, Spencer P. Magleby, Carl D. Sorensen, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education (January 1997): 17 - 28. Spring 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 7-8, 2017 MSU4. Milo Koretsky, Christine Kelly, and Edith Gummer, “Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories,” Journal of Engineering Education (July 2011): 540 - 573.5. Heshmat A. Aglan and S. Firasat Ali, “Hands-On Experiences: An Integral Part of Engineering Curriculum Reform,” Journal of Engineering Education (October 1996): 327 – 330.6. Stupak P.R., S. Rumrill, B. S
Engineering, UCL, in 2000, becoming a Senior Lecturer in 2006 and full Pro- fessor of Communications Systems Engineering in 2015. He received an MA in Teaching and Learning in Higher and Professional Education in 2016. From April 2012 to April 2016, he was on secondment to the UCL Engineering Faculty as the Director of the Integrated Engineering Programme, a cross-faculty curriculum review and revision of the undergraduate programmes. He is currently Vice-Dean (Eduction) in the UCL Faculty of Engineering Sciences and co-director of the Centre for Engineering Education, a joint central between UCL Engineering and the UCL Institute of Education. Professor Mitchell is a Char- tered Engineer, fellow of the Institution of
]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data[5] U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, “Employment Projections: Fastest growing occupations,” 2022. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables.htm[6] T. Simley et al., “Assessing the Efficacy of Integrating Computer Science, Math, and Science in a Middle School Sphero Robotics Summer Program,” in 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology, RESPECT 2020 - Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Mar. 2020. doi: 10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272479.[7] A. Sullivan and M. U. Bers, “Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8
engineering at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is currently the chair of the Department of Chemical, Biological and Bioengineering at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Impact of an Intensive Design Experience on Self-Efficacy, Valuation of Engineering Design, and Engineering Identity in Undergraduate Engineering StudentsIntroduction This paper reports on a NSF IUSE:RED project that is focused on integrating elements ofneeds finding and design into courses throughout all four years of the engineering curriculum.The project is based on the
. Page 9.1351.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright . 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationFor this reason, most engineering programs require their students to take an introductorymaterials class. This includes community colleges with engineering transfer programs. In theU.S. alone, the “Introduction to Materials” course enrolls over 50,000 students a year.1 Theprimary goal of the class is to provide a foundation in materials science and engineering that thestudents can build upon in their major classes and future careers.The curriculum and lab content for the existing “Introduction to Materials” course taught at SanJose
meet-and-greet eventbetween students and BAE200 faculty member was a key activity that contributed to helpingstudents select a degree concentration and think about career opportunities.References[1] A. Baker et al., “Preparing the Acquisition Workforce: A Digital Engineering Competency Framework,” in 2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, Aug. 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/SysCon47679.2020.9275661.[2] R. Mansbach et al., “Reforming an undergraduate materials science curriculum with computational modules,” Journal of Materials Education, vol. 38, no. 3–4, pp. 161–174, 2016.[3] D. Ahmed, M. Nayeemuddin, T. Ayadat, and A. Asiz, “Computing Competency for Civil Engineering Graduates: Recent
2427 Lessons Learned and Best Practices for using an Analytic Strategy Approach for the Creation of Virtual Laboratories for Distance Learning in Engineering Technology Anthony W. Dean, Carol L. Considine, and Gary R. Crossman Department of Engineering Technology Old Dominion University Norfolk, Virginia 23529AbstractThis paper describes the use of an Analytic Strategy Approach used in the development of aVirtual Automation and Controls Lab in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Program of
Paper ID #45050Nurturing Interdisciplinary Engagement: A Case Study of Resourcing andRecruiting Strategies in an Early Academic Career Interdisciplinary Project-BasedLearning CourseDr. David Gray, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Gray receieved his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2000. He then earned a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2002 and 2010, respectively. Much of his graduate education focusDr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at
Session 2647 AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY GRADUATES CHARLIE P. EDMONSON, JOSEPH A. UNTENER The University of DaytonABSTRACTGraduates of Engineering Technology Programs continue to perform at high levels of employersatisfaction in very diverse positions. This paper describes a study performed by The Universityof Dayton Engineering Technology Department of graduates between the years of 1992 - 1996.This study addresses salary levels, satisfaction of graduates with the Engineering TechnologyProgram, academic preparation, and career mobility
new schools to develop GCSPs as part of the NAE GCSP Proposal review committee. She is also actively involved in the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), focused on students’ de- velopment of entrepreneurial mindset through GCSP and curriculum. Amy recently received the 2019 KEEN Rising Star award for her efforts in encouraging students to develop an entrepreneurial mindset. Amy has contributed to the development of a new hands-on multidisciplinary introduction to engineering course and a unique introduction to engineering MOOC. She is interested in curricular and co-curricular experiences that broaden students’ perspectives and enhance student learning, and values students’ use of Digital Portfolios to
1 Session XXXX An Interactive Approach to Teaching Moment Equilibrium Using Virtual Surgical Planning (Work in Progress) Anne-Marie Ginn-Hedman Department of Biomedical Engineering Texas A&M University AbstractIntroductory static mechanic courses traditionally have limited practical examples for biomedicalengineering students. We therefore created a virtual lab where students can apply classroomknowledge to solve clinical
living-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Mr. David ZhaoAlexandra KulichDr. Madeline Polmear, University of FloridaDr. Nathan E Canney P.E.,Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts UniversityDr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado Boulder c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #25567Student Views on their Role in Society as an Engineer and Relevant EthicalIssuesDr
AC 2008-897: EVALUATING DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF PEER INTERACTIONUSING AN ON-LINE INSTRUMENTAlan Cheville, Oklahoma State UniversityJames Duvall, Oklahoma State University James Duvall is completing his BSEE degree at Oklahoma State University and expects to attend graduate school studying microwaves or photonics. Page 13.575.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Evaluating Different Aspects of Peer Interaction Using an On-Line InstrumentBackground and ContextAs universities move towards integrating in-depth team-based design experiences there is anincreasing need to train
. Page 24.1318.16 8. E. Keenan and A. Steele, Developing a Pedagogical Infrastructure for Teaching Globally Distributed Software Development, In Collaborative Teaching of Globally Distributed Software Development - Community Building Workshop (CTGDSD), May 23, 2011.9. P. Gloor, M. Paasivaara, C. Lassenius, D. Schoder, K. Fischbach and C. Miller, Teaching a Global Project Course: Experiences and Lessons Learned, In Collaborative Teaching of Globally Distributed Software Development - Community Building Workshop (CTGDSD), May 23, 2011.10. M. Richey, F. Zender, D.P. Schrage, G. Jensen, B. McPherson, J. Fehr, M.M. Symmonds and D.E. French, An Innovative Approach to an Integrated Design and Manufacturing Multi- Site “Cloud
AC 2007-2721: SPONTANEOUS GROUPS VERSUS LONG-TERM TEAMS: ANINVESTIGATION USING COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING IN A FIRST-YEARENGINEERING COURSETamara Moore, University Of Minnesota Tamara Moore is a Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Minnesota. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, her M.S.Ed. in Mathematics Education and her B.S. in Mathematics from Purdue University. Tamara taught high school mathematics for seven years prior to pursuing her doctorate. Her research interests include curriculum development, the learning of complex problem-solving in mathematics and engineering, teamwork, and integration of
itdemonstrates the iterative processes of engineering design and product development. It is alsothe sum of the creative efforts of first-year engineering students, senior Industrial Designstudents, junior business students, and senior industrial and manufacturing students. Finally, thisproject is an example of the products and services of the Engineering Design Center for Service-Learning located at Western Michigan University to enhance K-12 mathematics and scienceteaching and learning.IntroductionThe subject of light reflection, refraction, absorption, and transmission is first introduced in themiddle-school science curriculum (often taught in 7th grade). However, middle-school textbooksgive incomplete and sometimes even incorrect impression of these
Paper ID #10253An Inventory to Assess Students’ Knowledge of Second Law ConceptsDr. Timothy J. Jacobs, Texas A&M University Dr. Timothy J. Jacobs is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. His research interests include thermodynamics, internal combustion engines, and ped- agogical improvements to content and integration of design in engineering science courses. His teaching interests include thermodynamics, internal combustion engines, and experimental design.Dr. Jerald A. Caton, Texas A&M University
Advances in Engineering Education FALL 2017You Be the Judge: When Competitions Employ anEngineering Design RubricGAIL LYNN GOLDBERGGail Goldberg ConsultingEllicott City, MD ABSTRACT This article examines the use of an engineering design rubric by judges for three different stu-dent competitions—one regional, one national, and one global—to evaluate portfolios posted onthe Innovation Portal, a free online resource available to students, teachers, and others engagedin STEM education across instructional levels. Judges responded to an online survey on the Engi-neering Design Process Portfolio Scoring Rubric (EDPPSR) following each
2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference WEAVEonline: An Assessment and Planning Management System for Improving Student Learning Wei Zhan and Jay Porter Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution, Texas A&M UniversityAbstractEvery degree-granting program at Texas A&M University is required to participate in theassessment of student learning outcomes using WEAVEonline system. The assessment data isthen used to identify improvement opportunities.WEAVEonline is a management system for program assessment and planning. Specific studentlearning outcomes are identified or revised at the beginning of each
learnable skill, an orientation of practice, and an aspectof professional being. Elements of each construct of empathy are integrated into each of the threedimensions of the model for empathy in engineering (MEE). Within the dimension of empathy as a learnable engineering skill, there are fivecomprising components: affective sharing, self and other awareness, perspective taking, emotionregulation, and mode switching. Affective sharing relates to the cognitive process by which oneshares the emotions of another; self and other awareness moves one from the cognitive processto the affective by experiencing another’s emotions; perspective taking relates to the behavior ofadopting another’s point of view. The component of emotion regulation, has
the assessment process as a means ofaddressing academic integrity, along with communicating clearly during courses what theimplications of cheating and plagiarism are on the cheating process, thus that ultimately thestudent is the loser.BYOP has been successfully implemented in both in person and online courses (see Table 1) andthere is no element of the methodology that requires being in person to achieve quality results. Ido not have significant experience in online courses that do not have regular weekly “class”sessions so I cannot comment intelligently on how to implement BYOP in an asynchronousformat. The connection between instructor and student is vital for the success of this approach.For future work, the first thing to consider is
Biomedical Engineering and Electrical Engineering, respectively.Miss Xi Zhan, Department of Educational Studies, The Ohio State University Xi Zhan is a doctoral student of Educational Administration at The Ohio State University. She holds an M. A. in Educational Administration from The Ohio State University, U. S. A. and a B. A. in Teaching Chinese as a Second Language from Southwest University, China. She has experience in teaching Chinese language in a vocational school in Thailand and teaching children who have intellectual disability and challenging behavior in China and U.S.A. She also assisted with an instructional design of multimedia case studies on technology integration for teachers and school leaders during her
Paper ID #8617Forming a Coalition to Decrease Freshout Rampup Time in the EngineeringWorkplace: A Business Plan for an Academic, Industry, and GovernmentPartnershipDr. Steven W Villachica, Boise State University Steve Villachica is an Associate Professor of Instructional and Performance Technology (IPT) at Boise State University. His research interests focus on leveraging expertise in the workplace in ways that meet organizational missions and business goals. He is currently working on an NSF grant to increase engineer- ing faculty adoption of evidence-based instructional practices [NSF #1037808: Engineering Education
, abstracts, and technical reports. Ted received his B.S. from the University of Wisconsin – Madison and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Purdue University, all in mechanical engineering with an emphasis in the thermal sciencesDr. Carolyn J. Lawrence-Dill, Iowa State University Carolyn Lawrence-Dill has devoted the last 20 years to developing computational systems/solutions that support the plant research community. Her work enables the use of existing and emerging knowledge to establish common standards and methods for data collection, integration, and sharing. Such efforts help to eliminate redundancy, improve the efficiency of current and future projects, and increase the availability of data and data analysis tools for plant
Paper ID #35106STEM Enhancement in Earth Science (SEES): A reimagining of an onsiteNASA/TSGC/UTCSR high school internship programMrs. Celena Miller, University of Texas Austin - Center for Space Research Celena Miller is the Senior Outreach Program Coordinator for the Texas Space Grant Consortium in Austin, Texas. She has worked for over twelve years in education. During that time, Celena has worked in the Texas public school system, promoting earth and space education to students, teachers and the community through curriculum, professional development, science nights, and career exploration. Celena has been recognized for
measured the perception of STEM. The following study is structured so that an overviewof the activity is provided, followed by the results from the Motivated Student LearningQuestionnaire, the results from the STEM Semantics Survey and a conclusion of findings withrecommendations for future research.Engineering Afterschool Activity.As part of the engineering afterschool activity, middle school age participants designed andconstructed a structure using K’NEX Education Real Bridge Building sets. Four-sets of theK’NEX building pieces were combined, providing participants with more than 9000 buildingparts to use for this activity. Each step of this activity played an integral role in the overallunderstanding of the engineering design and construction
AC 2012-4615: MAPPING THE BEHAVIORS, MOTIVES, AND PROFES-SIONAL COMPETENCIES OF ENTREPRENEURIALLY MINDED EN-GINEERS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGA-TIONDr. David Pistrui, Acumen Dynamics, LLC David Pistrui serves as the Managing Director of Acumen Dynamics, LLC, a strategy-based education, training, and research firm that focuses on practical knowledge and skills that help organizations align vi- sion and strategy with execution and performance. Working as an independent scholar, thought leader and advisor to corporations, family foundations, academic institutions, government agencies and global think tanks, Pistrui’s activities include strategy development, business succession, assessment modeling, tech
learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410- 8415. https://www. pnas. org/content/pnas/111/23/8410. full. pdf[19] Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Petterson, M., Gere, A., & Shultz, G. (2021). “Praxis of writing-to-learn: A model for the design and propagation of writing-to-learn in STEM.” Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1548-1555.[20] Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). “An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing.” Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9-30.[21] Sampson, V., & Walker, J. P. (2012). “Argument-driven inquiry
Paper ID #33702An Evaluation of a University-Level, High School Course Taught to FosterInterest in Civil Engineering (Evaluation)Ms. Morgan R. Broberg, Purdue University Morgan Broberg is a current Ph.D. student in Civil Engineering at Purdue University. Her research inter- ests include modeling, analysis, and design of steel-concrete composite systems and effective teaching in civil engineering.Susan Khalifah P.E., S.E., Purdue University Ms. Susan Khalifah is the Director of Student Experience in the Lyles School of Civil Engineering at Purdue University. Additionally, she is an instructor for CE 479 (Design of Building
on: • Topical overview • Audience members • Positives of the talk • Elements to work on for future talks • Outcomes of the talk • Next steps for personal presentation improvementThis structure allows students to not only perform a careful analysis of their ownperformance, but also to compare and contrast others’ experiences with audience andpurpose during the presentations of their peers, all of whom present technical topics in avariety of engineering organizations. In this way, students are able to norm theirexperience with benchmark professionals in their own and other industries. In studentself-reports, this norming process plays an integral role in helping them feel morecomfortable with presenting and more confident in