mentoring, and community building 3. Participation by students in research-focused activities such as research seminars and undergraduate experiences 4. Participation by students in career and professional development activities Results: 1. Feel a stronger sense of community on the campus over the non-scholar affiliated Colleagues 2. Women in the S-STEM have an easier time integrating academically as well as transfer students in the program5) ECE Scholars [21]University: Seattle UniversityDiscipline: Electrical and Computer EngineeringNumber of students: 32 students, 5 yearsInitiatives:1. Peer tutoring, informal study partners and industry mentorship program2. Professional development seminars and
fellow in Immunology at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn. She sub- sequently worked for four years as a Senior Research Specialist at the Vanderbilt Cell Imaging Re- source (CISR) microscope facility before joining the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineer- ing (IBBME), University of Toronto as an Assistant Professor. She is currently the Associate Director, Undergraduate Programs at IBBME as well as the Associate Chair, Years 1 & 2 in the Division of Engi- neering Science. She serves as faculty supervisor for the Discovery initiative and is program co-director for the Igniting Youth Curiosity in STEM Program. Dawn was a 2017 Early Career Teaching Award recipient at U of T and was named the 2016
classrooms throughout the Boise area and serving as a career mentor to high school students interested in pursuing engineering as a career. Taylor’s role at CSATS focused on interfacing with science and engineering research faculty to develop and implement K-12 teacher professional development. Currently, Taylor is pursuing a doctorate degree in Materials Science and Engineering and Penn State University.Dr. Matthew Johnson, Matt is an Assistant Professor with the Center for Science and the Schools in the College of Education at Penn State University. His research interests focus on how teachers learn about epistemic practices of en- gineers through in-service teacher professional development programs and how they provide
National Science Foun- dation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of interdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Ca- reer Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David B. Knight is an Associate Professor and
applying principles of clean energy to a real-life situation for college credit ● Increase student content knowledge in STEM, in general, and clean energy, in particular ● Improve students’ attitudes toward interest in, and confidence with STEM and Clean Energy content, as well as future careers in these sectors ● Increase students’ preparedness for college expectationsThis program was made possible via three annual grants from the Massachusetts Clean EnergyCenter, in-kind contributions from the educational institutions, and the industry partners, whovolunteered company time and resources. The program design was based on a review of existingresearch which led to the development of a logic model--a graphic illustration of the theory
institutions to enhance their experience indesign and/or leadership roles, and thus attract employers of interest [6], [10].Other students engage in undergraduate research opportunities as an alternative venue given itsimmediate and long-term benefits [5], [6], [12], [17], [25], [27], [32]. Research efforts indicatethat undergraduate students participating in research obtain greater confidence in research andprofessional abilities, attest awareness of a graduate school environment, gain significant growthin structuring and conducting research project, and pursue STEM careers and Ph.D. studies post-graduation [3], [25], [26], [27].Nonetheless, procuring internship positions, joining research groups, or being accepted intograduate school, highly depends
bring students from across the country to auniversity campus for the summer. These students learn how to conduct real research in theirdiscipline by actually doing it, under the supervision of a faculty mentor. Many students whoparticipate in REU programs remember these programs long after the program is complete. TheREU experience of working with a faculty mentor on bona fide research is undoubtedly key tothe educational and career planning benefits that students enjoy. The best REU experiencestypically don’t happen by accident. They must be deliberately planned. Despite the importanceof this component of REU programs, minimal literature related REU social programs exists.This paper considers what makes a strong REU social program.1
who complete a degree and are career-ready to enter engineering and computer science (ECS). The SE-SC framework has guided theimplementation of select interventions/practices that meet the criteria of being able to besustained, have broad impact, are based on evidence supporting their effectiveness in STEMlearning environments, and that directly engage and support students as they traverse theacademic pathway leading to degree completion in Engineering and Computer Science (ECS).This research project aligns with the need to boost the nation’s economic growth andcompetitiveness by not only expanding emphasis on STEM education but systemically addressingways to expand the impact on the education of ‘Hispanic’ students, thus contributing to
NSPE that has been certifyingengineering technicians since 1961 and engineering technologists (by education andexperience) since 1980, may be important for career advancement. This paper examinesthe considerations in developing exams that can meet such needs. Other topics addressedinclude: the need for different exams at the 2- and 4-yr levels, an exam format thatincludes separate breadth and depth components, the types of exam-result data that aremost helpful for outcomes assessment, development of the question items, and studentmotivation.Introduction: Four-year engineering programs in the U.S.A. often use the Fundamentals ofEngineering (FE) exam as a direct measure of outcomes for EAC of ABETaccreditation, but such use of the FE exam is
enhance theirstudies and get a head start in their careers; officials with government entities as they face criticalengineering issues and determine how best to solve them; and educators, who can truly make adifference in engineering education reform.The need to educate the engineer of the 21st century more strategically is essential to theendurance of the profession. Developing a proposed education program through modifications ofsuccessful programs to meet the needs of the 21st-century engineer will enable engineers toacquire the skills necessary to succeed in the world economy and to grow within the domesticengineering and construction market in a more transparent manner. This paper is based on theauthor’s book The 21st Century: A Proposal for
2006-2407: IMPROVING A NACME CLASS WITH AN EMPHASIS ON DETAILEDTIME MANAGEMENTMary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University MARY R. ANDERSON-ROWLAND is an Associate Professor in Industrial Engineering. She was the Associate Dean of Student Affairs in the Fulton School of Engineering at ASU from 1993-2004. She was named the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005 and selected for the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by the American Association of Engineering Societies. In 2002 the Society of Women Engineers named her the Distinguished Engineering Educator. She has received many other awards for her support of students. An ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on the career
program in Computer Science,and AACSB accredited programs in Business Administration and in Accounting.Since 1976, UE has offered a BS degree in Engineering Management which is a combination offundamental engineering courses and fundamental business courses, together with electives. Thedegree was not designed to be ABET accredited and has never been submitted for evaluation.There were two “ideal” candidates for the degree; students who sought a career at the interfacebetween engineering and business (e.g. technical sales, construction management) and studentswho wanted a second degree to compliment a degree in engineering or in business.In recent years, faculty interest in the program has been lukewarm and student demand has beenvery light. Often
vary. Out of this set, a notable population of young professors and instructors are and will befresh postdoctoral research associates, as well as fresh doctoral graduates.This particular section of the teaching and instructor community is likely to have the longestteaching careers, but at the onset of their careers they will have the least teaching and hands-onexperience. As fresh instructors, they will have limited experience with new pedagogicaltechniques which will empower learning in a hybrid brick-click classroom.3-4 Recently, in theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Arkansas, an experiment wasconducted, titled Teaching Scholars program, to develop a conscious approach for training apostdoctoral research associate
STEM fields. (3) (6)These programs are often characterized by the rigorous on campus academic training to preparematriculating students for freshman courses and social activities to help familiarize students with“college-life.” Reports on current summer bridge programs suggest that students who participatein such programs are more apt to successfully complete their first and second year of theiracademic careers when compared to their peers who did not participate in such programs. (4) (6)The National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Louis Stokes Alliances for MinorityParticipation (LSAMP) Program provides support for a number of universities as they implementprograms to increase the number of URM students successfully completing STEM
development onmathematics and science is targeted to attract females to engineering8, lack of knowledge onengineering disciplines and associated career opportunities has also been observed to partiallyexplain female underrepresentation in engineering fields9. The current trend in apparent femalestudent shortage of STEM interest can partially be mitigated by utilizing outreach activities inearly stages.High school students are the major recipients10 of most K-12 engineering outreach camps that areproven effective to attract as well as to expose students to science and engineeringdisciplines11,12. A number of STEM camps focused on specific student clusters such as middleschool female students in a day camp13, grade-level14 or specific minority
. National Science Foundation-sponsored SUCCEED Coalition. He has also been active in promoting qualitative research methods in engineering education through workshops presented as part of an NSF project. He has received several awards for his work, including the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers, the Ralph Teetor Education Award from the Society of Automotive Engineers, being named a University of Florida Distinguished Teaching Scholar, and being named the University of Florida Teacher of the Year for 2003-04. He is a member of the American Society for Engi- neering Education and the American Educational Research Association and is currently Editor-in-Chief of Polymer Reviews.Dr. Mirka
been Efforts in this area areAttitudes toward in program to see what prepared along the just beginningMechanical the attitudes are but lines of work done atEngineering also if they are the University ofSurvey predictive of Pittsburgh12 persistenceTable 2: Overview of the Evaluation Strategy as of December 2011Methods of Assessment Page 25.852.6The students were asked to develop a Power Point assignment assuming they were presenting toa group of 9th and 10th graders at their high schools’ career day. They were to describe (notproselytize) Mechanical
current issues, excite student interest in finding solutions to challenges that face theirgeneration, and engage students in learning the required skills to solve these problems.Never has it been more important to engage more students in science and engineering than intoday’s society where the demand for engineers is expected to significantly exceed the supply inthe near future1. Concurrent to this growing deficit in technically-trained workers is the rapiddiversification of our population. In order to fill the gap, people from diverse backgrounds willneed to be motivated to choose engineering as a career choice2. Extensive research shows thatone way to engage students is to connect problems to societal impact by integrating the “humanelement
about running amusic recording business and the technical aspects of music recording. In this course the projectis focused on recording bands and then sweetening the original tracks into finished CD tracks.There are other courses planned that would appeal to a wider student demographic.One goal of the program is to tailor courses to the students and their interests, not tailor thestudents to the courses. Additionally, we want to show students that their interests can be turnedto an academic path and also future careers, albeit not necessarily as lead guitarists in deathmetal bands! Often as academicians, whether at the secondary or post-secondary level, weinherently push career paths that can be labeled traditional, as opposed to the myriad of
Professional Development Buffet: From Banquet to À La CarteAbstractBoth ABET and industrial advisory boards encourage engineering departments to includeinstruction in “soft skills” that reflect the broader professional qualities necessary for studentsuccess in their careers. These include oral and written communication, ethics and professionalbehavior, resume and interviewing skills, electronic and professional etiquette, informationliteracy, and broader knowledge of engineering solutions in a global or societal context. Whilesome departments dedicate one or more instructional credits to accomplish this objective, othersmay integrate such topics into existing core courses. This paper presents a one-credit model fora junior-level course in professional
alternative energy sources. And that was good as far as itwent; my sense was that it did not go far enough.FIGs at UW-MadisonIn Fall of 2007 I had the opportunity to conduct one of only two FIG (Freshman Interest Group)courses in the College of Engineering. This led me to a review of ideas for first year curriculumreform. Most first year programs have as a primary aim the improved retention and academicsupport for beginning students; an emphasis on under-represented students is usually important.In addition, such programs strive to move freshmen more quickly into a mature and productiveunderstanding of their career choices and their implications; essential skills can be emphasized insuch programs to speed up the students’ development of engineering
375 academically prepared STEM majors from seven different collegesand universities, Seymour and Hewett (1997) indicated that the most commonly reported factorsamong all students entering as a STEM major were: intrinsic interest in STEM; persuasion orinfluence of individuals such as parents, teachers, and mentors; desire for a high paying job orprestigious career; strong high school performance in math and science; family tradition; andrecruitment. Closely related to self-motivation in STEM was a social commitment to specificcareer goals (Seymour, 1997). A 2000 report by the National Center for Educational Statisticsfound the racial gap that exists in STEM program enrollment between white or Asian and
Paper ID #10783Building A Healthy Online Student Community Through Education Environ-ment DesignMrs. Karen L. Bollenbach, The University of Virginia Mrs. Bollenbach is a student at the University of Virginia and anticipates receiving her B.S. in engineering science in May 2014. She graduated from Virginia Tech with a B.S. in health education in 1993 before beginning a career in the insurance industry. In 2009, she began studying drafting and engineering at Tide- water Community College. As a 2013 Virginia Microelectronics Consortium (VMEC) summer scholar, she conducted thermoelectric thin film research at the Applied
areas, the discovery of newapplications of that knowledge, and the creation of new markets in which to apply theseapplications have caused a “significant shift in employment opportunities” (Creed, Suuberg, &Crawford, 2002, p. 185) for which many current engineering graduates are not adequatelyprepared.As a result, the professional outlook and career path for an engineer looks very different than itdid in the past. In an article about de-industrialization and its effect on engineering education,Wei (2005) remarked that, “research and development in manufacturing companies used to beviewed as a glamorous career for the brightest engineering graduates, but the number ofattractive job offers has been declining for many years” (p.130). Today
students have commented onhow these courses have broadened their perspectives, made them more versatile and enhancedtheir career progression. Since most successful entrepreneurs have a holistic systems approach tonew ventures, a unique “Systems Engineering Entrepreneurship” program is being pioneered toaugment the Engineering Management program at Florida Tech. Page 10.544.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationIntroductionOver the past seven years, Florida Tech’s Engineering Management program has
Challenges and Opportunities in Ethics Education in Biomedical Engineering Paul J. Benkeser1, Roberta M. Berry2 and Jonathan D. Olinger3 Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University1 / Schools of Public Policy2 and Aerospace Engineering3, Georgia Institute of TechnologyI. IntroductionThe challenges of interdisciplinarity—integrating bioscience, biomedical, and bioengineeringknowledge and skills—are well known to biomedical engineering (BME) educators.Undergraduate BME engineering educators face the additional challenge of preparing theirstudents for diverse professional career paths in a
with making science more relevant to studentsTable 5. Gains towards Project Goals and ObjectivesGoals and Objectives Gains ThemesProduce scientists, engineers, science -Valuable teaching experienceand math educators -Professional development -Personal developmentFellows realize connections between -Networking opportunitieseducation, research and professional -Value goal setting in professional developmentexperience and relate to career success -Relate teaching to career options -Realize connections between learning and practice
responsibility and deference to authority, and too many sidelinecommitments such as girlfriends/boyfriends and part-time jobs (to pay for their expensiveautomobiles and insurance) all increase the challenge of succeeding in college. Professorsare aware of the needs for rigor and excellence in the classroom and sensitivity to theabove factors that compromise such. Experienced faculty have already come toequilibrium in balancing standards versus sensitivity, and rigor versus rapport. However,NEE often have difficulty in establishing equilibrium and may start their teaching career aseither too easy and casual, or too hard and hard-line. Some will go through a series ofunder damped oscillations (flip-flops) between these extremes before reachingequilibrium
Communities (http://ceae.colorado.edu/EDC/). The goal ofthe program is to educate globally responsible students who can offer sustainable andappropriate technology solutions to the endemic problems faced by developingcommunities worldwide. The program is designed to serve as a blueprint for theeducation of engineers of the 21st century who are called to play a critical role incontributing to peace and security in an increasingly challenged world.The training that we will provide students will lead to a Bachelor of Science inEngineering, with a minor in Humanitarian Engineering. We anticipate that, even ifgraduates with these credentials do not spend their whole careers in humanitarianengineering endeavors, their multi-faceted expertise and
AC 2011-2141: GOLDSHIRT TRANSITIONAL PROGRAM: FIRST-YEARRESULTS AND LESSONS LEARNED ON CREATING ENGINEERINGCAPACITY AND EXPANDING DIVERSITYTanya D Ennis, University of Colorado Boulder TANYA D. ENNIS is the current Engineering GoldShirt Program Director at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She received her M.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Southern University in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Her career in the telecommunications industry included positions in software and systems engineering and technical project management. Tanya most recently taught mathematics at the Denver