. Methods Student(s) Clicker ABCD Internet / Proposed raise voting App based method: LaserPerformance Criteria hand(s) cards pointersEasy and quick hardware/ x x xsoftware set-upLow cost of setup and use x x xLow usage burden for x x xstudentsLow/no learning curve for x x xadoption by facultyZero potential for technical x
as compared to first-year students. The lower expectation of seniorstudents suggest that engineering instructors should consider ways to engage upper level studentsin creative behaviors. Future research includes a longitudinal study to examine how creative self-concept changes in progression through the engineering curriculum.Introduction The concept of creativity has been an important research topic since the 1950’s and1960’s.1 Educators and scholars with diverse domains of expertise have studied creativity, theskills associated with creativity, and techniques to increase creativity in their respective fields.2-6However, even in the field of psychology, where the most research pertaining to the topic hasbeen produced, researchers
, underrepresented minoritiescomprised 33.2 % of the U.S. college age population, 26.2 % of undergraduate enrollment, and17.7 % of those earning science and engineering (S&E) bachelor’s degrees. In graduate school,underrepresented minorities comprise 17.7 percent of overall enrollment but are awarded just14.6 % of S&E master’s and 5.4 % of S&E doctorate degrees, with a progressive loss ofrepresentation as one proceeds up the academic ladder [5].Researchers offer many explanations for the persistent achievement gaps while recognizing thatthere are many interrelated factors. They agree that family and community differences, schoolcontext, low expectations, and lack of exposure to role models, information about careeropportunities, and advanced
outcome; (c) We tested and evaluated the possibility of hardware and software secure system co- design teaching and research integration; (d) Using the experience gained, lessons learnt for developing a respective multi-disciplinary laboratory for both research and teaching of hardware/software security (this is partly done and will be a future-work as step-forward for hands-on experiments); and (e) Inter- and intra-university research collaborations were initiated and will be pursued to ensure delivering an expanded set of outcomes for the integration.References[1] S. Ravi, P. C. Kocher, R. B. Lee, G. McGraw, and A. Raghunathan, “Security as a new dimension in embeddedsystem design,” in Proc. Design Automation
literature on effectiveness of information techonology in education.J. Eng. Educ. 89, 33–37 (2000).7. Podolefsky, N. S., Perkins, K. K. & Adams, W. K. Factors promoting engaged exploration with computersimulations. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 020117 (2010).8. Rieber, L. P., Tzeng, S. C. & Tribble, K. Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: finding the right mix. Learn. Instr. 14, 307–323 (2004).9. Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Bruchmuller, K. & Hacker, S. Supporting learning with interactive multimediathrough active integration of representations. Instr. Sci. 33, 73–95 (2005
Energy Sources: Watt Committee: report number 22 (No. 22). CRC Press. Page 26.1484.6Rosillo-Calle, F. (2012). The biomass assessment handbook. Earthscan.Huber, G. W., Iborra, S., & Corma, A. (2006). Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: chemistry, catalysts,and engineering. Chemical reviews,106(9), 4044-4098.Howes, R., & Fainberg, A. (1991). Energy sourcebook: a guide to technology, resources, and policy.Rothman, M. P. (2000). Measuring and apportioning rents from hydroelectric power developments (Vol. 419).World Bank Publications.Outlook, A. E. (2010). Energy Information Administration. Department of Energy.Watson, J
. National Science Foundation through grant numbers 1347417,1347482, 1347580, 1347718, and 1500309. The opinions are those of the authors and do notnecessarily represent the National Science Foundation. The authors would like to thank theinstructors and students who agreed to be part of the pilot study, as well as project advisoryboard members.References 1. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. 2. Finelli, C. J., Richardson, K. M., & Daly, S. R. (2013). Factors that influence faculty
civilengineering faculty have sought to develop their program appropriately along a set of commonlyaccepted educational taxonomies; that is, Bloom’s Taxonomy. These widely known taxonomiesare based on the seminal work of the 1950’s educational committee chaired by Benjamin Bloom.The committee established a set of taxonomies in three domains of learning: cognitive, affectiveand psychomotor. The cognitive domain taxonomy is widely accepted in many fields and hasbeen identified as, “arguably one of the most influential education monographs of the past halfcentury.”3 The taxonomies are a language that describes the progressive development of anindividual in each domain and are defined as follows:4 Cognitive: of, relating to, being, or involving
the early 2000’s, but the problems were often posed as already defined tasks, that while open-ended in possible solutions, provided the students all of the outside information that they need to develop the model. In practice, we have found that when working on MEAs, students often misunderstand the problem or the client’s needs and wants early in the problem-solving cycle. The three activities presented here are MEAs that have been modified to better scaffold the problem-defining phase of the design cycle and to support students in developing problem-scoping skills. Activity Summaries
Engineering (GARDE) Program under grants CBET–1067740 and UNS–1512564. Opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the NSF. All student work/images presented in this paper were included withthe written permission of the associated students.References[1] National Instruments. "NI ELVIS," 2019, http://www.ni.com/en-us/shop/select/ni-elvis.[2] National Instruments. "LabVIEW," 2019, http://www.ni.com/en-us/shop/select/labview.[3] National Instruments. "myDAQ Student Data Acquisition Device," 2019, https://www.ni.com/en- us/shop/select/mydaq-student-data-acquisition-device.[4] National Instruments. "myRIO Student Embedded Device," 2019
to tell where an output originated withoutcontext; fortunately, the utterance “I had a thought” communicates clearly the idea originatedwith S1. Considering S2’s response in line two it is evident that there is some confusion on theusefulness of differentials, making the discussion inherently valuable. S1: I had a thought. Are we going to have differential temperature within the differential length? S2: I’m not sure…why we need a derivative this way? This [current equation] seems accurate, because… S1: If you have a differential length are you concerned with the temperature within that…at that length? Because this temperature is dependent on the length, right? So, I guess it’ll be just dT/dl…but then… S3
byadaptation.In an ideal setting, participants in a transdisciplinary project would have immediate feedback onthe effects of their actions. They would then adapt through small-scale experimentation and learnfrom the results [33]. For example, in the theoretical project on water catchment, participantsmay have a theory that water features with sustainable gardens would lead to greater sense ofcommunity and less crime. This theory could be tested with a prototype project and inquiry intochanges into the sense of community. The feedback would lead to further adjustments. Assuggested by Waddock et al.’s [9], an adaptive evaluation framework would adhere to theheuristics to “prioritize learning in the context of constant change,...work with co-evolution
. • Successfully demonstrated how strategic financing of the project can ultimately provide the village with household lighting and charging capabilities and an electrified water pumping system that will cost less than current household lighting practices.The project succeeded in its goal of developing an electric grid that is truly affordable for adeveloping community. This case study can be adapted as a template for grid designs fordeveloping areas, and can be expanded in future works to explore additional topics such as loadgrowth, Single Wire Earth Return, urban communities, and more advanced financial analysis. V. REFERENCES[1] S. Chowdhury and H. Patel, "Review of Technical and Economic Challenges for Implementing Rural
did somelevel of mental manipulation of the object to get the answer. Guessing categorizes responses thatused the word ‘guess’ or explained that the student arrived at a conclusion by chance or withoutshowing evidence of deliberate reasoning. Guiding rule describes when the student(s) used astandard or criterion to judge which option is likely to be the answer, for example, studentresponses that involved the use of if-then logic (“if…then…”) or stating a specific criterion thatled to the answer (“whatever is…is the answer”). Intuition describes students’ responses inwhich the word “intuition” was used or the response showed that the student came to anunderstanding of the answer immediately without the need of conscious reasoning. Process
Game 2. Apply team communication strategies 1. Explain concepts of project scheduling Project Virtual 2. Create project management https://psu.box.com/s/79h0o2y Management Construction Desktop plans osbb25bk1ggzionus9o5mzdgk Lecture Topic Simulator 4 3. Evaluate scheduling choices and factors
* Pacific Islander Test Anxiety 0.013 0.005 0.008 ** Engineering GPA Female or Gender Non- 0.007 0.003 0.036 * Binary Native Hawaiian or Other 0.055 0.029 0.057 n/s Pacific Islander Mathematics GPA 0.149 0.049 0.002 ** Test Anxiety 0.010 0.004 0.017 * Mathematics GPA Female or Gender Non- 0.047 0.016 0.004 ** Binary Native Hawaiian or Other 0.368 0.142 0.009 ** Pacific Islander Test Anxiety 0.065 0.016
identity. Given thelow rates of participation in co-curricular activities during the freshman year, efforts should beconcentrated on increasing participation in activities that may benefit students most, such asparticipating in engineering student organizations. The findings presented are part of a largerproject supported by the NSF under Grant No. 1504741.References[1] National Academy of Engineering, “Understanding the Educational and Career Pathways of Engineers,” The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2018, doi:10.17226/25284.[2] S. L. Rodriguez, C. Lu, & M. Bartlett, “Engineering identity development: A review of the higher education literature,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science
selected, the outcomesmay have been different.AcknowledgementsThis research is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF-DUE-0302542) and is partof the on-going efforts of the Center for Assessment of Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics at the Colorado School of Mines (see http://www.mines.edu/research/ca-stem/). Page 13.1238.13References1. Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Moskal, B. Java-Based Animation in Building viRtual Worlds for Object-orientedprogramming in Community colleges. NSF-DUE-0302542.2. Walker, Leslie., “Recognize Me?”, The Washington Post Online, accessed 2006,http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006
- Summer 1998.3. Jones, R. C. ,Kumar, T “Technological literacy for non-engineers,” Frontiers in Education Conference, 1991. Twenty-First Annual Conference. 'Engineering Education in a New World Order.' Proceedings. 21-24 Sept. 1991 Page(s):179 – 184. Page 13.897.54. Krupczak, J.J., Jr.; Ollis, D.; Pimmel, R.; Seals, R.; Pearson, G.; Fortenberry, N. “Panel - the technological literacy of undergraduates: identifying the research issues,” Frontiers in Education, 2005. FIE '05. Proceedings 35th Annual Conference 19-22 Oct. 2005 Page(s):T3B - 1-25. Krupczak, J.J., Jr.; VanderStoep, S.; Wessman, L.; Makowski, N.; Otto
model follows. Page 13.219.5 3As also mentioned above, a basic DEA model allows the introduction of multiple inputs and multipleoutputs and obtains an “efficiency score” of each DMU with the conventional output/input ratioanalysis. Defining basic efficiency as the ratio of weighted sum of outputs to the weighted sum ofinputs, the relative efficiency score of a test DMU p can be obtained by solving the following DEAratio model (CCR) proposed by Charnes, et al.1: s ∑v k =1
Cycle format used in lesson module design. • Leaders and participants worked through an abbreviated Legacy Cycle module to experience the process, including using technology for formative feedback and for lesson development. • Leaders examined other examples of Legacy Cycle modules. • Participants applied HPL to the participants' own selected course(s) Revisited course objectives to determine acceptable evidence and plan the assessment(s) to be used (formative and summative) Designed effective challenges to engage students with the content Identified appropriate learning activities
3 3 5 5 5 Statement External Search 10 6 6 9 10 4 6 8 10 S S S S Benchmarking 10 8 8 10 10 8 9 7 8 Dissection 10 8 8 9 9 2 9 8 9 Concept Generation 10 5 9 5 9 4 9 8 10 T T Concept Selection
systems, their written comments revealed that they had actually learned manyvaluable lessons about what is needed to adequately instruct another person as well aswhat to expect from real systems and data.Bibliography1 A. Selmer, M. Goodson, M. Kraft, S. Sen, V. F. McNeill, B. Johnston, C. Colton, CEE, Summer, 2005, p. 232.2 J. Henry, R. Zollars, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN, 2003.3 J. Henry, R. Zollars, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.4 J. Henry, R. Zollars, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR, 2005. Page 11.872.9ChE 441
focuses on oil spills, a major reason for the development ofMOTEMS4.Summary and ConclusionsThis paper presents the development of coastal engineering design projects/studies in civilengineering Capstone courses at The Citadel. Specifically, a structural engineering professor hasdeveloped a project involving the design of a fixed marina dock system for gravity andenvironmental loading. An environmental engineering professor has included a separatecomponent to consider the environmental aspects of marine oil terminals.References1. ICC, 2003. International Building Code, International Code Council, Falls Church, VA.2. Department of Defense, 1 July 1999, “Mooring Design,” Mil-HDBK-1026/4A, Washington, D.C.3. Ferritto, J., Dickenson, S
, 2001. 4. Geankoplis, C. J.; Transport Processes and Separation Process Principles, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003. 5. Kranz, W. B., “Pediment Graduate Course in Transport Phenomena,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition. 6. Thompson, K. E., “Teaching PDE-Based Modeling to ChE Undergraduates,” Chemical Engineering Education, 34, 146 (2000). 7. Sinclair, J. L., “CFD Case Studies in Fluid-Particle Flow,” Chemical Engineering Education, 32, 108 (1998). 8. Besser, R. S., “Spreadsheet Solutions to Two-Dimensional Heat Transfer Problems,” Chemical Engineering Education, 34, 160 (2002). 9. Zheng, H.; Keith, J
: • Hartman, F. T. (2000). Hartman, F. T. (2000). Don't park your brain outside: A practical guide to improving shareholder value with SMART project management (1st ed.). Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute. • Kerzner, H. (2001). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (7th Ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. • Kezsbom, D. S., & Edward, K. A. (2001). The new dynamic project management: Winning through the competitive advantage (2nd ed. Vol. 1). Toronto, ON: John Wiley & Son. • Project Management Institute, I. (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (Vol. 1). Newtown
their preparation for real jobs6, 7. The choice of one- or two-semester capstonecan make a difference in what students experience and what can be achieved. Most engineeringschools opt for a two-semester capstone8. In addition, the experience obtained is in tune withABET accreditation requirements9, 10. Moreover, close interaction with students offers theinstructor an invaluable chance to mentor them and initiate them into research and design in aninformal and actually more effective manner than in traditional courses. It was reported thatpromoting creativity in engineering classes leads to student retention and better student-professorinteractions11. Therefore students are also likely to understand the instructor‟s guidance from amore
that allows you access to the number of people in a given classroom or computer lab without physically visiting the classroom or the lab.”To realize the second and third success criteria, the course was designed by the course advisor tomeet the following requirements: to introduce the students to basic networking and computing technologies and tools; to have an organizational structure that would support modular and integrated solution design; to form high performance and diverse team(s) that are effective and efficient; to foster project-based environment where the students are responsible for their own learning; to ensure adequate accessibility and availability of resources for the students (human
the Engaged inThermodynamics material. With more information on the exact format of the courses and themanner in which the Engaged material was used a better correlation between student engagementand the material can be made.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantsDUE-0536299 and DUE-0920436.Bibliography 1. P. Tebbe, J. Pribyl, and S. Ross, “Full Development of Engineering Scenarios to Promote Student Engagement in Thermodynamics – Year 1”, Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville KY, 2010. 2. Chen, H., Lattuca, L., and Hamilton, E., “Conceptualizing Engagement: Contributions of
jobs to countries outside the U.S. borders.1 Even though college anduniversity enrollment rates have increased dramatically over the last thirty years from 11 millionin 1976 to over 19 million in 2012—an increase of 64% in just 3 decades—STEM degreeattainment rates among historically underrepresented racial/ethnic minorities (includes AfricanAmericans (AA), Latinos (LA), and Native Americans, [(NA) URMs]) continue to lag behindthose of White and Asian Pacific Islander (API) students. For instance, only 24% of URMscomplete a bachelor’s degree in science and engineering (S&E) within six years of initialenrollment compared to 40% of Whites and 50% of Asian students.2Other national statistics show that many students who enter college intending