. Graduates must demonstrate an understanding and reasonable compliance with the following as they apply to civil engineering: a. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics (through differential equations and probability and statistics), science (including calculus-based physics and general chemistry), and engineering; b. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, c. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems, d. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, e. an ability to communicate effectively, f. a knowledge of contemporary issues, and g. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
) in February 2004; a revised (second) edition was published in February2008 (BOK22). The BOK2 is a comprehensive list of 24 outcomes divided into three outcomecategories: foundational, technical, and professional. The BOK2 outcomes have the desired levelof achievement defined according to Bloom’s Taxonomy for the cognitive domain3. The BOK2has recommended outcome achievement targets for each stage of the fulfillment pathway: thebaccalaureate degree (B), post-baccalaureate formal education (M/30), and pre-licensureexperience (E) (see Figure 1).Detailed implementation guidelines are included in the second edition of the Civil EngineeringBody of Knowledge for the 21st Century (BOK22); see www.asce.org/raisethebar/reports. Policy465 and BOK2 are
learning.Dr. Victoria E. Goodrich, University of Notre DameDr. Rachel B. Getman, Clemson University Page 25.742.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Improvements in Computational Methods Courses in Chemical EngineeringAbstractAs more core courses in the undergraduate curriculum require significant ability using computerskills, we see a need for improved methods of instruction in computer methods courses requiredin the chemical engineering curriculum. It is important to provide students with a series ofapproaches and activities that ensure (1) that students
AC 2012-3770: INTEGRATING SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION INTOFRESHMAN CHEMISTRY PROGRAMS TO SUPPORT WOMEN IN EN-GINEERINGKristen B. Coletti, Northeastern University Kristen Coletti is a third-year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, majoring in chemical engineering and pursuing a minor in mathematics. Coletti is not only a chemistry tutor but has also worked at the MathWorks, Inc. In addition, she has held co-op positions at both the Shaw Group and the EMD Serono Research Institute.Melinda Covert, Northeastern University Melinda Covert is a third-year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, studying chemical engi- neering and pursuing a minor in business administration. In addition to being a
AC 2012-2959: PREPARING THE ENGINEER OF 2020: ANALYSIS OFALUMNI DATAIrene B. Mena, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Dr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the College of Engineering at Penn State University. In this role, she provides support to faculty in trying innovative ideas in the classroom. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis in applied testing and measurement. Her current
AC 2012-3765: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FOR ARCHITECTUREAND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT STUDENTS: TEACHING METH-ODS AND CHANGING NEEDSMr. James B Guthrie P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Guthrie is an Assistant Professor for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Poly- technic State University, San Luis Obispo. Guthrie came to Cal Poly with more than 30 years of structural engineering experience and is a registered Professional and Structural Engineer in the state of California. Guthrie received a B.S. degree in structural engineering from the University of California, Davis, in 1972 and an M.S. degree in structural engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, in
AC 2012-4973: STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF TABLET PC INTERAC-TION TECHNIQUESMahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Virginia Tech Jean Mohammadi-Aragh is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education. Before attending Virginia Tech, she earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in computer engineering from Mississippi State University and worked full-time in a scientific visualization research lab. Currently, she is a Dean’s Teaching Fellow and ENGE Ambassador. She is teaching a freshman engineering course while pursuing her research interests involving technology use in the engineering classroom.Dr. Christopher B. Williams, Virginia Tech
the Page 25.1452.4instruction cycle. The complete block diagram for the simple ALU system is shown in Figure 3. CLK Operand A A 7-Seg B Display AN / CA Operand B Y ALU nf zf
below.On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. Please rate the following:1. Overall writing workshop 1 2 3 4 52. Progressive writing assignment 1 2 3 4 53. Grammar lectures 1 2 3 4 54. Grammar handouts 1 2 3 4 55. Report format document and template 1 2 3 4 56. How important do you think good writing ability is to you as a future professional engineer? a) very much b) somewhat c) not very important 7. Would you recommend future ME-310 classes be assigned a similar
modeling is used to highlight the hidden game inclassroom problems relating to the first law. Also, students collaborate with each other to assistin understanding of first law problems. Finally, the students are given specific feedback from theinstructor and classmates to help students understand how to make judgments about heat transfer,work, and energy in first law problems. Page 25.115.13Figure 9: Alignment of content, assessment, and pedagogyReferencesAnderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: Longman Pub
. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology Margaret B. Bailey, P.E., is a professor of mechanical engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) located in Rochester, N.Y. Bailey is also the Founding Executive Director for the nationally recognized women in engineering program called WE@RIT (http://we.rit.edu/). At the institute level, Bailey serves as Faculty Associate to the Provost for female faculty and she co-chairs the President’s Commission on Women. In these roles, she leads efforts to create strategies to increase the representation of women undergraduate students and improve recruitment, retention, and advancement of women faculty. Within
can follow through the several multidisciplinary projects whichwill represent the next phase in institutionalizing SE into the capstone across the engineeringprograms.A first design for a rubric to assess the SE aspects of the project has been developed and shownin Appendix B. The rubric was used for guidance by the faculty in the final presentation inhelping guide them with grading of the project but it did not prove possible to apply the rubric inthe manner for which it was intended, to provide assessment of the achievement of the individualSE competencies. The result was that a common assessment protocol could not be achieved andconnected to student grading which in the end is the key. This is being addressed in the Phase
studentswithin the context of an already full curriculum.Bibliography1. Beakley, G. C., D. L. Evans, and J. B. Keats. 1986. Engineering: An Introduction to a CreativeProfession, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, NY.2. Herrmann, N. 1996. The Whole Brain Business Book: Unlocking the Power of Whole Brain Thinking inIndividuals and Organizations, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.3. Kao, J. 2007. Innovation Nation: How America Is Losing Its Innovation Edge, Why It Matters, andWhat We Can Do To Get It back, The Free Press, New York, NY.4. Nierenberg, G.I. 1982. The Art of Creative Thinking, Barnes & Noble Books, New York, NY.5. Cooper, R. K. 2006. Get Out of Your Own Way: The 5 Keys to Surpassing Everyone’s Expectations,Crown Business, New York, NY.6
(a) Engine Showing Tank in background (b) Engine Showing Solenoid Valve(c) Controller Showing Wiring (d) Simplified Controller Box Page 25.346.12Figure 3. %Hydrogen and RPM for Briggs and Stratton; Without Knock BRIGGS AND STRATTON 23HP ENGINE TEST Ranges of H2 % Injection versus RPM 14 13 12 11 % H2 Injected 10 9 8 7 6 5 1500 2000
teaching for ENGE 1024, is an ENGE Ambassador, is actively involved in the Graduate Engineering Education Consortium of Students (GEECS), and is serving as the secretary for the VT ASEE Student Chapter for the 2011-2012 school year. Her current research interests focus on graduate teaching assistant (GTA) motivation to teach and GTA teacher identity development in first-year engineering courses.Mrs. Jeremi S. London, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jeremi London is a graduate student at Purdue University. She is pursuing a M.S. in industrial engineering and a Ph.D. in engineering education.Ms. Ida B. Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ida Ngambeki is a doctoral candidate at the School of Engineering Education
leadership development. He holds the Asa S. Knowles Chair of Practice-Oriented Education at Northeastern University. A Ph.D. in policy studies from the State University of New York at Buffalo, Raelin received his formal training as an employment researcher. Since then, he has produced over 100 journal publications in the leading management and social science journals. Among his books are: Building A Career, The Clash of Cultures: Managers Managing Professionals, Work-Based Learning, and Creating Leaderful Organizations.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Margaret B. Bailey, P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at the Rochester Institute of
modern Europe. She has published several articles on noblewomen’s access to political power. She has had several articles published in Germany, Russia, and in North America.Dr. Seung Youn Chyung, Boise State University Seung Youn (Yonnie) Chyung is a professor in the Department of Instructional and Performance Tech- nology in the College of Engineering at Boise State University. She received her doctorate of education degree in instructional technology from Texas Tech University and teaches graduate-level courses on evaluation methodology.Dr. Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology Cheryl B. Schrader became Chancellor of the Missouri University of Science and Technology, formerly the
to applying entropy to a variety of applications in life ranging from theautomobile to natural disasters to medical applications. The 145 statements wereevaluated based on their correctness. A partially correct answer is one where the effect ofentropy was not completely explained. An example of this is the statement “In weather,precipitation is a form of entropy.” A correct answer would be “In weather, precipitationcreates entropy when it erodes farm soil.”The students in the thermodynamics class were given a different assignment for theiressay (Appendix B). Fifty statements from the essays were evaluated based on thecorrectness of the definition of entropy. The results are contained in Figure 8. Thirty fivestatements about the purpose of
due to limited driving Department of Engineering (a) (b)range and lengthy recharging times. A novel powertrain toincrease utility of BEVs is being developed at the University of University of Arkansas – Fort SmithArkansas – Fort Smith. The key component of this powertrain is 5210 N. Grand Avenuethe use of a 5-speed transmission matched with a
Creating a Culture of Entrepreneurship Vi Richard B. Brown The University of UtahCollege of Engineering Spin-offs Notable Entrepreneurial AlumniSimon Ramo, TRW John Warnock, Adobe Alan Ashton, Word Perfect Ed Catmull, Pixar Mark Fuller, WET Technologies Jim Clark, Netscape, Silicon Graphics 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
) what the problem is, (b)what the engineer plans on doing to resolve the problem, and (c) what processes the engineerplans on implementing to solve their problem. DfXs are essentially well defined commonengineering problems that an engineer will encounter when working in a specific field. Forexample, DfE highlights what things an engineer must consider when designing in the field ofenvironmentally conscious design. The different stages of a DfX’s development therefore mirrorthe depth to which engineers have considered, or defined, a given problem. We hypothesize thata step-by-step descent through the stages of a DfX’s development would both motivate studentsby exposing them to the history of their discipline, and sensitize them to design
AC 2012-4703: A MODEL FOR DIVERSITY AND EQUITYDr. Sylvanus N. Wosu, University of Pittsburgh Sylvanus Wosu is the Associate Dean for Diversity Affairs and Associate Professor of mechanical engi- neering and materials science at the University of Pittsburgh. Wosu’s research interests are in the areas of impact physics and engineering of new composite materials, dynamic problems in composites failure, and energy containment and responses of dynamical systems. Wosu is also interested in engineering edu- cation with particular interests in development models for effective recruitment, retention, and mentoring of women and under-represented students. Other research interests include experimental investigation of the
. Figure 2 O the 294 awaards reviewedd, approximattely half of thhem containedd Forms of Cyyberlearning (see Of (Table 1). Moreover, Fiigure 3 revealls which Form ms of Cyberleearning are ussed by each diiscipline. Bassed ona quick gllance, four infferences can be b made. Onee, all disciplinnes have at least two formss of cyberlearrningamong theeir awards. Seecondly, the representation r n of cyberlearrning varies across a discipliines, withEngineeriing, Computin
AC 2012-4578: TOWARDS AN ”ADAPTIVE CONCEPT MAP”: CREAT-ING AN EXPERT-GENERATED CONCEPT MAP OF AN ENGINEERINGSTATICS CURRICULUMMr. Jacob Preston Moore, Virginia Tech Jacob Moore is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Dr. Robert Scott Pierce, Sweet Briar College Robert Scott Pierce is an Associate Professor of physics and engineering at Sweet Briar College in Sweet Briar, Va. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993. Prior to his teaching career, he spent 13 years in industry designing automated equipment.Dr. Christopher B. Williams, Virginia Tech
AC 2012-4042: DEVELOPING EXPERIMENTS FOR THE VIBRATIONCOURSE WITH MINIMAL EXPENDITUREDr. B. S. Sridhara, Middle Tennessee State University B. S. Sridhara is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Middle Tennessee State University. He received his B.S.M.E. and M.S.M.E. degrees from Bangalore University and Indian In- stitute of Science, Bangalore, India. He received his M.S.M.E. and Ph.D. degrees from Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, and Auburn University, Alabama. Sridhara has published sev- eral peer-reviewed articles in the areas of acoustics, vibration, finite element methods, and engineering education.Mr. Daryl Hunter White, Middle Tennessee State University Daryl
AC 2012-3973: INVOLVING STUDENTS IN AN INTERNATIONAL TECH-NOLOGY EXCHANGEDr. Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University Clifton Farnsworth received B.S. and M..S degrees in civil engineering from Brigham Young University and a Ph.D. in civil engineering from the University of Utah. He worked as a geotechnical engineer for eight years with the Utah Department of Transportation, spent three years as an Assistant Professor of civil engineering at the University of Texas, Tyler, and has a current appointment as an Assistant Professor of construction management at Brigham Young University.Prof. Mark Owen Lords, Brigham Young University Mark Lords received B.S. and M.Acc. degrees in accounting from Brigham Young
University of Alabama, Huntsville. Virani’s research interests include engineering education, empirical software quality, and cognitive perspectives of systems engineering teams. She teaches decision and risk analysis, software systems architecture, and systems integration, verification, and validation. She is a member of ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education) and IIE (Institute of Industrial Engineers).Ms. Iris B. Burnham, Da Vinci School for Science and the Arts Iris B. Burnham is the Founder and Superintendent of the Burnham Wood Charter School District in El Paso, Texas. The Da Vinci School serves grades 5-12 and has been designated an Innovative STEM Academy by the Texas Education Agency. Burnham ’s career
AC 2012-5421: ENHANCING STUDENTS LEARNING THROUGH MILLCONCEPTDr. MD B. Sarder, University of Southern Mississippi MD Sarder is an Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator of the Industrial Engineering Technology program at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM). He is also an Associate Director of the Center for Logistics, Trade, and Transportation. At the USM, he revamped his program by developing as many as 14 new courses, implementing hands-on experience in courses, and delivering online courses for distant students. Sarder is very active in engineering and technology education research. He has published a book and more than 50 articles in various areas of industrial engineering. He is involved with
theIEEE Region-5 competition platform during the first part of the semester. In addition to thetheoretical coverage of the course subjects and hands-on design preparations, the teams werefurther asked to a) develop and submit a project design, timeline and a required component listfor the robot assembly based on the 2011 IEEE Region-5 competition guidelines, deadlines andobjectives; b) participate in the mentorship program; and, c) to establish an official robotics club.All robot design components were obtained by the project management based on the teamproposals. The students enhanced their robotics educational experiences significantly byproviding mentorship to a number of middle-high schools teams during the local BEST middle-high school
the design toachieve mixing without the usage of an external stirrer (mixer). Although these designs presentedabove have limitations and shortcomings, the main success was related to student interaction andinvolvement in the design and development of the experimental micro-devices and testing set-up. A BFigure 4: Micro-mixer chip designs. (A) Includes a magnetic mixer applied to eliminate bubbles and induce mixing. (B) Alternate chamber mixer design with the more common v-type inlets.In Figure 4A the rounded nature of the mixer should be noted. The inlets are positioned in amanner that allows the incoming fluid to follow the outer edge of the pattern and to circulatearound the mixer in an