isuseful information to share with the community, as a case study about what worked, what did notwork and lessons learned moving toward the second iteration. This first assignment of the projectwas on exploratory grounds, aiming to overcome two major challenges: a) transfer to a big classof an activity and assessment type that the instructor has successfully used in smaller senior levelclasses; and b) the unpopularity of this specific class among students. Past surveys have pointedto two main reasons the class is unpopular: first, students do not immediately recognize this classas a CEE class, therefore association to CEE is a conscious, consistent effort throughout thesemester; second, similar to what has been reported in the literature (e.g. [13
engineering massive open online courses. The potential implicationof this study is student retainment and persistence in MOOCs and its impact on the futuredesign process of massive open online courses in engineering.ReferencesAlcarria, R., Bordel, B., de Andrés, D. M., & Robles, T. (2018). Enhanced peer assessment in MOOC evaluation through assignment and review analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(1), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7461Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with massive online courses. International conference on world wide web. 23(14). 687–698.Armellini, A., Rodriguez, P., & Cecilia, B. (2016). Are
) PEV penetration levels. Demand profiles after optimal DSM (b) for low PEV penetration (with 70% discount as the optimal incentive), (c) for moderate PEV penetration (with 40% discount as the optimal incentive), and (d) for high PEV penetration (with 20% discount as the optimal incentive) [5].4.2. Minimizing Power Generation Cost: Cooperation with a Generation CompanyIn this part of study, the PEVs are involved in the generation scheduling and UC problems to minimize thetotal power generation cost of a GENCO. All the details of the problem and specifications of the generationsystem have been presented in reference [6]. Table 2 presents part of the problem simulation results. As canbe seen, the primary value of minimum total cost of problem
issuperior to the traditional tell-and-practice sequence. Journal of educational psychology, 110(4), 596.[3] DiSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and instruction, 10(2-3), 105-225.[4] Johnston, I. D., Crawford, K., & Fletcher, P. R. (1998). Student difficulties in learning quantum mechanics.International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 427-446.[5]Prusty, B. G., & Russell, C. (2011, August). Engaging students in learning threshold concepts in engineeringmechanics: adaptive eLearning tutorials. In 17th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE) (pp. 21-26).[6]Coller, B. D. (2008). An experiment in hands-on learning in engineering mechanics: statics. International Journalof Engineering Education
on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (ICTLHE 2012), Malaysia, pp. 183-190.[8] B. J. Zimmerman, “Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses?” Contemp. Edu. Psychol. vol. 11. no. 4, pp. 307-313, 1986.[9] P. R. Pintrich, “A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students,” Educ. Psychol. Rev, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 385-407, 2004.[10] S. M. Elias and S. MacDonald, “Using past performance, proxy efficacy, and academic self-efficacy to predict college performance,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2518-2531, 2007.[11] A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1997.[12] C. D. Spielberger, Test
attended fiveREU workshops at University of South Carolina (UofSC) on topics ranging from ethics, posterpresentation preparation, and graduate school application preparation. The students alsoparticipated in the project team’s critical thinking sessions on defining a research problem, doinga literature search, and the research process. The research group traveled to Clemson to visit theCyberphysical Systems Lab and Tier 1 University Transportation Center for ConnectedMultimodal Mobility (C2M2) at CU (see Figure 3 (b)). The final research presentations were heldat the end of the program on the college’s campus. Students presented their posters to other summerresearch students, college faculty, and guests.During this REU, we were able to involve a
school educators work with graduateinstructors to ensure participating students understand fundamental and relevant scientific theory;secondary school educators are solely responsible for student assessment. Instructors Secondary Students A B Week 0 Background Lecture Key background theory *Initial Skill Lab Visit Initial Skill Lab Visit
separated solids from acidified dairy cow manure Bioresour. Technol., 114 (2012), pp. 195-200[2] A. Agostini, F. Battini, M. Padella, J. Giuntoli, D. Baxter, L. Marelli, S. Amaducci Economics of GHG emissions mitigation via biogas production from Sorghum, maize and dairy farm manure digestion in the Po valley Biomass Bioenergy, 89 (2016), pp. 58-66[3] M. Huber-Humer, J. Gebert, H. Hilger Biotic systems to mitigate landfill methane emissions Waste Manag. Res., 26 (2008), pp. 33-46 https://extension.psu.edu/carbon-methane-emissions-and-the-dairy- cow, Accessed 22nd Dec 2017[4] Y. Liu, B. Ni, K.R. Sharma, Z. Yuan Methane emission from sewers Sci. Total Environ., 524–525 (2015), pp. 40
Energy”, Human Ecology Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp.76-89, 2006.[2] Environment America Research, “On-Campus Wind Energy”, 2007. Available: https://environmentamerica.org/resources/amc/campus-wind-energy[3] A. K. Sleiti and A. Mehrabian, “Case Study of a Cost-effective Small Wind Turbine”, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 10, pp.132-138, 2015.[4] A. Yang, Y. Su, C. Wen, Y. Juan, W. Wanga, and C. Cheng, “Estimation of wind power generation in dense urban area”, Applied Energy, 171, pp.213-230, 2016.[5] J. Park, H. Jung, S. Lee, and J. Park, “A New Building-Integrated Wind Turbine System Utilizing the Building”, Energies, 8, pp.11846-11870, 2015.[6] R. Kumar, K. Raahemifar, and A. Fung, “A critical review of
the sophomore year for engineering majors in the Mechanicscourses. At Wichita State University, most engineering majors must pass the first EngineeringMechanics course, Statics, before graduating with an engineering degree. Based on a criteria of anA, B, or C letter grade corresponding to a passing grade in a course, the overall pass rate in Staticsat Wichita State for ~750 students was 64% according to a 2014 report. 4 This dataset included 175students in the first author’s Statics sections that were taught in a hybrid format using both lecturevideos and face-to-face meetings with all exams conducted in a face-to-face format. The studentsthat took the first author’s hybrid format Statics course had a very similar pass rate of about 66
,performance, and value beliefs. A qualitative analysis showed that students mainly chose topursue a baccalaureate degree in engineering due to the financial reward, family influences,faculty support, and early childhood interest. Furthermore, students’ motivation to continue topursue an engineering degree was attributed to prestige, engineering experiences acquired,financial and academic support, faculty and peer support, and gain of engineering knowledgethroughout their academic journey.Implications of the study were: a) a set of small samples of data was analyzed, and b)examination of students belonging to a specific cohort. This cohort was provided with financialand academic support to navigate through their studies. Future studies could consist
Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Fl, 2019.[4] M. R. Bohm, H. E. Ingram, J. S. Linsey, and R. L. Nagel, "The Impact of Functional Modeling in an Engineering Design Curriculum," in Accepted to the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL USA, June 15 - 19 2019, vol. ASEE2019-26458: ASEE.[5] J. T. Nelson, A. R. Murphy, J. S. Linsey, M. R. Bohm, and R. L. Nagel, "A Function-Based Scoring Method for Evaluating Student Mental Models of Systems," in ASME 2018 IDETC-CIE, Quebec City, Quebec, CA, August 26 - August 29 2018: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.[6] P. M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Currency, 1990, p. 445.[7] A. B. Markman
Associate Professors. Another recommendation was to establish annualTable 1. Promotion to Full Professor: A Guide for Key Stakeholders (working draft)Preface: Annual letter from Provost and Committee on Appointments & Promotions (COAP)A. Overview of Promotion Process and Roles of Key Stakeholders 1. Process diagram and annual timeline of deadlines and notifications 2. Roles of nominator and advocate a. What’s the difference between the nominator and the advocate? b. Identifying and soliciting external reviewers c. Writing the nomination letter d. Preparing for meeting 1: Translating the candidate’s field and scholarship e. Preparing for meeting 2 3. Roles of COAP members
: 1. An overview of: a. The project; b. The social, political and environmental context; and c. The technical work proposed 2. A progress report on the technical work and issues faced 3. Near final details on approximately 40% of the final report content and two technical appendices 4. A forward-looking update on: a. What is going to be achieved by final report submission; b. The time/budget spent compared to the proposed timeline; and c. An evaluation of the roles being undertaken and their effectivenessAdditionally in Week 6, students submit a “40% Design” report electronically as a single PDF filefor evaluation and feedback (analogous to an early draft report
computer program for the numerical simulation and visualization ofdynamic vibration absorbers. Only minimum requirements were defined in the projectassignments and no limits were placed on the students’ creativity or on the amount of timethey should invest in order to complete the projects. This kind of creative freedom paired withthe competition between the teams led to one acceptable and two very presentable results. Allthe figures presented in this paper are based on the programs written by those latter twoteams, hereinafter referred to as “group A” and “group B”.Equations of motion of dynamic vibration absorbersDynamic vibration absorbers are widely used passive vibration control devices. They can berealized as a comparatively lightweight
influence of role models on major and career decisions [4]. The researchdiscussed in this paper focused on three subscales of the LAESE survey, (1) Engineering Self-Efficacy 1, (2) Engineering Self-Efficacy 2, and (3) Engineering Career Expectations. EngineeringSelf-Efficacy 1 is a measure of the student’s perception of their ability to earn an A or B in physics,math, and engineering courses and succeed in their engineering curriculum without sacrificingoutside interests. Engineering Self-Efficacy 2 is a measure of the student’s perception of theirability to complete engineering requirements such as their science and math coursework, as wellas their general ability to complete any engineering major [5].Researchers from the University of Michigan
% 40% 30% W F D- D D+ C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A Semester Grade Figure 3 – Average Pre-test Score as a Function of Semester Grade. All Data | Least Squares: All Instructors 1st Author 80% Average Pre-Test Score
course difficulty in engineering schools located inother countries, in order to discuss implications for different educational systems. 5. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by CORFO under grant no. 14EN12-26862.The authors wouldlike to thank Paolo Fabia, Angela Parra, and Sebastián Vásquez for motivating this study asstudent representatives in 2019, aiming to create a shared meaning for course demandamong students, teaching staff, and managers.6. References[1] D. Gerrard, K. Newfield, N. B. Asli, and C. Variawa, “Are students overworked? Understanding the workload expectations and realities of first-year engineering,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017.[2] M. Christie and E. de Graaff, “The philosophical and
have tofabricate the voussoirs yourself. 4 The thick semicircular arch does not require abutments on most surfaces because its weight creates enough frictionto resist the thrust.Figure 3. Top: students constructing the thin parabolic arch (left) and the completed thin parabolic arch(right); Middle: students constructing the thin semicircular arch (left) and the completed thinsemicircular arch (right); Bottom: students constructing the thick semicircular arch (left) and thecompleted thick semicircular arch (right)References [1] D. Billington, The Tower and the Bridge, New York: Basic Books, 1983.[2] R. Hooke, A description of helioscopes, and some other instruments, London, 1676.[3] B
lecture, we covered common misconceptionsuncovered using student concept maps and addressed student-submitted muddiest points. Thestudents were also assigned a problem set that required application of chemistry to solveproblems related to the Flint Water Crisis (Appendix A). Problem sets were completed in pre-assigned groups. In addition, a writing assignment developed with input from the UW WritingCenter (Appendix B) was completed by all students. A timeline of all of the activitiesimplemented for the Flint Water Crisis case study and related assessments is provided (Fig 1).Table 2: Additional proposed learning outcomes, assessments, and activities. (G) indicates a group assignmentor activity. Learning Outcomes
Proceedings of the 49th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Cincinnati, OH, Oct. 16-19, 2019. 3. C. Zilles, M. West, D. Mussulman, and T. Bretl, “Making Testing Less Trying: Lessons Learned from Operating a Computer-Based Testing Facility,” in Frontiers in Engineering (FIE), 2018. 4. B. Chen, M. West, and C. Zilles, “Do performance trends suggest wide-spread collaborative cheating on asynchronous exams?,” in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 2017. 5. B. Chen, M. West, and C. Zilles, “How much randomization is needed to deter collaborative cheating on asynchronous exams?”, in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 2018.6. B. Bloom, “Learning for mastery
foundation on which this survey was established assumes that motivation and learningstrategies are not inherent attributes of the learner, but rather are contextually attached. Althoughthe MSLQ scales have been extensively tested in different subject-matter contexts inengineering, this study aims to examine the MSLQ constructs and factor structures in a novelengineering educational setting. This paper validated three MSLQ subscales in an “ABC” learning environment forengineering dynamics: (A) Active learning, (B) blended structures, (C) and collaborative studentengagement that have shown to be highly influential for university-level engineering students.This unique class environment exhibits several features that make it a new and
presenting ourwork-in-progress paper and hearing what other universities/programs have done in the face ofthese common challenges.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to acknowledge the support from Leonhard Center for Enhancement ofEngineering Education at College of Engineering in Penn State.References[1] Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (1998). Survival skills for graduate school and beyond. New directions for higher education, 1998(101), 29-40.[2] Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2011). The role of relationships in the transition from doctoral student to independent scholar. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 5-17.[3] Lovitts, B.E. (2005) Being a good course‐taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the
Development of Latinx Students,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 62, no. 3, 2019.[13] M. Camacho and S. Lord, The Borderlands of Education: Latinas in Engineering. 2013.[14] G. A. Garcia, Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs) in Practice: Defining “Servingness” at HSIs. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc., 2020.[15] R. A. Revelo and L. D. Baber, “Engineering Resistors: Engineering Latina/o Students and Emerging Resistant Capital,” J. Hispanic High. Educ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 249–269, Jul. 2018.[16] B. Flyvbjerg, Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.[17] H. A. Goldstein, “The ‘entrepreneurial turn’ and regional
ofcommunities of practice. Wenger [5] originally proposed and Kolikant, McKenna, & Yalvac [6]summarized the key dimensions: (A) “What it is about”: A joint enterprise as agreed upon by itsmembers, (B) “How it functions”: Mutual engagement that creates a social bond between members, and(C) “What capability it has produced”: the shared repertoire of resources (e.g., vocabulary, artifacts)created by members. We have outlined several activities to encourage development of a community ofpractice among students (Table 1). The following are pertinent to the summer calculus experience:1. The Citadel’s College Success Institute (CSI): Our students participate in CSI before their freshman year. Through CSI, students are acquainted with campus life
fluids were poured into the graduated cylinders after the entiresystem had been set up. The cost for materials and supplies for this apparatus is $123.76. (a) (b) Figure 1. The tripod damper system (a) CAD model, (2) prototype Figure 2. Fabrication of the tripod damper system2.2 ExperimentsThe lead weights connected to the cylinder filled with water were first pulled down to 2 inchesfrom their equilibrium position and then released from there to cause the oscillation of the leadsand spring within the water. Following the same approach, the oscillations of the system withinthe olive oil and maple syrup were also observed and recorded. The same
out that thewhole package is easy to use, and the examples are very well designed in order to introducestudents step-by-step to projects with increasing complexity [11]. Full list of components, tutorials,codes and questions that can be given to students in such three-hour long activity are given on theSparkfun web page [11]. If someone would want to replicate this activity, just pick one of the 16given circuits, depending on a time, from the Sparkfun Tutorials webpage [11]. 3Figure 1 shows students in the workshop working on Arduino projects. Figure 1. a) Students working on the Arduino projects from Sparkfun Inventor Kit; b) Sparkfun Inventor Kit [9]The
FFF printing, we must A) determine the OH = “OverHead” costs hard to determine how much of the machine cost goes into one rollquality of reclaimed plastics, B) determine the achievable consistency of the reclaimed 3) Consistency of Pulverized Plasticplastics, C) use this data to calculate the scalability of this process and its entrepreneurial
theengineering classroom, the study selection process was not designed to be comprehensive nor toidentify exemplars. However, this review lays the foundation for a more rigorous and systematicreview in the future. In the following four sections, we present a summary of our literaturereview and present the following for each of the four selected virtues: (a) definition of the virtue,(b) role of the virtue in engineering education, (c) teaching the virtue in engineering education,and (d) summary paragraph.Critical Thinking: An Intellectual VirtueDefining Critical Thinking as a VirtueCritical thinking represents “the cognitive skills of analysis, interpretation, inference,explanation, evaluation, and of monitoring and correcting one’s own reasoning” [28
demystify computer programming for students. Theyworked individually with faculty and academic aides to develop a simple computer program thatcalculated the cost of transportation of freight. The presentation skills development activityincluded an introduction to MS PowerPoint and the elements of a good presentation. Studentsworked in groups of four and prepared presentations of what they had learned during the summerprogram. They delivered their presentations to their peers and parents during the closingceremony. Figure 2 illustrates students participating in the summer camp activities. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (g) (h