Instructional Diagnosis): Tapping Student Perceptions of Teaching" in E.C. Wadsworth (ed)., Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press, 1988.[9] J. Kulik, "Student Ratings: Validity, Utility and Controversey," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, pp. 9-25, 2001.[10] A. Sherry, C. Fulford and S. Zhang, "Assessing Distance Learners' Satisfaction with Instruction: A Quantitative and Qualitative Measure," The American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 4-28, 1998.[11] L. M. Blaschke, "Using social media to engage and develop the online learne in self-determined learning ," Research in Learning Technology, vol. 22, 2014.[12] S. Wickramasinghe, and W. Timpson, "Mid-Semester student feedback enhances student learning
sequential designs within a mixed methods approach[4], a variety of research techniques was employed to elicit students’ views and attitudes. Afocus group of five Latino/Hispanic students was asked about their perceptions and attitudesregarding the climate within an engineering college. From their responses emerged 10 themes,collapsed into six dimensions; these were later used to construct a nine-item survey instrumentdeployed to over 150 Latino/Hispanic engineering students. In asking whether Latino/Hispanicengineering students felt disconnected to the general student population and to the engineeringdiscipline, the study also investigated the extent to which self-segregation occurred across otherethnic/racial groups. Questions were primarily
Organization Development, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 97-99, 1984.[7] B. Black, "Using the SGID Method for a Variety of Purposes," in To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational Development, Stillwater, OK: New Forum Press, 1998.[8] N. Diamond, "SGID (Small Group Instructional Diagnosis): Tapping Student Perceptions of Teaching" in E.C. Wadsworth (ed)., Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press, 1988.[9] J. Kulik, "Student Ratings: Validity, Utility and Controversey," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, pp. 9-25, 2001.[10] A. Sherry, C. Fulford and S. Zhang, "Assessing Distance Learners' Satisfaction with Instruction: A Quantitative and Qualitative Measure," The American Journal of Distance Education, vol
to consider what dispositions I brought to this research as both a graduatestudent and an instructor. My experience as a graduate student increased my ability to noticewhen language was affected by the desire to express competence and reflect a certain identity,two important elements in our study of empathetic disposition. Through my teacher lens, I wasable to discern shifts in speech that indicated a change of attitude or perspective at both historicaland personal levels. As someone who values human-centered research and empathetic pedagogy,I worked to maintain impartiality in my analysis through reflexivity and collaboration with theother analysts on our team to help ensure my interpretations of the data remained close to thestudents
leadership learning opportunities and experiencesof undergraduate engineering students as a whole. Our study fills this gap by examining how1203 undergraduate engineering students at a large, Canadian, research-intensive university haveused non-formal learning spaces—co-curricular and extra-curricular activities—to hone theirleadership and engineering skills and identities. Our quantitative analysis of survey resultssuggests that explicit leadership programing, student government and industry-basedprofessional development activities were most effective at helping engineering students developtheir leadership skills. When it came to catalyzing their engineering skills development, wefound that internships, design competitions and professional
faculty mentorship, the pathway into and through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. She is also the Engineering Workforce Development Director for CISTAR, the Center for Innovative and Strategic Transformation of Alkane Resources, a Na- tional Science Foundation Engineering Research Center. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and
space propulsion. He received BS, MS, and PhD degrees from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, and was a research engineer at Starfire Industries LLC before returning to academia as an assistant professor of aerospace engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. In 2017 he joined the faculty of aerospace engineering at the University of Illinois. He has published over 150 journal and conference papers on space propulsion and he regularly teaches 200 students a year in his senior-level aerospace propulsion course. He was recipient of the University of Illinois Provost Award for Excellence in Under- graduate Teaching in 2023. ©American Society for Engineering
to Inform First-Year Bowman, T. A. Seifert, G. C. Wolniak, E. T. Advising Practices and Policies at Northwestern Pascarella, and P. T. Terenzini, “How college University's McCormick School of Engineering,” affects students: 21st century evidence that higher Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference education works”, Vol. 3, 2016. & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017, https://peer.asee.org/29143[2] L. D. Patton, S. R. Harper, and J. Harris, “Using critical race theory to (re)interpret widely studied
related grants funded by the National Science Foundation, and a prior paper by the P4E research team was awarded Best Diversity Paper at the ASEE Annual Conference in 2015. She also conducts technical research with civil engineering and construction management graduate students. She and her students study ways to extend the safe and useful life of existing structures, particularly concrete bridges, through enhanced inspection, management and repair techniques. This research has been funded by the Mountain Plains Consortium, a USDOT University Transportation Center, and the Colorado Department of Transportation. She teaches courses in structural engineering such as reinforced and prestressed concrete design and civil
navigate diverse cultures and places, learning and applying the course content in afamiliar setting before departing. Engineering students who implement some of the skills andcontent typically see an immediate return during the experience. The reflective final project thatthey complete once they return reinforces the awareness and skills that are a link betweenclassroom theory and concepts and real-time impacts.Through a continuous improvement feedback model, this paper also seeks to identify the rangeof content that can be refined and leveraged for various locations. Quantitative results indicatethat global/cultural skills are relevant immediately, requiring little reinforcement from othercourses. This study provides a baseline of data and
mentoring relationships for women pursuing technical careers”, Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 89, 2000.11 Judge, J. and Leary, J. “Department-Specific Mentoring Network for Women Students in Engineering”, Proceedings of 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2005.12 Wilder, P., Kenefic, R., and Burke, A., “Integrating engineering practice into undergraduate curricula using project simulation: outcomes related to retention and persistence” Proceedings of 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2005.13 Rippon, S., Collofello, J., and Hammond, R., “Helping Freshmen Develop a Personal Identity as an Engineer” Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for
. We were also interested in how challenges might be overcome with moreresources and coordination. It is clear that many Nodes and Sites lack funding andexpertise necessary to do evaluation research, and the sharing of instruments andevaluation protocols could enhance evaluation and assessment activities. As I-Corpsenters a new phase of expansion, findings from this study will inform our ownevaluation work going forward, and allow us to share best practices with I-Corpseducators and administrators across the U.S. BACKGROUNDAcademic EntrepreneurshipMany institutions are actively investing in entrepreneurial ecosystems and initiatives toboost the involvement of faculty and graduate students in commercialization
quantitative and qualitativemethods requires expertise in many areas and can be a challenge on its own. One way to addressthis is to have experts with a variety of experience associated with project. On one‘s owncampus, experts in statistics for qualitative work or interviewing and data coding for quantitativework can be a treasure for supporting work in engineering education research.ResourcesInstruments from Study 1 are available throughhttp://www.ee.washington.edu/research/community/Community/Home.html.Instruments and models from Study 2 can be requested through Dr. Julie Martin(jtrenor@clemson.edu).SummaryIn Study 1, the role of community as it is associated with student engagement in academicendeavors can range from negative to negligible to
the last 60 years, engineering graduation rates have been around 50% [4]; similarly, inMexico, engineering graduation rates barely achieve 40%. A review of the literature conductedby Geisinger and Raman [4] identified a set of factors that contribute to the attrition of students.These factors include classroom and academic environment including teaching and advising,grades and conceptual understanding, self-efficacy and self-confidence determined by highschool preparation in math and science among others. Engineering educators have argued thatpersonal and socio-economic factors can contribute to the attrition of students; however, there isa proportion of engineering students that leave because of the educational system. Studies haveshown that
andreflect on their community’s strengths and concerns through imagery, fostering critical dialogueand knowledge-sharing [1]. While popularly utilized in medicine, social sciences, and education,its application in engineering education [2–5] and computer science education [6–8] is relativelynew and underexplored. This position paper aims to bridge this gap by presenting acomprehensive account of a pilot study that introduces photovoice to computer science students,showcasing the method’s merits and contributions. It will outline implementation and adaptationof the method’s steps, obstacles faced during its duration, the value derived from the emergentthemes from visual artifacts developed from participants, and the holistic value derived fromactive
graduates prepared to engage in entrepreneurial and intrapreneurialactivities?The research team is pursuing these questions through a multi-method approach, includingqualitative and quantitative methods. The work meets the requirements of Design andDevelopment Research, as specified by the Common Guidelines for Educational Research in thatit contains: 1) Development of a solution based on a well-specified theory of action appropriateto a well-defined end user; 2) Creation of measures to assess the implementation of thesolution(s); 3) Collection of data on the feasibility of implementing the solution(s) in typicaldelivery settings by intended users; and 4) Conducting a pilot study to examine the promise ofgenerating the intended outcomes [22].Theory
implementation of the solution(s); 3)Collection of data on the feasibility of implementing the solution(s) in typical delivery settingsby intended users; and 4) Conducting a pilot study to examine the promise of generating theintended outcomes [12].Description of Study Site and ParticipantsThe data presented in this paper were collected from five regional community college partnerswhose primary emphasis is on 2-year degrees and workforce certificates, in addition to limitedBachelor’s degrees in nursing, secondary education, and business. The missions of these statecolleges is to support the needs of the local community and prepare students for workplacesuccess.Pre-Research ActivitiesThe research team conducted a comprehensive literature review in the
: 1) Development of a solution based on a well-specified theory of action appropriateto a well-defined end user; 2) Creation of measures to assess the implementation of thesolution(s); 3) Collection of data on the feasibility of implementing the solution(s) in typicaldelivery settings by intended users; and 4) Conducting a pilot study to examine the promise ofgenerating the intended outcomes [22].Theory of ActionHuman capital theory is a theory of investment in human capital, or the abilities and skills,acquired through investment in education and training, of any individual, that enhance potentialincome earning [23]. Human capital models examine how students make cost–benefit analysesand subsequent decisions on whether to attend and persist
Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, 2018, Accessed: Feb. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,4c37811e62eac771,359bf188 17ac4bed.html[19] L. N. Fleming, S. E. Burris, K. C. Smith, L. B. Bliss, I. N. Moore, and F. Bornmann, “Beyond persistence: Graduate school aspirations of Hispanic engineering students at HSIs,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014, pp. 24–228. Accessed: Feb. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/beyond-persistence-graduate-school- aspirations-of-hispanic-engineering-students-at-hsis[20] M. G. Cuellar and A. M. Gonzalez, “Beyond the Baccalaureate: Factors Shaping Latina/o Graduate
Paper ID #30728Poverty and Guidance: Challenges and Opportunities in MathematicsPreparation for EngineeringDr. Eliza Gallagher, Clemson University Dr. Gallagher is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with joint appointments to Mathematical Sciences and Education & Human Development. Her research interests include student cognition in mathematics, development of teacher identity among graduate teach- ing assistants, and curricular reform to foster diversity and inclusion in STEM fields. She is co-PI on an NSF INCLUDES Design and Development Launch Pilot, ”Statewide
studies focused on solving is at the core of adistinction that we wish to draw attention to between ‘problem-solving’ and the solving ofproblems.According to a joint executive report from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and theNational Endowment for the Arts (NEA), student skills in engineering problem-solving(specifically in electrical engineering and computer science) are in dire need of a boost. Thereport states that “undergraduate and graduate students who study electrical engineering andcomputer science lack the ability or self-efficacy to create new ideas and innovations that stretchbeyond rote classroom exercises”1.Other high-profile reports agree: The National Academy of Engineering lamented in 2004 that“engineering students are not
success for underrepresented students in the STEM fields[13-15]. Investigating academic self-concept can provide a conceptual tool to understandstudents’ perceptions of their academic identity, their perceptions of their capabilities within theacademic discipline and how they overcome academic challenges.Complementing undergraduate enrollment numbers, women have been shown to demonstrate ahigher academic self-concept in biology and medicine as opposed to engineering and math [14].According to the National Science Foundation, men earned approximately 75% of theengineering, mathematical and computer science bachelor’s degree in 2020 [6]. Men alsodemonstrate higher levels of academic self-concept [16]. Given the reported lower levels ofacademic self
Session 1630 Engineering Project Team Training System (EPTTS) For Effective Engineering Team Management Patricia F. Mead, Marjorieanne Natishan, Linda Schmidt, James Greenberg, David Bigio, Arpita Gupte BESTEAMS Mini-Teaching Center A. James Clark School of Engineering University of Maryland, College ParkAbstractThe BESTEAMS: Building Engineering Student Team Effectiveness and ManagementSystems Mini-Teaching Center has implemented a pilot, in-class, workshop highlightingthe influence of learning style preferences on project team management
iteratively improveand expand, year-to-year, we have been able to focus on retaining what worked, addressing whatdid not work, and adding a new variable each time that can then be iteratively improved uponthe next time followed by expansion, if desired and needed.Assessing Progress for the Pilot Programs. The CoE and WCOB are currently usingqualitative data analyses through entry, mid-way, and exit surveys. Our intention is to researchand apply appropriate quantitative data analyses to further evaluate and iteratively improve theprogram with the overall objective of attracting, retaining, and graduating students who arecapable of innovating in a realistic, commercializing environment and to better prepare them forentering the workforce and to
master’s degree than prior to doingresearch, and 50% reporting being “much more likely” to pursue a PhD. Many of the studentspresented their research at professional conferences. This project also led to a National ScienceFoundation Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI) Research Experience andMentoring (REM) award in collaboration with Harvard University and Bunker Hill CommunityCollege to pilot a model to engage students from underrepresented backgrounds at these partnerinstitutions in undergraduate research [13], [14], [15].Grainger Engineering Graduate Student Diversity Ambassadors Program, 2022 – 2024, PI:StaffDescription: This project established the first cohort of the Engineering Graduate StudentDiversity Ambassadors
engineering settings.MethodsThis study analyzes student survey data using statistical methods in a quantitative researchdesign. Students in seven, large undergraduate engineering courses representing four differentengineering majors self-reported demographic information and emotional engagement as part ofa larger study that explored different factors which may inform student engagement inengineering classrooms.ParticipantsThe sample population in this study consisted of 781 undergraduate engineering studentsrecruited in the last two weeks of the term. Self-reported ethnicity included Asian (47%), Black(3.5%), Hispanic (3.5%), White (41%), Pacific-Islander (less than 1%), Native American (lessthan 1%), and Other (3%). 24% of the sample were female, 75
and ContextResearch design. This pilot study employed a convergent parallel mixed methods approach [31]to analyze counselors’ reactions and ongoing professional development needs with regard topreparing and informing students about science and engineering career pathways. Pilotqualitative and quantitative data were collected simultaneously to determine school counselorpractices and constraints related to STEM advisement.Conceptual framework. The theoretical basis for the professional development design isderived from two psychosocial theories that explain academic and career choices. The theory ofplanned behavior suggests that students make academic decisions based upon their self-efficacyand sense of controllability [32]. That is, career
itself to “topic-chaining” instruction which has been found to be particularly effective for URMs [21] -[25].Topic chaining pertains to the need to build towards complex topics by relating previous learningexperiences to future ones while also introducing relevant context. MethodsThe current case study is part of a larger National Science Foundation (NSF) grant funded(1734878) study concerning engineering identity development among middle school youth andpostsecondary engineering students in a summer intervention program. The study alsoinvestigates how early-career math and science teachers draw upon content learned in theprogram to adopt culturally responsive STEM pedagogy for application in their
gathering and informed decision-makingduring the first year. Our hybrid model is targeted at students who meet all the standardadmission requirements for engineering, but do not know which degree program they want topursue. In the remainder of this paper, we describe two primary challenges for transitioning tothe hybrid model (Sections 3 and 4), the resultant introduction to engineering course that wasdeveloped and piloted in Fall 2014 (Section 5 and 6), our future trajectory for our hybrid model(Section 7).2. Institutional ContextMississippi State University is a rural, research-focused, public, land-grant institution with anenrollment of 16,500 undergraduate students and 3,700 graduate students. The college ofengineering (CoE) is the third
California, Irvine and is working on a Masters in Science Education at California State University Long Beach. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Breaking Through the Obstacles: Strategies and Support Helping Students Succeed in Computer ScienceIntroduction and MotivationNot only that there is a continuously growing number of students who want to study computerscience (CS) but also there is a large need for CS graduates. The computing jobs are crucial forthe development and growth of the economy worldwide. For example, the data from theIntegrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) [1] by the U.S. Department ofEducation’s National Center for Education Statistics