10 Megawatts to a Better Education Daniel Schmalzel, Rowan University, New JerseyAbstractRowan University Engineering students have been given a unique opportunity to work towardsthe creation of a 10 megawatt (MW) photovoltaic (PV) system as one component of theuniversity’s commitment to carbon neutrality. Students are learning a broad range of skills thatapply to all levels of PV system design. For example, they are learning to assess site feasibilitythrough the use of specialized equipment and software including shading assessment andexpected power production. As they evaluate the quality of each site, the student team mustunderstand the flow of energy through every stage of the system
the relevant technical background to accomplish a long-term 7h design project 7I I am good at listening to other people's ideas 9a I am skilled at not letting my own problems get in the way of a team project I bring to my team the appropriate hands-on experience to accomplish a long- 9f term project 9j I understand how to effectively organize and conduct a meeting 10 b I bring to my team the necessary teamwork skills to work collaborativelyResultsThere were 1135 invitations emailed to Dalhousie University students from the Dean ofEngineering. The study population represents all students currently enrolled in engineeringcourses at Dalhousie University in all 4
AC 2011-1062: THE DISMANTLING OF THE ENGINEERING EDUCA-TION PIPELINEErik N Dunmire, College of Marin Erik Dunmire is a professor of engineering and chemistry at College of Marin. He received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from University of California, Davis.Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of engineering and mathematics at Canada College. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female, minority and other under- represented groups in mathematics, science and engineering.Kate A Disney, Mission College, Santa Clara, CA Engineering
the restitution phase of the collision[11]. It isconventional, therefore, to compare their magnitudes by means of a ratio called the coefficient ofrestitution.For two particles A and B that are, say, assumed to be moving in the same direction before aswell as after central impact with absolute velocities v A and v B , respectively, analysis shows thatthe coefficient of restitution is related to the relative speeds of the particles before and afterimpact, as shown below [1-3]. (v B ) after − (v A ) after e= (v A )before − (v B )before (1)If particle B represents the ball and particle A the rigid surface of the court, then, in this case, thecoefficient of restitution
relatives. At the second school, students were in a French Immersion program(B). Many had professional parents.The research project involved three classroom visits conducted in January 2011. In the first brief Page 22.685.2visit of approximately 15 minutes, researchers conducted pre-assessments of students’conceptions of engineers by having the students write and draw pictures of how they understoodfour careers (teacher, doctor, accountant and engineer) and then match a series of descriptors(including words such as caring, works with others etc.) to each career.Discussion of Pre-assessments: Stereotypes about CareersThe pre-assessment activity
. The raw material is A, but the feed Page 22.1127.7stream contains 20 mole% inerts, I (non-reactive impurities), at a total flowrate of 100 kmol/hand 50°C. The feed stream is mixed with recycled, unreacted A and then preheated to at leastFigure 4: Generic Process Flow Diagram for Unit 200 Page 22.1127.875°C but no more than 155°C before entering the reactor. The heat source is low-pressure steamat 160°C that condenses at constant temperature. In the reactor, the reaction that occurs is A→B,with a maximum possible conversion of 95%. The reactor is adiabatic (meaning that no heat isadded or
Group 1) had not been exposed to engineering through reading and discussion of Engineering Elephants or through any other means within the classroom setting. The second group (identified as Group 2) had been exposed only through the reading and class discussion of Engineering Elephants. The final group of students (identified as Group 3) participated in a program which included reading and discussion of Engineering Elephants in combination with hands-on experiments and field trips.Results Page 22.962.5Figures 2-4 show representative illustrations from all groups.A B
). However, one of the earlier definitions is still widely accepted andcomprehensive: Service-learning is “a course based, credit-bearing, educational experience inwhich students (a) participate in an organized service activity that meets identified communityneeds and (b) reflect on the service activity in such a way as to gain further understanding ofcourse content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and an enhanced sense of civicresponsibility." (Bringle & Hatcher, 1995). Key elements of service-learning that appear to beimportant to researchers and practitioners include: projects or placements that meet academicobjectives in a credit-bearing course, the meeting of real community needs, analysis or reflectionon the part of students to
arguments for including service as part of a profession, suchas social justice and humanitarianism. Public relations and a positive public image for theprofession could also be considered as motivation.The question of whether service is, or should be, considered part of the engineering professionwas put to engineering students, both beginning an engineering program and those who havetaken courses with service-learning projects embedded.Service-learning is “a course based, credit-bearing, educational experience in which students (a)participate in an organized service activity that meets identified community needs and (b) reflecton the service activity in such a way as to gain further understanding of course content, a broaderappreciation of the
, (b) serve in a core maintenance capacity, and (c) conduct assessment ofthe core curriculum.This paper will describe the existing approach to the challenge of assessing learning outcomesrelated to courses delivered by the College of Liberal Arts and Education, and makerecommendations based on the literature in organizational change theory to achieve higher levelsof “buy in” from the stakeholders. Achieving high levels of participation in core assessment willrequire a significant cultural shift in the institution, as academics place a high value on autonomyin their teaching as well as in their scholarship, and thus some tend to see mandates forassessment as interference with academic freedom.2 Existing ApproachThe engineering programs at
the setpoint Nc is set to 0.5. The settling time will be set at 4 seconds. For a third order system, the following is the characteristic equation. ( S A)( S 2 BS C) S 3 ( A B) S 2 ( AB C) S AC 0 (11) where: A is a pole on the real axis, B 2 n1 andC n2 is the damping ration and n is the undamped natural frequency of the system. The percent overshoot is calculated by the following: 2 PO 100e / 1 10% (12) which leads to 0.6. The settling time will be the time when the response is within 2% of its final value. It is calculated by: 4 e n t s 0.02 ts 4
. References 1. Streveler, R., B. Olds, R. Miller, and M. Nelson. Using a Delphi Study to Identify theMost Difficult Concepts for Students to Master in Thermal and Transport Science.Presented at Presented at ASEE Annual Conference, at Nashville, TN, 2003.2. Jacobi, A., J. Martin, J. Mitchell, and Ty Newell. A Concept Inventory for HeatTransfer. Presented at Frontiers in Education, at Boulder, CO, 2003.3. Midkiff, K, T. Litzinger, and D. Evans. Development of Engineering ThermodynamicsConcept Inventory Instruments. Presented at Frontiers in Education, at Reno, NV, 2001.4. Olds, B., R. Streveler, R. Miller, and M.A. Nelson. Preliminary Results From theDevelopment of a Concept Inventory in Thermal and Transport Sciences. Presented atPresented at
students agreed that they intended to review their work before exams. A Useful Problem B Plan to review 80 80 principal stress 70 Percent of students Percent of students 70 muscle force 60 60 diving board 50
correlation analysis in SAS resulted in a significant coefficient or strong positiverelation between several subparts of items 11 and 12. Viewing the analysis results, it becameapparent that these relations can be grouped into six clusters: A = [3, 4]; B = [6, 7, 8]; C = [7, 8,9, 10]; D = [10, 17]; E = [12, 13, 14]; and F = [16, 17, 18, 19] as shown in Figure 1. Theserelations have a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 or above, which according to the criteria inTable 2 represents a strong or significant relation. Pearson correlation coefficients greater than0.9 where found for item pairs in cluster F (16&17), F (17&19), and F (18&19). Pearsoncorrelation coefficients greater than 0.8 were found for item pairs in cluster A (3&4), B
participants of the workshop held in the GSA NE/SEmeeting at Baltimore during March 2010. The participants were also asked to commenton the possible areas of improvement for each tutorial. Sample questions posed to theparticipants are provided in Figure 9.1. To recover a 5-year cycle in a climate time series, what cut-off frequencies should youchoose? a. [0.3, 0.5, 1.0] cycles/year b. [0.1, 0.2, 0.3] cycles/year c. [1.5, 2.0, 2.5] cycles/year d. [0.005, 0.002, 0.001] cycles/year10. A peak in the periodogram (power spectrum) indicates a ____________ frequencycomponent in the time series. a. Strong b. Weak c. Cannot say from the information provided13. I understood the need for preprocessing the time
to include management issues in thecurricula, and 3) the ASCE vision for civil engineering in 2025 to include leadership, teamwork,public policy, and management as educational outcomes.Some advantages of the MS management option include (a) a structured mentoring experiencefor graduate students, (b) an effective means to acquire projects for the undergraduateculminating design class, and (c) a forum that allows practicing engineers to share professionalexpertise directly with students. In addition, students gain an understanding of how technicalproficiency must be meshed with business acumen to have a successful career in engineeringmanagement.IntroductionThe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has become a strong advocate
Magazine, IEEE, 16 (4), 27-36.6. Rabins, M.J. (1998). Teaching engineering ethics to undergraduates: Why? What? How? Science and Engineering Ethics, 4 (3), 291-302.7. ABET. (2011). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Efective for evaluations during the 2010-2011 accreditation cycle. ABET, Inc: Baltimore, MD.8. Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10 (2), 343-351.9. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.10. Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? Four Critical Years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.11. Terenzini, P. T., & Reason, R. D. (2005,). Parsing the first year
assigning quality Levels (scores) to each of the dimensions, while the I-MAP (Appendix B)provides guidance specific to the JIT MEA. The quality Levels possible vary from one(sub)dimension to another, but the values of the Levels are the same. Specifically, a qualityLevel 4 corresponds to a letter grade of “A”, Level 3 = “B”, Level 2 = “C”, and Level 1 = “D”.Mathematical ModelMathematical Model Complexity. In Carnes, et al.6, the Mathematical Model Complexity wasassessed based on the progression of the number of statistical measures used. For example, ateam that began by using Mean alone to rank the shipping companies in DRAFT 1 was judged tohave made progress if they used both Mean and Standard Deviation in DRAFT 2. Similarly, theaddition of a
Page 22.1325.10prospective students to the STEM areas.For Cochise, the goal of the project was to get students into the engineering pipeline at thecommunity college so they can continue on to universities to pursue bachelor’s degrees.Progress for Cochise College is measured in students who enroll in the STEM classes thatsupport engineering along with those who transfer to four year schools. Other goals of theproject include a) maintaining the relationship that has been established with ASU; b) creating anetwork with other rural community colleges who are building programs in the STEM fields; andc) to offer scholarship incentives for qualified and capable students to pursue engineeringdegrees.Seeing an increase in the number of students who
-11 Accreditation Cycle. ABET Inc., Baltimore, MD.3. http://d-lab.mit.edu. Accessed 1/20114. McGarvey, K., M. Biggs, J. Hill, M. Panko, N. Bacher, and B. Sukumaran. “Engineering Innovators without Borders: Developing Entrepreneurial Opportunities for the Developing World through Engineering Redesign,” International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 48-61, 2009.5. Magoon, C., K. Villars, J. Evans, B. Hickey, A. Sayre, C. Tutino, and R. J. Swap. “Water Supply and Treatment Design in Rural Belize: A Participatory Approach to Engineering Action Research,” International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 47-63, 2010.6. Estell, J., K. Reid, and J
research and has been used as a wayof predicting students’ academic interests and goals in engineering7. SCCT has threeoverlapping models aimed at understanding how people: a) Develop basic academic and career interests b) Make and revise their educational and vocational plans, and c) Achieve performances of varying quality in their chosen academic and career pursuits.Within these models, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, goals, and other factors such asgender, race, barriers, etc. help shape a students’ career path. An example of a barrierwould be negative contextual influences, or adverse learning conditions5. These theoriesare somewhat foundational when understanding the constructs of self-regulation and self-efficacy.Self
evaluation plans are listed below. The full discussion of them takenfrom the workshop report is presented in Appendix B. • What are the intended goals of the project? For learning focused projects, this question could be stated as “What do you want the students to achieve?” • Based on your project goals, can you write a set of hypotheses for your project? • What evidence that the project has achieved its intended goals will be convincing? If you are able to construct hypotheses for your project, this question could also be stated as: What evidence will allow you to accept or refute the hypotheses? • In order to generalize the results of the projects, it is also important to ask the following question: Why did
and the gpa is quite large.The differential between EAS211 grade and gpa is negative, meaning that the EAS211 grade islower than the previous term gpa. Thus a smaller negative number for this metric indicatesperformance closer to the student’s previous level. Students in the middle gpa group showessentially no difference in this metric (0.1). Students in the lowest and highest gpa group whohave had two chemistry course show better performance by this metric with differences of 0.4and 0.3, respectively. Note that a value of 0.3 for this metric would be approximately thedifference between a B and a B+.To further examine the effect of chemistry courses on engineering course grades, correlationcoefficients were determined for several paired
interdisciplinary laboratory sequence in electrical and computer engineering: curriculum design and assessment results,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Issue 2, pp: 143-152, May 200011 G. H. Bernstein, J. B. Brockman, G. L. Snider, and B. E. Walvoord, “ From Bits to Chips: A Multidisciplinary Curriculum for Microelectronics System Design Eductaion,” 2003 International Conference on Microelectronics System Education, 200312 LabVIEW 6.1 Manuals, National Instruments, www.ni.com13 John Essick , “Hands On Introduction to LabVIEW for Scientists and Engineers,” Oxford University Press, USA ,November 12, 200814 E. C. Ifeachor and B. W. Jervis, “Digital Signal Processing: A Practical Approach,” Prentice Hall, New
with emphasis on post-design activitiessuch as equipment operation, maintenance, or personnel training, the academic community offerstwo and four-year programs in engineering technology. Currently only three schools offer four-year B. S. degree programs in the Nuclear Technology or Nuclear Engineering Technologyareas. These are Excelsior College, Thomas Edison State College, and the University of NorthTexas. A list of core and elective courses offered at the three colleges is presented in Table 1.0 ofthe Appendix. The list shows that the three programs have the following nuclear core topics incommon: Nuclear Materials Health Physics/Radiation Protection Radiation Measurement Plant Systems Overview Reactor Core
AC 2011-1585: WE CAN’T GET NO SATISFACTION!: THE RELATION-SHIP BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ETHICAL REASONING AND THEIR SAT-ISFACTION WITH ENGINEERING ETHICS EDUCATIONMatthew Holsapple, Univeristy of Michigan Matthew Holsapple is a doctoral candidate at the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Ed- ucation at the University of Michigan. His research interests include moral development and character education in higher students, professional ethics education, and research design and quasi-experimental methods in research on college student outcomes.Janel Sutkus, Carnegie Mellon UniversityDonald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Donald Carpenter is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and the
manufacturingengineering/technology educators and practitioners access and use it in their dailylectures/operations. The findings of the summer research study and its implementation in amanufacturing course are reported in this paper.2. IntroductionRETainUS program contributes to advancing the manufacturing base in the U.S. throughmeaningful changes in the teachers' understanding of manufacturing and how it relates to theMath and Science curriculum. This program aims at improving the teachers' comprehension ofthe research and development process through hands-on experience and real world problems thatrelate to: a) advancing the state of the art in conventional manufacturing processes; b) new trendsin manufacturing such as rapid prototyping, c) emerging
initiative whose mission is to identify and motivate disadvantaged minorityelementary and secondary students. The Center’s mission includes: a) assuming a moreproactive stance in the education of youth; b) employing the development of a groupachievement model for disadvantaged elementary and secondary students; and, c) increasing thepool of students who are prepared, motivated and qualified to enter higher education. TwelveCenters throughout the state of Florida have inducted more than 17,500 high achieving studentsinto the National Achievers Society. More than 13,250 students have participated in the AnnualBrain Bowl Competition.The SATThe SAT Reasoning Test is a standardized test for college admissions in the United Statestypically taken by high
AC 2011-811: GRADUATE STUDENTS MENTORING UNDERGRADU-ATE RESEARCHERS ON A LARGE-SCALE EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCHPROJECT - A CASE STUDYGregg L. Fiegel, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Gregg L. Fiegel is a Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), San Luis Obispo. He is a registered Professional Engineer in California, and he serves as the ASCE Student Chapter Faculty Advisor. Dr. Fiegel received his B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Cal Poly in 1990. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of California, Davis in 1992 and 1995, respectively.H. Ben Mason, University of California at Berkeley Ben Mason
AC 2011-534: USE OF A PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE SIMULATION INA FIRST YEAR INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING COURSENaomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison Naomi C. Chesler is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering with an affiliate appointment in Educational Psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics and cardiac function as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities.Cynthia M D’Angelo, University of Wisconsin - Madison Cynthia D’Angelo, Ph.D. has a background in physics and science education. She has always been inter- ested in improving science instruction and most