engineering have not placed sufficient emphasis on pedagogy orcurriculum as avenues for reform, despite repeated calls to do so. Davis and Rosser1 note thatwhen institutions undertake curricular reform, they rarely consider the gender impacts of theirefforts, let alone fully integrate curricular reform with strategies to establish gender equity. Thecurrent mindset is that improving engineering education in mainstream ways, without consideringgender or race, will help all students – “the rising tide raises all boats.” Thus, reforms - such asestablishing relevance of course material - are often done only from a white male perspective, andmay or may not have relevance for white women and people of color. Rosser 2 notes that whenreforms are implemented
developing as a leader. Six male and six female students, tworepresenting each major are selected from the pool of nominees to participate. Students fromthe Henry B. Tippie College of Business and the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at Iowaare also invited to participate in the program.Objectives:• Increase each student’s self-awareness• Expose students to the value of awareness of others' personality preferences and values• Expose students to real world challenges and dilemmas• Provide opportunities to communicate effectively with a diverse group Student Leadership Institute – 2Program structure:The Institute is a two-day event that is held at an off-campus location
, S. B., Jobe, J. M., 2001. Basic Engineering Data Collection and Analysis. Duxbury, Thomson Learning.3. Standridge, C. R. and Marvel, J. H., 2002. Engineering Statistics as a Laboratory Course. Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Canada.4. Gupta, S. K. and Marchetti, C. E., 2003. Materials Science Experiments and Engineering Statistics. Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Nashville, TN.CAROL E. MARCHETTICarol E. Marchetti is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics and Statistics, and the winner of the 1998 Provost’sAward for Excellence in Teaching. She teaches introductory and upper-division statistics courses, and is a memberof the Institute Effective Teaching
conflict.This can be helped by (a) creating an environment where students feel safe enough to do this, (b)directing their attention to this issue, (c) welcoming discussions about conflict, and (d) providingthem with tools to identify and resolve conflict.Note that we are not saying that all learning is necessarily preceded by conflict, nor that conflictis the only key to learning. Once a student is ready for learning, they may proceed with little ifany conflict. They may be more open to making subsequent changes too. A few people maynever enter conflict, though we expect those to be very few indeed. Furthermore, effectivelearning requires many other elements, such as sources of new models to try, situations in whichto practice, and communities for
and a proof test to compare actual launch distance to thepredicted. The predicted performance of the launcher and supporting design analysis was requiredprior to construction of the catapult. The analysis included: 1) Estimate striker velocity as afunction of spring displacement by applying the principle of work & energy; 2) Estimate the initialvelocity of projectile as a function of striker momentum by applying the principle of impulse &momentum and; 3) Estimate the projectile launch distance as a function of launch angle and initialvelocity by applying particle kinematics. Little emphasis was placed on grading in this first versionof the EPBL insertion. An A was assigned to members of the winning team and a B to all othersexcept for
). The hazards are still identified as those that may,could, or will cause moderate to serious injury (or death) if not avoided. The safety alertsymbol format (triangle with exclamation point) is shown in Figures 3 a, b, c. Thestandard recommends that the word message “should be concise and readily understood.”The word message obviously should not include mundane features such as generaloperating instructions for the machine. The “pictorial should be readily understood andshould effectively communicate the message.” Pictorials currently in use include suchthings as bloody amputated fingers, legs caught in screw conveyors, arms, and fingers Page
specification analysis is completed. b) Product is re-designed to fit MECO capabilities while still maintaining OmniMount functionality. c) CAD drawings are created and approved. d) CAD drawings are distributed to students in Casting and Forming class. e) A two-year plan is created for the product (Gantt Chart). f) Process plans (methods, operations, and tooling) are created. g) Manufacturing cell designs are created. h) Manufacturing cells are simulated by senior students in the Simulation class (MET 415). i) Complete cost analysis of the product cycle (manufacture and assembly) is created.In MET 344, Casting and Forming, the following functions are completed by multiple studentteams and reviewed by a team of industry
-I, Appendix B).Typically, a student registered at Miami University would fulfill 28% Foundation requirement, 9%Focus requirement, and 63% in the field requirement as shown in the pie chart (Figure-1). Page 8.688.3Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Foundation (28%) Focus (9%) Field (63
Session _____ Learning Design in Lab Camilla M. Saviz and Kurt C. Schulz School of Engineering and Computer Science University of the Pacific, Stockton, CAAbstractLaboratory curricula in two core undergraduate-level engineering courses, FluidMechanics and Materials Science, have been enhanced through implementation oflaboratory design experiences. In addition to performing established experiments,students work in teams to develop a laboratory experiment investigating a course-related topic which they are required to research and formally report
The Senior Design Project: From Concept to Reality Roobik Gharabagi, William J. Ebel Department of Electrical Engineering Saint Louis University 3450 Lindell Blvd St. Louis, MO 63103 gharabr@slu.edu, ebelwj@slu.eduAbstractThe senior design experience at the Department of Electrical Engineering of St. LouisUniversity is a two semester course sequence with sixteen weeks per semester. The totalof thirty two weeks for the senior design courses is divided into three major sections oftwelve-twelve-eight weeks. The end result of each major
American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Conference, Toronto, Canada, June, 2002.[2] B. Graubard, F. Chen, Z. Min, R.J. Weber, D. Rover, and J.A. Dickerson, “Lessons Learned: Installing a Wireless System in the C6 Virtual Reality Environment,” IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, 7th Annual Immersive Projection Technology (IPT) Symposium, Orlando, March 2002.[3] J. A. Dickerson, W. C. Black, C. Cruz-Neira, R. Weber, “CRCD: Wireless Multimedia Communications for Virtual Environments,” Invited Paper at the American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June, 2001.[4] R. Stuart, Design of Virtual Environments: Barricade Books, 2001.[5] Allen Bierbaum, VR
Dr. Robert Maruca, Associate Professor of ChemistryTextbook: Energy and the Environment; R. A Ristinen and J. J. Kraushaar, J. Wiley and Sons Publishing Co., 1999.References: N/ASupplies: Calculator, Paper, Pencil, EraserGrading: Lesson Plans 100 points Lab Reports 50 points each Notebook 50 pointsGrades: 90% - 100% A 80% - 89% B 70% - 70% C
b/c I enjoy learning or take my deep knowledge in the mission field.)The average workweek lasted 43.1 hrs. The maximum number of hours worked per weekwas 65 and the median workweek was 40 hours. When asked “what do you like leastabout your job,” seven women mentioned the long hours required, and one specificallymentioned the uncertainty of the number of hours that might be required on any given day.One woman stated the following: My company encourages involvement in civic organizations as well as professional ones. Often times there are city/town/county board meetings related to our projects we must attend during the evenings. Engineering is not simply a 9 to 5 job. This, in combination with the stress of the
Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey.7. Rosson, M. B., J. M. Carroll. (2002) Usability Engineering. Scenario-Based Development of Human- Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California.8. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the User Interface. Strategies For Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Biographical InformationBARBARA BERNAL THOMASThomas is a full professor in the School of Computing and Software Engineering at Southern Polytechnic StateUniversity for the last seventeen years. The areas of Software Engineering, User-Centered Design and ComputerGraphics & Multimedia are the focus endeavors. She is a co-founder of the SPSU Usability Research Lab and
. BibliographyErwin, B. (1998). K-12 Education and Systems Engineering: A New Perspective. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle, WA.Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC (1993). The Federal Investment in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education: Where Now? What Next? Report of the Expert Panel for the Review of Federal Education Programs in Science.Gallagher, M. & Bauerle, A. (2003). Toying With TechnologySM: Bridging the Gap Between Education and Engineering. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Albuquerque, NM.Genalo, L. J., Wright C. T., Wright K. B. (1998). Toying with
material to the students is instruction withexperiential learning. 1. Writing a. Formal technical reports following the technical journal format (One individual and two team reports) b. Safety report for supervisor and peers (One individual) Page 8.753.12 c. Operations Manual for a non-technical audience (One individual)Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 1313
publication by ABET that identifies the learning outcomes necessary to maintainABET accreditation [2]. In this publication, ABET defines the following learning outcomes thatmust be demonstrated in an accredited engineering program: (a) ability to apply knowledgeacquired, (b) ability to design and conduct experiments, (c) ability to design systems, (d) abilityto function on multi-disciplinary teams, (e) ability to formulate and solve problems,(f) understanding professional responsibility, (g) ability to communicate, (h) understanding theimpact of engineering solutions in a global context, (i) recognition of need for life-long learning,(j) knowledge of contemporary issues, and (k) ability to analyze and interpret data.At Christian Brothers University
multiplyingrequirements as the design progresses. Additionally, students are given the explanation thatsuitable coverage of all the listed requirements should lead to a grad of B, while quality andappropriate additions will lead to higher grades. Subject 10% Submittal 35% Submittal 100% Submittal Introduction USMA Standard Title Required Required Required Page A-E Firm’s name, logo Required Required Required and project cover
nanotechnology. The program is designed to cater to incomingstudents with diverse backgrounds, to prepare the students for new challenges in theworkplace, and to provide a curriculum with strong multidisciplinary foundation that canevolve with changing technology. The new curriculum consists of a set of core coursesand several focus research areas. It provides students with extensive hands-onexperience, a comprehensive experience in teamwork and technical communication, andthe opportunity to exercise and develop their creativity and innovation.I. IntroductionThe integration of entire systems into micron scale devices and the sensing technology tointerface these devices to the real world is and will be core disciplines required for nextgeneration
that choice, and (b)we could provide them with an industrial level set of development tools.† We would think very carefully before having a real customer for such a course, because this would increase thecost of failure, which in turn may prevent students from taking risks and trying something new. Academia is not the Page 8.1080.2real world, and it may be best to use that to our advantage by doing things that are not easily done in the real world,such as encouraging students to focus on learning even if it may lead to project failure. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
Session 1630` Dilemmas in Framing Research Studies in Engineering Education David F Radcliffe, Lesley Jolly Catalyst Centre, School of Engineering, University of Queensland, AustraliaAbstractThere has been considerable debate about the need for more empirical, evidence based studies ofthe impact of various interventions and practices in engineering education. A number ofresources including workshops to guide engineering faculty in the conduct of such studies haveemerged over recent years. This paper presents a critique of the evolution of engineeringeducation research and its underlying assumptions in
Graduate Degrees Polymer Technology 2.3 Graduate Admissions Systems & Controls 2.4 Financial Support Turbomachinery 2.5 Graduate Student Enrollment 5. The Future of the Department 2.6 Digital Archiving System Appendices 2.7 Graduation Statistics A. Faculty Biographies 2.8 Exit Interviews B. Graduate Course Syllabi 2.9 Rankings C. ME Development & Advisory3. Degree Requirements
4.25Average of the above factors (5 = very good & 1 = very poor) 3.89 4.62 4.77 4.43 4.43Percentage of student grades B and A 50.00 50.00 69.00 93.00 65.50Percentage of student grades C and below 50.00 50.00 31.00 7.00 34.50 Page 8.1312.5 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
communicators, be socially adept, manageprojects, and be prepared for leadership roles.Changing an existing education program can be a daunting task. However, when inspired tosuccessfully prepare graduates for engineering practice in the 21rst century, it is well worth theeffort.Bibliography: 1. Beder, S., “Beyond Technicalities: Expanding Engineering Th inking.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, January 1999, 12-19. 2. Bowman, B. A., and Farr, J. V., “Embedding Leadership in Civil Engineering Education.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, January 2000, 16-20. 3. Koehn, E., “Professional Program Criteria for Civil Engineering Curriculums.” Journal of Professional
Session 2793 ESTIMATION OF LAMINAR BURNING VELOCITIES BY DIRECT DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY J. Uske and R. Barat* Chemical Engineering Department New Jersey Institute of Technology University Heights Newark, NJ 07102Abstract By being a function of both transport (diffusion) and chemical reaction rates, thelaminar burning velocity (LBV) of a gaseous fuel/oxidant mixture is a window to thecomplexities of combustion. Direct photography of the inner cone of a Bunsen flameremains a
Electrical Engineering Education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 45, No. 3, August2002[18] W. E. Dixon, D.M. Dawson, B.T. Costic and M.S. de Queiroz, “A MATLAB-Based Control SystemsLaboratory Experience for Undergraduate Students: Toward Standardization and Shared Resources,” IEEETransactions on Education, Vol. 45, No. 3, August 2002[19] J. Attia, PSPICE and MATLAB for Electronics, An Integrated Approach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2002,ISBN 0-8493-1263-9[20] Discussions with the RIT Electrical Engineering Department Industrial Advisory Board, May 2002.[21] J. Lang, “Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers, Journal ofEngineering Education, January, 1999, pp. 43-51.[22] E. W. Maby, A. B. Carlson, K. A
offers seminarsfor beginners and more advanced faculty. Blackboard’s online teaching environmentincludes the following functionalities: (a) Content management tool for instructors to posttheir lecture notes, homework assignments, study guides, homework and exam solutions,(b) Communication tool for asynchronous and synchronous collaboration between facultyand students and among students, (c) Assessment tool which includes test and quizcapabilities along with an online gradebook, and (d) Control tool for faculty managedutilities. Fig. 1 shows the control panel of EET 3100 Advanced Digital Design course,which was delivered the first time during Fall 2002 semester. Fig. 1: Blackboard Control PanelCourse-management tool
examined some existing and also new methods and technologies needed toglobalize CD projects. We also presented our own personal experience with ipTeam software inseveral funded pilot projects. We believe by adopting these technologies into design curriculum,engineering schools will have the same potential of improving their programs that leadingmanufacturing companies have enjoyed through the integration of these technologies into theirs.Bibliography1. Trippp, S.D., Bichelmeyer, B. “ Educational Technology Research and Development”, 38 (1), 31-44, 1990.2. Bunderson, C. V., Gibbons, A. S., Olsen, J. B., & Kearsley, G. P., “Work models: Beyond instructional objectives”, Instructional Science, 10, 205-215, 19813. “Ford, GM Announce
term.SummaryIntroducing games in the classroom can be daunting, but the benefits to your instruction and students’learning makes it worthwhile. It takes time to find activities that are suitable for your subject matterand students. Don’t be discouraged that every class doesn’t have the same level of fun and games –take it one class at a time. Start by trying one activity the next time you need a change of pace in classand watch the fun and learning begin!Bibliography 1. Felder RM. Reaching the second tier - Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching 23(5):286-290, 1993. 2. Sanoff AP. Building tomorrow's workforce. ASEE Prism 10(6):16-22, 2001. 3. Anthony S, Mernitz H, and Spencer B. The ChemLinks and
), and Dr. A. Serbezov (ChE, RHIT). Their feedback has been veryhelpful in achieving better results. Student feedback and participation have been invaluable.References 1. Arce, P. “Group Projects-Based Final Exams,” Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the ASEE, 1999. 2. Arce, P. and P. Arce-Trigatti, “Parallel between Team Sport Coaching Techniques and Engineering Instructions,” Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the ASEE, 2000. 3. Arce, P., and L. B. Schreiber, “High Performance Learning Environment or Hi- Pele,” (Pre-print, 2003). 4. Creighton, L., “Kicking Old Habits” Prism Magazine, April Issue, 33 (2001). 5. Smith, K., “Project Management and Teamwork,” McGraw Hill BEST, N.Y. (2000