increase in student learning. Wang2 reportspositive student feedback and outlines the controversy regarding the use of schematicsversus the use of a hardware description language (HDL), expressing a concern thatemphasis on an HDL may distract students from the fundamentals of digital logic systems.Wang suggests an integrated approach incorporating breadboard debugging techniques,design and simulation with CAD tools, and verification on a development board. Wangsuggests that an HDL be taught later at the junior level. Radu et al1 emphasizes schematics,introducing an HDL in the context of code fragments and writing test benches. We alsoused an integrated approach, based on schematic capture.Radu, et al1 emphasize the use of development boards and
supplemental materials for transient topicalinterest to seeing digital tools as a significant catalyst for change in teaching and learning. Fromthe many challenges facing K-12 teachers, we isolated two critical hurdles that must besurmounted in order to improve middle school STEM instruction:≠ The ever-widening gap between the production of quality, web-delivered instructional new media and most middle school teachers’ ability to meaningful integrate these advancements into their curriculum and their classroom activities; and≠ The demands placed on teachers by new reform guidelines -- both state and national -- that call for less dependence on textbooks, lectures, and de-contextualized lab work and more emphasis on inquiry-based
understanding of ergonomic andsafety applications. To prepare industrial and manufacturing engineering students for today’swork environment, courses should be geared toward developing a knowledge base to expandcareer opportunities and allow students the ability to move forward simultaneously withindustrial advancements. The goal of this project was to research and develop an Ergonomic andSafety curriculum together with the definition of a standard curriculum design process that willallow for ease in future implementation of programs independent of the area of study. The basisof the defined procedure is a survey of involved parties. The outcome of the project included acourse-specific Ergonomic and Safety curriculum. The proposed four-course/one-project
ElectronicAccess (Experience)AbstractThis paper will focus and comment on the operational variability introduced to a long-standing collaborative aimed at an underrepresented population of Native Americanengineering students in North Dakota. The focus of this paper will center on a decade-long distance-based education collaborative’s resilience to the rapid change incurred bythe adjustments forced upon education by the 2020 pandemic. The most notable of thechanges was the shift from having the majority of the student curriculum taught face toface (outside of the distance-based pre-engineering program) to suddenly the entirety ofthe learning experience moved online. For this particular program, this included the two-week Summer Camp experience at North
construction of women’s identities and roles in past and present societies, and most recently, equity issues surrounding gender and underrepresented populations in engineering education. She can be contacted at cynthia.e.foor-1@ou.edu.Dr. Susan E. Walden, University of Oklahoma Research Institute for STEM Education, Director Sooner Engineering Education Center, Associate Direc- tor for Education and Outreach University of OklahomaDr. Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at the University of Oklahoma. She holds a doctorate and master’s in computer science, and a master’s in applied mathematics from Michigan State University. She also holds a B.A
Page 23.919.3communication learning experiences for undergraduate engineering and information sciencestudents. These educational resources and case studies include: 1) a multi-robot design challengefor a regional robot contest, 2) multi-robot classroom activities for an introductory roboticsmodule and a computer science course, and 3) a programmable wireless controller for multi-robot communication. The capabilities of these development tools also support multi-robotsolutions across several commonly-used mobile robot platforms, including VEX, Lego NXT, andArduino systems. The overall objective is to provide educators with successful tools andresources to integrate multi-robot communication and technology into the curriculum andoutreach
the first semester of engineering physics.Among those six, one student achieved an A in engineering physics, one a C, and the other fourreceived grades of D or below—so physics achievement appears to be a major barrier for studentsuccess in the Engineering GoldShirt Program.The results from the first group of students who passed preparatory physics and then performedpoorly in engineering physics showed that their preparation was clearly insufficient. Thus, weredesigned the preparatory physics curriculum for the second cohort by consulting with twoprofessors from the physics department, reviewing course content with the GoldShirt team,obtaining feedback from students and integrating more learning technology into the curriculum.The changes
Paper ID #34200Work in Progress: Remote Instruction of Circuitry in a MultidisciplinaryIntroduction to Engineering First-year CourseDr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Dr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nicholas Hawkins is an Assistant Professor in the
serves as a basefor learning how to build a circuit where errors in creating the circuit can be easily corrected. Page 26.605.5 F E C B A DFigure 1: An LED Circuit with (A) LM555 Timer Integrated Circuit, (B) 1.8MΩ Resistor,(C) 270Ω Resistor, (D) 22KΩ Resistor, (E) LED, (F) 10nF capacitor, with wires connectingthe electrical components on the breadboard.The 555 IC was placed between the bottom and top half of the breadboard, and the capacitor wasplaced towards the top of
reform needed thatconnects creativity to engineering in an atmosphere that welcomes diversity. Introduction Engineering is a creative and diverse profession integral to the sustainability of a rapidlyevolving economy, and a field where the diversity and perspectives of women engineers isessential [1], [2], [3]. This study examined the creative self-efficacy (CSE) of undergraduatewomen engineering majors, their beliefs about creativity, how they describe themselves ascreative, and their lived experiences that influenced them to choose engineering as a career path.ABET [4] highlighted the significant connection of creativity in engineering curriculum to theengineering profession. The creative
gap between astandard engineering curriculum and the engineering workforce, however recent researchindicates that there are still significant gaps in the skills required to be a successful professionalengineer and what skills are gained through the undergraduate curriculum and co-ops12. Severalof the skills not addressed by co-ops are – applying interpersonal skills in managing people gaining leadership skills managing the planning and organization of project tasks conveying ideas o verbally o in formal presentations.Thoughtful integration of the Collegiate Design Series can provide an opportunity for women todevelop these skills critical to success in engineering academically and
reference anoutline for the introduction of UGS – UNIGRAPHICS® into a mechanical engineeringundergraduate curriculum was discussed. Students can achieve a good level of proficiency with atype of software package that they will likely use when working in an industrial environment. CAE tools also provide an excellent teaching aid, which can be used to illustrate theory andconcepts by means of computer simulations. This issue has also been discussed in previousworks 2, 3 , where simulation tools are shown to allow for an improved understanding of conceptspresented in design courses. In this work a simulation project is discussed, which can improve student understanding ofundergraduate solid mechanics, kinematics / dynamics and mechanism design
programmers. Studies in both K-12 and post-secondaryprogramming education hint that an inclusive and supportive learning environment canimprove student motivation and confidence more than any particular pedagogicaltechnique of tool (10, 18, 20). Studies in motivation and self-determination support thevalue of autonomy, competence and relatedness as integral to academic success (7).Class Environment and Student PopulationOur study was conducted over six academic semesters of an introductory computer-programming course at a large Midwestern university from the spring 2011 semesterthrough fall 2013. The class is a required course for majors in the department, and is theonly required programming course they will take. Second-year students are the
in the UCSB Molecular-Beam Epitaxy Lab where he focused his research on investigating the ALD process on III-V semiconductors and the epitaxial growth of ohmic contacts on III-V materials. He returned to the University of Minnesota in 2010 as a research scientist investigating techniques to tailor the surface chemistry of SiNCs for use in light emitting diodes and solar cell applications. More recent work has focused on the growth and integration of CIGS and CIAGS homojunction and heterojunction solar cells. In the fall of 2013, he joined the Department of Physics and Optical Engineering at the Rose-Hulman In- stitute of Technology as an Assistant Professor. Current research efforts are focused on the development
received NAE’s Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder DANIEL W. KNIGHT is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from the Louisiana State University, and an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of retention, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education.Diane Sieber, University of Colorado, Boulder DIANE SIEBER is an
(LMS), which are the learning centre inUniversities (Figure 2). Figure 2. Lab services through a LMSThanks for this new scenario, students will have the opportunity to use the modules alreadyavailable in these platforms, such as content manager, communication methods (chat rooms,forums and e-mail), evaluation questionnaires (IMS QTI), etc. Otherwise, if each Universitydevelops its own labs and its own modules associated to them, it is likely to re-invent the wheelevery time. With this architecture, each service (lab) will offer a common interface that willallow easy integration in an LMSs.Internally, the architecture consists of different layers, which will allow the student tocommunicate with a hardware device
11.527.11faculty can take advantage of Portfolio integration and sharing to provide better advising. Futureversions that expand the archival capabilities and permit tailored assessment tools will greatlyenhance the department’s ability to assess curriculum. Taken all together, electronic portfolioshave the potential to revolutionize the way we handle our personal, educational, and professionalinformation in ways previously not possible.Bibliography1. "Portfolio" Def. 1a,b. Oxford English Dictionary. Online Ed. 19892. Black, P. and D. William, Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment, in Phi Delta Kappan International. 1998.3. Electronic Portfolio Consortium, , last accessed 1/15/064. Barrett, H.C., Electronic Portfolios, in
, e.g., capstone projects.However, students would benefit from, and are interested in, integrating holistic educationthroughout the curriculum. Moreover, university engineering programs that are accredited byABET are required to meet these objectives. In their recent redevelopment of the student outcomescriteria, ABET [1], [2] identified seven primary outcomes for students. Of these, items two andfour focus on holistic engineering, emphasizing global cultural, social, environmental, andeconomic factors.To address all of the critical aspects of engineering projects, students must successfully analyze therequirements, synthesize information, and evaluate several design options for a given problem.These cognitive skills match well with Bloom’s
available for further work. An example of a project may be found in a 6-piece tetrahedron that was first designed by students in the CIM course in the Summer of 1995.Over the coming year the tetrahedron will be subjected to the 9-step process that has beenoutlined in this section and will be terminated with the robotic assembly of the parts. Students from all three areas benefit by being able to relate the nuances of course andlaboratory material being covered in their individual areas to the overall manufacturing processand to the objectives of the overall curriculum. The Manufacturing Systems Engineeringcurriculum benefits from the addition of the SLA equipment in two ways. The RP & Mlaboratory enhances the level of sophistication of
context motivatesstudents and engages them to a point where they become active participants in the learningprocess. An effective approach to discovering what will motivate and engage students is to focuson student’s interests, goals, aspirations, and values. With a better understanding of students it ispossible to develop an effective learning environment or activity that is embraced by students,leads them to a deeper level of learning, and entices them to become lifelong learners. Thisapproach was the starting point in the development of an online artificial intelligence or“chatbot” named Anne G. Neering (EnGiNeering). The chatbot is a computer program deliveredon course websites that serves as a text based conversational agent. The purpose of
from the University of Minnesota’s Electrical Engineering program. He works for Xcel Energy in their Strategic Technology Department, investigating renewable energy generation, storage and transmission technologies for Xcel. He was involved in the deployment of Xcel Energy’s “Smart Grid City” project in Boulder, Colorado. As an EE student, he helped develop curriculum and projects, as well as source materials required for BRIDGE’s outreach work. Mr. Sonnenburg became a member of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) student organization, and continues to volunteer time with the student organizations.Munira Masoud, Xcel Energy Munira Masoud is currently
. Motivation: Develop increased interest in the manufacturing area and its underlying sciences. 5. Integration: Identify the relationships between the components of manufacturing, both along the life cycle of a product and among the functions of a manufacturing system. 6. Diversity: Interact in the classroom with groups composed of various skills, background, and interests. If the goal is to reach a majority of the students, motivate them to learn and understand, and convey thecourse material effectively, then the course or curriculum should be designed to address the objectivesmentioned above.4. DESIGN OF AN INNOVATIVE COURSE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS
AC 2009-676: COMPUTING ACROSS CURRICULA: THE VIEW OF INDUSTRYLEADERSEric Wiebe, North Carolina State University Dr. Wiebe is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education at NC State University. He received his Doctorate in Psychology and has focused much of his research on issues related to the use of technology in the instructional environment. He has also worked on the integration of scientific visualization concepts and techniques into both secondary and post-secondary education. Dr. Wiebe has been a member of ASEE since 1989.Chia-Lin Ho, North Carolina State UniversityDianne Raubenheimer, North Carolina State UniversityLisa Bullard, North
scope of an engineering curriculum? (3) What are the characteristics of a middleware framework that will allow the inclusion of real-world data sources within the classroom?2. Sensor data in engineering learning environmentsThe major challenge of incorporating large-scale real-world sensor data into engineering learningenvironment is the infrastructure, knowledge, and equipment prerequisite for utilizing sensordata. Typically speaking, engineering students must at first have fundamental knowledge ofsensors and data acquisition in order to understand what the sensors measure, how sensorstransmit data, and how to acquire the sensor data prior to learning how to represent the data andconduct statistical analyses using the
University for five years. In 2010, she was hired as an external evaluator to conduct research on community/university partnership relations at the University of Cincinnati. She has received several awards including the: 1) UW College of Education outstanding research award (2015); 2) UW College of Education outstanding service award (2016); and 3) Honored College of Education Faculty at Fall Convocation (2017). Her research interests include partnerships within pre-service and in-service teachers in STEM Education with a focus on engineering education and integrated STEM. An active mem- ber of AERA, ASEE, ASTE, NARST, and NSTA, Dr. Burrows has presented at numerous conferences, published in ranked journals (e.g. Journal
of education characterized by: physical separation of learners from theteacher, with limited access to the teacher and other learners; an organized instructional program;technological media, and two-way communication” 1. Many universities are modifying existingon-campus courses that use the Internet as an instructional delivery tool. More and moreuniversities are offering courses (undergraduate and graduate, alike) that students can takecompletely via the Internet with no live, face-to-face component.Is a completely distant approach appropriate for a graduate degree in technology? We assert thatin order to maintain the quality and integrity of a Master of Science degree in technology, itcannot be based completely on distance education; it
Society for Engineering Education, 2011 engineering education include spatial visualization, the use of learning management systems for large- sample educational research studies, curriculum development, and fulfilling the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering environment through the use of collaborative learning, problem- based learning (including design-build projects), classroom interaction, and multiple representations of concepts. He has his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from The Ohio State University and he earlier re- ceived an M.S. degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a specialization in Operations Research also from The Ohio State University. Address: Engineering
Paper ID #12018A Blocks-based Visual Environment to Teach Robot-Programming to K-12StudentsMr. Raghavender Goud yadagiri, NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering Raghavender Goud Yadagiri received his B.Tech degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from JNTUH, Hyderabad, India, in 2011. After obtaining his B.Tech he worked as an Embedded As- sociate at Thinklabs Technosolutions Pvt. Ltd for two years. He is currently pursuing a M.S degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering with specialization in Computer Engineering. Raghavender con- ducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory at NYU Polytechnic
mandatory tutoring was Computer Page 25.748.4Programming I. The tutoring was integrated into the course syllabus and students not 3 performing well in the initial assignments were referred to a tutor and some hours ofsupplemental instruction were enforced. The success of this strategy was remarkable and othernew courses with large dropouts were targeted for mandatory supplemental instruction. TheEngineering Physics I, Engineering Physics II classes along with Computer Programming I classwere selected on the Fall 2010.III.c Curriculum and
Table 1). All courses included an onlinecourse interface delivered though a common course management system, Blackboard Learn.Online courses used the Blackboard Learn interface as the exclusive delivery system for thecourse, while face-to-face and hybrid courses used the interface to supplement traditional in-person course delivery and management practices.Table 1 Courses Used for Survey Administration Course Level Format Information Systems Applications (2334) Lower division (sophomore) Face-to-Face Integrated Information Systems (3355) Upper division (junior) Face-to-Face Visual Merchandising (3304) Upper