where small research groups tend to work with little equipment initially [26],or due to the type of work, such as educational research, which usually has little need forsophisticated test equipment [49].4.5 A Conceptual Framework for the Engineering Ph.D. Research ExperienceA concept map (Figure 1) was synthesized to show how the social, historical, cultural, andmaterial contexts might
understanding the problem before moving aheadand the diagram appears as a concept map that attempts to represent the problem in terms of afundamental objective and parameters to be considered in meeting that objective. Madison and Sam pre/post ECA PSD Qualitative ComparisonIn the pre session, Sam and Madison spend a significant amount of time working to define theproblem. Eventually, they progress their discussion to elements of model development, but theyfocus modeling on data acquisition aspects. Specifically, they decide (unvalidated) that they willbuild a platform to test and determine if the concept is feasible; Madison: “Well so from this pointthen I think that we should build one platform. If we have done the research thus far
deliverables spread over one semester: 1. Concept map exploring connections between energy and (a.) poverty, (b.) food production, processing, and distribution, and (c.) the environment (group assignment, each group picks one of the options) 2. Preliminary documentation of clients’ needs, characteristics, and perspectives. Includes discussion board participation, interview results, on-line and in-person research (individual assignment) 3. Preliminary decision matrix memo documenting 6 different user perspectives (group assignment) 4. Jigsaw assignment where team representatives investigate different cooling technologies and report back to their teams, (e.g., Refrigeration vapor-compression system, Evaporative
. Desselles. “S-STEM Summer Scholarship for a Sophomore Bridge: Year 1 in Review”. Proceedings of the 125th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[7] J. FitzSimmons, C. Levesque-Bristol, E. M. Bonem, E. A. Lott, L. C. Parker. “Education Redesigned: Impacting Teaching and Learning through a Faculty Development Course Redesign Program”. Proceedings of the 126th Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[8] C. Gordon, H. Sevin. “A Supplemental Instruction Model for Engineering Physics Instruction”. Proceedings of the 122nd Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[9] J.D. Karpicke and J.R. Blunt, 2011. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborate studying with concept
content and the major assessments as well as the connections betweenthe different course topics and the students’ overall professional development. Moving forward,additional scaffolding (such as a course concept map and an individual professional developmentplan) will be used to help frame the course and the assessments to help students see thealignment within the course as well as alignment with their graduate careers and overallprofessional development.3) What are the challenges that instructors reported in teaching the course and what are thestrategies to resolve the challenges? All three professors agreed (in their interviews) that the implementation went well for thefirst time, pilot offering. However, three major challenges were
foreign. As has been seen at other universities, thiscontributed to students’ lack of engagement and dissatisfaction [1].Females and minorities are chronically underrepresented in engineering [2] and industry iscontinually calling for additional engineers [3, 4]. Extensive research has been done on ways toincrease student engagement and success in STEM fields [5-7]. The 2012 President’s Council ofAdvisors on Science and Technology report Engage to Excel lists these as strongly supportedpractices: small group discussion and peer instruction, testing, one-minute papers, clickers,problem-based learning, case studies, analytical challenges before lectures, group tests, problemsets in groups, concept mapping, writing with peer review, computer
and results section of this report.CE 340 is only offered in the fall semester, at which time both sustainability and resiliency wascovered. For each ALM, the lecture was a standalone lecture with a PowerPoint presentation andan instructor guided group discussion. The sustainability ALM was considered by the instructoreasier to implement as the material cost and environmental impact are already covered in theregular course content. Resilience concepts were covered by relating mitigation methods for civilinfrastructure during a disaster event. Methods of assessment included the use of concept maps.Students were given concept maps as a take home activity, and offered extra credit uponcompletion of the activity.CE 360 is a spring only class, and
touch fasteners. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Replacing Graded Homework Assignments in StaticsAbstractInnovation in Statics instruction is an important area of research with new approaches including:flipped classroom, concept mapping, on-line homework, and others. Most traditional teaching ofStatics has involved a homework assignment where the students solve problems similar to thosefrom lecture. The homework problems serve to reinforce the new concepts and to develop thestudents’ ability to solve math and physics based problems. These homework assignments havealso typically been graded student assessments.The challenge with using these homework problem sets for student
teaching. • Design of an effective class: students will be able to establish learning outcomes, align assessments with course outcomes, align activities and assignments with course outcomes, and prepare an effective syllabus. • Creation of a productive learning environment: students will be able to promote a civil and engaging learning environment and embrace diversity in course planning and activities, use concept maps and other visualization tools, and develop self-directed learners. • Active learning techniques: students will be able to implement flipped classroom approach and create active learning opportunities in lecture courses. • Technology in teaching: students will be able to understand the
, Albuquerque Copyright © 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 11another soft skill. Open ended problems help with this requirement. The university setting shouldprovide opportunities for student to make connections of the information using a framework orscaffold. Concept maps are an excellent way to achieve this objective. Summary and ConclusionsIn conclusion, there is a mental health crisis facing the university. Campus counseling centers andmental health services are being stretched to the limit. Dr. Ben Locke, Executive Director of theCenter for Collegiate Mental Health, states “the data suggests that the demand (for
Principles of Ship Design, Ship Design and System In- tegration, Marine Engineering and Principles of Naval Architecture. His research interests include Naval and Commercial Ship Design Tools and Methods, Design Optimization and assessment of ship intact stability.Prof. Elizabeth (Elisha) MH Garcia, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Dr. Elizabeth (Elisha) MH Garcia is an Associate Professor of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Connecticut. She has taught at the USCGA for over a decade. Her research interests include analytical modeling of vortex-induced vibrations, as well as pedagogical research into the efficacy of concept maps as a learning tool in engineering courses
Note Comparison/Sharing 0.36 0.18 0.45 0.81 0.19 0 Table 1 continued from previous page Pre-Survey Post-Survey Technique Yes No Do Not Know Yes No Do Not Know Peer Evaluation 0.50 0.32 0.18 0.75 0.25 0 Concept Mapping 0.41 0.05 0.55 0.75 0.25 0 Debates 0.32 0.50 0.18 0.50 0.50 0 Jigsaw Group Projects 0.14 0.14 0.73 0.25 0.44 0.31 Case Studies 0.64 0.18 0.18
thinking about what they are doing"[4]. Such techniques include a range of activities from the simple - minute papers or pausingperiodically to have students work a problem or reflect on the material with a partner - to complex- concept mapping or peer instruction in which students present course materials by "teaching"their peers how to solve a problem or relate the material to their interests [6].In a meta-analysis of 225 scholarly papers, Freeman et al. found that student performance in STEMcourses improved by nearly half a standard deviation, or half a course grade, when active learningtechniques were incorporated into a course, compared with lecture-only courses [7]. Thetechniques presented in the papers included a wide variety of options
drawing a concept map, making notes on what is understood, asking questions, comparing and contrasting cases, designing plans, making hypotheses and causal relations, and generating predictions.3. Active instruction: For the instrument, active instruction is assessed in individual activities in which the students are engaged during or outside the class, such as making presentations, asking or answering questions during class, reviewing content before class, and solving problems on their own.4. Passive instruction: As the name suggests, this involves activities in which students passively receive information from the instructor, such as when the instructor a) directly gives most of the information for a homework assignment, b) gives
development/Intellectual development: Perry and King and Kitchener 9. Organization for learning Introduction/the advanced organizer/using advanced organizers/prior knowledge. Memory/cognitive organization/mediating responses/impact of K-12 and career pathways. 10. Concept learning Robert Gagné/Misperceptions/using examples. 11. Complex concepts Complex and fuzzy concepts/staged development/concept mapping and key concepts. 12. The learning centered ideology. How Introduction/Communities of practice, communities of care
categorized based on the function of denials and acceptances for thefinal decision. As Table 3 presents, five codes subsequently emerged. In each chunk of discourse,first we carefully analyzed important factors that directly affected students’ decisions by usingdifferent means. We drew concept map diagrams and used frequency analysis to understand theflow of students’ ideas in dealing with variables and others students’ suggestions or challenges.Table 3 presents the coding scheme that we developed to analyze critical factors that affect students’final decision-making and examples from the data analysis.Table 3. Critical factors for final decision-making Decision Sub-element Example