data types, control flow statements, fileoperations, and modules are covered 10. Common Python programming interfaces used to callPSS/E functions are elucidated. Using Python programming to automate power system studies(load case, modify case, impose disturbances, run simulations, clear disturbances, runsimulations, write results to a file, etc.) is illustrated. PSS/E provides a comprehensive set ofprogramming interfaces between Python environment and PSS/E functions. Selected sets ofessential functions for case preparation, power flow, fault analysis, stability analysis, and resultsretrieval are covered, such as psspy.fnsl, fdns, natono, case, seqd, scmu, scinit, scdone, abusreal,busdat, scbus2, scbrn2, etc 3. The PSS/E Application Program
) Engineering content a) Students identified the role of clients/users b) Students identified criteria/constraints c) Students modeled their solution(s) prior to creating their final prototype d) Students identified connections between engineering and society e) Students utilized peer and teacher feedback to make decisions about redesign f) students utilized data acquired through testing when making decision about redesign3) Gender differences a) Were girls more, equally, or less actively engaged (answer for each stage of the engineering design process) b
AM to Noon. (See Course Outline)STUDENT PRESENTATIONSEach student must choose two subjects from different chapters from the book “How Things Work” and present them in a PowerPoint format to the class at the appropriate time. The presentations will be graded for content and style by the professor and peers on anonymous ballots. The eligible subjects must be selected from the following chapters: 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16. In case there are not enough subjects, the second presentation may be presented by teams of two students.SHOEBOX SCIENCE PROJECTSEach student is required to develop one shoebox science project based on a specific TEK Physics problem from their particular grade level. The shoebox projects will be presented
to the course in 2010. He is co- author, with Robert Irish, of Engineering Communication: From Principles to Practice (Oxford Canada, 2008), and is also on the writing team for a new design/communication textbook for first-year engineering students. Page 25.507.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Effects of lecture capture on a large first year engineering courseIntroductionOur first year engineering classrooms are undergoing many obvious changes, such as increasingclass sizes, growing international student body, greater diversity in student background, and
well established student-centered approach which promotesapplication-based learning, enhances problem solving skills and fosters peer learning. This paperdescribes implementation of a PBL lab within a junior-level course on environmentalengineering processes. The PBL exercise was an open-ended, two-hour lab, where student teamsdesigned, built and tested a prototype water treatment system to achieve stated water qualitycriteria (UV transmittance and turbidity). Each team was given a scope of work that outlined theproblem, objectives, design criteria, available materials, constraints, effluent quality testingprotocol (using a synthetic influent) and evaluation criteria. Students were given no priorinformation about the lab, and the PBL lab was
States. UDLAP’s School of Engineering offers since 1970a bachelor (licenciatura) program in food engineering, with the following goal: “To educate wellinformed, critical, creative and innovative professionals that are highly skilled in food science,engineering, and technology, but above all, aware of their great social responsibility to ensure afair distribution of the benefits of globalization”. Our Food Engineering program is approvedinternationally by the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) and accredited by the Consejo deAcreditación de la Enseñanza de la Ingeniería (CACEI), which is the peer-accrediting agency ofABET in Mexico.Course descriptionsThe studied courses, Food Analysis and Laboratory of Food Analysis are a junior level 3
emergency management and disaster assistance. He has authored numerous papers and presentations focusing on the use of decision support systems for risk assessment, threat analysis, and emergency management. During his tenure at JSU, Skelton has mentored more than 70 students at his research center, focusing on problem solving, software development, and GIS utiliza- tion. Skelton’s primary areas of interest are STEM education, risk assessment, decision support, and cyber security.Dr. Pao-Chiang Yuan, Jackson State University Pao-Chiang Yuan received his Ph.D in civil engineering (environmental/water resources engineering) from Oklahoma State University. Yuan serves as Peer Reviewer for state, private grant programs, and
related to the integration oflearning and work. 5Data from Australian and Portuguese surveys show that engineers tend to spend the majority oftheir working week (around 60%) engaged in activities which involve interaction with others(meetings, supervision, writing reports, etc.) and only around 40% is devoted to technicalengineering activity. • There are also new organizational aspects in engineering education6:On the one hand, engineering issues, either in industrial products or in engineering projects, arequickly becoming increasingly complicated and most of these issues cross disciplinary lines.On the other hand, the working environment is becoming more and more internationalized dueto the globalization of the world economy. Products are
, and sciencestudents at a variety of institutions. Both reviews yielded important information that contributedto the final model for the Rose-Hulman Leadership Advancement Program.Engineering educators have acknowledged the challenge of providing leadership developmentopportunities for students, given the crowded curriculum of most engineering programs and thelack of leadership expertise among engineering faculty. Cox, Cekic, and Adams, writing in a Page 25.1343.3special Leadership issue of the Journal of STEM Education, conducted a research study withengineering faculty at a Midwestern university; the purpose of the study was to
deliverables outlined in Table 2. Page 25.1382.4Table 1: Systems Engineering 368 Student TasksTopic Students Tasks and DeliverablesTopic Students Tasks and DeliverablesRequirements / Technical Extract top level requirements from statement of need and stakeholder Performance Measures interviews. Write succinct, quality requirements that in addition to functional needs address regulatory, health & safety, and non-functional needs. Perform requirement analysis Manage
doing so should be recognized and addressed. In addition tocorporate and peer pressure to immediately enter the workforce, many students have anegative perception of the economic consequences of this decision. They often believethat the best economic return will be obtained by going directly into the workforce and Page 6.1036.1that pursuing graduate studies will cost too much in both tuition and lost wages. Many of Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationour students, including those at the top of their class, are
of this paper is to present the resultsof a student assessment of a specific web-assisted teaching methodology that has been used toteach twelve engineering courses.The MethodThis particular method grew out of the one of the author’s familiarity with the use of PowerPointbriefing charts in a business environment. In business, engineers, project managers, andorganization managers routinely communicate information to employees, customers, and peers ina briefing format. The ability to pull together technical briefings on very short notice is animportant practical skill. It is becoming standard practice in industry for briefing charts,calculations, drawings, and computer models to be stored in intranet-based databases that can beaccessed by
materials can be viewed withthe two most popular Web browsers, namely, Netscape or Internet Explorer Webbrowsers. The web site for the course can be found at http://etcs.ipfw.edu/~lin. Page 5.199.3 Figure 1. A Snap Shot of the Course Web SiteThe course materials are divided into sixteen modules and are covered in approximately40 contact hours. Each set of lecture notes, in Microsoft PowerPoint file format, isprepared and posted before the class lecture. Students can download the files and printthem as slides to help them write down lecture details. They can also view thepresentation slides using a Web browser through an Internet connection at
, with set of 2D/3D modeling and editing tools.V. Mannequin Integrated with CADMannequin’s real power is realized when it is integrated with CAD system. Mannequin wasdesigned to be completely compatible with any CAD packages that can read or write DXF files. Ourresearch showed that the problem of incompatibility between systems, as indicated by manyresearchers earlier, existed between these two as well. However, we were able to solve most of theproblems, and effectively integrate these two. This integrated ergonomic CAD system will providea powerful tool for the designer to test the functionality of the design for almost anything destined tobe used by humans. For example, design students can use this software package in conjunction witha CAD
28, instructors monitoredand assessed my team skills).However, according to the interview data, the team process check needed further refinement.Although both female and male students believed that the process check was good in theory, theyfelt it could be improved to allow for student anonymity. Despite the fact that the documentationallowed students to voice issues, problems, and team dysfunction, the process can be deadlocked.Some students were reluctant to write critical comments about others fearing retaliation. Otherswere reluctant to reflect critically on their own attitude, behavior, and performance and havethose comments voiced publicly during the focus group. According to students, if this policy isto become more effective, both
, have been available for more than a century,biomedical optics has developed into a field of its own only in recent years, significantly spurredon by the development of lasers and optical fibers. Medicine was one of the first majorapplications of lasers, and today there is probably no field of medicine or biology which doesnot employ optics and lasers in some form. Biomedical optics is now an important and growingfield of biomedical engineering. In the past 4 years, the creation of 2 dedicated peer-reviewedjournals (Journal of Biomedical Optics, Applied Optics - Optical Technology and BiomedicalOptics) in the US alone, attest to this. The growing market represented by the biomedical opticsindustry is also evidenced by the creation of new
methodical troubleshooting and encourages the student teamsto exercise caution as they prepare to collect data. An interesting observation is that severalstudents originally thought that incorporation of DAQ techniques would make their laboratoryexperience easier, but were quickly reminded by their peer team members that there was plenty ofwork to do.There are numerous positive aspects to inclusion of DAQ in lower division laboratory courses.From the students’ perspective, the greatest benefit is the redirecting of their time from relativelymindless data collection and hand recording followed by data entry (with the possibility of typingerrors generating invalid data/results) to focusing on understanding the experimental setup andmechanics concepts
exercise during class in which you ask students to identify key areas aboutwhich their attitudes (positive or negative) are likely to have an impact on their academicsuccess. During this brainstorming session, write all responses on the blackboard. Feel free toadd a few of your own.Step 2. Pick 8-10 of the areas listed, and as a homework assignment have each student writedown three positive attitudes and three negative attitudes they have about each area.Step 3. During the class period in which the homework assignment is due, have volunteers sharenegative attitudes they have about each of the areas. Ask each respondent to answer the Page
up a missedclass by writing a research paper on a topic of interest to the class. An individually written essayexam is given as a final exam that contributes to approximately 20% of the course grade.Prior to the final exam, each student’s grade is normally in the “B” to “A-” range because of thedependence on team grades and a liberal grading policy. Thus the final exam, with its 20%weight, can increase this spread from “C” to “A”. Assessment of Student Satisfaction and Opinions Student satisfaction with course over its two most recent offerings has been assessed, andthe results are presented here. Three areas have been assessed: (1) satisfaction with the course,(2) rating the reading assignments, and (3) rating
thesophomore year. This component is designed to extend learning opportunities that apply thefundamentals of design along with hands-on experiences. The students are required to analyzeand solve open-ended design problems, test and experiment with different concepts, and useengineering process skills such as teamwork and development of technical reports. An emphasisis placed on the connection between theory and design applications, comparisons of analyticalwork with test results, reporting, and working with peers. Details on this effort and organizationof the developed material are given.IntroductionIn recent years, there has been remarkable changes in methodologies by which aerospacecompanies develop their products. As a result, the length of
support videotaped engineering extension courses, providing an interactivelaboratory setup students may control from a remote site. LabView provides theinstrumentation display and command interface. The Internet provides access and real timedisplay of audio and video display features. Prototype is complete and operating on the Internet.Introduction The University of Idaho provides off-campus students with courses on videotapessupplemented with access to an instructor by telephone, fax, and email. These students can takeclasses for a quite attractive price. Though unable to attend in person, by videotape they sitalongside their peers on campus. Now in its twenty-third year, Engineering Video Outreachkeeps each of three studios booked for over
institutions towards the adoption of computer-based exams [1, 2, 5, 6]. Studies like those by Lappalainen et al. [1], who found improvedoutcomes by beginning with paper-based exams and continue with computer-based exams, andGrissom et al. [4], who reported higher success in writing recursive solutions through computer-based exams, underscore this trend. Deloatch et al. [15] further highlighted a preference forcomputer-based exams, citing perceived improvements in quality, speed, and anxiety reduction.Computer-based exams present both opportunities and challenges, particularly in terms oftechnical stability and academic integrity.. For example, Rajala et al. [2] developed anexamination platform for Java programming, integrating multiple-choice
. At the time of this writing, they all work in a large, Southeastern research-intensive R1higher education institution in the United States. Some of the authors do not self-identify asLatiné/x but rather by their home country (Villanueva et al., 2022). All authors have differinglevels of educational experiences, both in their home country and in the United States. All havecommonly migrated to the United States as part of their professional growth. Each of themconsiders themselves to be insiders of their Latin heritage and culture but outsiders to theexperiences the other authors have faced. All recognize that their identities are non-Monolithic
process, for example, by orienting them to the expectations of an engineering ethicsconference or journal.Our Present WorkAt the time of writing, we have only begun Step 1 of the ABCD approach. When surveyingfaculty assets, we consider faculty in our university instead of limiting them to the College ofEngineering because some engineering programs are offered in other colleges. We also recognizethat other colleges have faculty who carry out research or have experience relevant toengineering ethics from the perspectives of history, sociology, political science, law, data andinformation sciences, business, etc. In the long run, it would be desirable to recognize theirexpertise when mapping faculty assets in engineering ethics.Because our faculty
, Waves, andElectromagnetism. As a requirement, all projects must include mathematical modeling andanalysis of experimental data.Methodology:Table 1 [23], [24] presents the evidence that the proposed approach intends to collect inrelation to the competences to be developed by the students.Table 1 – Competences and evidences Competences Evidences Develop knowledge The students will collaborate with their peers and teachers to conduct a survey and define the theme of their project. Synthesize The project must be written in scientific language. knowledge Communicating Additionally, the students are required
, IT Essential II) MCSA and MCSE certifications, making him officially Microsoft certified. Engaging Online Learners Grant Writing with Farmingdale Qualtrics CircleIn Application and Software Professor Eltaeib has been invited as a Judge for Poster Presentations and is part of the IESC 2021 Organizing Committee: International Energy & Sustainability Conference 2021 (IESC 2021). This honor is a feather in his cap, acknowledging his skill and mastery of the subject and provides exposure to the broader academic community, not only for himself but also his department and school. He enhanced his career whilst studying by working in the private sector as a software developer in several companies and the Enterprise
of the subject. They also found that the coursehad a broad application to their remaining core courses in chemical engineering.In addition to being more relevant to students’ goals and interests, tailored courses offered by thehome department provide opportunities for students to develop connections with peers andprofessors in their major and to create a sense of belonging to the program [15].In the biological engineering program at North Carolina State University, BAE 200 – ComputerMethods in Biological Engineering is a 2-credit hour course taken by 2nd year undergraduatestudents in the Biological Engineering Program. The course was created to replace theintroductory computer programming course that students used to take in the computer
students visualize code more effectively compared to their 2Dcounterparts (e.g. Scratch) [13], [14]. Not only was the visualization of components effective, butstudents reported higher levels of active listening, active learning, and peer collaboration whenusing LEGO® robotics.Using a LEGO® SPIKE™ robot and block-based coding, teachers can overcome challenges theyface such as motivating students by giving them a physical tool that represents visual codingpractices [13], [14]. This physical and visual tool can also assist in structuring game-basedproblem-solving challenges while minimizing syntax and code structure difficulties [15]. Using aproper game-based approach to teaching computer science using a LEGO® SPIKE™ robot, willsupport high school
a coursewhich was themed around a three-part core of logic, area under a curve, and limits whileintegrating algebra and trigonometry review. Emphasis is placed on exploration, rigorousderivations, and proofs to develop mathematical thinking.In fall 2022 the pilot was administered to six sections of Precalculus. The progress of thestudents from each section was tracked through the 2022-2023 academic year. Data from examsin their subsequent calculus courses was collected and compared to their peers from non-pilotsections of Precalculus to determine if there were statistically significant differences inperformance. This paper will outline and detail the curriculum. Statistical results from apreliminary study of effectiveness will be presented
University teaching research-informed writing and publication practices to PhD students throughout the College of Engineering. She brings a focus on information literacy to the critical review of scholarly communication practices in the classroom.Dr. Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University Dr. Kristi J. Shryock is the Frank and Jean Raymond Foundation Inc. Endowed Associate Professor in Multidisciplinary Engineering and Affiliated Faculty in Aerospace Engineering in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She also serves as Director of the Craig and Galen Brown Engineering Honors Program. She received her BS, MS, and PhD from the College of Engineering at Texas A&M. Kristi works to improve the