younger students. “It brings the project to life in a way that is better than writing it out.”Participants saw value in the range of lessons available to teachers, on topics that they might nototherwise be familiar with. They also noted that when given the chance, interactions between thecollege students and K-12 students provide an additional benefit for both groups, by adding a‘mentoring’ aspect to the whole experience.Moving ForwardSTEM QuESTS is now in the middle if its second year. With more time for preparations, andbased on our experiences in the first year of the competition, we have made a few changes. 4We’ve updated materials so students
Laboratory, “About the EcoCAR EV Challenge,” Advanced Vehicle Technology Competitions, 2022. https://avtcseries.org/about-the-ecocar-ev-challenge/[2] Dillon, H., & VanDeGrift, T. (2021, July), Creating an Inclusive Engineering Student Culture Through Diverse Teams: Instructor-led and Student-led Approaches Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Virtual Meeting. https://peer.asee.org/32428[3] Pucha, R., & Dunbar, T., & Yow, R. (2022, August), Role of diverse teams and socio-cultural aspects on students learning in freshman design course Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41820[4] J. Martins, “Write Better
100 80 points for leader week and Mandatory Week/ 15 for other weeks 20 points for othersCase Studies (2) 200 100 points each -Group Project 200 -Simulation Game 200Total 1000 1000Table 1: Changes in Assessment of Learning from Fall 2012 to Fall 2013 1. Assignments:In Fall 2012, the students worked on 2 qualitative assignments each worth 40points. The students had to write 2 pages-reports on a topic provided for eachassignment. In Fall 2013, a major revision was made to
and how fast they receive information. They can pause, rewind, take notes, and replay a screencast so they manage the pace, as opposed to a classroom where instructors cannot go at a pace that is ideal for everyone. are short and focus on one topic so they hold students’ attention. They do not feature the instructor and they do not contain extraneous material, both of which can hinder learning. allow instructors to use class time for active learning (e.g., ConcepTests, clicker questions, peer instruction, group exercises), since information delivery is outside of the classroom. minimize cognitive overload by presenting diagrams and verbal explanations simultaneously, which enhances learning [11
cycle. The main point of these standards is that the evaluation of students’ performance will based on samples of work in three categories of students: those in the upper 75 percentile, those in the 50 – 75 percentile and those below the 50 percentile populations. Thus the assessment results compiled are based on course performances and grades, exams, projects, presentations of students, and writings as required in some courses. Furthermore, each course specifically addresses the learning outcomes and relation between the course and the Program outcomes, the methods used for the evaluation of students’ performance and the relevance of the course materials to the Program outcomes following the
. He has consulted for several IC design companies and an international research institute, also for one of the best business trial law firms in the world. Dr. Lie has co-founded the NoiseFigure Research Inc. with his student Dr. Lopez since 2009, focusing on state-of-the-art RF-SoC technologies and the company has won several Phase I c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #9363 and Phase II STTR/SBIR awards and other contracts. Dr. Lie has authored/coauthored over 150 peer- reviewed technical papers and book chapters and holds six U.S. patents. Dr. Lie’s group has published
group. They had to also identify thetypes of engineers and non-engineers that are needed to address the challenge and explain howthe various people would need to be involved. Page 24.1314.3The second assignment was to prepare an annotated bibliography. Rather than simply asking thestudents to find a number of sources that were relevant to their topic, they were also asked toreview the sources and write a brief summary of the information presented in the sources. Thisencouraged them to consider the relevancy of the information and then to describe theinformation in their own words by preparing the summary. This assignment was due by thefourth
a two-part initiative where students willhave the opportunity to receive mentoring from an industry-based or academia-based leader oftheir choosing. This way, students may engage proactively with individuals who may or may notbe in their current professional networks. This may then reinforce the knowledge and skillsstudents learn from their mentors and allow students to serve as peer mentors to otherengineering students.The mentoring system is a personal development relationship between students and their chosenmentors and mentees, which involves routine activities and interactions. Students' activities withtheir mentors and mentees are expected to be in-person, or as direct as possible, and will befacilitated by technological means such as
century, an engineer must havemultiple skills and be able to multi task and produce good quality products. With today’stechnology there is a rise in many cross functional engineering discipline needs. A powerengineer of the future must be a well-rounded engineer who understands broader fundamentalsof cross engineering disciplines and is also has the proficiency to manage projects, write reportsand have good communication skills. The industry is seeking power engineering education tobroaden in a cross function of engineering studies such as networking, control systems andpower electronics in order to transition to the smart grid[13].III.3 What Industry and Workforce is seeking in Power Engineering Education.With the innovation of technology and
Page 23.1078.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Sophomore-Level Curriculum Innovation in Electrical and Computer EngineeringAbstractHistorically, the early years within an electrical and computer engineering (ECE) curriculumhave largely focused on electrical circuits. A new sophomore level ECE course and laboratorywhich provides students with a breadth of foundational ECE concepts, frequent opportunities toengage with the instructor and peers in a problem solving learning environment, and bothformative and summative assessment approaches was introduced by Prof. Peroulis and acommittee at the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue
to those of their peers on campus11.They also address the needs of students with motion disability. Simulated experiments are moreaccessible to learners who often find it difficult or unsafe to use a real laboratory.An issue of major concern is the recruitment of female and minority students12. Being portable,recruiting professors will be able to take the VL with them when going on recruiting trips.Steps in the Development of Virtual LaboratoryThe virtual laboratory development is composed of several phases as described in Figure 1. Theseare: I. Development of lab modules II. Instructor training III. Dissemination IV. AssessmentThese tasks are interrelated and feedback was used regularly to improve the lab
Software DesignTypically, development tools needed for the microcontroller can be divided into two differentgroups: software and hardware. Software tools include assemblers, compilers, program editors,debuggers, simulators, communication programs, and systems integration environments toimplement solutions. In the wireless robot project, the BASIC Stamp2 microcontroller isinterfaced to the BASIC Stamp2 Editor software, which is used to write programs that theBASIC Stamp2 module will run. The software is also used to communicate with Easy BluetoothModule. The BASIC Stamp2 Editor is free software, and the two easiest ways to get it are:• Download from the Internet. Search for “BASIC Stamp2 Windows Editor Version 2.0” onwww.parallax.com, the Parallax
objectives. Students were organized into collaborative teams to work onthese projects, which encouraged teamwork and peer learning. During the implementation phase,the technical subject content was integrated with the three C's: Curiosity, Connection, and Creatingvalue, as defined by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) [13]. This approachenabled students to engage with the research process, understand its various phases andinteractions, and synthesize information from diverse sources to address both local community andglobal challenges. Additionally, they learned to formulate and effectively communicate designrequirements and solutions, focusing on their societal benefits and economic feasibility. Thesebehaviors were in line with the
training due to demanding schedules. VR environments, by contrast, provide thebenefits of self-paced learning with immediate feedback, aligning with students' technologicalcomfort, and preference for flexible learning.In the late spring and summer 2024, the engineering and honors college librarian the emergingtechnologies graduate assistant at the University of Arkansas-Fayetteville Mullins Libraryexplored two VR applications for soft skills development with a focus on helping engineeringstudents. At present, engineering disciplines do not emphasize soft skills development whencompared to other concentrations [4], [5] especially in areas where communication is paramount.These communication subsets consist of writing, presentation, empathy, and non
many knowledge sources, practices, andmethodologies that inform how they design and conduct research and their future orientations inthe discipline. Both graduate student researchers co-designed with the end user to developprojects or products [1]. Graduate student researchers in engineering education constantly designresearch studies, tools, and environments with their advisors, peers, and other researchers.However, opportunities to co-design engineering projects with learners and educators are lesscommon for engineering education graduate students. Yet the work that graduate studentresearchers develop can influence K-12 educators and students and vice versa. Thus, graduatestudent researchers must have experience working with learners and
the end of a class, their reports are submitted to the instructor or TA automatically. c) Students make appointments with the instructor using their PDAs to send the request to the instructor’s PDA and get a confirmation using the application suite. d) Students write answers of the exams and send answers to the instructor using the application suite. e) Students run and display their homework on the PDAs and project it on the screen with the help of the application suite.5 Development of Smart Classroom using RCSM In this section we will discuss how to use our Reconfigurable Context-Sensitive Middleware(RCSM) to develop our Smart Classroom. RCSM architecture is shown in Figure 2. In the
performance and attendance. Furthermore, the research can group students into thosewho engaged with the online materials and those who were completely disengaged. Theinstructor plans to incorporate online and HyFlex options in future course offerings and expandthis study by monitoring attendance and its impact on performance. This study provides a basisfor exploring the relationship between attendance and student outcomes and will pave the wayfor further research into its underlying mechanisms.AcknowledgmentsTo assist the writing process, the help of AIs was used; for example, we used Grammarly AI tocorrect grammar, check sentence formations, and improve writing.References[1] A. Verde and J. M. Valero, "Teaching and Learning Modalities in Higher
instance, the goal is to achieve harmony in the system at all costs as soon as possible. 6. Can you provide examples of the type of data that can be transmitted from a machine to its supervisor? a. PackTags (Machine Status) b. Commands/Recipe parameters (Temperature, Speeds) c. Current Operating Mode d. Alarms e. Machine Cycle Count 7. What are some examples of data that can be exchanged between machine peers? a. Machine Status b. Machine Mode c. Communication Status 8. Besides packaging or producing products, what are some other intended uses for a packaging machine? Can you give examples of packaging machine modes
experiences. The effort covers various courses, including Physics/Mechanics,Calculus, Statics, Control Systems, Digital Signal Processing, Probability, Estima-tion, and Computer Algorithms. The larger scale project, as it relates to calculusconcepts, intends to develop and integrate engaging games, relevant 3D puzzles andbrain teasers, captivating animations, real-world intuitive illustrations and demon-strations, short video clips, hands-on activities (including virtual reality and aug-mented reality experiences), collaborative teamwork and communication exercises,small-scale inquiry-based research, as well as engaging presentations and peer-basedlearning. It should be noted that this work should be considered as work in progress. Itis intended
intrinsic and extrinsic motivation [14].When students engage in project-based learning, their need for autonomy can be met as theyactively engage in tasks that promote learning, develop their cognitive capabilities, fostercollaboration amongst peers, and when they receive the right scaffolding from faculty [15].This paper directly builds on a study carried out with the students of Ashesi University whoparticipated in a first-year design-oriented course in 2022 [7]. That study commenced anexploration of the three constructs brought into view – self-efficacy, self-determination andagency, and it revealed the need for relying more on existing validated surveys. Here, a revisedset of scales is used to explore the relevance of these constructs through a
these efforts, first-generation students are stillless likely than their peers to persist or graduate from college [4] and there is the need forcolleges to understand the skills that first-generation students bring to college, and the skills thatthey perceive to be important to help them succeed in their coursework.The low number of women studying engineering at colleges continues to also be a problem,despite the efforts to increase the representation of women. According to the 2022 AmericanSociety of Engineering Education (ASEE) report, women made up only 25.5% of the totalundergraduate engineering enrollment compared to men at 74.5% [5]. The retention rates forwomen undergraduate engineering students are also highly concerning, as 22.7% of
enablestudents to visualize and experiment with complex engineering concepts, conduct experimentsremotely, access interactive learning materials, collaborate with peers, analyze and interpret data,and develop programming skills. Through the integration of digital tools and technologies, first-year engineering students can benefit from hands-on learning experiences, gain opportunities forcollaborative learning and communication, and prepare themselves for the digitally focusedmodern engineering industrial world.1. Introduction:Over the past decade, there has been a significant evolution in technology, engineeringtextbooks, examples, and practice problems. This transformation has fundamentally altered ourapproach to thinking, analyzing, and solving
encouragestudents to discuss their predictions of what will happen with their peers, rather than justanswering with iClicker, as this has been shown to further improve student learning [8, 14].Lastly, we plan to reshoot some of these videos utilizing best practices to improve theireffectiveness, such as showing demonstrations from a first-person perspective [14], writing outkey information as the demonstration is given rather than just displaying it [15], and focusing onvisual tabletop demonstrations [16]. We believe that these changes can further improve thequality of demonstration videos to improve the overall educational experience of our students byproviding high quality, exciting demonstrations to them in a course where they previously didnot have
. Dr. Popa is the recipient of several prestigious awards and the author of over 300 peer reviewed conference and journal articles, mainly in IEEE and ASME publications. He has been very active in the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society (RAS), including extensive competition, workshop, conference, and journal service. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 [WIP] The Magic Orb: A mechatronics demonstration and course project to attract next-generation engineering studentsAbstractOpen-house events hosted at university labs for K-12 students, typically feature academicresearch which often requires prior knowledge of the field to fully appreciate its significance.This disconnection
entering material for otherstudents to note that they were doing so in the ‘discussion’ area of each page.We have found the wiki format to be useful for projects in a Mass and Energy Balances course,but this does not mean that this is a useful format for projects in other courses. For example, therigorous formatting requirements of a senior laboratory reports, such as flowsheets, equipmentdiagrams, and numerous chemical and mathematical formulas, would make the use of a wikidifficult. Also, if a project report is more than 10 pages, the wiki format may not be appropriatebecause it requires that the person preparing the report be actively connected to the internetduring the entire time they are writing. In summary, we tend to prefer using wikis in
price bids while commercial bids are lump sum.Phase 1 - Project Planning and DesignStudents begin the simulation in Phase 1 by being presented with a list of potential projects toreview. Considering market conditions, student teams proceed by selecting a project to plan andthen designing a project control system for the project. This is accomplished by selectingmethods for each project activity and balancing the schedule and cost considerations. In Phase 1,students compete against their peers as well as the simulation’s virtual companies for award ofthe project. Award of projects is based on the team’s accuracy and proximity to the simulation’sinternal estimate. Teams that are not initially awarded a project for their efforts must continuewith
3manufacturing processes. Students conducted research on a topic related to industrialengineering. The research projects were narrow enough for completion during the allocated time,yet broad enough to present a variety of research challenges. The basic activities of the summerresearch experience were: 1) on-site orientation; 2) reflective journals; 3) Spanish languageinstruction; 4) research methods seminar; 5) field research project; 5) oral and writtenpresentations; and 6) assessment and evaluation. Time at the end of the program was planned forthe synthesis of the students' findings and for writing, followed by the oral presentation anddiscussion of results in a group setting. The remainder of this article shares the experiences ofone of the
throughout each semester; • The Educational Psychologist/Researcher is a member of the faculty of the College of Engineering and Director of the Writing Lab Center, and is trained in both data collection/analysis procedures, and in teaching and research in technical communications; • Industry partners of the CSEMS program include the Tennessee Valley Association (TVA), Wright Technologies, The Solae Company, and Memphis Light, Gas, and Water, and these team members provide internship and co-op opportunities for CSEMS students.Results to Date: In the 2002-2004 period, 59% of the CSEMS participants receivedbachelor’s degrees from The University of Memphis, and 34% were still activelyengaged in the
assessment of these learning outcomes asreported through the Student Assessment of their Learning Gains Instrument within engineeringtechnology programs capstone courses.Introduction There is a driving need for accountability and quality measurement in the highereducation system within the United States. As a result, universities and programs look towardsaccreditation, third party peer review systems ensuring the quality and holding educatorsaccountable. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) is the group thatprovides accreditation to engineering, engineering technology, and other engineering relatedprograms throughout institutions in the United States. Aft (2002) describes basic steps of the ABET accreditation
classroom). Each projector screen will cover two of the flat screen LCD monitors when inuse. Therefore, the visual system in the room can be operated in one of three modes: 1. Four projectors 2. Two projectors and four LCD monitors 3. Eight LCD monitorsThe instructor station is an Intel Quadcore PC with a quad-port video board, 1 terabyte of disk storage,and 4 gigabytes of memory. The instructor station is also equipped with two WACOM pen screensallowing the instructor to write on the computer screen. We chose the Synchroneyes software to controlthe student workstations. With this software the instructor can broadcast their screen(s) to all studentscreens or project any student’s screen to their own screen.The technology environment for