): 1. Professionalism/Work Ethic (80.3%) 2. Teamwork/Collaboration (74.7%) 3. Oral Communications (70.3%) 4. Ethics/Social Responsibility (63.4%) 5. Critical Thinking/Problem Solving (57.5%) 6. Information Technology Application (53.0%) 7. Written Communications (52.7%) 8. Diversity (52.1%) 9. Lifelong Learning/Self Direction (42.5%) 10. Creativity/Innovation (36.3%) 11. Leadership (29.2%)• HSE student participants are strongly motivated to pursue STEM careers, are more likely to enroll in and complete post-secondary education and training in STEM, and enter the STEM workforce in greater numbers than do non-HSE
BusinessOne of the main components of the new program was the development of the STESE graduatecourse. To develop the course sequence, the authors worked closely with faculty members whoare part of a burgeoning entrepreneurship program within the COB. Course content that isspecific to global sustainable enterprises was developed in consultation with faculty memberswho were actively involved in the GSSE program and in the entrepreneurship certificate programfor undergraduate students [11]. Specifically, in its first offering, course content for the STESEcourse was culled and/or course syllabi were shared from the following existing courses withinthe COB, which span from the 200 to the 600 level: Social, Ethical, and Regulatory Issues in Business
institutional mission, departmental mission and resources; size ofthe institution; accreditation criteria and professional organizations; collective bargainingstatus; classification of the institution; disciplinary objectives; new technologies; andresearch.”The ASCE Task Force (1998) developed models linking scholarship, teaching, and service andprofessional development with values of excellence, integrity, leadership, and ethics. Indeveloping these models, the Task Force stated “…institutions need to place less emphasis uponsterile definitions and more upon the creation of a means to reward substantive facultyachievements.” Page 4.443.9The ASCE Task
Examination isbeing used as a bench-mark of progress. The several aspects of the rebuilding project aredescribed along with a report of progress and lessons learned. The paper concludes withobservations about the ethical and cultural nature of engineering education and somerecommendations about changes that are required to achieve the desired outcomes of therebuilding project.Historical Backdrop:The Faculty of Engineering was established in the 1960’s and 70’s by a consortium of USUniversities with USAID sponsorship1,2. The project was a “turn-key” project that provided abuilding, laboratories, and US based education for the new Afghan Faculty members. Facultymembers from the participating US Universities established and taught classes and
technicalinformation, including analysis of audience, language, and purpose; techniques of persuasion;page design and graphics; and technical definition and description. Students also prepare memos,resumes, lab reports, and a documented technical research paper. Oral technical presentations arealso required. The interrelationships of technology and society, along with the ethics oftechnology, are considered.TC 481: Advanced Technical Communication. Applications of skills learned in previoustechnical communication courses, with emphasis on practical writing and speaking. Studentsprepare informal and formal documents, including instructions, proposals progress reports, andletters. Individual and group oral presentations, as well as group project and ongoing
junior year, cannot join the program at any other time.A new Introduction to STEM course was implemented in the DEEA program as one ofthe first courses that the new DEEA students ever take in College. The new course coversfundamental concepts and information about engineering professions, ethics, engineeringeconomics, systems of units, and other topics that are included in the Introduction toEngineering courses at STC and UTPA. In addition, the course also involves CBI withhands-on activities to engage and motivate students to learn and get familiar withpractical applications in STEM fields. In this new Introduction to STEM course, 53students participated during the Summer II term in 2009. 2. Supporting STEM Pathways with CBI and Hands
engineering education in order to make a “whole person” of the graduate.Engineering faculty largely agree that engineering students (and faculty) can learn agreat deal from liberal arts faculty and their publications, particularly in the valuablearea of “soft skills.” Through our interactions on campus and the ABET 2000 Criteriawe have certainly seen that engineers benefit from interaction with arts/humanitiesfaculty and the materials they develop. Examples include dealing with team membersand clients, interpersonal communications, understanding one’s abilities and growthareas, communicating concepts to a wide audience, understanding ethical theories,wrestling with ambiguity in those situations which are not clearly black and white, andunderstanding
) Systems Thinking Systems Thinking - What Engineers Bring to the Game (Key Competency) Global Perspective Working and Leading within a Global Value Chain (Facing Business Realities) Innovation On the Job Innovation, Creativity and Risk Taking (Facing Business Realities)• Expected learning outcomes: o Effective demonstration of eight competencies o Understand the theory behind the practice of management o Demonstration of communication skills rhetorically, interpersonally , and in writing o Self-knowledge—character, communication, ethics, innovation/creativity, skills in economics, marketing, teamwork, global awareness/world view, project planning
mechanics, including nonlinear structural analysis, computational mechanics, and biomechanics. He is also active in engineering education and engineering ethics, particularly in mechanics education and appropriate technology. At UPRM Papadopoulos serves as the coordinator of the Engineering Mechanics Committee, which man- ages the mechanics courses taken by all engineering majors. He also co-coordinates the Social, Ethical, and Global Issues (SEGI) in Engineering Program and Forums on Philosophy, Engineering, and Technol- ogy.Vincent C. Prantil, Milwaukee School of Engineering VINCENT C. PRANTIL Vince Prantil is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the Mil- waukee School of Engineering. Dr. Prantil
potential demand for the graduates.Seventy-nine companies responded to the online survey which was administered during thesummer of 2009. Figure 3 shows the type of industry for which the respondent worked.Figure 3. Type of Industry For Which the Respondent WorkedThe Table 4 shows the summary of the skills desired by the companies grouped into threecategories identified as important: personal, technical and conceptual. Interestingly, the highestscoring personal skills were ability to adapt and ethics, followed closely by the ability tocollaborate. Security and infrastructure/networking were the top rated technical skills employerswere looking for, while problem-solving abilities were the top ranked conceptual skill employersvalued. A theme among
problem statements andspecifications, consideration of alternative solutions, and detailed system description. Further, it isrequired to include constraints such as economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics, and socialimpact. Courses that contain engineering design normally are taught at the upper-division level of theengineering program. Some potion of this requirement must be satisfied by at least one course which isprimarily design, preferably at the senior level, and draws upon previous coursework in the relevantdiscipline”. (14)A proliferation of capstone design experiences, over the last decade, has taken place at manycolleges of engineering – all seem to meet some of the requirements noted above. The ABETrequirements is the
in their ability to make a difference and be productive members of society due toan increased awareness of developing engineering solutions within a societal and global contextrequiring a sense of ethics and civic engagement. Overall, students pointed to the benefit ofusing S-L experiences and projects as concrete and “tangible” ways to present their levels ofknowledge and skills on resumes and during actual and potential employment interviews.Students often commented on their coursework with S-L as bring more fun, engaging,interesting, and “cool” educational activities. Student Interview and Focus Group Reports of S-L Challenges and SuggestionsStudents also discussed their challenges with S-L experiences, and suggested possible
). Assessment of Ethics Modules in an Engineering Curriculum. ASEE 114th Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI. June 24–27, 2007. Paper # AC 2007-14. Teaching Ethics – II. Session # 3440. Wednesday, 27th June 2007. 12:30 – 2 PM.51. Narayanan, Mysore. (2007). Assessment of Perceptual Modality Styles. ASEE 114th Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI. June 24–27, 2007. Paper # AC 2007-18. Assessment and Evaluation in Engineering Education – I. Session # 1530. Monday, 25th June 2007. 2:15 – 4 PM.52. Narayanan, Mysore (2007). The Three R’s of Assessment: Recording, Reviewing and Reporting. ASEE 114th Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI. June 24–27, 2007. Poster # AC 2007- 15. Emerging Trends in
research on engineer- ing education as a visiting scholar in Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHKUSTin 2013. His research interests are in Engineering Educationincluding adult education and distance learning prac- tice. He is the member of the International Association for Continuing Engineering EducationIACEE. He holds Bachelor of Engineering from College of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, and Master of Military Science from College of Information System and Management, both of them are in NUDT.Dr. Huang Zhang, National University of Defense Technology Zhang Huang is a Lecturer in the National University of Defense Technology. His main research interests include global engineering education, ethics
ethical and responsible research.3.2 MethodsNanoJapan participants in Summers 2012 and 2013 and RQI REU students in Summer 2013completed pre- and post-program assessments using the Georgia Institute of TechnologyInternational Internship (GITII) survey, a valid and reliable instrument developed to assess students’general knowledge, abilities, and skills related to technical internships. The instrument wasdeveloped by the Georgia Tech Office of Assessment and uses an externally validated General Self-Efficacy Scale to assess an individual’s ability to cope with stressful life events.30 We selected thisinstrument as one of the assessment tools for NanoJapan because it is specific to technicalinternships and allows comparison with a referent group of
, • Solve fundamental engineering problems using computer tools, • Perform basic file management tasks using an appropriate computer tool, • Work effectively and ethically as a member of a technical team, and • Develop a work ethic appropriate for the engineering profession. We did not want to create a new course with the overhead that would create an additionalburden to the faculty. The approach was to integrate service-learning into one of the sections ofthe course. Other approaches that have been used in large classes are to offer service-learning asan option to another project or assignment. These models have been shown to be effective butrun the additional logistical challenge of matching the
positionto measure and assess the merit of what their students are learning. But inflated grades are tooblunt an instrument for this purpose because of their poor resolution (they’re limited to mostlyjust two grades: A and B, neither of which used to mean “average”).But even more important are fundamental social questions related to grade inflation’s impact oncredibility, accountability, responsibility and, last but not least, ethics.42 For example, does gradeinflation set a good example of candid evaluation of academic and professional performance forour students to follow and is engineering practice, and for that matter society itself, best servedby it?Be that as it may, there should still be interest in learning more about grade inflation, even
multi-disciplinary teams e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. An ability to communicate effectively h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context i. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j. A knowledge of contemporary issues Page 9.88.8 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
program curriculum meeting the programeducational objectives, let’s first identify the program outcomes in which the curriculum are tomeasure and the relationships of these program outcomes to the program educational objectives.The program objectives are: Pgm Obj 1. Sound preparation for adaptation in exciting, rapidly-changing areas of technology and the passion for lifelong learning Pgm Obj 2. Ability to respond to ethical and public issues, including safety, social, environmental concerns, and understanding of how engineering solutions affect the wider society Pgm Obj 3. Ability to apply personal values to daily and professional life, the development of skills
research career: o training on how to conduct successful research o leadership and ethics training o professional activities off campus o training in making choices about graduate school o visits to other universities • To simulate a positive graduate school community: o engaged and committed faculty mentors o a flexible work schedule o lodging in a community of cohorts, preferably on campus o non-academic interaction with faculty, other research mentors, and institute administrators o some planned extracurricular activities in the region • To attract quality students: o stipends that are competitive with traditional summer internship
communitybuilding between program participants. The program included the integration of math, science,humanities, and economics courses with a seminar series that required students to studyhistorical, contemporary, ethical, and social aspects of the sciences and engineering. Theseminar also introduced project modules that exposed students to interdisciplinary problemswhose solutions required application of knowledge from the students’ current coursework intheir other classes. Student responses from the 1994-95 trial program resulted in the integrationof additional mentoring and social connections for support in the following year. The 1995-96trial was updated and the positive student response to the program only improved. In a follow-upsurvey administered
, responsibility, andaccountability were expected at all times.The CDIO Capstone Course incorporated pedagogical approaches based on a set of research-based learning principles. · Learning in a team environment required the development of communication, presentation, listening, compromise, and consensus skills. 8-10 It also required that students develop business ethics that pertain to responsibility, attendance, delivering what is promised on time, and ensuring quality in the work . 11 · Learning in a laboratory environment exposed students to the experimental iterative process where theory determines experimental design and the resulting data is used to refine the theory. This environment allowed students to
. Page 7.908.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationMost researchers report that psychological factors play the most important role in studentcheating. For example, Roth and McCabe 13 found a strong correlation between student valuesand cheating. An example of this is the apparent success of honor codes based on the idea ofshared communities and individual responsibility at colleges and universities in reducing cheating. Carefully designed honor codes, which speak directly to student moral and ethical standards,have also been found to reduce the levels of cheating 1,13.Demographic factors
discipline design projects • Communication across disciplinesSensitize to contemporary issues • Professional issues • Total project scope • Ethics • Interpretation and interaction • Societal concerns • Professional societies • Impact of engineering • Outside activities decisions(ECE) Impart essential ECE • Breadth and depth in math, • Exams (written, oral)knowledge
to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; g) An ability to communicate effectively; h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context; i) A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning; j) A knowledge of contemporary issues; and k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.Without significant education reform at the most basic level, it is difficult to imagine anyundergraduate curriculum in the country meeting the spirit of these new requirements. Without asignificant overhaul of
, University of Cincinnati, will, demonstrate that its graduates meeteleven ABET outcomes: a. Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b. Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c. Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs d. Ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e. Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g. Ability to communicate effectively h. Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context i. Recognition of the need for and the ability to engage in life-long
offeredin the CoE. The course helped them to understand the structure and differences betweenprograms to reassure their career choice. The course also included topics in ethics, theengineering method, and teamworking. Team activities and hands-on small projects inducedthem to know each other and develop community sense. INGE-3002 deepened students’knowledge about their chosen field of study and the importance of basic engineering courses forbeing successful later on in their study programs [13]. It connected freshmen, with seniorsworking on their capstone design projects, to learn how the latter carried an engineering design,followed up the solution development process, and attended presentations of completed designs.Freshmen were then tasked with
morechallenging for minoritized students. Additionally, minoritized engineering graduate studentsencounter lack of representation at faculty and student levels, exacerbating unwelcoming feeling,and tokenism as part of diversity campaigns [13], [22].Reason of engagement and experiencesDespite all the challenges mentioned above, minoritized students often embrace their agency toplace issues in the forefront and engage in activities to help them and others navigate injusticesand inequalities. Indeed, community values and a sense of responsibility to respond to socialinjustice give minoritized students the motivation to help others reduce inequities within theirfield and develop equity ethics—challenge social inequities through their vocation—andamplifying
E. Rush, “‘Why does all the girls have to buy pink stuff?’ The ethics and science of the gendered toy marketing debate,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 769–784, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3080-3.[11] E. Sweet, “Boy builders and pink princesses: Gender, toys, and inequality over the twentieth century,” Dissertation, University of California, 2013. Accessed: Oct. 26, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1517101640?pq- origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true[12] C. J. Auster and C. S. Mansbach, “The gender marketing of toys: An analysis of color and type of toy on the Disney Store website,” Sex Roles, vol. 67, pp. 375–388, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11199
. 3. I can apply the engineering design process to solve real-world problems. 4. I understand the role of engineering in society. 5. I believe that engineering contributes to everyday life. 6. The field of engineering offers solutions to important problems. 7. Engineers play a significant role in technological innovation. 8. Engineering is a field that requires creativity and problem-solving. 9. The work of engineers impacts environmental sustainability. 10. Creativity in engineering is fundamental. 11. Engineers must work collaboratively to be successful. 12. Ethical considerations are important in engineering. 13. I am aware of the broad range of careers available in engineering. Students are