ofAI tools raises concerns about plagiarism rates and the ethical use of technology in academicsettings. Educational institutions are actively crafting policies to navigate the complexities ofGenAI usage while maintaining academic integrity [2], [3].Recent advancements in GenAI have ushered in a new era for educational methodologies,offering innovative tools for learning and teaching. Integrating GenAI tools such as ChatGPTand MidJourney into educational practices is becoming increasingly common, with these toolspredicted to become as ubiquitous as traditional software like Microsoft Excel in the near future[4]. The emergence of GenAI necessitates reevaluating pedagogical strategies, suggesting a shifttowards technology-integrated learning
-dominatedenvironments and pursuing male leadership models. Figure 1. Critical engineering skills for facing challenges and seizing opportunities.Significant disparities become apparent when discussing gaps between industry demands andthe skills possessed by engineering graduates. Previous studies have identified criticaldeficiencies in areas such as effective communication, teamwork, management and decision-making, ethical leadership, and social responsibility within the engineering field. Engineersoften encounter challenges applying these soft skills in dynamic work environments,underscoring the pressing need to address these discrepancies during academic training.The ability to communicate effectively and collaborate in multidisciplinary teams is
differentproblem scenarios: model and construction of a scale prototype of a Hyperloop vehicle [46] runin the 2019 academic year and create a working prototype of an assistive robotic arm, done in the2022 academic year. After ethics approval, text was extracted from PDF and Word documents,followed by minor preprocessing and splitting using the spaCy library 1.Annotation and Dataset Preparation:Manual annotation was initially performed by one of the authors, and ambiguous cases werediscussed with the course instructor. Human annotation is a time and resource-consuming taskthat can limit the size of the fine-tuning dataset. To expedite annotation validation, we employedGPT version 4.0 for comparison, addressing discrepancies between human and GPT
., [4-6]) and only recently it has been proposed to be used in thecommunication, teamwork, and the ability to recognize and assessment of professional skills [7-9].resolve ethical dilemmas), and (ii) awareness skills (i.e., This paper is organized into four sections. First, a summaryunderstanding the impact of global and social factors, of current assessment techniques for teamwork skills, and aknowledge of contemporary issues, and the ability to dolifelong learning) [2
discussthe multiple-section Project Lab and the associated Design Projects. Part Three will discuss howthe Lecture and Project Lab build towards the last half of the semester with the Grand DesignChallenge project and competition.THE PREVIOUS COURSE Prior to Fall 2005, Hofstra Engineering required First-Year students to take ENGG 9A -Introduction to Engineering, a 2 credit lecture-only course meeting twice a week. The maincomponents were the typical subjects taught over the past two decades, namely engineeringproblem solving, introductory information outlining the various types of Engineering majors,along with overview material on a variety of topics such as ethics, design, statistics, computerprogramming, plotting, and report writing. Two or
. Instructors wrestled with studentfrustration and the reality that good projects were tough to come by and an engineer’s“final design” could always be modified by a client.In 2000, the classroom and the capstone design components of this course began tochange. Planning and Design of Construction Projects continued to consist of two 50minute classroom sessions each week and two three hour laboratory periods per week. Toenhance student achievement of various educational outcomes and better meet the needsof the Coast Guard, the classroom portion of the course expanded its focus to coverlecture topics that can be assigned to six broad categories: 1. Planning 2. Cost Estimating 3. Scheduling 4. Engineering Economics 5. Engineering Ethics
thinking, systems engineering and systems decision making throughout a career of professional excellence and service to the nation as an officer in the United States Army. Outcome 1.1: Define the problem, design solutions, make decisions, and implement the chosen engineering solution within a broad global and societal context. Outcome 1.2: Act professionally and ethically as a leader of character within each stage of the system lifecycle. Objective 2: Produce graduates who effectively lead interdisciplinary teams in Joint, Combined, inter-agency, and multicultural environments. Outcome 2.1: Lead and work effectively as a contributing member of multidisciplinary systems engineering teams
. Instructors wrestled with studentfrustration and the reality that good projects were tough to come by and an engineer’s“final design” could always be modified by a client.In 2000, the classroom and the capstone design components of this course began tochange. Planning and Design of Construction Projects continued to consist of two 50minute classroom sessions each week and two three hour laboratory periods per week. Toenhance student achievement of various educational outcomes and better meet the needsof the Coast Guard, the classroom portion of the course expanded its focus to coverlecture topics that can be assigned to six broad categories: 1. Planning 2. Cost Estimating 3. Scheduling 4. Engineering Economics 5. Engineering Ethics
get caught up in these little bubbles. When you die, your bubble stops because your body [is]obsolete and becomes dated and we now need a new version. Versus building a legacy as to, you're leaving a footprint where people remember not just the title of the name, the person. That’s why I say, I'm unapologetically me. ~ Lola, Black/African American• Recall that EM is considered a cognitively based phenomena. Specifically, cognition – the way one thinks and metacognition – how one thinks about thinking.• This includes growth mindset, resourcefulness, and ethical and social responsibility but in our sample, this also represented the negative thought processes experiences by participants such as stereotype threat and imposter
higher for females highlight theirheightened sensitivity and responsiveness to environmental issues, which could be linked to amore empathetic and caretaking disposition.Conversely, male students scored higher in Basic Determinism, Religious Traditionalism, andGender Traditionalism. Higher scores in Basic Determinism suggest that male students are moreinclined to see the world in terms of fixed rules and predictable outcomes, which might makethem less flexible in adapting to new or uncertain situations. Increased scores in ReligiousTraditionalism for male students indicate a stronger adherence to traditional religious beliefs andpractices, which could influence their moral and ethical decision-making processes. Thesignificantly higher scores in
learning environments, computer science education, and Artificial IntelligenceDr. Laura E Brown, Michigan Technological UniversityDr. Jon Sticklen, Michigan Technological University Jon Sticklen is an Associate Professor with the Engineering Fundamentals Department (EF) and Affiliated Faculty with the Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences (CLS). He served as Chair of EF from 2014-2020, leading a successful effort to design aDr. AJ Hamlin, Michigan Technological University AJ Hamlin is a Principle Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technological University, where she teaches first-year engineering courses. Her research interests include engineering ethics, spatial visualization
to analyze and interpret datac. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needsd. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teamse. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problemsf. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityg. An ability to communicate effectivelyh. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal contexti. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learningj. A knowledge of contemporary issuesk. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.The Tiny House project helped the capstone students achieve nine of the
ofmaking design decisions in economic, environmental, and societal contexts is emphasized from theperspectives of engineering and physical and mental health.“The Intersection of Society and Design” explicitly addresses four societal impact outcomes in ABETCriterion 3: Student Outcomes 2, 3, 4, 5, which emphasize the public health and safety impacts ofdesign, ethical decision-making, collaborative productivity as a team member, and effectivecommunication with diverse audiences [2].Increasingly professionals in all fields are called upon to present technical concepts of their disciplinesto a non-technical audience [3]. Juan Felipe Pulido wrote that I wish I’d known that being an engineer involves more than just engineering—more than
actionimproves learning [12]. However, the instructor sometimes intervened and slightly altered thecomposition of the groups to ensure a proper and balanced mix of students in terms of academicsand work ethics among other factors.Each group was requested to seek and list three initial real highway problems as possible themesfor the projects. As seen later, a single theme would be established as the research topic of theproject for each group based on certain criteria in consultation with the instructor. Each groupwould briefly present its three possible highway problems to the entire class.One of the criteria in choosing the candidate highway problem that would be under investigationwas its location. Safety was a concern with a paramount significance
. The following learning outcomes are what the course was designed around: 1- Be able to applyTRIZ problem solving to novel problems, and Manufacturing Design Principles and Human-Centered Design principles to projects, 2- Be able to identify, formulate, and solve engineeringproblems and to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineeringpractice, and 3- To understand the ethical responsibility. Nine lectures were developed, where each was designed to last three hours (with the labcomponent), and four labs were held throughout the semester that were designed to reinforce keylearning concepts. The lectures and the labs are shown in Table 1. Table 1. The nine lectures and the four labs that were held
another (remote learning) occurred.Something that is not able to be explicitly stated from the survey data is the impact of theconnection with our students. The authors all had the same personal conclusion that, although wewanted more, the sense of connection via Teams with our students was as vital to our well-beingin this uncertain time as we hope it was for our students. This approach provided the opportunityto continue to make “constructive utterances” and ensure we all had “enough turn taking” tohave a positive experience.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors want to acknowledge our students! Throughout this unprecedented series of events,we are incredibly proud of their work ethic and perseverance, as well as their steadfast resolve tobecome the
information needs, consider them thoughtfully,incorporate stakeholder feedback into project design where possible, and communicateeffectively and ethically. This course addresses an emerging and important aspect of civilengineering practice and is breaking new ground in engineering education.References[1] "Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer," American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019.[2] Linda Geppert, "Educating the Renaissance Engineer," Spec, vol. 32, pp. 39-43, Sep 1, 1995.[3] ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/.[4] R. D. Bullard, "Solid Waste
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference ProceedingsCharacterizing the Educational Effectiveness of STEM Demonstrations at Science- focused Events for Adult Audiences Dr. Tom Lucas* Purdue University lucas113@purdue.edu Science and its applications in engineering and technology are valuable tools to wield whileaddressing the plethora of environmental, ethical, and logistical concerns facing our modernsociety. It is not necessary for all individuals to work in a scientifically-focused industry, but arespect and understanding for the efforts of scientists is beneficial for
M (SD) Design: • Understanding of what engineers “do” in industry or as faculty members 3.07 (0.62) • Understanding of engineering as a field that often involves non-technical considerations (e.g., 3.04 (0.76) economic, political, ethical, and/or social issues) • Knowledge and understanding of the language of design in engineering 3.04 (0.76) • Knowledge and understanding of the process of design in engineering 2.96 (0.81) • Your ability to “do” design 2.85 (0.66) Problem
defined as key learning outcomes179 (KLO): (1) communication-related topics, (2) engineering economics-related topics, (3)180 engineering ethics-related topics, (4) legal aspects, (5) safety aspects, (6) design-related181 topics. The following subsection describes how this study determined and prioritized KLO. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings182 Figure 1 shows the proposed CEM template183 replicating six construction project life cycle phases184 embedded into the two-semester concept for the185 CEM Capstone course. CEM Capstone instructors186 can utilize this template to develop detailed187 capstone course plans
recognized as a critical professional skill in support ofengineering design work. As such, there are a growing number of curricular initiatives to supportthe development of engineering students' empathy as a design skill [14]. These initiatives span avariety of approaches, including stakeholder engagement in human-centered design, service-learning projects, and curriculum on ethical impacts of our engineering work [18]. However,within engineering, students identified empathy as a critical interpersonal skill for buildingrelationships in their everyday lives, yet struggled to see how empathy is involved in theirengineering work [19]. This disconnect highlights the importance of emphasizing empathy as notonly an engineering design skill, but also as a
overall obtain atenure-track position [3]. Most doctoral scientists and engineers obtain employment in theprivate sector rather than in education [4], and increasingly as entrepreneurs. A wide range ofskills and knowledge is required in order to succeed in industry, such as leadership,communication, and teamwork skills [5] as well as development of understanding of business,social, and ethical contexts within STEM [6]. Traditional graduate programs fall short ofpreparing students for multifaceted careers in the current landscape of rapidly evolvingtechnology and scientific knowledge [2]. The PAtENT model provides a framework to engageengineering doctoral students in entrepreneurship throughout their academic work and not as anaddendum to it. In
Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2002.[8] McGeen, M., Friauf, J., “The Evolution Of An Advanced Communication Skills Course,” Paper presented at the Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2001.[9] Squires, A., Pennotti, M., Verma, D. “The Effect Of Incorporating Verbal Stimuli In The Online Education Environment: An Online Case Study,” Paper presented at the Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois, 2006.[10] Leitch, K. R., Dittfurth, R. B., “Online and In-seat Ethics Instruction: The View from Both Sides,” Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012.[11] Rusco, Eileen M., “What’s my communication style
/2317745859. DOI: 10.18260/p.23398.[5] H. LeBlanc et al, "Combining technical and entrepreneurial skills in an electric circuitscourse through project-based learning," in Jun 15, 2014, Available:https://search.proquest.com/docview/2317698763.[6] R. J. Voigt, R. Ives and J. M. Hagee, "Modified Studio Lab Classroom Used To TeachElectrical And Computer Engineering To Non Engineers," 2003 Annual ConferenceProceedings, . DOI: 10.18260/1-2--12139.[7] M. Tomhenry et al, "Systematic Review of Rigorous Research in Teaching IntroductoryCircuits respectively. Her current engineering edu- cation research interests include engineeringstudents' understanding of ethics and social responsibility, sociotechnical education, andassessment of engineering pedagogies
experience? RQ3: According to students, what challenges did they face over the course of a year-long research experience?MethodsThis paper uses a combination of a priori and in vivo coding on qualitative, semi-structuredinterviews with 12 participants in a long-term undergraduate research program. Appropriateinstitutional ethics approval was obtained prior to data collection.Participants and SettingThe participants of this study are 12 undergraduate students in the department of Mechanical andMaterials Engineering at a land-grant, research-intensive university in the mid-west UnitedStates. The participants, comprising of eight males and four females, were in classes betweensophomore and senior year of their engineering major and were
recruit students from other majors(eg. Business and Public Policy), all students from the first three semesters came frommechanical engineering. The main barrier is that courseloads during the junior and senior yearsare often already filled with in-major requirements. EDR was always open to all majors but withits listing as an ME course, it provides little potential curricular credit for degrees in othermajors.For the fourth offering currently underway, a new course listing with a college-wide designationhelps broaden the appeal by making it easier for non-majors to take the course. The course wasalso added to a Science Technology Ethics and Policy minor, and a GenEd designation iscurrently being pursued. The cohort from the current semester now
significant learning.entrepreneurial mindset. Please Somewhat like me • A person who has a strong work ethic; who isread each description and think Like me persistent.about how much that person is like Very much like me • A person who has the ability to learn fromyou or not like you. Select the rating failure as well as success, and move forward.that best reflects how much the • A person who is a good communicator andperson in the description is like you. wants to collaborate with others.To assess whether a student understands the characteristics and activities experienced in a STEMcourse, the
are also interested in the environment in which they will be workingand relating stories from consulting jobs helps motivate them in class6, 11. Studentquestions about “real-world” experiences can lead to discussions that could relate toprofessionalism and ethics, liability, and other non-technical issues9. Industrialexperience and professional licensure is more important in undergraduate programs thanin graduate programs1. This stems from the fact that many graduate students aremigrating toward careers in academia and research, while the undergraduate counterpartsare most often going into field engineering positions upon graduation. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
meaningful conclusions, ML and MT algorithms are not necessarily diverse enough to beused in all situations. Furthermore, there are discussions that such applications struggle to adequately improve thequality of courses in the humanities. Many of the assessment tools have difficulty identifying highquality responses from low effort ones. In fact, open source AI chatbots can be used to trick MLgrading algorithms and remove the student from the feedback loop altogether. Thus, there arisesthe need for ML algorithms to detect ML submissions. This requires educators to invest time andenergy better diverted to course material and development to focus on the ethical ramification ofsuch problems. Lastly, many of these methods are algorithmically