engineering education. In their report for the American Association forthe Advancement of Science, Malcom et al. found that, despite increases in the number ofbaccalaureate degrees in science and engineering for Blacks and Hispanics, there was an overalldecline in minority graduate enrollment in STEM fields, especially first-year graduate enrollmentin the natural sciences, computer sciences, mathematics, and engineering. Explanations for thisdecline include the attraction of lucrative careers in industry, increased debt burden fromundergraduate education, and a shift in enrollment from graduate to professional schools,especially medical school.8Given the questionable improvement in participation rates and continued underrepresentation ofAfrican
continuing for a five tosix year period provided students were making adequate academic progress toward thedoctoral degree. Over the years, recruitment of candidates for the programs expandedbeyond the initial local schools to include public and private universities across thecountry as well as the HBCUs and HSIs. Additionally, to help identify students early intheir undergraduate careers who might have the potential to seek graduate technicaldegrees, the Labs established undergraduate summer intern programs to give women andminorities the opportunity to work in an industrial research environment. To furtherreach students in high school before they went on to college, the Labs provided a weeklong series of seminars and laboratory visits for high
are broad statements that describe the career and professionalaccomplishments that the program is preparing graduates to achieve during the first few yearsfollowing graduation,” according to the proposed TAC general criteria2 to be effective for 2004.Metrics are specific measures used to prove objectives are being met.“Program Outcomes are statements that describe what units of knowledge or skill students areexpected to acquire from the program to prepare them to achieve the program educationalobjectives. These are typically demonstrated by the student and measured by the program at thetime of graduation,” according to the proposed TAC general criteria2 to be effective for 2004.Assessment consists of one or more processes that identify
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 1: Initial BME Program Educational Objectives The Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering offers an undergraduate BS degree program in Biomedical Engineering (BME). The faculty of this department in concert with constituencies have developed the following undergraduate educational objectives for the BS in BME degree. 1. To educate students for successful careers in Biomedical Engineering. Emphasis is placed upon mastering the fundamentals of engineering and biology, the ability to solve engineering problems, and understanding the creative process of engineering design. 2. To instill in the students a sense of confidence in their ability to grasp and
41 33 48 49 42 45 46 47 49 51 794 Availability of Tutorial Help 38 38 44 48 45 49 53 50 47 46 46 688 Career Counseling 34 31 36 42 44 36 39 39 40 40 46 778 Help-Selection of Engr Major 33 34 36 36 40 32 36 40 40 38 46 869 Help-Selection Non-Engr Major 24 23 21 30 28 24 25 28 32 31 40 467 Purdue Interest Questionnaire 34 41 29 32 30 30 30 30 37 34 34 1069Freshman Engineering Information FormPlacement of beginning students in initial courses in math, chemistry, physics, communications,and more recently in computer classes is critically
AC 2011-700: UNDERWATER ROVS IN PRE-COLLEGE EDUCATION:UNIVERSITY-K12 PARTNERSHIPS THAT GO BEYOND THE COMPE-TITIONSDouglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University Mr. Oppliger is a professional engineer and a lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. He is the director of the High School Enterprise program which has a mission to increase the numbers of students pursuing post-secondary degrees and careers in STEM fields. At its core, this program supports K-12 teachers who are leading teams of students in long-term STEM projects. This work is the latest in Oppliger’s history of working in K-12 STEM areas. For the past 10 years he has developed and taught first
, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National En- gineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of re- cruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University ARMANDO A. RODRIGUEZ is the co-PI of the NSF METSTEP grant to work with non-metropolitan community colleges to produce more engineers, especially female and underrepresented minority engi
aboutrobotics’ before takin ng the class. The course increased thhe student interests in robbotics andassociateed careers, ass shown in Fig. F 3, wheree there were only 3 studeents stating ‘Very interesstedin roboticcs’ before th he course whhile 10 studennts stated the same outcoome after thhe course.Moreoveer, nine studeents became interested inn a robotics career after the course while w there was wonly one student with h the same raanking beforre the coursee. (a
engineering andcomputer science fields as viable and exciting choices for a career for themselves.Within the UNM School of Engineering (SOE), students generally do not have an opportunity towork in project management teams until they are nearing completion of the program. TheInstructors designed the team collaboration introductory course to provide a grounding in themost essential skills needed in the engineering work world. The course curriculum goal was: 1)to lay a foundation in general engineering project principles; 2) expose students to engineeringdesign phases; 3) develop an understanding of concurrent engineering and design manufacturing;and 4) use the small task group to analyze best product solutions. Recognizing that small taskteams are
: Industrial Advisory Board (IAB): • 68% of industrials think that the local IAB provided strategic and operational guidance to their respective local institutions. • 79% and 90% of industrials and faculty, respectively, believe that the IAB provided support (financial and non-financial) to MEEP activities. • 95% of industrials consider that MEEP students would be more useful to their respective industries, and 79% are more likely to hire a MEEP student over a typical student.RE: Faculty issues • 71% of faculty received release time for the project. • 50% of faculty understand that their participation in MEEP was beneficial to their careers; 62% were provided with positive
MEEP students would be more useful to their respective industries, and 79% are more likely to hire a MEEP student over a typical student.RE: Faculty issues • 71% of faculty received release time for the project. • 50% of faculty understand that their participation in MEEP was beneficial to their careers; 62% were provided with positive feedback from their supervisors. • 14% received better student evaluations compared to regular courses. • 64% said the had a better experience with MEEP courses, compared to regular courses. • 57% believe that their participation in MEEP was an element for teaching/education awards and recognition; but only 10% think that their
, Civil Engineering,Chemical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Ethno-Botany. From 2009 until the onset ofthe covid-19 pandemic, a total of sixty-one US students participated in the Colombia basedprograms, with twenty in Cali at Uni Del Valle and forty-one in Cartagena at Uni Cartagena andUniversity of San Buenaventura Cartagena. The paper will cover the inception and developmentof both project sites, the different approaches to Global Engagement, the best practices,outcomes, program duplication, career outcomes of participants, and post covid-19 opportunities.Introduction - U.S. Students Studying AbroadThe integration of a Study Abroad/International Research internship at the undergraduate andgraduate level is increasingly being seen as a
graduatestudents build community, such as Bridge programs [11],[12],[13], Alliances for GraduateEducation and the Professoriate (AGEP), the Louis Stokes Bridges to the Doctorate (BD) [6], theAlliances for the Inclusion Across the Nation of Communities of Learners of UnderrepresentedDiscoverers in Engineering and Science (INCLUDES) [14], CGS PhD Completion Project [15],Gates Millennium Scholars Program [16], and others. These programs help set students up forsuccess in their careers, complete their graduate degrees, and contribute to the advancement ofknowledge and innovation.Additionally, connecting students to opportunities earlier in the educational pipeline plays a keyrole in the diversification of graduate student populations as well as their
further improve teamwork efficacy. Policies shouldalso focus on developing interdisciplinary teams and soft skills. Encouraging engagement withURP alumni as well as the industry can provide current participants with networkingopportunities, career advice, and insights into the long-term benefits of URPs. Finally, researchcan be demanding, therefore, providing mental health support and stress management resourcesfor students participating in URPs can help students maintain a healthy work-life balance.Keywords: undergraduate research, teamwork, collaborative learning, group developmenttheory, engineering education, URP, research program, NSF, REU, Tuckman1. Introduction1.1 Undergraduate Research Programs (URP)Undergraduate Research Programs (URPs
Paper ID #43145A Data-gathering Effort on STEM v. Non-STEM Faculty for Assessing Equityin Recruitment, Retention, and Promotion at a Large R1 InstitutionMilagros Rivera, George Mason UniversitySupriya Baily, George Mason University Professor and Co-Director, Center for International EducationPatrick Willette Healey, George Mason UniversityDr. Trish Wonch Hill, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Dr. Trish Wonch Hill is an applied sociologist who collaborates with scientists across STEM disciplines to investigate how to spark STEM career interests during childhood and adolescence. She is particularly interested in how to find STEM
consulting experience spanned eight years and included extensive work with the US military in Japan, Korea, and Hawaii. In 2008 Elizabeth shifted the focus of her career to education and academia, later receiving her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Arizona State University. Prior to her position at Cal Poly Dr. Adams taught engineering for 13 years in community colleges in Arizona and California. Her work highlights a commitment to undergraduate engineering education and its improvement through best teaching practices. Her research efforts are focused on increasing transfer student success.Dr. Nihal Orfi, Fresno City College Dr. Nihal Orfi teaches full time as an Engineering faculty at Fresno City College. She obtained her
1. Briefly, the centerpiece of the program is our quarterly Success inSTEM seminar, which students take every quarter for their first two years at University ofWashington Tacoma. Through these weekly sessions, students connect with each other and withtheir faculty cohort mentor, learning to support each other through challenging times,developing a growth mindset towards their academic journey, understanding barriers that leadto equity gaps in STEM such as stereotype threat and imposter syndrome, and building a senseof belonging and self-efficacy. The seminar allows participants to explore co-curricularopportunities (e.g., student clubs), campus resources such as disability services and financial aidoffices, and career preparation, while
organization. Engineering-focused companies require a diverse workforce that is capable of innovation and many studentswill not join these types of firms in as their first employer post-college. Intrapreneurial skillshave been shown to facilitate career progression and improve managerial skills andopportunities. In order to address the need for more STEM workers to have intrapreneurial skills,TIP recruited and enrolled academically talented and diverse electrical and computer engineeringundergraduate students. TIP provided a multi-faceted approach to improve entrepreneurshipskills. Specifically, the program combined faculty and industry mentorship, workforcedevelopment seminars, an industrial internship, entrepreneurship programs, and scholarships
interviews included topics such asprofessional history, including career backgrounds; details of the classes they teach, including size,format, structure, and support; course design considerations; assessment practices; goals andchallenges for students; professional development experiences, especially around teaching andlearning; and impressions of faculty incentive structures, especially tenure and promotion, whereapplicable. Student interviews included topics such as motivation for choosing the major; studentlearning goals, including both skills and perspectives; student beliefs about their instructors’ goalsand priorities; experiences with assessment; and alignment between instruction and learning goals.The interviewer asked follow-up questions
copingmechanisms in minoritized undergraduate students in STEM higher education.MentoringSome college students arrive on campus already with coping skills gleaned from family or otherexperiences. How can colleges ensure that all students have the ability to learn and apply coping skills toensure academic and career success? Scholarship on communities of practice (for example, the computerscience department) detail that new members or outsiders can only become a part of the community whenthe elders of the community (i.e., faculty, advanced students) accept and indoctrinate them in the cultureof the community (Wenger, 1998). This concept can be executed through mentoring. Mentoring is therelationship between a more experienced individual and a less
popular textbook, Wavelets & Filter Banks, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, 1997, and the author of several matlab-based toolboxes on image compression, electrocardiogram compression and filter bank design. He also holds a patent on an efficient design method for wavelets and filter banks and several patents on wavelet applications including compression and signal analysis. He received the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Transaction in Signal Processing Paper Award (Image and Multidimensional Processing area) for the paper he co-wrote with Prof. P. P. Vaidyanathan on linear-phase perfect-reconstruction filter banks (1992). He received the National Science Foundation Career Award in 1995 and
, 2014-15, and 2015-16. Furthermore, he was a shortlisted candidate for the UGC Teaching Award (Early Career Faculty Member).Prof. Norman C. Tien, University of Hong Kong Norman C. Tien is the Taikoo Professor of Engineering and Chair Professor of Microsystems Technology at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). He is also currently the Head of Innovation Academy of Faculty of Engineering and the Managing Director of the Centre for Transformative Garment Production. He served as the Dean of Engineering from 2012 to 2018, and as the Vice-President and Pro-Vice-Chancellor (Institutional Advancement) from 2019 to 2021 at HKU. Prior to joining HKU, Professor Tien was the Nord Professor of Engineering at Case Western Reserve
class without aninstructor and the EPICS Program scrambling to fill that slot. By developing the partnershipwith the company’s management and the EPICS Program, we are able to work together toreplace employees as they move through their careers and maintain the academic support duringthe school year. Some corporate volunteers cannot commit to a weekly meeting and they serve as designreviewers. Twice each semester, every EPICS team conducts a design review, at the midpointand end of the semester. Corporate representatives serve as the design reviewers for the teamsand provide valuable feedback to the students. Each design reviewer is given training andstandardized forms to provide feedback and the teams are scheduled so that a reviewer
definition of quantitative and precise metricsthat reflect changes in the program. A second is the data collection and the action definitions thatshould minimize or, at least, allow the resolution of interdependencies and correlations amongthem. While these form an intellectually interesting modeling and feedback problem, one mustalso be prepared to accommodate some faculty resistance, indifference, or simply lack of time toperform such tasks. Viewing automation and consistency as a key for the success of continuousimprovement, we have implemented this feedback process for the last four years and here wepresent some of our experiences.1. IntroductionObjective and meaningful evaluation of student performance and career success is a complicatedproblem
multiple sources forenergy and climate data (DOE, NASA, NOAA, etc.), simulation results from global climatemodels, and results from their own simulations utilizing climate models (EdGCM). Extensiveuse of MS Excel and Matlab are required for processing and analysis of the large data sets. Theimpacts of the course on the students were assessed with a combination of quantitative andqualitative approaches. Substantial quantitative gains were made in the students’ climate literacy,especially in knowledge areas. Students also showed gains in their self-reported feelings thatthey could solve a new problem or tackle a challenge, were good at interpreting charts andgraphs and manipulating databases, and were interested in pursuing a career in science
of achievement,persistence, direction, and self-efficacy2-4; all are important in the field of engineering educationas many students, especially underrepresented minorities, leave before reaching their goal ofgraduating with an engineering degree.5 Because goal setting and monitoring involve reflection,both introspective and prospective, they can be difficult for engineering students to engage insince students are often uncomfortable with, and even resistant to, reflective activities. 6-8However, we observed that students began to engage in goal setting and monitoring as naturalby-products of the development of a professional portfolio. The professional portfolio is ademonstration of students’ preparation for an engineering career, and thus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) where women make up 51% of its science undergraduates and 35% of its engineering undergraduates. For women to participate to their full potential across all science and engineering fields, they must see a career path that allows them to reach their full intellectual potential. Much remains to be done to achieve that goal.”6In 2004, the Board of the InterAcademy Council formed an Advisory Panel on Women for Science. In 2007,the study Women for Science: An Advisory Report7, funded by L’Oreal Paris, the Netherlands Ministry ofEducation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and an anonymous donor, was prepared by the InterAcademyCouncil.It shows the concern is global, stating: “The low representation of women
that people’s experiences are informed by the intersection of race andgender.4,5 Very little research has been able to examine engineering student experiences at theintersection of gender and race. As a multi-site study based on data from diverse undergraduateengineering programs, and with significant numbers of African American and Hispanicrespondents, PACE is uniquely suited to address this gap in the literature and identify howgender and race jointly affect student experiences. The results of this study are of increasingimportance as more research relates certain types of student interactions to interest inengineering majors, and pursuit of an engineering career.6BackgroundA recent report from the National Action Council for Minorities in
civil engineering in 2025 andbeyond. 2 It is important that students who aspire to become civil engineers to understand theskills, knowledge, and attitudes that they will be expected to have when they enter the workforce.If students gain an early understanding of these issues they may either be more or less motivatedto pursue a degree in civil engineering. For example, many students today in “Gen Net” aremotivated by social good and wanting to make the world better; however, they often do notperceive that engineering is a way to achieve this goal.10 A career that benefits society has beenfound to be even more motivational to female and minority students.14 Parikh9 determined that
top 5% engineering teacher for 2009-2010. She received the WEPAN Engineering Educator Award 2009, ASEE Minorities Award 2006, the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005, and the National En- gineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of re- cruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Anita Grierson, Arizona State UniversityDr. Rakesh Pangasa, Arizona Western College PAKESH PANGASA is the PI of the