, she worked as a reference librarian at Johnson & Wales University-Charlotte and Central Piedmont Community College. A large focus of her day-to-day work and research interests lies in the fields of data informed decision making, information seeking behavior, and student library engagement and motivation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 An Assessment of the Impact of Library Instructional Strategies on Engineering Students’ Information Literacy Jeffrey McAdams, MLS (Co-Principal Investigator) Assistant Professor and Engineering Librarian, J. Murrey Atkins Library Rebecca Croxton, MLIS, PhD (Co
. He has over 10 years of experience teaching Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Equations. In more recent years, Dr. Fury has shifted focus to service in administration. He is especially interested in developing impactful practices and programs that support the success of underrepresented groups in STEM education.Dr. Michael Kagan, Pennsylvania State University Michael (Mike) Kagan is an associate professor of physics at Penn State Abington. He received a Ph.D. in Physics from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Kagan’s research interests are diverse and include Quantum Gravity and Cosmology, Electric Circuits and Algebraic Graph Theory; Physics EducationDr. John Majewicz, Pennsylvania State University
engineering careers in industry, government agencies and other organizations concerned with the environment and the provision of primary materials and secondary materials and energy, as well as graduate studies in related disciplines. • This course teaches the basic concepts and skills needed for the practice of Earth and Environmental Engineering, including measurement and control of material and contaminant flows through the environment, assessment of environmental impact of past, present and future industrial activities, and analysis and design of processes for remediation, recycling, and disposal of used materials. • This course ensures that the technical training of our students is based on a strong liberal arts
her college, Bailey teaches energy-related courses and serves as a mentor and advisor to undergraduate and graduate mechanical engineering students who are involved in her research. Bailey teaches courses related to thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, and design. She is actively involved in curricular development and assessment activities, ranging from individual courses to college and institute-wide programs. Bailey and her graduate students conduct research in thermodynamic analyses of complex, energy-intensive systems such as coal-fired power plants and commercial refrigeration plants.Prof. Stefi Alison Baum, Rochester Institute of Technology Carlson Center for Imaging ScienceProf. Sharon Patricia
and graduation and the other between graduation and theirsecond year as a practicing engineer, The two specific aims of this project are: (1) model thedevelopment of student and early-career engineer epistemology and conceptual understanding ofcivil design concepts, and (2) identify key conceptual and epistemological changes that challengeearly-career engineers. The specific research questions of this project are: 1. How do engineering students change conceptually and epistemologically during the course of their undergraduate education? a. Which previous student beliefs and ways of thinking are the most resistant to change and interfere the most with learning? 2. How do early-career engineers change
of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 2013. 15(2): p. 173-192.50. Garza, A.N. and A.S. Fullerton, Staying close or going away: How distance to college impacts the educational attainment and academic performance of first-generation college students. Sociological Perspectives, 2018. 61(1): p. 164-185.51. Hammes, J.F. and E.J. Haller, Making ends meet: some of the consequences of part-time work for college students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 1983.52. Phillippe, K.A. and L.G. Sullivan, National profile of community colleges: Trends & statistics. 2005: Amer. Assn. of Community Col.53. Whitley, S.E., G. Benson, and A. Wesaw, First-generation student success: A landscape analysis of
- funded program from the U.S. Department of Education to help first-generation and under-resourced students to successfully persist and graduate from college. Before her career transition into higher education, Lori worked in private industry in educational publish- ing. She has more than 10 years’ experience leading research and development of new products and sales training programs in a successful start-up company. She combines her multi-dimensional experience in student services in higher education, private industry and business and career coaching with her passion for helping students, alumni, and professionals identify and achieve their chosen career path. She has a doctorate in Higher Education Administration
and family impacts. Creative combinations of alreadyestablished international faculty contacts, graduate students, and undergraduate projects couldactually make a global experience productive for a research program. Do you have contactssomewhere else in the world that could benefit from having a student team tackle a problem forwhich they don’t have the time or resources? Could that problem be something related to yourown research? Institutional BarriersThe institutional barriers consist of concerns about the academic worth of the experience,curriculum constraints, awarding academic credit, and the calendar. Creative repackaging ofcurriculum requirements and employment of accepted assessment processes
Paper ID #39068Telling Half a Story: A Mixed Methods Approach to UnderstandingCulturally Relevant Engineering Education in Nigeria and the U.S.Moses Olayemi, Purdue University, West Lafayette Moses Olayemi is a Doctoral Candidate and Bilsland Dissertation Fellow in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests revolve around the professional development of engineering educators in low resource/post-conflict settings and the design and contextualization of in- struments to measure the impact of educational interventions. Research projects on these topics have and are currently being
their identity and promote change on the campus atlarge.Here, we will discuss our design and implementation of a LGBTQIA+ reading group for STEMstudents and faculty as a mechanism to disrupt the erasure of queer narratives in STEM. Throughthis group, students are able to discuss queer identities and social issues in a formal setting andconnect with literature that validates their experiences of isolation and discrimination in their field.We will discuss the reading group structure and design, provide reflection on best practices fromour pilot group in Fall 2020, and will present student and faculty reflections on their experiencesin the group.Reading Group Development and StructureReading Group DevelopmentThe idea to run this reading group
in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s research is in STEM education, 21st century skills, and design and evaluation of learning environments informed by the How People Learn framework.Dr. Emily Binks-Cantrell, Texas A&M University Emily (Binks) Cantrell, Ph.D., is a Clinical Assistant Professor of Reading and Language Arts at Texas A&M University - College Station, where she teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses in reading and ESL, co-directs the Texas A&M Reading Clinic, and also serves as the adviser for the Aggie Story- telling Association. She has published
committingto purchasing initial production units once the new vehicle has successfully passed Federal TransitAdministration (FTA) certification testing. The project provides exposure to a very real industryapplication which is similar to what many of the students will face when entering their career fields,and will allow for practical application of project planning, design innovation, budgeting, working withindustry standards and government regulations, as well as manufacturing process planning andexecution. An industrial approach is being utilized for the design process which emphasizes use of severalautomotive industry best practices including Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Design FailureMode Effects and Analysis (DFMEA), as well as
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University and Bachelor degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Physics from Cedarville University. His research interests are focused on best practices for student learning and student success. He is currently developing and researching SMART assessment, a modified mastery learning pedagogy for problem based courses. He created and co-teaches a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies.Sara Roccabianca, Michigan State University Sara Roccabianca is an Assistant Professor in the Department of
U.S. GDP is attributable to advancements in science and technology. This despite the fact that less than 5 percent of the U.S. workforce is composed of scientists and engineers, thereby suggesting that each one percent of the workforce engaged in those professions accounts for something like 15 percent of the growth in GDP. A truly remarkable multiplier.” - Norm Augustine (Augustine, 2013)In Spring 2015 a workshop was held at the National Academy of Engineering designed to buildcapacity for the engineering education research community to better communicate with a broadspectrum of policy makers. The underlying hypothesis is that despite the impact how engineersare educated has on national priorities, researchers in
answer formats. • understand the impact of, and incorporate new technologies, including computer presentation software, in oral communication. • become more critical thinkers, speakers and listeners. • learn the concepts of, and practice ethical communication.From the ISE program standpoint, an Oral Communications Thread should address the basictheory and concepts of oral communication much like a Communications course. Additionallythere should be an emphasis on personal and small group communications associated with one-on-one meetings and shop floor discussions. We want to focus specifically on having thestudents present the results of their analysis and designs developed in the courses and do not feelthe need to
Social Thought and a bachelor’s degree in anthropology from Dickinson College.Dr. Matthew Frenkel, New York University Matthew Frenkel is the engineering librarian at NYU’s Bern Dibner Library, and an adjunct faculty in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon. He is a member of the ASEE Engineering librarian division (ELD). Matthew’s background is in the experimental study of optical whispering gallery sensors, but his current research interests are in how undergraduate and graduate engineering students develop their professional skills.Mr. Mikolaj Wilk, New York University Engineering Reference Associate at Bern Dibner Library c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
a student’s vertical integration of knowledge from previous courses. Industry leaders1 arebeginning to recognize this growing problem as technology expands ever faster. These concernshave been translated into the ABET 2000 outcome criteria2. There is an urgent need forengineers who can assimilate knowledge and translate it efficiently across and upward alongdiscipline paths to achieve levels of experience lost through retirement and the lack of full-production aircraft design programs. In order to achieve these ambitious goals, it is imperativethat each student learns to the best of their ability throughout their undergraduate experience.This is obviously not the case in current practice in all levels of student performance. The central
, mentored and have productively conducted research, theywill choose faculty careers. Conversely, they found scientists, no matter their background,reported less interest in faculty careers (particularly for those at research-intensive universities),and increased interest in careers outside of research over time in graduate school.25Reflecting on the work of these programs and the resulting improvements in completion of PhDsand steps forward in institutional change, a faculty career model that better defines what ishappening in best practice situations and that better speaks to the PhDs who are choosing non-academic careers is clearly needed. An improved model can be used by policy makers indeveloping funding solicitations as well as by institutions
result from the environment. Here, the independentor controllable variables are called “design elements” or “factors.” The present study focused onidentifying design elements in the context of a faculty development workshop in the area of as-sessment. The research question was: “For professors who are improving their knowledge ofassessment and their ability to effectively assess others, what factors (design elements) or com-binations of factors mediate in learning, attitudinal changes, and performance improvements?”Important reasons to research faculty development include (a) effective faculty developmentproduces “great coaches” who bring out the best in others, and (b) impacting a small communityof professors impacts many students.In summary
academic secretary at the Faculty of Engineering of the Andrés Bello University. The areas of research interest are the impact, relationship and integration of the gender perspective within communications and marketing in the various areas of development, digital marketing and content marketing.Maria Elena Truyol María Elena Truyol, Ph.D., is full professor and researcher of the Universidad Andrés Bello (UNAB). She graduated as physics teacher (for middle and high school), physics (M.Sc.) and Ph.D. in Physics at Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. In 2013 she obtained a three-year postdoctoral position at the Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Her focus is set on educational research, physics education, problem-solving
technology is chosen as a medium for teaching CT, it is recommended that teachers beaware of the best practices for using technology around children. This will help ensure that thetechnology used is safe, age-appropriate, and aligns with the curriculum's learning goals [32].Limitations and Future WorkThe CTPF+ frameworks based on the systematic review collected from ProQuest. Therefore,works that can provide different insight into this research may have been missed. Also, mostliterature reviews build their work on Brennan and Resnick, which can lead to bias as itinfluences all the author’s views. Other limitations are the limited work for data science, and AIinfers the need to have more research to influence the judgments, and the inclusion of CT
workforce requirement. FLATE’s flexible college and career pathway (Figure 1.)was created for Florida students and incumbent workers in order to prepare them with theeducation, skills, and credentials to support both small and large manufacturers, and to create atrained workforce for Florida which would have a positive impact on the economy and attractnew business enterprises to the state. The restructure of the A.S. Degree for engineeringtechnology education statewide required the direct address of significant challenges connected toindustry relevance, student recruitment, curriculum content, and faculty professionaldevelopment. The complexity of this higher technical education transformation is best describedin five phases: Research and Planning
unique contributions, particularly within aSTEM field that is often misunderstood [4]. Further, the nature and context of learningenvironments was found to impact caregivers’ adoption of various roles and speaks to the valueof purposefully designed and supplied environments to facilitate learning.Related WorkCaregivers play an important role in shaping their children’s STEM experiences, dispositions,identities, interests, and practices [12]–[17]. For example, Vedder-Weis [17] highlighted howfamily negotiations of roles and recognition within everyday interactions around sciencepositioned one child as the science person (i.e., “good” science participant) and another child asthe science antagonist (i.e., uncooperative or a hostile science
Page 22.1681.5 materials, and other materials shared among partner institutions and broadly disseminated. · Share best practices for engaging undergraduates in research early in their academic careers with campuses around the state and more broadly and provide consulting services to campuses interesting in establishing, expanding, or enhancing their capabilities to engage first and second year students in research.Student participation in the URC activities will be apportioned annually based on graduationrates at the end of each academic year.Engineering and Science Summer AcademyAs a component of the MI-LSAMP Pre-First Year initiative and through funding from the 3MFoundation, Alcoa Corporation and the DTE
Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 925–955. doi:10.3102/00028312155846216. Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs, Distance Education, 35(2), 149–158. doi:10.1080/01587919.2014.9207527. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design. New York, NY: Wiley.8. Kizilcec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 22(2), 1–24. doi:10.1145/26997359. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1
quite the same way. For example, students have commented on theirsearch pages that Google cannot give them the kind of scholarly sources they need tounderstand engineering concepts. Because of the librarian’s direct engagement in first aclassroom and then a faculty, the perception has changed – and for the better.In this way, we are able to approach the outcome that Brent argues for: learning aresearch process and “learning by inquiry in a collaborative environment” [18].Bibliography[1] A. Parker and N. Godavari (2007). “Information Literacy and the art of doing research within the context of an engineering technical communications course,” The Canadian Design Engineering Network (CDEN) and the Canadian Congress on Engineering
Page 9.294.9 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationEach year, the CfAO hosts a Professional Development Workshop (PDW) on Maui for CfAOgraduate students, postdoctoral researchers and educators, select Maui high school teachers, andMCC faculty and administrators. This years’ workshop was titled “Broadening the Impact ofYour Research: Teaching, Communicating, and Partnership Building.” Based on recognizedbest practices for engaging students in STEM, and particularly for engaging underrepresentedstudents in STEM, much of the workshop focuses on teaching educators the methods of inquiry-led
1, 2, and 3 . This ability can be used as a prognostication factor for achievement andattainment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) 4, 5 . It is well documentedthat 3D spatial skills can be developed through practice. Sorby has shown that a course aimed atdeveloping the 3D spatial skills of first-year engineering students has a positive impact on studentsuccess, especially for women 6 . The research team has developed a semester-long online, spatialskills workshop. The content incorporates online resources related to mental rotation, 2D and 3Dspatial visualization, and abstract reasoning. An experimental group of female first-yearengineering students will participate in the weekly online workshop. To assess
, Golnaz’s research focused on modeling and measuring connected design learningin engineering digital learning environments using discourse network analytics. Her current researchexamines the intersection of STEM practices and computational thinking. Naomi C. Chesler is Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison with courtesy appointments in Pedi- atrics, Medicine, Mechanical Engineering and Educational Psychology. She graduated with a BS in general engineering from Swarthmore Col- lege and then obtained an MS in mechanical engineering from MIT and a PhD
first-year engineering.The intended outcome of this work is to establish a set of guidelines or principles that willinform the work of the first-year community at the instructional, advising, recruitment, andoutreach levels. This study will ultimately situate across factors for success in post-secondaryeducation (access, persistence, engagement, performance, graduation), with implications for boththe student, instructor, and administrator, to better align preparation, expectations and supportwith what students anticipate and actually face in their first-year.The principal research question leading this investigation asks: What experiences are reported aspreparing for (bridging) or limiting (acting as barrier to) success in the first-year? As