on ways to connect hands-on experiential components with distance learning opportu- nities for future water and waste water treatment operators.Dr. Andrew N.S. Ernest, Western Kentucky UniversityMr. Joseph Lee Gutenson, University of Alabama Mr. Gutenson is currently pursuing his master’s and Ph.D. in Civil/Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama. His research interests include water resource planning and security, computer in- formation systems, and environmental sustainability. He has worked on a variety of water-related projects including several funded by the National Science Foundation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Institute for Hometown Security
Technical Managers2023 ASEE Engineering Management Division (EMD) Abstract This work in progress (WIP) paper aims at demonstrating the innovative design ofintegrating a communication course with the Capstone course, which is part of the Master ofEngineering Technical Management (METM), a 21-month online graduate program for workingprofessionals in the engineering technical management fields. As the culmination of theirgraduate study, students must identify an organizational/technical challenge, formulate a feasibleproject plan to address the issue to bring impact to the organization. During this process, theywill conduct research, create a strong business case for their industry sponsors
, and Canvasas the Learning Management System (LMS). Additionally, E. Session 3: Final Preparations and Strategyparticipants learn how to interact with their IoT devices,including initial setup, connectivity, and basic programming. The final session before the marathon event allows teamsThis session ensures teams are equipped with the necessary to refine their strategies and address any remaining technicaltools and understanding for effective collaboration and project or conceptual challenges. Participants review their progress,management. Figure 3 finalize their project plans, and ensure all components are fully
with the rubric encouraged educators to internalize itsconcepts, making inclusivity a central consideration in their pedagogical planning and execution.In addition, the rubric was adaptively used in action research projects, underscoring its versatilityand applicability across various educational initiatives. Although it was not initially specified asa requirement for these projects, educators intuitively incorporated the rubric into their researchmethodologies. This spontaneous adoption highlights the rubric’s utility in structuring inquiriesinto inclusive practices, enabling educators to conduct meaningful investigations that contributeto the broader discourse on equity in STEM education.Through both its immediate application during the
connections.• Boeing is working with several airports, airlines and other partners in developing tools such as SARA (Speed & Route Advisor) for “tailored arrivals”.• SARA delivered traffic within 30 seconds of planned time on 80% approaches at Schiphol airport in Holland compared to within two minutes on a baseline of 67%.• At San Francisco Airport, more than 1700 complete and partial tailored arrivals were completed between December 2007 and June 2009 using the B777 and B747 aircraft. The tailored arrivals saved an average of 950kg of fuel and ~ $950 per approach. Complete tailored arrivals saved approximately 40% of the fuel used in arrivals. For one year period, four participating airlines saved more than 524,000 kg of fuel and
results-driven outcomes. Thephilosophy of this approach focuses on three components: 1) a clear set of desired results byidentifying goals for students, identifying the specific information students will understand andwhat students would be able to do as a result of the learning activity; 2) identification ofassessment evidence, allowing teachers to develop performance tasks to evaluate student results;and, 3) creating a learning plan that includes activities for students, enabling them to achieve thedesired results.This approach allows us to address the lessons learned in Year 1, because the approach will workregardless of the framework standard or grade level. This approach also allows teachers to use
in decision-making representation in decision- decision-making making Shared Funding • Undercompensating the • Provide fair & equitable • Set up a sustainable funding community partners funding to community for system for the future • No plan for long-term duration of project • Community can generate operations & • Funding is centered around value after the project has maintenance
engineering set-up and anybusiness model that is to appropriately capture and nurture the essence of engineering firms mustof a necessity be able to position innovation properly as a value proposition that is central andconnected to all activities of such firms.The Business Model Canvas is a model building tool that has had wide use since it wasconceived in planning for the future of an enterprise. It is used principally to identify the valueinherent in a business activity and how such value will be packaged and offered to the targetmarket. However, just like any other business concept, the Business Model Canvas has itsdrawbacks and researchers are quick to point to what it cannot do more than what it can do. TheBusiness Model Canvas proposed by
students are encouraged to consider these specific course learning outcomes:1. Apply a formal engineering design process to solve an open-ended, externally supplied engineering design problem.2. Work effectively on an engineering team.3. Formally define an engineering problem and generate an engineering specification document.4. Apply creative techniques to generate conceptual design solutions.5. Apply structured decision schemes to select appropriate engineering concepts in a team environment.6. Evaluate potential design solutions through the use of engineering and physical science analysis techniques and tools.7. Construct and test prototype designs.8. Develop and implement a design verification plan and report.9. Communicate and
events, and services of the brand have a better chance to create their own brands and activities, such as the ability targeting one of the key to the audience the relationship between planned. Hypothesis: Brand sponsorship has a positive effect on building strong brands. Factor 3: “The model highlights four successive and progressive stages
teaching andresearch capabilities. This paper reflects on the experiences of a faculty member (author) whoparticipated in the Associated General Contractors of America’s Robert L. Bowen IndustryResidency Initiative, which allowed them to work closely with a multinational constructioncompany on a major medical center expansion project. The internship spanned various aspects ofthe project, including safety management, pre-construction planning, communication strategies,and business development. The paper emphasizes the immediate benefits of this internship, suchas deeper insights into modern construction technologies, safety protocols, and projectmanagement practices. It also discusses the long-term impact, which extends to curriculumimprovements in
curriculum [7] secondary education settings, students are ready to use thewhich puts more stress on curriculum administrators to technology at their disposal [14]. We will look at four broadintegrate technology into lesson plan requirements. Owen and factors, all of which are independent from each other butDemb have found there is much pressure to use technology in possess a connection to our goal of educaitonal technologythe classroom as well as other education environments, implementation (See Fig. 1).including those at the college-level [8]. With the variety andaccess at our disposal, funding for integration projects havesprouted left and right [9] which exacerbates the
child transportation system is a device could be implemented into the design instead of having eachfor children ages of four to ten. By conducting research, the member work exclusively on a separate subsystem. Further-task was to build a device that is inexpensive, safe and visual- more, one member has responsibility for project managemently appealing to both children and their parents. Design re- and planning to keep the team organized and on track whilequirements included the ability for the device to collapse and another brings his experience with fabrication to constructionfit into a carrying case that is lightweight and comfortable. and device development. The final two members contributeThe
the original advanced computer architecture content. I believe in this class project so Iam planning on still offering the course to the non-EE/CPE/CSC students but then also haveeither one separate lecture per week where I split the EEs, CPEs and CSCs from the otherstudents in the course for some number of weeks so I can talk about the required computerarchitecture topics to the EE, CPE and CSC majors.Course Lecture and Lab ContentA general schedule of the course is included in Appendix A. Due to the variety of backgrounds inthe class, lecture was a challenge. Successful portions of the course included discussions thateach major could come at from their own viewpoint. For example, reading on electronic medicalrecords was assigned in the
in 2024. This camp is a two-week camp. During the first week, a group of HSTAteachers come to campus to learn about the activities with faculty, meet the mentors, and explorethe campus. The goal of this week is 1) to help teachers prepare to help teach the lesson plans ofthe camp to students, 2) build a database of activities that they can use in the future in theirclassrooms, 3) further their confidence in STEM. The second week students attend the campwhich is broken into three components: STEM activities, a team-building project, andexploration of the regional area.ChallengesRunning these summer programs requires year-round duties of a faculty member to prepare forthe summer months. Responsibilities for the organization of these camps fall
accrediting agencies, institutional influences of college missionsand resources, and unit-level influences of faculty, discipline, and student characteristics. Starkalso created the Contextual Filters Model that provides an overview of the various contexts thatinfluence course planning for college faculty (Lattuca & Stark, 2011; Stark, 2000; Stark et al.,1988). A study by Lund and Stains examines unique environments and contexts of departmentsin influencing STEM faculty’s teaching practices and finds that disciplinary differences exist andhave shown potential associations to level of adoption of evidence-based instructional practices(2015). Another study shows similar findings where faculty’s teaching practices differ based onthe contexts they
. Test Plan and ResultsIn order to test the system, the ladder logic program was written and downloaded to thePLC. After a successful download, the PLC was reset and tested for correctness. This is avery simple process of flipping a switch on or off to simulate parts passing the sensor,etc. If the ladder logic program is not correct, the PLC will either not function at all, orthe results will not be correct. This makes it fairly easy to debug.The program worked exactly as planned in the end. A switch was thrown to simulate theproximity sensor counting. When the switch was thrown the programmed amount oftimes, the robot was set into motion. This is simulated by a light on the PLC lighting up.When the time elapsed for the robot to take the tray to
they learn in a classroom environment and its reflection in professional applications. In addition, this collaboration bridges the gap between academia and industry. This semester was spent towards building a positive working relationship with industry. As the course is offered only once a calendar year, we will implement the plans generated by these ideas in Fall 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Future Approaches: 1. Guest lecturers from local companies: Invite the project manager or a company representative to spend a
research on workload assess- ment. Dr. Pennathur has also been recently awarded two grants from the National Science Foundation in Engineering Education. In one of the grants, he is modeling how engineering faculty plan for their instruction. In a second grant, he is developing a model for institutional transformation in engineering which balances access and excellence. Dr. Pennathur is the author/co-author of over 100 publications in industrial engineering and human factors engineering. He is on the editorial board of the International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, among other journals.Priyadarshini PennathurProf. Nicholas A Bowman, University of Iowa Nicholas A. Bowman is the Mary Louise Petersen Chair in Higher
: cosψ x1 = sin θ x sin θ 1 cos (φ1 − φ x ) + cos θ x cos θ 1 cosψ x 2 = sin θ x sin θ 2 cos (φ 2 − φ x ) + cos θ x cos θ 2 (4) cosψ x3 = sin θ x sin θ 3 cos (φ 3 − φ x ) + cos θ x cos θ 3We will arrange three detectors on a horizontal plane. The x-axis will be aligned with thenorth, y-axis with the west and z-axis with the zenith directions. Fig. 3 shows the plan ofthe detectors’ positions. It is assumed that the source illuminates the three detectorsequally. N 1 W E
to the stages of self-regulated learning,i.e., planning, performance, and self-reflection.Results: Results indicate that students had prior knowledge of project management but lackedfamiliarity with the research process. Students encountered project management challenges, buteffective communication and clear goal setting were key strategies in meeting deadlines andcompleting coursework. Students valued collaboration and continuous mentoring, and the coursehad a positive impact on students' understanding and interest in research, as well as theirdevelopment of transferable skills for future practice. Overall, this study highlights theimportance of project management skills and mentorship in promoting self-regulated learningand research skills
the first-year experience.Backward Design and the CAP modelThe backward design of curricular development starts with the basic idea of starting from the end, wherewe envision our students to be after the learning experience we are designing [4]. Its central premise isthat once the educational purposes (i.e., the learning outcomes) of a learning experience areconscientiously selected, the rest of the elements of the experience (i.e., the pedagogical activities, andcorresponding assessments) should be designed toward the achievement of those identified outcomes [5].Therefore, the three main stages of backward design are: (1) identifying desired results, (2) determiningacceptable evidence, and (3) planning learning experiences and instruction
twenty-eight undergraduateagricultural and biological engineering students’ self-ratings of their proficiency level withlearning objectives following weekly assignments in a process engineering course. Theseresponses, in conjunction with results from the learning-objective based grading of students’work by the teaching assistant were analyzed to determine patterns in students’ learning needs asthe semester progressed. Examples of inferences about students’ struggles that the instructordrew from the results of students' self-ratings and actions that the instructor made or plans to takeare discussed.I. IntroductionUniversity instructors write course learning objectives, and they may even use these as a guide todesigning their instruction as
Undergraduate Programs in the Depart- ment of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She has been active in improving undergraduate education including developing laboratories to enhance experimental design skills and mentoring and guiding student teams through the capstone design and a translational course following capstone design. In her Director role, she works closely with the departmental leadership to manage the undergraduate program including: developing course offering plan, chairing the undergrad- uate curriculum committee, reviewing and approving course articulations for study abroad, serving as Chief Advisor, and representing the department at the college level meetings. She is
second, morein-depth, course to the curriculum. This response reveals a need for further investigation intodifferent aspects of transportation engineering curricula, specifically looking into the degree towhich secondary courses are present in civil engineering programs seven years down the road.Aside from course structure, specific concepts covered in transportation engineering is anothertopic of interest among researchers. Transportation engineering is a large field encompassingmany different sub-fields; e.g., transportation planning, roadway design, travel behavior, policy,and traffic operations, among others. Recent work aimed to uncover how different professionalsprioritize what topics students cover in their transportation engineering
. However, in recent years, many of the manufacturing-related machines haveevolved to be non-hands-on. Consequently, more time is spend planning the process, for instancein CAD/CAM environments. The analysis of data is becoming more important in recent years aswell. Not just since the rise of Industry 4.0 is the number of sensors steadily increasing,generating an ever bigger amount of data. Along with this trend, the learning goals of laboratorycourses shift accordingly – from manual operation of machines towards process planning,observation and data analysis. This enables to use of so-called remote laboratories as part offlipped laboratory concepts, given their shifted focus of achievable learning outcomes [2], [6].Such remote laboratories are
at least they have a limitedunderstanding) what surveying engineering is. This has created enrollment challenges in manysurveying programs e.g., [4], [12], [27], [28]. It is worth mentioning that some surveyingprograms (undergraduate and/or graduate) that have developed online programs haveexperienced great success [29]-[31]. In our previous work we surveyed current students andalumni, focusing on the reasons why they selected surveying as a career and how they learnedabout surveying [12]. While the survey provided many insights that are useful in refining ourrecruitment plans, current surveying students and alumni provide half of the picture, becausethey have already selected surveying as a career. They were able to learn about surveying
moment delivered in one of multiple formats, including presentations, a discussion, videos, orinteractive content. Sometimes we select topics that are relevant to the class session, e.g., cement burnswhen discussing concrete or crane safety when discussing construction site planning. But other times weselect general safety, health or wellbeing topics of importance to the students. Examples include CPR, activeshooter safety, bicycle safety, drowsy driving, and stress management, to name a few. Figure 1 includessample slides from two safety moments. The top slides are focused on a building industry related topic, laddersafety, while the bottom slides are a more personal topic, cooking safety and fire hazards associated withcooking on a stove, a
the kits (only photo diagrams of the proper configurations were provided). Onestudent suggested; “Some more in-depth questions (the TA was very good about prodding ourgroup to continue to think about the problem) could be included at the end to help withunderstanding beyond the base level.” Overall, the trend of student feedback providesencouraging justification to continue development of this activity and the accompanying hands-on components. In the future, we plan to investigate the students’ cognitive gain regarding rigidbody kinematics through pre and post activity assessments.AcknowledgmentsThis work was funded in part by the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research aspart of the Learning Lab (https://calearninglab.org
about who their customer is, what needs the customerhas, and how to meet them. In other words, they are developing an entrepreneurial mindset [2].In order to meet this shift in societal thinking, the importance of exposure to engineering [3] andentrepreneurship earlier in education increases. In this study, Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM) Pre-Service Teachers (PSTs) enrolled in an engineering educationcourse where they completed an entrepreneurial Problem-Based Learning (PBL) unit. ThroughPSTs’ reflections, post-assessments, and lesson plans, we gathered their perceptions regardingthe integration of entrepreneurial mindset within their content and future teaching. The researchquestions we investigated are: 1