this database extensively in planning afield and laboratory investigation program to characterize soil properties needed for the design oftheir facility.Paul Palazolo has customized the computational and project elements from “Sooner City” intohis undergraduate Civil Engineering Computation course at The University of Memphis withextension of the authenticity of the programming to relate to actual engineering audiences. Page 6.1138.1 "Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2001, American Society for Engineering
community vision with Pitt’s core compe- tencies of research and education, Sanchez has built up Pitt Hydroponics in Homewood, founded Con- stellation Energy Inventor labs for K-12 students, and re-created the Mascaro Center’s Teach the Teacher sustainability program for science educators in the region. As a teacher he designed and created the Sustainability capstone course which has annually partnered with community stakeholders to address sustainability challenges at all scales. Past projects have in- cluded evaluating composting stations in Wilkinsburg, studying infrastructure resilience in Homewood, enabling community solar in PA, improving energy efficiency in McCandless Township, and improving water quality in
actually spent on teaching them how to identify theircustomers." Students are not conducting experiments in the stereotypical, laboratory-situatedway, but instead through Customer Discovery: students are "testing [their] hypothesis" by talkingwith and gathering feedback from customers. Exploring user needs is the foundation of theentire Customer Discovery process, to determine the value proposition, or the "value" thatcustomer will derive from the product's use. As one interviewee said, "once you understand thevalue, then later you can transform that into your requirements, documentation to conductresearch, [you can] build product, whatever.”Interviewees agreed that Customer Discovery is also when students understand, define andreframe the problem
development. This paper outlines the proposed work and the materials developed tosupport the implementation of the project in Fall 2015.IntroductionComputer programming is a common mandatory course taught in the first year of engineeringand computer science programs. These types of courses typically utilize a common programminglanguage (MATLAB, C, Java) to teach students about syntax, programming techniques, andintroduce students to applied problem solving1-4. Learning a computer programming languagehas been known to be difficult for high-school and university students because of the lack of timefor practice5, in addition to the conceptual complexity of the topic and logical reasoningprocesses required for understanding. Programming courses are
Engineering Education, Associate Professor, and Assistant Head of the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. An award winning teacher, his main areas of research and teaching are design and design education. Page 12.865.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Improving Engineering Design Instruction through Lessons Learned from FIRST Lego League MentoringAbstractEngineering design courses at the undergraduate level pose substantial challenges to novice aswell as veteran faculty, especially when implementing open-ended design problems to facilitatestudent learning. This paper
. Slicing Solids k. Presentation of Solids. Table 1. A Summary of Several Important Solid Modeling OperationsThe developed reference guide has been provided to all instructors assigned to teach this coursein the spring 2006 semester. The instructors can utilize such a guide while teaching in theclassroom/laboratory settings to complement their teaching and effectively aid the students withthe understanding and visualization of three-dimensional solids. Using this guide, a variety ofsolid models can be developed and edited with ease through interactions and discussions withstudents. The constructed models effectively enhance the visualization capabilities of studentsand provide them with new perspectives. This method of delivery for
attainable in a traditional classroom or laboratory environment.IntroductionTechnology has allowed instructors to introduce visual elements into the traditional classroom.Visualization through custom animations can provide a very realistic insight into thefunctionality of digital systems. Visualizing the dynamic behavior of physical systems is animportant part of the learning process for engineering and technology students.LearningLearning is the active process, or experience, of gaining knowledge 1 . Knowledge can be gainedthrough reading, listening, or interacting with new material. The basic premise of learning is thatnew information is related to existing knowledge 1 .Research suggests that learning is hierarchical in the sense that complex
andtechnology, who are at the leading edge of advancing the practice of engineering through theirteaching, industrial engagement, and original professional scholarly work relevant to creativeengineering practice and its leadership for technology development. The paper raisesfundamental questions that must be answered to design a complementary faculty reward templateof creative professional scholarly work, teaching, and engagement for high-caliber engineeringprofessionals in parallel to the academic scientific research template, which predominantly existsat schools of engineering and technology across the nation. Page 9.823.1
professionalinterests; learning through hands-on activities in a rich technological environment;fostering peer-learning and collaboration in the class; and encouraging participants toreflect on their learning..IntroductionSubjects such as mathematics, science and technology are currently being instructed inschool as separate disciplines, and teachers often teach specific subject matter and haveonly little knowledge about subjects not within their area of expertise. Only few teachersunderstand broad terms such as technology and technological literacy. In the Departmentfor Science and Education at, we feel it is important to promote technological literacyamong mathematics, science and technology teachers in order to enhance theirunderstanding of technology and
Session 1675 Faculty Internship In The Telecommunications Industry Willie K. Ofosu Telecommunications Dept. Penn State Wilkes-BarreAbstractExcelling in the categories of research, teaching and service in one’s area ofspecialization ultimately results in a new faculty gaining tenure. There are manyapproaches one can take to satisfy the requirements in any one of these categories. Oneapproach is placement in industry. Industrial placement is a component of life-longlearning plan that helps to
requiresfrequent cooperation, productive deliverables, and high dependencies on institutionalresources. Many examples are described in [11]-[12]. Another aspect of teaching involvescollaborative learning (CL) where students are divided into functional teams. It certainly Proceedings of the 2023 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2023, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 465concentrates on interdependence, interaction, group feedback, and group assessment. Therefore,these teaching components play important role in a course design.This newly developed Embedded Systems Technology course is
Technology and Construction Management Engineering Technology programs inour department. It is also a prerequisite course for a number of other courses in both programs.CON 161 is a 2 hour and 50 minute per week lecture course that introduces students toconstruction material characteristics, residential and small-scale commercial buildingconstruction methods, and the construction industry as a whole. Other than a soil sieve test,CON 161 lacks a laboratory component. Assessment of student learning in this course hastraditionally been either via weekly quizzes, mid-term and final examinations. Faculty membersteaching the three sections of this course normally draw construction details on the board andsupplement their teaching with PowerPoint
Engineering at The Citadel. Dr. Batouli received his PhD in Civil Engineering from Florida International University. He also holds Master of Public Administration and Graduate Certificate in Homeland Security and Emergency Management from FIU, Master of Science in Civil Engineering/Construction Engineering and Management from IAU, and Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering/Surveying from University of Tehran. Dr. Batouli is a Professional Engineer (PE) registered in SC. He also holds Project Management Professional (PMP) international certificate. Dr. Batouli teaches diverse range of courses in civil engineering, construction engineering, and construction/project management. As a teacher, he aims to inspire his students
systems. The positions of each of the degrees of freedom are acquiredusing optical linear encoders and a National Instruments data acquisition board using aLabVIEW interface. The experiment uses the theoretical values that are calculated during thepre-laboratory section for comparison purposes. The uncertainty behind the measurementsystem is analyzed. Plots of input force vs. output amplitudes and phases are generated for thevarious operating frequencies of the system. These results are finally compared to thepredicted results and conclusions are drawn. A sample laboratory handout is presented. Page 9.927.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American
AC 2012-3007: UPRM CHEM E SUSTAINABLE ENERGY DEMOS, WORK-SHOPS, TOWN HALL MEETINGS, ETC.: WORKING THE PIPELINEDr. Jos Colucci Ros P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez Jos A. Colucci Ros is a professor of chemical engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez (UPRM). He has received teaching and research awards, and professional service recognition such as Chemical Engineer of the Year in Puerto Rico, Distinguished CHEM E Professor (UPRM-CHEME) and Researcher (UPR), and 2009 EPA Environmental Quality Award. He has industry and management expe- rience, and has held leadership positions at UPRM such as Head of the Chemical Engineering Department, Associate Dean of Research in Engineering and UPRM R&D
the samegroup of 3 to 4 students for all laboratories and had two weeks to complete each lab. During thetwo week time period, students have two 3-hour lab sections, four 2-hour teaching assistant hoursin the lab, four 2-hour instructor office hours and an on-line forum related to the course that wasmonitored frequently by the teaching assistant and instructor. Groups were formed on the first dayof class and allowed students to form their own groups with the exception that all students in agroup must be in the same lab. To aid in creating groups, students evaluated their experience inthree categories: software development, hardware design and computer graphics. Students wereadvised to form well-balanced groups, since all laboratory assignments
Undergraduate InstitutionsNonresearch or teaching-oriented institutes have characteristics that can hinder the scope or successof research efforts. This section discusses several of these.Lack of graduate programs and advanced course work, laboratories, and equipment is a majorlimitation in leveraging the expertise and management of the professor. Although undergraduateresearch assistants can be utilized6, their relative lack of knowledge, maturity, and commitmentcan be a hindrance. Also, there are often few, if any, faculty colleagues that share expertise andinterest in one’s particular narrow research field.Personnel such as technicians, technical writers, and even secretaries needed to support researchmay be in short supply. Such deficiencies will
AC 2011-2818: THE ROLE OF THE COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY INTHE NUCLEAR INDUSTRYJoseph F. Kmec, Purdue University Joseph F. Kmec is currently Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue Uni- versity, West Lafayette, IN. His teaching areas of concentration are energy-based and include Applied Thermodynamics, Internal Combustion Engines, Motorsports, and Power Plant Systems. His recent activ- ities involving student projects include engine simulation, power plant performance analysis, and nuclear technology. He may be reached at: kmecjf@purdue.edu.Dr. Bryan J Hubbard, Purdue University, West Lafayette Bryan Hubbard is an Assistant Professor in the Building Construction and Management (BCM) Program
, SouthAfrica.25 Hines and Lethbridge26 also presented a report on development and creation of a leanuniversity.Besides the applicability of lean principles at universities, there have been studies onimplementing lean in the classroom and laboratories. Tatikonda 2 reported that by applying leanprinciples, it is possible to refine the course content to enhance student understanding. Heapplied the lean tools to design, teach, and assess accounting courses that helped students gain abetter knowledge and skills required by the employers. In addition, the applicability of leanmanufacturing to university laboratories was investigated by Sreedharan and Liou.27 It has beenreported that students working on lean projects and following lean in laboratories
Paper ID #16267Integrated Fluids and Electronics Labs to Measure Fluid FlowDr. Kristen Ann Thompson, Loras College Dr. Kristen Thompson is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering at Loras College. She teaches Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, Dynamics Systems, and Introductory Physics courses. She earned her Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin - Madison and her B.S. from Michigan Technological Uni- versity both in Chemical Engineering.Dr. Danial J. Neebel PE, Loras College Dr. Danial Neebel, PE is a Professor of engineering and computer science at Loras College. During the 2013-2014 academic year he served as
faculty has a diverse set of skills and expertise but shares a common vision ofmultidisciplinary project-based learning. The current full-time tenure track faculty roster is 25%female and is led by Dean Dianne Dorland, who joined Rowan in 2000.Henry M. Rowan Hall opened in January 1998, and was dedicated that April. The $28 million,95,000 SF building was designed to accommodate seamless integration of teaching, research andproject-based learning. Figure 1 shows a view from the atrium of Rowan Hall. Classrooms haveeasy access to laboratories and laboratory-support rooms. Non-load-bearing walls separateclassroom and laboratory modules so that they can be easily modified. The building contains atechnology spine, which is a key to the building's
the analysis of the applicationsusing them. This approach is used in many different areas of electrical engineering and withsuccess in engineering science programs. However, many of the engineering technologyprograms would not be able to implement this approach easily due to the limitations on extracourse credits available, and the time needed to complete prerequisite courses in math andphysics as well as the higher levels of math and physics required compared to engineeringscience programs. Another obstacle to a practical teaching approach is a lack of properlyequipped laboratories because of the prohibitively higher prices of the equipment used in RFengineering compared to other areas in electrical engineering [2].Curriculum Design
the calculationsalone or with their classmates. The undergraduate teaching assistant and I would then help asthey encountered roadblocks while doing their work.The classroom where this course is taught is attached to the undergraduate unit operationslaboratories. The room can hold more than 40 students, but with these activities it is best to keepthe enrollment in a single section to 24 or so. Thus, two sections are usually necessary eachsemester. The room has long tables with electrical outlets every few feet. Two sinks are availablein the lab space a few steps outside of the classroom, so water access and cleanup are easy.Another advantage of using this classroom is that the students can see the laboratory equipmentthat they will be using
the learning objectives of the courses have been accomplished, theirconfidence in taking on new challenges in these domains, and the degree to which they feel thatthe HPL centers entered into the course. This last topic was addressed by a series of elements notdirectly asking about HPL, but framed to reveal this. For example, to understand whether thecourse was assessment-centered we asked their level of agreement with the statements, “Ireceived adequate feedback on my work,” and “I was able to obtain enough practice onimportant topics.”Another part of the quantitative study was gauging to what extent the teaching reflects HPL. Weexpected simply by using the laboratory kits and employing active learning, these courses will beassessment and
Paper ID #30221A Vertically Integrated Design Program Using Peer EducationDr. Ross Aaron Petrella, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University Joint Departmentof Biomedical Engineering Dr. Petrella received his B.S. in biomedical engineering from Virginia Commonwealth University in Rich- mond, VA and his Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from Old Dominion University in Norfolk, VA. He joined the University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University Joint Department of Biomed- ical Engineering first as a postdoctoral research scholar and is now an assistant teaching professor where he teaches
since 2000, Dr. Bullard has won numerous awards for both teaching and advising, including the ASEE Raymond W. Fahien Award, the John Wi- ley Premier Award for Engineering Education Courseware, NC State Faculty Advising Award, National Effective Teaching Institute Fellow, NC State Alumni Outstanding Teacher Award, George H. Blessis Out- standing Undergraduate Advisor Award, and the ASEE Southeastern Section Mid-Career Teacher Award. She is a member of the editorial board for Chemical Engineering Education and serves a Director of the Chemical Engineering Division of ASEE. She will be a co-author, along with Dr. Richard Felder and Dr. Ronald Rousseau, of the 4th edition of Chemical Process Principles. Dr. Bullard’s
returned to his boyhood home and is teaching at Northern Michigan University. He is a member of HKN and IEEE, a Registered Professional Engineer in California, and is a past chair of the Energy Conversion and Conservation Division of ASEE. Page 26.1597.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Training Engineers and Technologists via Model TrainsAbstractThis paper looks at a novel way to teach Programmable Logic Controls via N-Scale Modeltrains. Many electric machinery courses have a component that covers Programmable LogicControllers (PLCs), since they are widely used in
first-semester course which has three mainobjectives: (1) to prepare students for the rigor of future engineering classes; (2) to providestudents with a solid foundation of basic engineering skills; and (3) to introduce students to thedifferent engineering majors available at Clemson and possible career options. In Fall 2014, theGE program enrolled 1215 new freshman and 177 new transfer students1.Promoting problem solving development in first year engineering courses is critical to ensuringstudents’ transition successfully into upper-division courses and ultimately to a practicingengineer2. Innovative approaches to teaching problem solving skills have the potential ofappealing to a broader range of students in engineering3. “Traditional
design. The University Curriculum Committee approved the request to change thecontact hours for Structural Analysis from 3 hours of lecture per week to 2 hours of lecture plus2 hours of laboratory per week to accommodate the experiential aspects of these proposedchanges. After assessing the changes to the Structural Analysis course, we will decide whether tomake similar changes in the class meeting times for the Structural Design courses.The Structural Analysis course syllabus lists the following broad goals for the course: a) Students will develop technical skills in classical methods for analysis of determinate and indeterminate structures. b) Students will gain proficiency in analysis structures comprised of trusses, beams, frames
least be allowed to decide howto do it.” In this case, the course takes on the priorities and biases of the individual giventhe (often unpopular) task of teaching the course.An alternative would be to work towards a consensus among the faculty about whatshould be done in first year engineering, and an agreement that all who teach the course Page 7.987.1will carry out those wishes, regardless of their personal biases. This approach is made Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationeven more difficult when one