, learningobjectives and expected outcomes for the four GC DELI units adapted for high school studentscan be found in Appendix A, B, C and D.1.1 GC DELI for High SchoolIntroduction to Engineering in High School (ENGR 102 HS) is an introductory engineeringcourse offered by the University of Arizona, College of Engineering (COE). Taught by highschool teachers to high school students, the dual credit program has been in operation for sevenyears. Like the on-campus version of the course, ENGR102 HS introduces students toengineering design principles and practices as well as to emerging and current challenges withinthe field. Winner of the 2014 ASEE “Best Practices in K-12 and University Partnerships” award,ENGR 102 HS is currently offered in 37 high schools
Paper ID #13269A Scalable Instructional Method to Introduce First-Year Engineering Stu-dents to Design and Manufacturing Processes by Coupling 3D Printing withCAD AssignmentsMr. Ethan Reggia, University of Maryland, College Park Ethan Reggia is a Junior undergraduate mechanical engineer at the University of Maryland, College park. He works for Engineering Information Technology in the A. James Clark School of Engineering as a 3D printing technician.Mr. Kevin M Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park Kevin Calabro is Keystone Instructor and Associate Director in the Clark School of Engineering at the University of
defined as level below the B-level. The designrationale of every KPI is area-specific and requires deep understanding of the technicalities ofthe measured area. Due to the wide coverage of the framework, we had to deal with manydifferent areas related to higher education. The following strategies are adopted to insure theadequacy and verify the developed rubrics: Interviews with experts External reviews Comparisons with existing rubrics Developing a rich and standardized set of rubric descriptorsThe measurements could be interpreted per criteria, KPM, KPI, and/or combined forms. The 5-point rubric scale of KPIs – Nascent, Beginning, Developing, Competent, and Accomplished ismapped onto constant values (6.25, 12.5, 37.5, 62.5
-Based Introduction to Engineering Course on Improving Retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(1):79-85. 7. Knight DW; Carlson LE; Sullivan JF (2003). Staying in Engineering: Impact of a Hands-On, Team-Based, First-Year Projects Course on Student Retention. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 8. Knight DW; Carlson LE; Sullivan JE (2007). Improving Engineering Student Retention through Hands-on, Team Based, First-Year Design Projects. 31st International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI. 9. Marra RM; Palmer B; Litzinger TA (2000). The Effects of a First-Year Engineering Design Course on Student Intellectual Development as
terminology was a concern of theparticipants. Participant A: “..sometimes some of the students even have a hard time understanding bending moment and torque. They are taking Physics at the same time and the terminology doesn’t always match. The Physics’ instructor uses torque a lot. I don’t know if anyone else..” Participant B: “Yeah my students have come with the same thing. They use torque and moment is a new term for them. So they want to know what the difference between moment and torque is.” Page 26.980.6In Physics (often taken before or concurrently with Mechanics of Materials), students are taughtthat
thedevelopment of international research experiences for undergraduates students that mirror theREUs that have traditionally been offered at domestic universities.2.2 Domestic and international REUsThe National Council on Undergraduate Research defines undergraduate research as “Aninquiry or investigation conducted by an undergraduate student that makes an originalintellectual or creative contribution to the discipline” and identifies six key benefits of theseexperiences: a) enhancing student learning through mentoring relationships with faculty, b)increasing retention, c) increasing enrollment in graduate education and providing effectivecareer preparation, d) developing critical thinking creativity, problem solving, and intellectualindependence, e
could be the “hierarchy of instructors’intended learning goals for using modeling and simulation”28. This conceptual frameworksuggest eight qualitatively different categories that detailed ways in which instructors canconceptualized the incorporation of simulation tools as learning activities into courses. Theseeight categories are depicted in Figure 1 below and can be summarized into two majorlearning goals: (a) executing (using) simulations to identify and describe the governingfundamental physical principles or behaviors of devices, materials and other artifacts, and (b)building (programming) simulations to apply modeling and computational techniques toapproach engineering tasks. Figure 1. Hierarchy of instructors’ intended learning
this course transformation might have onundergraduate engineering students, we investigated the following research questions: 1. Does inclusion of a discussion opportunity improve student development in (a) integrative learning and knowledge and (b) lay the groundwork for self-authorship beginnings? 2. At the end of the course, is the student more confident in declaring a major?4.0 Methods Survey Instrument The survey instrument, (integrative learning survey) was developed, using a modified Self-Authorship Survey (SAS)8 and a modified Integrative Knowledge Portfolio Survey self-assessment instrument9, which resulted in a 33-item survey, see Appendix. Integrative learning isdefined by the AAC&U as “an
Paper ID #14151Implementation of Course-Based Learning Communities and Living Learn-ing Communities along with the Development of a Simple Python Programfor Measuring RetentionDr. Mary E. Goodwin, University of South Florida Dr. Goodwin, who has engineering degrees in industrial and environmental engineering, is the Director of Student Services in the College of Engineering at the University of South Florida. She worked in industry for 9 years and over 20 years in higher education focusing on engineering education.Mr. John Pharo Morgan III, University of South Florida John earned his M.Ed. in 2003 and has worked as an
written feedback returned to students during the next classperiod, indicating whether students’ understanding of the reason for their error(s) was accurate Page 26.587.4and responding to any unanswered student questions.At the end of the semester, student surveys were administered in class to learn more aboutstudents’ perceptions of the value of the additional writing assignments. Students answered 11multiple-choice questions, such as: Writing out questions that I had about a problem in the first part of the in-class questionnaire made it a) a lot easier to identify concepts/computational steps with which I had trouble. b) somewhat
an interface betweenSCADA system and the Internet.Software has been developed by Clayster, allowing a user to connect to Buffalo Statesite and get access to data. This software can be installed on any computer or on a smartmobile device.Figure 7 illustrates data from the test circuit. These data are shown in the text formatin RELAB OPC Console software. Voltages, currents, frequency and breaker statusat buses A and B are being monitored. Any other parameters for monitoring can be Page 26.1503.7added to this list. The circuit breaker status is true when the breaker contacts areclosed and false when breaker contacts are open. Fig. 6. Test
Paper ID #11656Smartphone-Based Measurement of Acceleration: Development of a Smart-phone Application for Use in an Engineering Dynamics CourseDr. Scott Bevill, Colorado Mesa University Scott Bevill is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Colorado Mesa University in Grand Junction, CO. He completed his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2009 at Stanford University.Ms. Kelly Bevill, Colorado Mesa University Kelly Bevill, P.E., is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management at Colorado Mesa University in Grand Junction, CO. She completed her M.S. in Environmental Engineering in 2005 at Cornell University
a, Kelly K, Carr K. Increasing Participation of Women in Cyber Security. In: 2012 ASEE SoutheastSection Conference. San Antonio, Tx: ASEE; 2012.11. Fuller A, Turbin J, Johnson B. Computer Club for Girls: The problem with seeing girls as the problem. Genderand Education. 2013;25(4):499–514.12. The Center for Women and Information Technology (CWIT). The Center for Women & InformationTechnology: Mentoring Tool Kit. Baltimore, MD; 2004. Page 26.437.10
buttons (A, B, C, D, E) and an on/off button3.Naturally when the lab instructor started generating the material for the course, this experiencecame back to him and he decided to use this technology to the advantage of the students so thatthe course material could be dynamically altered to help the freshmen feel more comfortablewith the software. This grand idea was brought to a halt when upon installing the driversoftware, it crashed his computer and every time the receiver was plugged in it also wouldcrash. This meant that the nearly 8 year old technology could not be used and should bereplaced by a more modern solution. When looking around for a new solution, two main factorswere necessary for a product to be used in our class. The first main
and Legacies: A Guide to Qualitative Interviewing. Retrieved from http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~pchsiung/LAL/reflexivity.13. Kirby, S. & McKenna, K. (1989). Experience, Research, Social Change: Methods from the Margins. Toronto: Garamond Press.14. Kuh, G. D., & Love, P. G. (2000). A cultural perspective on student departure. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 196–212). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.15. Guiffrida, D. A. (2003). African American student organizations as agents of social integration. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 304-319.16. Thompson, C. E. & Fretz, B. R. (1991). Predicting the adjustment of Black students at predominately
blocks. One terminal blockcontains the connections (E, B, C) for a BJT. A second terminal block has connections (S, G, D)for a MOSFET. The third terminal block makes available ±15VDC that may be used assubstrate bias voltages when tracing the IV characteristics of MOSFETs that are part of transistorarrays (e.g., CD4007).Two switches determine the functional mode of the curve tracer (MOSFET vs BJT, andNPN/NMOS vs PNP/PMOS).Fig. 1. Curve tracer front-panel connections. The unit is presently configured to measure the I-Vcharacteristics of a PMOS device.Figure 2 is a block diagram of the curve tracer. We have a complete schematic diagram of thedevice, but it is not included here. The schematic was drawn in landscape mode on an 11”×17”sheet, and
). Work in Progress - Using Videoand Self-Reflection to Enhance Undergraduate Teams. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Frontiers in Education Page 26.241.15Conference, Arlington, VA. 4. Hulsman, R. L., Harmsen, A. B., & Fabriek, M. (2009). Reflective teaching of medical communicationskills with DiViDU: Assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients.Patient Education and Counseling, 74(2), 142-149. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.009 5. Marita, P., Leena, L., & Tarja, K. (1999). Nurses' self-reflection via videotaping to improve communicationskills in
prestigious 2014 ”Wylie Way” award. He has presented an NSF workshop on and authored a variety of papers/presentations in the critical field of student pipeline success in STEM education. Galley is the Collin College co-PI for the Dallas STEM Gateways Collaborative NSF STEP Grant led by the University of Texas at Dallas. Finally, Galley sits on the STEM Advisory Board of the MTBC. Prior to joining Collin College, Galley was a Senior Engineering Fellow, a Senior Scientist and a Senior Manager in the semiconductor industry working for companies such as ATMEL, Raytheon Corporate and Harris Semiconductor. He brings more than twenty-five years of Silicon Valley based in- dustrial technology experience to his role in the
with a clear and thorough presentation of the theory and application of the principles of engineering mechanics. Emphasis is placed on developing the student’s ability to analyze problems – a most important skill for any engineer. [9, p. v, emphasis added]Our goal here is not to debunk the ES nor to call for their exclusion from the engineeringcurriculum. The ES are crucial in engineers’ toolboxes and professional formation. Our goal hereis to make visible that they a) play important normative roles and have been amazingly durableyet can be contested, b) reinforce ideologies and mindsets, and c) can blind engineers to socialinjustices and the need for engaging in SJ by addressing the SJ dimensions already inherent
effectiveness of the strategies for helping your students learn the content, skills, and mindsets within engineering. 2. Select one strategy from the workshop, and explain how you can use it in your current or future teaching. Your explanation should include: a. A class context in which you will implement this strategy b. The reason you chose this particular strategy and how it will help your students learn c. How you will implement it in your teaching, and d. What challenges might you encounter in implementing this strategyUnlike typical program evaluation questions, which tend to focus on the value of the seminar orthe strength of the facilitator,11 these
engineering: results of a qualitative study.Presentation at Mid-South Research Association Meeting, Biloxi, MS.[6] Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College. 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.[7] Ponton, M.K., Edmister, J.H., Ukeiley, L.S., & Seiner, J.M. (2001). Understanding the role of self-efficacy inengineering education". Journal of Engineering Education 90(2), 247-251.[8] Maton, K. I. & Hrabowski III, F.A. (2004). Increasing the number of African American PhDs in the Sciencesand Engineering: A Strengths-Based Approach. American Physiologist 59, 547-556.[9] Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research, v2. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.[10] Ost, B. (2010). The role of peers
effective use and purchasing of consumable materials; 5. Established guidelines for new equipment acquisition to ensure broad impact and high use by students; 6. Established two signature programmatic areas of focus a. Aggie Innovation Design Challenges: corporate sponsored 1-day design challenges that foster multi-disciplinary student involvement and are supported by a faculty mentor; b. Aggie Innovation Pop-up workshops: Offered by faculty and corporate partners, these workshops to jump-start student learning into new areas and/or areas outside of their direct major. Participation in these informal workshops is through an on- line registration and are
Paper ID #14070A Transformative Apprentice Research STEM ProgramDr. Mohamad Musavi, University of Maine Dr. Mohamad Musavi is the Associate Dean of the College of Engineering at the University of Maine. Previously, he was the chair and professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. He has 32 years of experience in STEM and engineering education, smart grid and power systems, intelligent systems, robotics, and computer vision. He received his MS and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan in 1979 and 1983. Dr. Musavi is a Senior Member of the IEEE and the 2015 recipient of the
Paper ID #13108Developing and Validating a Concept InventoryMiss Natalie Jorion, University of Illinois, Chicago Natalie Jorion is a research assistant and Ph.D. student of learning sciences specializing in psychometrics at the University of Illinois in Chicago, 1240 W. Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60607; njorio2@uic.edu.Dr. Brian Douglas Gane, University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Brian Gane is a Visiting Research Assistant Professor at the Learning Sciences Research Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago. Dr. Gane’s research focuses on psychological theories of learning and skill acquisition, assessment
Paper ID #13075Engineering Graphics Concepts: A Delphi StudyDr. Mary A. Sadowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mary A. Sadowski has been at Purdue since 2003 and until September 1, 2011 served as the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Learning in the Purdue College of Technology where she provided leadership for strategic initiatives in undergraduate education. As a professor of Computer Graphics, her research interests include enhancing visualization skills, cre- ative thinking, and learning styles. She is currently funded to begin gathering data to create a concept inventory for engineering graphics. As
Paper ID #14123Engineering Leadership: A New Engineering DisciplineDr. Roger V. Gonzalez P.E., University of Texas, El Paso Roger V. Gonzalez, Ph.D., P.E., is the Director of the Leadership Engineering program for the College of Engineering and Professor and Chair of Engineering Education and Leadership. Dr. Gonzalez earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 1986 from UTEP. He earned his M.S. in Biomedical Engineering and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and was a Post-Doctoral Fellow and the premier Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and Northwestern Medical School. Professor Gonza
Paper ID #11586MAKER: A One Hour RobotDr. Hugh Jack, Grand Valley State University Dr. Jack is a professor of Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering at Grand Valley State University in Grand Rapids, MI. His interests include robotics, automation, and design. Page 26.1108.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 MAKER: A One Hour RobotAbstractThe paper outlines a simple robot design that uses a 3D printer, two remote control (RC) servomotors, and an
Paper ID #11233Running the Academy as a BusinessDr. Mitchell L Springer PMP, SPHR, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Springer currently serves as the Executive Director for Purdue University’s College of Technology located in West Lafayette, Indiana. He possesses over 35 years of theoretical and industry-based practical experience from four disciplines: Software Engineering, Systems Engineering, Program Management and Human Resources. Dr. Springer possesses a significant strength in pattern recognition, analyzing and improving organizational systems. He is internationally recognized, has contributed to scholarship more
2015 ASEE MidAtlantic Section Conference A Potential Solution for Textbook Affordability Ashwin Satyanarayana, Tatiana Malyuta and Hong Li N-913, Computer Systems Technology, New York City College of Technology (CUNY), 300 Jay St, Brooklyn, NY 11201.AbstractThe cost of college textbooks has skyrocketed in recent years. To students and families alreadystruggling to afford high tuition and fees, an additional $1,200 per year on books and suppliescan be the breaking point. That’s as much as 39% of tuition and fees at a community college and14% of tuition and fees at a four-year public institution.During the fall of 2013, the
, and K.A. Soschinske, Strategies for industry and university cooperation in engineering ethics education. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005.7. Brown, P.S. and P.A. Seaburg, The Architectural Engineering Institute -- A professional society for architectural engineers. 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, 1999.8. Aultman-Hall, L. and B. Holmen, Promoting women as leaders for engineering: The role of individuals, organizations and professional societies. 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.9. Durham, S.A. and W.E. Marshall, Enhancing a student's engineering experience through participation on student organizations. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, 2012