value overall team/group work differently, or justinterdisciplinary teamwork. Thus, we anticipate that future analyses will support the initialpositive results shown by the perceived benefits to interdisciplinary teams as well as additionalstudent gains in self-efficacy, project competencies, and other design course objectives.References[1] S. McComb and J. Kirkpatrick. “Impact of pedagogical approaches on cognitive complexityand motivation to learn: Comparing nursing and engineering undergraduate students,” NursingOutlook, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 37-48, Jan. 2016.[2] World Health Organization, Framework for Action on Interprofessional EducationCollaborative Practice. Geneva: World Health Organization, pp. 1–64, 2010.[3] M. Cox, P. Cuff, B. Brandt
design from the start. The fifth principle is to ensure allscience and mathematics concepts, and technology tools employed are necessary forstudents’ successful completion of the STEM-design projects. With these principles inmind, the next step is to examine classroom enactments of the curriculum, focusing onthe extent to which students apply mathematics and science concepts to their designwork and the challenges and affordances for doing so (Berland, 2013).Effective Instructional Methodologies Contemporary engineering education should emphasize the design process,challenge-based learning, and other engineering habits of mind (Berland, Martin, Ko, etal., 2013). The results of Berland, Martin, Ko, et al.’s (2013) study revealed that as
engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions. Dr. Bailey is the Principal Investi- gator (PI) for the RIT NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant. The goal of this large-scale ($3.4M), multi-year university-level organizational transformation effort is to increase the representation and advancement of women STEM faculty. At the university level, she serves as Senior Faculty Associate to the Provost for ADVANCE and co-chairs the President’s Commission on Women.Prof. Joseph A. Raelin, Northeastern University Joe Raelin is an internationally recognized scholar in the fields of work-based learning and leadership. He holds the Asa S. Knowles Chair of
Interval Plot of REF/SEN/VIS/, REF/SEN/VIS/, ... 95% CI for the Mean 32 30 28 Data 26 24 22 20 L O EQ L O EQ L O EQ /G /S /G /S
Development Program) in the early 1980's, the RESP curriculum aims for the mostdifficult parts of first-year calculus, chemistry, and physics. In other words, RESP is notremedial.Put another way, RESP’s guiding philosophy is to give students the chance to have a badsemester, if one is coming, without impacting their academic record and with ample support todevelop new skills for student’s new collegiate setting. Students do not receive course credit, toremove the threat of permanently codifying poor performance on a student’s transcript. Thisdiffers from models that offer course credit, which carries the risk of permanent academicconsequences. During the summer, students build resilience as well as technical skills and entertheir fall semester aware
, teaching/learning approach and assessment procedures.Key questions that we have pondered about are centered on what defines a chemical engineer inthis century, what are the current trends and how best to equip our graduates with competitiveskills both in the context of our country and internationally. Taking and innovator´s approach toour curricular intervention, we have tried to solve four simple questions 21:What orthodoxies can we challenge? Page 26.2.8 How can we best harness the current trends in the field, both in research and education?How can we take advantage of our available resources and strengths?What are the most important needs
factor that has remained constant over this period of time is students communicating their impression and belief that STEM majors are“hard”. Parents and society express the same impression.A recent New York Times article attributes some of this hardness to tough introductory math andscience classes. The article included the following quote from a student (with 800 Math SATand reading and writing scores in the 700’s) who switched from mechanical engineering topsychology during fall of their sophomore year: “I was trying to memorize equations, and engineering’s all about the application, which they really didn’t teach too well,” he says. “It was just like, Do these practice problems, then you’re on your own”.5Seymour and
comparative literature review.,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 38, no. 3 Article 7, 2006. [2] E. Lindsay and M. C. Good, “Effects of laboratory access modes upon learning outcomes,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 619–631, 2005.[3] J. E. Corter, J. V Nickerson, S. K. Esche, C. Chassapis, S. Im, and J. Ma, “Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories,” ACM Trans. Comput. Interact., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 7, 2007.[4] B. Aktan, C. A. Bohus, L. A. Crowl, and M. H. Shor, “Distance learning applied to control engineering laboratories,” Educ. IEEE Trans., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 320–326, 1996.[5] Labshare, “The
advanced education or career advancement. Many Morgan State University (MSU) graduate students come from economically disadvantaged families and have very limited financial support for their full-time graduate study. Some of them solely count on the scholarships provided by the school or have to take out student loans. Supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM), NASA research grants and other Federal research grants, many MSU engineering graduate students have been involved in applied research projects with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Army Research Laboratory, and the local industry. These projects include but
Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada. Page 26.629.11 [4] Meyers, K. L., Ohland, M. W., Pawley, A. L., Silliman, S. E., Smith, K. A. (2012). Factors relating to engineering identity. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 14, 119-131.[5] Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 273.[6] Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2011). Quebrando Fronteras: Among Latino and Latina undergraduate engineers. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10, 134-146.[7] Pew Research Center: U.S
projects in the future? 6 3 5 4 2 x = 4.86 x = 3.88 3 s = 0.38 s = 1.13 2 1 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 1
26.646.3described in a recent report titled Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education, fundedby the National Science Foundation (NSF) and published by the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE). 6Problem StatementExpanding on the issues described in the introduction, the problems faced by science andengineering (S&E) employers, whether in industry or governmental agencies, are multifacetedand combinatorial. The supply and demand of graduates currently is not in an equilibrium stage,and despite the efforts to expand STEM opportunities, the number of college students pursuingscience and engineering is stagnating. 7 Stagnation continues when unemployment is at recordlows for S&E graduates, this dynamic defies the “invisible hand
field constitute legitimate exceptions to stricturesagainst text recycling.A problematic area involves translations: while some may view translating an article from onelanguage to another as intellectually suspect and perhaps a case of duplicate publication, Wenand Gao offer a compelling argument that this practice actually “maximize[s] the effectivenessof academic communication and equalize[s] the rights of creating, distributing and accessingknowledge.”12 Furthermore, they note, that moving from one language to another involves morethan simply translating the words. It may include adding extra background information,completely revising the scope of the literature review, and, in general “reposition[ing] theresearch in an international context
) Semester Outline Week Lecture Topic(s) Laboratory Topics 1 Site & Project Design Loading Overview Criteria -Structural Subsurface Loading Exploration Program -Wind Pressure Layout -Snow Loads Page 26.1019.5 -Building Codes (Mass, IBC) 2 RISA-2D Lecture Site Geology & Truss Analysis using and Examples Soil
, etc.), (2)their opinion on how the project helped them learn the subject content (e.g., controls conceptsand methods), and (3) their opinion on how the project helped them learn the computer tools(e.g., MATLAB and SIMULINK functions). The complete survey questionnaire is included inAppendix II. TABLE II compiles the survey results.TABLE II. Student Self-Evaluation with End-of-Project Survey Mean Mode(s) Standard Deviation Student General Perception 1. Interesting and motivating 3.6 3 0.99 2. Sense of accomplishment 3.5 3, 4 0.87 3
. Thepresentation should focus less on note taking strategies and more on ways to transforminformation, with supplemental readings attached. The addition of the “supplement” part of theStudy Cycle appeared to be extremely valuable as students self-reported use of campusresources, peers, TA’s, and professors as a result of this section and could use more time.References1. Freedman, M. The passage through college. J. Soc. Issues 12, 13–28 (1956).2. Schreiner, L. A. & Pattengale, J. Visible Solutions for Invisible Students: Helping Sophomores Succeed. (2000).3. Tobolowsky, B. F. & Cox, B. E. Shedding light on sophomores: an exploration of the second college year. (2007).4. Hunter, M. S. et al. Helping sophomores succeed
, andsupersaturation is possible. However, in the right graph there is no solid region where oneelement could be soluble in the other in the solid state. With no solid solubility, a supersaturatedsolid solution cannot be created. So the underlying reason(s) for difficulty in understanding thefirst explanation could lie in poor chart reading ability, vocabulary, or in the meaning ofsolubility limit or all. The response addresses all issues with the two graphs, but could have beenimproved with better labeling on the diagrams.Fig. 3. Faculty response on white board to students’ Muddiest Points on age hardening Al alloys. The comments in Muddy Points 2–5 all relate to difficulty in reading the graph, whichplots metal hardness (a measure of strength) as a
different disciplines. Finally, it could be that the student engagement survey does not capture all facets of student engagement, specifically within the domain of engineering. In the future, a different measure of student engagement could be used to see if these relationships hold true.[1] A. Wigfield, and J. S. Eccles, "Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation," in Contemporaryeducational psychology, vol. 25.1, 2000, pp. 68-81.[2] J. S. Eccles, T. F. Adle, R. Futterman, S. B. Goff, C. M. Kaczala, J. L. Meece, and C. Midgley,"Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors" in Achievement and achievement motives: Psychologicaland sociological approaches, J. T. Spence Eds. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company. 1983, pp. 75–138.[3] K
and technology teacher, as well as several years of electrical and mechanical engineering design experience as a practicing engineer. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering from Swarthmore College, his Master’s of Education degree from the University of Massachusetts, and a Master’s of Science in Mechanical Engineering and Doctorate in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Louis Nadelson, Utah State University Louis S. Nadelson is an associate professor and director for the Center for the School of the Future in the Emma Eccles Jones College of Education at Utah State University. He has a BS from Colorado State University, a BA from the Evergreen State College, a MEd from Western
Moreover, the multi-modalinteractivity of the smartphone touchscreen facilitates intuitive interfaces that may improve userexperience as s/he interacts with a physical system through the smartphone.4 Thus, the embeddedtechnologies of smartphones have a great potential to impact the experiences of educators,researchers, and students in laboratory settings. In fact, smartphones have already been leveragedin educational settings to sense parameters of physical systems such as the rotational energy of apendulum by attaching the smartphone to a bicycle wheel and measuring the angular velocitythrough the embedded gyroscope.5 Even as this application of rigidly mounting the smartphoneto the system exploits the embedded sensing capability of these devices
sampling techniquesduring campus site visits (Patton, 2015).AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Kevin Fosnacht with the National Survey of StudentEngagement for assistance in providing the initial analysis of the data being used to validate theproposed model presented in this paper.ReferencesAllie, S., Armien, M. N., Burgoyne, N., Case, J. M., Collier-Reed, B. I., Craig, T. S., . . . Wolmarans, N. (2009). Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community: improving student learning in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 359-367. doi:10.1080/03043790902989457American Society for Engineering Education. (2014). Divisions: American Society
engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1): 27-34.[8] Baker, D., Krause, S., Roberts, C. (2007). An intervention to address gender issuesin a course on design, engineering, and technology for science educators. Journal ofEngineering Education, 96(3): 213-226.[9] Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases andrecommendations. Meridian: A middle school computer technologies journal, 5(1),83.[10] Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future.The Clearing House. 83(2): 39-43.[11] Alfonseca, E., Carro, R. M., Martín, E., Ortigosa, A., & Paredes, P. (2006). Theimpact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning: a case study.User
theory or concept based questions as opposed toproblem or application questions). In cases where the instructor notices lack of depth in thequestions, they can stimulate the discussion by injecting deeper questions on Piazza withoutproviding the answer.Stage 2 - Learning: The second phase, learning, happens periodically throughout the term in theday(s) before upcoming mini-tests. Students are given a schedule of when mini-tests occur at thestart of the semester. In this phase, discussion on Piazza is frozen, and students are given theopportunity to study each other’s questions in preparation for the mini-test.Stage 3 - Quiz: In the third phase students are required to take the test (individually), where thequestions in the quiz will be only from
effective engineering andSTEM learning and teaching in higher education.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.#1525345. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. This work is done in collaboration with the University of Kansas, IndianaUniversity, Queen's University at Kingston, University of British Columbia, University ofCalifornia, Davis, University of Colorado Boulder, and the University of Texas at San Antonio.References[1] M. W. Ohland et al., "Race, gender, and measures of success in engineering education," Journal of
systems are selected, configured and designed.Prof. M K Parfitt c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Observed Best Practices for Student Driven Multi-disciplinary Team-based Architectural Engineering CapstoneABSTRACTThe design, construction, and operations of buildings fall within the architecture and engineeringdomains. Buildings are highly technical and critical systems that are engineered to performance levelsthat allow buildings to function for 100’s of years. To achieve this, buildings require engineers andmanagers to be of a learned, regulated and licensed profession. While many engineering degrees educatebuilding design, perhaps best suited for the task is
constructs in engineering, and they operate as gatekeepers forwho participates and who is recognized as “capable” in engineering education. This tool (seeFigure 1) can be used in an exercise of self-reflection around one’s own beliefs about therelationship between intelligence and smartness.An understanding of how intelligence and smartness are constructed as well as active reflection onour own view(s) of the relationship between these two constructs can help us better understandhow we are active participants in processes that either validate or invalidate students’ abilities, inour own practice as educators. This is of vital importance because of the implications that theexclusionary nature of smartness and intelligence can have for students
assignments. CAD software was accessible online to accommodate the independent coursework and to provide flexibility for students to complete these assignments. As students learned these engineering skills, the engineering design instructor lectured them about the ways in which their newly acquired skills would aid them in designing and creating their search and rescue assistants (S.A.R.A.’s). The students synthesized these skills in the engineering design process and when physically creating their final S.A.R.A.’s in their engineering design class.Figure 3: Updated Conjecture Map with Integrated Engineering Design and Spatial Visualization Figure 3 illustrates the updated conjecture map
plan(s) and elevations of their building as well as the framing plan. Appendix 5 shows an example of the building layout. The evaluation rubric for the layout is shown in Table 2. 72% of students scored at least 90%, 16% between 75% and 90%, and 6% between 60% and 75% as well as below 60%.3- Design Handbook- 60%: Each member must submit a design handbook that includes hand calculations and/or software results of their building. The evaluation rubrics for the design handbook is shown in Table 2. 26% scored at least 90%, 42% scored 75% to 90%, 26% between 60% and 75%, and 6% below 60%.4- Written proposal- 5%: problem description, constraints, alternative solutions, analysis and design of each solution including hand calculations or
keying. The data streams then are transmittedsimultaneously over the sub-carriers at a low symbol rate. The total data rate is maintained to besimilar to the conventional single-carrier modulation schemes in the same bandwidth 21. At thereceiver side, reverse operations of the transmitter are performed. The RF signal is first down-converted to baseband for processing. Then, the signal is low pass filtered, converted to digitalsignal using an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter, and down sampled. The serial stream ofsampled time signal is converted into parallel streams by the serial-to-parallel (S/P) converterand the cyclic prefix is discarded from the received composite signal. The Fast FourierTransform (FFT) is used to transform the time domain
education," in 4th ASEE/AaeE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education,2005.[2] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey and L. J. Leifer, "Engineering designthinking, teaching, and learning," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 103-120, 2005.[3] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, "Pedagogies of engagement:Classroom-based practices," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 87-101, 2005.[4] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson and K. A. Smith, "Cooperative learning returns to college whatevidence is there that it works?," Change: the magazine of higher learning, vol. 30, pp. 26-35,1998.[5] K. S. Cockrell, J. A. H. Caplow and J. F. Donaldson, "A context for learning: Collaborativegroups in the problem-based