sophomore or junior years.It is impossible to estimate how many potential talented engineers leave the major because of thelack of visible application for the chemistry, physics, and calculus that dominate their freshman year. Christiansen1 observes that “the aim of teaching is not only to transmit information, but totransform students from passive recipients of other people’s knowledge into active constructors oftheir own.” One mechanism for attaining this goal is to involve engineering students in “hands-on”projects as early as their freshman year. The benefits of such an activity are clear and many.Ohlsson 2 argues that the key to effective teaching is to emphasize the process of acquiring andapplying disciplinary knowledge. Through these
end.The technology explosion we have witnessed in the past decade is providing a new paradigm forstudents to learn without the time and financial investment of attending the “traditional”university classroom. While the traditional classroom method has certain advantages, newtechnologies open up whole new student populations whose educational needs can be met byuniversities. Distance learning is not an attempt to replace the traditional university approach,but rather to broaden the ability of universities to fulfill their mission to provide quality educationto a more diverse group of students. Providing students with the needed resource books,software and weekly guidance, professors are able to teach with the same effectiveness as if theywere
material as well as developing all teaching materials (lecture materials, exampleproblems, etc.). These sessions are usually conducted in the computer laboratory. Team Project TimeThis is where the students "apply the concept." These sessions are conducted by a professor Page 4.334.5with the assistance of GTAs and undergraduate "team facilitators." The GTAs and theundergraduate team facilitators serve two different roles. The GTAs help in technical guidancefor the students. They supplement the technical assistance given by the professors. They alsoschedule and supervise non-class time openings of the project work room. The
Session 1547 Showing RLC Circuit Resonance with Electronics Workbench Chong Chen, Walter W. Buchanan Middle Tennessee State University/Oregon Institute of Technology AbstractIn circuit analysis courses, RLC circuit resonance is a topic that is difficult to teach withoutdemonstration. The physical demonstration of this topic requires several kinds of circuitcomponents and equipment. Some of these devices may not be available in a typical engineeringor engineering technology department laboratory.This paper presents teaching RLC circuit resonance with Electronics Workbench
Center DirectorCorey Pew (Assistant Professor)Adrienne Phillips (Associate Professor) Dr. Phillips is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Montana State University. She teaches environmental engineering courses and is a member of a team sponsored by the NSF RED program to develop integrated and project-based courses in a new environmental engineering curriculum. She also does research on microbial biofilms.Beth J Shirley (Assistant Professor)Stephanie G Wettstein (Associate Professor) Associate Professor © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: Writing in Engineering
of students in introductory materials engineering classes. Most recently, he has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for a courses on Connecting Mathematics with Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from here experience as a researcher and a manager at Honeywell Inc. She is currently working to develop
Session 1532 Making Technological Paradigm Shifters: Myths and Reality Experiencing the Electrical Engineering Learning Community (EELC) at Iowa State University Mani Mina Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State UniversityIntroductionDuring the second half of the 20th century, teaching technology to the engineering freshmen hasposed tremendous challenges. The main challenge can be summarized in the following question:What can we teach the freshmen in engineering disciplines that will be useful and
Rosa, A.J., 2005. The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal ofengineering Education, 94(1), pp.121-130.12] Meyer, G.M., 2002. Encouraging female undergraduate students. Journal of college science teaching, 32(2), p.98.13] Biddle, B.J. and Berliner, D.C., 2002. Small Class Size and Its Effects. Educational Leadership, 59(5), pp.12-23.14] Watson, S., 2003. Closing the feedback loop: Ensuring effective action from student feedback. Tertiary educationand management, 9(2), pp.145-157.15] Alderman, L., Towers, S. and Bannah, S., 2012. Student feedback systems in higher education: A focused literaturereview and environmental scan. Quality in Higher education, 18(3), pp.261-280.
previous work by the author, on viablestrategies to improve the classroom environment of engineering colleges in the Region. At thestart, the paper provides an overview of relevant benchmarks of engineering education in theRegion. Then, relates author’s preliminary findings on teaching/learning practices in engineeringcolleges of the Arab Gulf States, sheds light on the pros and cons of the lecture format, andexamines the literature on meanings and substance of different active learning protocols focusingon cooperative engagement strategies. Next, it identifies common barriers to reformation ingeneral, and to the use of modern pedagogical skills in particular. The paper also argues that anymeaningful change in Region’s classroom practices today
of engagement, and cooperative learningstrategies in particular. The paper is a follow up to previous work by the author, on viablestrategies to improve the classroom environment of engineering colleges in the Region. At thestart, the paper provides an overview of relevant benchmarks of engineering education in theRegion. Then, relates author’s preliminary findings on teaching/learning practices inengineering colleges of the Region, sheds light on the pros and cons of the lecture format, andexamines the literature on meanings and substance of different active learning protocolsfocusing on cooperative engagement strategies. Next, it identifies common barriers toreformation in general, and to the use of modern pedagogical skills in particular
The Evergreen State University, a Secondary Teaching Certifi- cate from University of Puget Sound, an M. Ed. in Instructional Technology Leadership from Western Washington University and a Ph.D. (research-based, not theoretical) in Educational Psychology from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.Patricia Pyke, Boise State University Patricia A. Pyke is the Director of the STEM Station at Boise State University. The STEM Station in a university-level initiative to build a STEM community where students and faculty are connected to the resources and support they need to achieve their individual goals in education, career, teaching and research. Her role as director for the STEM Station builds on previous work
sound educational approach. The college has along history of using a learn-by-doing approach to engineering education. Indeed, it is embodiedin the motto of the university “Discere Faciendo”, to learn by doing. Through this pedagogicalapproach, understanding theory is facilitated and enhanced by demonstrating its application tothe real world situations. This learning and teaching paradigm has allowed the colleges graduatesto be more productive ab initio in their professional careers than their counterparts with a lessrigorous laboratory and project based exposure. As evidenced by the growth of the “learn-by-doing” approach to education in the United States and the rest of the world, project basedlearning has been accepted as a valuable
Paper ID #18785Enhancing participation of deaf engineering students in lab discussionDr. Raja S Kushalnagar, Gallaudet University Raja Kushalnagar is an Associate Professor and the Director of the Information Technology Program at Gallaudet University in Washington, DC. He teaches information technology courses, and mentors deaf, hard of hearing and hearing students in information technology and accessible computing research. His research interests focus on the intersection of disability law, accessible and educational technology, and human-computer interaction. He worked in industry for over five years before
computational modeling. He runs the Mechanics and Modeling of Orthopaedic Tissues Laboratory at Bucknell, where they use computational and experimental techniques to better understand the mechanics of musculoskeletal soft tissues and human movement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Appropriate Finite Element Analysis in Mechanical Engineering: Teaching Best Practices through SimulationFinite element analysis (FEA) is a powerful computational tool employed in engineeringindustry, research, and in the classroom. While the finite element method was developed duringthe mid-twentieth century for civil and aeronautical applications, it has been adopted inmechanical
two types of networking with designs ofinteroperable protocols and proper network architectures.In this paper, we discuss the impact of this trend on the design of curriculum in theComputer Engineering Technology program. We also report our initial attempt inassimilating these two networks from the curriculum point of view. The related coursematerial and associated laboratory exercises used in this initial attempt and theirimplementation in the higher-level curriculum in Computer Engineering Technologyprogram are discussed. Page 9.780.1 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition
the engineering skills that are required by industry andthe engineering skills that are taught in our universities. One fundamental skill that is commonlyused in industry but almost always neglected in academia is the systems engineering approach todesign. The University of North Dakota is taking the initiative to teach systems engineering at the Page 6.889.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationundergraduate and graduate levels by designing small spacecrafts in class. The result of
transfer problems7, the use of a transport approach in teaching turbulentthermal convection8, the use of computers to evaluate view factors in thermal radiation9,implementation of a computational method for teaching free convection10, and the use of anintegrated experimental/analytical/numerical approach that brings the excitement of discovery tothe classroom11. Supplemental heat transfer experiments for use in the laboratory or classroomhave also been presented, including rather novel experiments such as the drying of a towel12 andthe cooking of French fry-shaped potatoes13. Suggestions for the integration of heat transfercourse material into the laboratory and classroom were described by Penney and Clausen14-19,who presented a number of simple
industrial andembedded computer systems, in situations where low cost, low speed and single devicecommunication is needed.In this paper we present a survey of the teaching material (section 1), hardware considerationsand laboratory exercises (section 2) that we have developed and used in CET 3510 course, tointroduce the students to the new interfacing and communication standards; at a level that thestudents can understand and incorporate in their laboratory exercises. Then, a rubric forassessment of student performance for programming assignments in the laboratory follows(section 3).1. Introduction to Port CommunicationIn today’s society, technology influences our daily lives in a variety of ways. We are constantlydependent on the use of technology
JACQUELYN F. SULLIVAN is founding co-director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program and Laboratory. She co-led the development of a first-year engineering projects course, and co-teaches Innovation and Invention and a service-learning Engineering Outreach Corps elective. Dr. Sullivan initiated the ITL's extensive K-12 engineering program and leads a multi-institutional NSF-supported initiative that created TeachEngineering.org, a digital library of K-12 engineering curricula. Dr. Sullivan has 14 years of industrial engineering experience and directed an interdisciplinary water resources decision support research center at CU for nine years. She received her PhD in environmental
teams work and what didn’t? We discuss the nature ofengineering, following with an introduction to our five-step engineering method: 1. Define the problem 2. Collect Information 3. Create Solutions 4. Perform Analysis 5. Make Decisions and repeat the cycle as necessaryThe design teams document this process in a team binder, graded at the end of each project,which is really a teaching tool to introduce them to laboratory notebooks. We use the binder, asopposed to a bound lab notebook, so that each team member can add individual exercises, in-class notes, CAD drawings, etc. throughout the semester.For each block of instruction students are required to study (review?) the lesson materialsprovided at the
engineering students. Theapplicability of PID in many different career fields, implies that many degree programs couldbenefit from adding it to their curriculum. Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering,Chemical Engineering, Electrical Engineering Technology, Mechanical EngineeringTechnology, etc. are all degrees that either already offer disciplines or courses that study thedesign and use of automated control [5].Part of the Advanced PLC laboratory at our university, the Amatrol Process Control System,shown in Fig. 1, is used to teach programming of industrial equipment for controlling the flowrate and level of fluids [3]. It is not concerned with the theory of PID control, rather it focuses onthe programming of industrial equipment and the
Paper ID #31733Work in Progress: Impacting Engineering First-year Students Retentionthrough a Non-conventional Engineering Learning CommunityDr. Sonia M. Bartolomei-Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Sonia M. Bartolomei-Suarez is a Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico Mayag¨uez (UPRM). She graduated with a BS in Industrial Engineering from UPRM (1983), a MSIE (1985) from Purdue University, and a PhD in Industrial Engineering (1996) from The Pennsylvania State University. Her teaching and research interests include: Discrete Event Simulation, Facilities Planning, Material
; Albuquerque, NM.4. Mukasa E. Ssemakula and Gene Y. Liao: ‘A Hands-On Approach to Teaching Product Development’ World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education vol. 5, no. 3 (2006).5. Mukasa E. Ssemakula and Gene Y. Liao: ‘Implementing The Learning Factory Model In A Laboratory Setting’ IMECE 2004, International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Nov. 13-19, 2004; Anaheim, CA.6. Mukasa E. Ssemakula and Gene Y. Liao: ‘Adapting The Learning Factory Model For Implementation In A Laboratory’ 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov. 5-8, 2003, Boulder, CO.7. SME. “Competency Gaps and Criteria.” Dearborn, MI: SME Education Foundation. Available online: http://www.sme.org/cgi-bin/smeefhtml.pl?/foundation
-contact laboratory instruction for the upper divisionengineering coursework, while lower division work is provided by the local juniorcollege. No core coursework is available asynchronously. The existence of this remoteprogram has created an environment where several traditional lecture-style classes arebroadcast into the main campus of the degree-granting institution from faculty at theremote site. Student populations at the course-generating remote site are small, betweenzero and four maximum during the study. Student populations on the receiving maincampus are significantly larger for this course, between 15 and 33 during the study.Courses broadcast into the main campus are not designated on the schedule as beinggenerating off-campus. So, many
. Students were told to writethe report for a professor who would be teaching the lab the following semester. This professorhad never taught the laboratory before, and students were to keep this audience in mind as theywrote. Furthermore, they were to give him advice on which open channel laboratory tasks tocontinue using when he taught the laboratory for the first time. This type of assignment (semi-formal report) and the choice of audience were different than students in either section had seenin previous writing assignments. Thus, students in one section did not have an advantage overstudents in the other section by having previous experience with this type of writing assignment.The final writing assignment was assessed using two methods. One
shown inappendix 1. The course description for these subjects in the curriculum does not exist andthe teaching material has been based on old notes that were translated from Russian tolocal languages, i.e. Pashto and Dari over thirty years ago. Furthermore, the curriculum isnot supported by any experimental work because of the lack of proper laboratory andequipment. This archaic curriculum is not compatible with the needs of the nation or thestudents’ career development. It has very limited or no balance between theoretical andexperimental knowledge and approaches, out of step with most universities across theworld, providing little context or practice into the learning. Furthermore, the level ofsome subjects in the curriculum may not be
Paper ID #17826EE and ME – Together Again: Forging a BSE from BSEE and BSME Pro-gramsDr. Dennis A. Silage, Temple University Dennis Silage received the PhD in EE from the University of Pennsylvania. He is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Temple University, teaches digital data communication, digital signal and image processing and embedded processing systems. He is also the Director of the Interdisciplinary Engineering program in the College of Engineering. Dr. Silage is past chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Division of ASEE, recipient of the 2007 ASEE National Outstanding Teaching
laboratory. Based on curricula need and support available from vendors the equipment listed below were opted. The same kind of equipment will be used in lab modules for an anticipated technical elective laboratory course (Industrial Automation and Robotics Laboratory) for ODU students in the ET (Engineering Technology) and Electrical and Computer Engineering B.S. program. Figure 3. PLC Rack with I/O Devices Figure 4. Festo Mechatronics Training System The following stations are now integrated in ODU Robotics lab: PLC Rack with HMI and Motor Drives, PLC Rack with I/O Devices, Festo Robot Teach Pendant with Conveyor Belt System, Festo Robot Training System, Festo Mechatronics Instrumentation system, Festo Mechatronics
curricula has proven to be challenging. This paper presents the initial phase of anexperiment in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech to address this problem by means of aresearch option in the traditional technical communication course. In this research option,students have the opportunity to prepare for and to document a summer research experience. Tothat end, the research option of the course is divided into two segments: (1) a spring segment toprepare students for a summer research experience, and (2) a fall segment to teach students tohow document that research experience. This research option culminates in an undergraduateresearch symposium that is to show other undergraduates the benefits of and opportunities for aresearch experience
skills needed for the practice of ECE. The course is focused on designing, debugging, and building walking robots using concepts from both electrical and mechanical engineering3. The entire course is centered on the laboratory and the construction of the robot. This includes using hand tools, soldering, using test equipment, building circuits on breadboards and on printed circuit boards, computer programming, etc. "They [the instructors] use the StiquitoTM, the robot building, as more of an engine to teach us other stuff, like basic circuitry, various equipment and how to use it, with basic computer programming ... all kinds of little things, making it well rounded."6. Develop a physical intuition for electrical and mechanical