with the space shuttle program, NASA, and its affiliates, such as Lockheed Martin. • This case study was initially difficult because my group had to defend a decision, that we knew was disasterous. Through discussion and research, we did, however begin to understand the decision of management. By using an Utilitarianistic point of view, it was the rational decision. • I learned that I have more of an engineering mind than a political mind. Just because a decision will make a couple of Congressman happy, doesn't mean it is the right decision. Page 6.562.18 • I have learned that I will really enjoy the field of
smart phones) have been introduced with significantlyreduced computational capabilities. This is only natural since these mobile devices where notdesigned to perform intense numerical calculations. However, they have become as common asslide rules in the 1960’s or hand calculators for the last four decades. There is now hardly anengineer without a smart phone. The question becomes, why is engineering education not usingsmart phones and tables (mobile devices) for complex engineering analysis? Two main concernscome to mind immediately, their screen sizes are small when compared to traditional desktop orlaptop computers, and they are relatively slow (but still faster than desktop computers in the1980’s). While the screen size can be a problem
of change of habits of mind, particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning of complexity. Page 25.44.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A First Step in the Instrument Development of Engineering-related Beliefs QuestionnaireAbstractAcquisition of new knowledge, skills, and dispositions is recognized as a process of change,largely influenced by learners’ beliefs (i.e. domain-specific beliefs, epistemological beliefs, andontological beliefs) and the richness of their
course for the firstsemester that would primarily address the question, “What do engineers actually do?” Theintention being that if students had a solid concept of what lay beyond the first three semestersfresh in their mind, they would be more likely to endure through the foundational courses andsucceed in achieving an engineering degree. The content of this new course would be gearedtoward introducing the practice of Engineering and the delivery method would be designed tomesh well with the learning style and behaviors of the new generation of freshmen. The new firstcourse was adopted into LeTourneau’s engineering program as part of a comprehensive five partfreshman experience: Part I - Introduction to Engineering Practice I (this course
integrate course materialwith knowledge from multiple disciplines and then to apply it to other contexts. Future engineersmust consider the people that engineering (technology) will affect and must gain competency inworking both alone and with others. To accomplish this goal, instructors should try to create a“cooperative learning community,” with a variety of learning activities, and encourage studentsto relate engineering with non-engineering material and everyday life. He claims that themeasure for success of a course is “the extent to which the material…is integrated into thestudents’ prior knowledge and given a high value in the students’ minds.”In his entry concept map (Figure 1), Teaching and Learning serves as the center of the map withfive
theories of conditionalizedlearning, students will learn engineering writing most successfully when it is taught not as anadd-on to engineering content but as an integral part of the engineering process in whichengineers communicate to specific audiences for specific purposes.Context and authenticity are also key components of successful learning according to JohnBransford, Ann Brown, and Rodney Cocking in How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience,and School134 Their two-year study of successful pedagogy, sponsored by the National Academyof Sciences, involved16 prominent educators and researchers who evaluated new developmentsin the science of learning. Many of these developments explain why integrated approaches tocommunication pedagogy are more
Session 3675 Long Term Optimum Strategies for New Engineering Faculty: A View from a Decade Down the Road Dr. Robert D. Engelken Professor of Electrical Engineering Arkansas State University State University (Jonesboro), AR 72467 Introduction New and/or young engineering faculty experience a variety of situations, perspectives,and challenges unique to their fresh arrival on the scene of academia. Many of these areassociated with the need for the new professor
students persist in engineering.Our study is situated in the context of civil engineering, as two of the PIs are civil engineeringfaculty members, but it should be noted that we often refer to engineering education in theaggregate. This is partially because students at our institution do not declare a specific majoruntil they complete some foundational coursework in math and science. The interventions in thisstudy are designed specifically with civil and architectural students in mind, but they may betranslated to other disciplines.Building Pathways ProgramsThe Building Pathways program features academic and professional development programmingfor engineering students during the first and second academic years and during the summer termsfollowing
collaborative change management and communities ofpractice in engineering education at the national level, where Mattucci developed a largeprofessional network across the country. In this role he often felt unfamiliar with the actors,priorities, and attitudes within the various contextual domains and the people he was workingwith. This role coincided with the initiation of his mindfulness and awareness practice, which ledto him actively seeking ‘contextual mentors’ to help navigate the systems. This approach ofintentionally seeking contextual mentorship has been ongoing for the last five years. Recently, hebecame more aware of the mentees in his network, and perceiving these relationships through asocial network lens, which has inspired this work, and
undergraduatetechnology and engineering curricula. The approach can be introduced in one classsession, with additional mentoring offered as needed. If time and resources allow,students can be coached through the proposed strategies over the course of a semester.Educators should keep in mind that it takes a long time for Google to “forget”information posted online, and that it takes time to see the results of the social mediaapproach proposed here. The senior year of college is a time when students are motivatedto change their online behavior, but ideally, social media literacy for online identitymanagement should be taught early, before damage is done, and while enough time isavailable to invest in building both a positive online identity and a professional
.)Keeping in mind the subjects specified by ABET and NCEES, and recognizing the areas of Page 10.1310.4overlap with other engineering and science disciplines, we conclude that there are five key areaswhich characterize chemical engineers: Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education • Knowledge of chemistry: The issue of what chemistry is essential for chemical engineers is beyond the scope of this paper. • Knowledge of material and energy balances and both single- and multi
, iswell aligned with the application of CTS to solve complex engineering problems.Despite this alignment the CLA does not offer a means for the development of CTS, nordoes it provide a suitable means for the sustainable assessment of CTS in a courseexperience.With this in mind, in order to provide a valid, authentic and sustainable means tosimultaneously develop and assess critical thinking within a course experience a realistic,contextually relevant, performance-based intervention, such as MEAs are ideal.4. Model Eliciting ActivitiesMEAs have been used in engineering education at the university level for the past decade10,11,34-36 . MEAs have shown promising results in developing students’ topical conceptualunderstanding, information
acknowledgesthat infrastructure design requires consideration of diverse settings and the needs of thecommunity as a whole rather than as a collection of individuals [32]. Too often, communityimpacts are only considered after the design has been developed according to the technicalcriteria. Through the use of CCD, the design can be developed from the start with both technicaland human criteria in mind. CCD emphasizes that both asking multiple community stakeholderswhat they need and observing how they interact with the system in question may be a better wayto ensure the community feels heard and the engineer understands where improvements can bemade to better fit the way people use a system [32].Another approach to addressing sociotechnical problems such
met yet and where potential problems may exist in thecourse.Figure 1 Rubric for an application (homework) problem from Thermodynamics 2 for the topic of combustion. The criteria that have a "bulls’ eye" are learning objectives and standards for the assignment.Figure 2 Rubric for an application (homework) problem from Thermal System Design for the topic of engineering economics. The criteria that have a "bulls’ eye" are learning objectives and standards for the assignment. Figure 3 Example from Canvas "Learning Mastery Gradebook" based on the outcomes grading. The color-coded scale is shown on the right.Instructor ThoughtsCertainly, the first feedback that comes to mind for
Paper ID #41854The Effects of COVID-19 on the Development of Expertise, Decision-Making,and Engineering IntuitionMadeline Roth, Bucknell University Madeline (Maddi) Roth is an undergraduate student with majors in Neuroscience and Psychology and a minor in Education.Miss Joselyn Elisabeth Busato, Bucknell University Joselyn Busato is an undergraduate student at Bucknell University, majoring in creative writing and biology.Dr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. ˘ in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa
. Then, by having the instructor share her own identity map, includingprivileges and oppressions associated, students were invited to consider the impacts within herlife and her engineering work before exploring their own. This resulted in individualpositionality assignments that were honest, and at times deeply reflective, with studentexperiences and realizations.LimitationsAlthough this exercise shows promise for increasing the engineer’s understanding ofpositionality, it is not sufficient in developing contextually minded engineers. There are multiplelimitations to this activity, as it is just that – a singular activity. This activity first relies on aclassroom atmosphere that is heavily interactive, safe, and unconstrained in discussion
, and diverse minds” (Holmes, 2018, p. 140).Learning how to design solutions to real-world problems is one of the cornerstones of anengineering student’s formation. From the industrial to the everyday settings, engineers play aninfluential role in how the tools, objects, and systems we interact with daily are designed. Yet,during their engineering education, quite often students experience a disconnection between thesocio-technical aspects of engineering design and the more technical courses in their curriculum,which can lead students to favor a view of engineering as a neutral discipline and put lessimportance on the human-centered aspects of design (Loweth et al., 2021; Miska et al., 2022). Inturn, when applying their knowledge to create a
of self-efficacy onretention among under-represented minority students. This study will include well-established measures ofScience/ Math/ Engineering academic self-efficacy and coping efficacy. However, work self-efficacy represents anew construct that focuses specifically on young workers‟ confidence in managing workplace conditions. The studywill feature a newly validated Work Self-Efficacy Inventory written by Joseph A. Raelin, at NortheasternUniversity, and published by Mind Garden, Inc.5.) Collect longitudinal data on the pathways to self-efficacy and individual-tracked retention in engineeringby following a cohort over a critical two-year time span. Most of the pivotal studies that established therelationship between self-efficacy and
, if atall. Yet, not wanting to embody the problematic stereotype of the engineer as a top-downplanner and solver of people’s problems, she set on the quest to understand how to“decolonize my mind as Shrestha proposes in her paper [30]. That is the ability to humblemyself and come from a mindset of collaboration rather than omnipotence like many of ourpredecessors.” Also, drawing on STS histories of engineers doing community development inthe 1960s [31], she “liked the idea of Volunteers in Technical Assistance (VITA) having no ColdWar political agenda when they distributed tools and applications of engineering techniques toaid communities who reached out to them. This made their work more accessible to anyonewho needed it although they fed
Paper ID #37800Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives in GraduateEngineering: A UK based case studyFrancesca BartramNatalie WintDavid Maxwell Rea © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion Initiatives in Graduate Engineering: A UK based case study1.0 IntroductionThe lack of student diversity within engineering education, and indeed the engineeringprofession, has been studied extensively worldwide, with particular focus on minority ethnicstudents. The case is no different in the UK, where the retention and
. With the perspective of a career centered in private sector technology and cybersecurity, she greatly values the contributions made by EdTech organizations, like Codio, to help faculty deliver better learning outcomes in CS and STEM for students of every level. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Proposing a Response Hierarchy Model to Explain How CS Faculty Adopt Teaching Interventions in Higher EducationAbstractDespite the high volume of existing Computer Science Education research, the literatureindicates that these evidence-based practices are not making their way into classrooms. WhileK12 faces pressures from policy and increasing opportunities through
Paper ID #37885Enhancing Undergraduate Materials Science Labs for Experiential LearningMr. Mackinley Love, University of Calgary Mackinley Love is a Master of Science candidate at the University of Calgary in the Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. He completed his Bachelor of Applied Science in the same department in 2021. His thesis topic and interests lie in the investigation of educational scholarship and its links with undergraduate engineering laboratories. He is also the president of the Engineering Education Scholarship Society (E2S2) for 2022-2023, the graduate student club that promotes
Paper ID #38069Story-Driven Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature ReviewDr. Ariana Turner, Georgia Institute of TechnologyHye Yeon Lee, Georgia Institute of TechnologyProf. Joseph M LeDoux, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Joe Le Doux is the Executive Director for Learning and Training in the Department of Biomedical En- gineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. Dr. Le Doux’s research interests include narrative and inclusive pedagogies and practices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
engineering students were the oneswho had this competence more developed since they presented many works during thecourse, and this allowed them to create this competence more. Third, leadership developmentis when students need to lead their final project. That is, students are required to keep theobjective in mind and manage the team and resources. To do so, they need to develop projectmanagement and leadership skills. All the competences cited are essential for industrialengineering students and leaders. Therefore, the way that was approached in this universitycould be replicated in industrial engineering courses. Finally, all these actions are to buildconfidence in engineering students so that they can solve engineering problems in theexternal
University of Iowa Dr. Rethwisch is a professor of chemical and biochemical engineering at the University of Iowa. His current research interest is assessing the impact of secondary curricula (particularly problem/project based learning curricula) on student interest and performance in science and mathematics, and on their interest in careers in STEM fields.Mark Andrew McDermott American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021A CASE STUDY ON HOW TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFSINFLUENCE THEIR ENACTMENT OF PROJECT LEAD THE WAY CURRICULUM 1AbstractThe purpose of the study aimed at gaining a better
Paper ID #19941Work in Progress: Quantification of Learning through Learning Statementsand Text MiningMr. Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma Jackson L. Autrey is a Master of Science student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Ok- lahoma from Tulsa, Oklahoma. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and currently is involved with research into design-based engineering education. After completion of his Master’s degree, Jackson plans to pursue a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering.Jennifer M. Sieber, University of Oklahoma Jennifer M. Sieber recently graduated
., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 4. Brereton, M. (2004). Distributed cognition in engineering design: Negotiating between abstract and material representations Design representation (pp. 83-103): Springer 5. Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. International handbook of research on conceptual change, 61-82. 6. Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Theoretical perspectives
Paper ID #14416How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Anotherfrom a Student Perspective?Dr. Jed S. Lyons, University of South Carolina Dr. Jed Lyons is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina. His passion is developing authentic engineering learning experiences for students from grades K through Ph.D. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Another
Paper ID #27558Using Human-Centered Design to Drive Project-Based Learning in a HighSchool Summer STEM Course (Evaluation)Mr. Austin C. Wong, The Cooper Union Austin Wong is a graduate of Cooper Union with a BA and MA in Mechanical Engineering. The research he is doing pertains to the advancement of STEM education with the help of rapid prototyping at a high school and college level. He is a high school STEM teacher at Grace Church High School, and developed curriculum for the high school physics, robotics, CAD, and engineering classes he teaches and is also the director of the Design Lab at Grace Church School. He also
open-minded to ideas.”Students recognized that exercising leadership did not rely require a dominant personality, andthat dominant team members might actually be detrimental. Said one participant, “I guess [myidea of leadership] has changed a little bit, because now I look a lot more to the quiet person,because they usually aren’t as overbearing in their ideas, so it’s more of a collaborative process.”Problem-Solving. Conventional wisdom holds that engineers are problem solvers. Problem-Solving is also recognized as a characteristic of leaders,17 particularly those in creative ortechnical organizations.22, 23 In addition to behaviors such as identifying technical problems andseeking solutions, this category included seeking improvement in team