shouldinclude a hands-on component aligned with the theoretical upgrades introduced in the course inthe form of term projects. Such projects can be on a variety of topics, such as smarthome/building, smart meter, smart distribution system, microgrid, communication infrastructure,Distributed energy resources (DERs) (e.g., rooftop solar photovoltaics (PV), wind), electricvehicle (EV), customer engagement, energy generation forecasting, load forecasting, and others.This paper will discuss the details of introducing a new course on smart grids in an electricalengineering technology program, including detailed examples of project selection.1. Introduction Power systems is a core field of electrical engineering technology. Electrical
shouldbe the most important or the highest priority. While it seems true that the health, safety, andwelfare of the public should be high priorities for engineers, there are certain situations where itmay not be possible to hold both safety and welfare paramount at the same time. As it is worded,the code of ethics provides no guidance as to which should be given final priority in such cases.The concepts of health, safety, and welfare have been central to engineering ethics since 1935when a Society Code of Ethics was first suggested for consideration in the May issue of TheAmerican Engineer [14]. The suggested language, in this document, included health, safety, andwelfare as the second of a series of engineering ethical principles, stating, “B. (1
fundamental understanding of how the structure responds or is designed torespond to these loadings. As such, architectural engineering programs have an obligation toteach the skill set of load determination, application, and analysis within their curriculum.Fortunately, most jurisdictions in the United States have adopted the International BuildingCode [1] and thus ASCE 7 (American Society of Civil Engineering, Minimum Design Loads forBuildings and Other Structures [2]). Based on this adoption, the ASCE 7 code is the naturalchoice to use for the determination of loadings within a course that focuses on the topic ofstructural loadings. However, teaching code procedures alone are not sufficient to gain anunderstanding of how structures behave due to
laboratorycourse in Additive Manufacturing, and how the course was customized to meet the needs of eachstudent. The faculty members who developed the course identified the need to ensure that everystudent enrolled in the course has a 3D printer in their possession for the duration of the course tomaximize the hands-on applications of the course. Students are given two options forcompleting the laboratory course depending on their discretionary funds. Option 1 is to purchasea commercially available inexpensive kit, which they build and use for the course and then keepafter the completion of the course. Option 2 is to borrow a printer from the department, whichthey will need to repair or upgrade, use for the duration of the course, and then return to
instruction to remotely teach engineering concepts to diverse,underserved communities during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.IntroductionBiomaterials are substances that can treat, augment or replace any tissue, organ or function of thebody [1]. At the inception of the modern biomaterials field in the 1940’s, this mostly includedbioinert medical devices and prostheses for cardiovascular and orthopaedic applications [2].Since this time, biomaterials have evolved with the field of tissue engineering, which aims todevelop functional substitutes for damaged tissues [3]. Today, scientists, engineers, andclinicians collaborate to develop a wide range of novel biomaterials that can diagnose and treatnumerous diseases in previously unimaginable ways [4
participatingfaculty is provided by Riley, Beaudry, and Bettencourt-McCarthy [1].Defining Excellent TeachingIf students learn more or more effectively because faculty are better teachers, then we are servingour purpose and efforts to improve teaching are worthwhile. Many contributions to the literaturethat attempt to define effective teaching include this concern: good instruction should be tied tostudent achievement [2]. If there are many ways to ensure student achievement – related to thestudents themselves, the conduct of the instructor, the learning environment, and other factors –how can we possibly hope to define the sort of instruction that produces achievement (a) flexiblyenough to allow for diversity in delivery by diverse faculty and (b) narrowly
Paper ID #32254Development of Attachments for the Quanser QubeDr. Diane L. Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University.Mr. Aaron-Joseph Michael Jones American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Development of Attachments for the Quanser QubeIntroductionThe Quanser Qube is an integrated servomotor lab hardware platform [1], shown in Figure 1.This platform includes not only the direct-drive brushed DC motor, but also two encoders as wellas the data acquisition system. One encoder is used
. A series of comprehensive educational videoand simulation-based learning modules were created for the Civil Engineering subdisciplines ofenvironmental, geotechnical, transportation, and structural engineering. The development andimplementation of such technology-based learning modules offer new opportunities to teachstudents the complex concepts of Civil Engineering through visual means. The efficacy of thelearning modules were evaluated through student assessment surveys for: (1) the appropriatenessof the module in aiding the introduction of course content, (2) the effectiveness of the module inenhancing student understanding of course content, and (3) the overall perception of students ofthe module. Implementation of the modules into the
problems. These non-technical skills allowstudents to understand the social, political, economic, cultural, environmental, and ethical aspectsof their future jobs[1]. The development of leadership is especially important for students whowish to pursue management careers including project management (PM) which is a highlyneeded and promising career path. Few undergraduate students are exposed to PM during theirundergraduate curriculum, and most PM courses are based on literature and reading. TheNational Research Council Board on Engineering education noted that undergraduate curriculumneeds to be reformed in order for undergraduates to get extensive exposure to interdisciplinary,hands-on skills, creative design, and systems thinking[2]. At the
ARISE program at UIUC. Here we describe thedevelopment, structure, and outcomes of the pilot year of an all-undergraduate soft roboticsresearch program.Introduction Participation in undergraduate research opportunities increases understanding, confidenceand awareness of opportunities in STEM fields [1]. In a national study, students’ desire to pursuea PhD increased by ~29% after performing undergraduate research [1]. Approximately 45% ofUIUC Engineering undergraduate students participate in research on or off campus.Comparatively, less than 1% of students from the three cohorts of ARISE program haveparticipated in research. To help close the undergrad research gap between ARISE students andtheir peers, we proposed developing a mentored
techniques. The context-dependent nature of this document and it’s significant use indecision-making supports the need for engineering-specific resume building guidance forundergraduate engineers [1]–[3].Undergraduate engineering students are often instructed to write their resumes using guidancefrom adisciplinary, non-engineering, unrelated sources [3]. This results in undergraduateengineers using information to craft their resumes that may not support the use of discipline-specific language. Resumes generated with this broad approach may not address employer needsand could therefore be perceived as “less attractive” by the employer, resulting in dismissal fromthe applicant pool and rejection from the opportunity.In this paper we focus on the
across the five periodical databases and restricted for peer-review journal publications. The resulting publications of each search was consolidated using 2Mendeley citation manager where duplicates were removed. Following the removal ofduplicates, we reviewed the article’s title and abstracts against the following research contextinclusion criteria: (1) participants in P-12 engaged in a STEM intervention with some focus onengineering, and (2) the measured affective view(s) focused on the views of the student as itrelates to engineering not the teacher, facilitator, or educator. Lastly, we scanned the remainingarticles’’ full-text against the
education landscape and culture, homework practiceshave evolved and online homework systems are increasingly used due to their potential inimproving students’ engagement, learning and performance [1], [2]. As such, we developed aset of prelab problems for the course SEE 310: Integrated Energy Solutions II, using theonline homework system, WeBWorK, with the goal to enhance student learning, and ensurethat students cannot copy directly from their peers. The prelab problems complement thecomputer-based lab sessions where students create and use energy systems models to deepentheir understanding of the models and related sustainability problems as part of their learningexperiences for the course. Consequently, we are interested to examine the impact of
to measureP-V-T relations for an ideal gas. The second part was a solar-powered hydrogen fuel cell vehicleand focused on energy conversion and efficiency concepts. The third is a project where studentsworked in teams to propose a project in their choice of one of two topics: one is a design projecton solar thermal energy and the other is a research project using calorimetry.The course consists of a 1-hour weekly lecture on Monday morning to discuss theory needed forthat week and present skills such as using MATLAB, uncertainty analysis, writing lab reports, etc.Students then meet in the afternoon on one day (Monday-Thursday) for a 3-hr lab session. Duringthis session, they are divided into breakout rooms to meet and work with their peers on
both weaknesses and strengths of the online version and those revelationshave informed modifications to the online process for future semesters.Introduction – The demand for online classes has been rising rapidly in the past two decadesand has further accelerated recently due to COVID-19. In that timeframe, there have been manyengineering lecture courses converted to online formats with considerable success [1]. Online labcourses for electrical engineering students have also been tried for several decades. The firstonline labs typically have involved performing computer simulations of the electronic circuits,though some have utilized remote control of the test and measurement equipment [2]. In morerecent years, there have been a number of
TAs did in the first term of remote learning worked;and carrying forward those practices into future remote instruction and instruction beyond theCOVID-19 pandemic may be recommended.IntroductionAccording to the 2019 Open Doors Report by the Institute of International Education (IIE), thenumber of international students studying in the U.S. was at its highest ever during the 2018-2019 academic year – almost 1.1 million students or 5.5% of the total population in highereducation [1]. In total, these students contributed over 44 billion dollars to the U.S. economy.And, of these students, over half pursued Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) degrees, with engineering remaining the most popular academic discipline among
breakout rooms periodically have the most positive impact onthe student’s perception of the session. 1. INTRODUCTIONOver the last decade, a growing number of instructors have had to rely on the use of online lecturesand tools to deliver class materials. To facilitate the communication and the interaction betweenstudents and teachers in higher education, online lectures have become increasingly popular. Withthe advancement of technology, online lectures provide a convenient method for meeting thedemands of a more flexible educational system. Studying engineering courses online at anytime from any location has become more attractive in recent years, but is not yet commonthroughout all engineering education programs [1]. In engineering, instructors
underrepresented in STEM, has long been a focus of policy makers, industry, anduniversity administrators alike [1]–[3]. Much attention has been paid to whether and howstudents are made to feel welcome in STEM as a result of classroom and extracurricularexperiences and, secondarily, how these experiences impact STEM retention outcomes [4]–[6].One psychological dimension that has emerged as particularly relevant is belongingness, or astudent’s “subjective feeling of fitting in and being included as a valued and legitimate memberof a particular setting” [7:421].Experimental results exploring students’ decisions to stay within or leave STEM fields can beunderstood within the context of student retention literature more broadly, specifically Tinto’sModel of
withinengineering lessons (both reported and observed) with the goal of developing potentialexplanations for patterns in teachers’ technology integration within engineering instruction byexamining teachers’ beliefs about what technologies are appropriate to integrate and theirconfidence implementing them. The following research questions guided this study: 1. How confident are teachers at integrating different digital technologies within engineering instruction? 2. How appropriate for integration within engineering instruction do teachers perceive different types of digital technologies? 3. What digital technologies do teachers use within engineering instruction? How does reported use compare with confidence and
institutions noted that “the most common use of assessmentdata is related to accreditation” and “the two greatest needs to advance student learning outcomesassessment are greater involvement of faculty and more assessment expertise, resources andtools” [1]. A similar 2013 survey observed that “the prime driver of assessment remains thesame: expectations of regional and program or specialized accrediting agencies” and “the rangeof tools and measures to assess student learning has expanded significantly” [2].There are multiple examples of learning assessment studies from different perspectives,including program-level assessment systems [3-6], assessment tools [7-9], the effectiveness ofassessment methods [10, 11], effect of technology and methods on
college level laboratory work. While theseresults were encouraging, comparisons to previous in-person outcomes and analysis of teacherexperiences (interviews) highlighted persistent gaps in student experience while completing theprogram virtually.IntroductionThe rapid shift to fully or partially online schooling imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic haspresented several challenges for students and teachers alike [1]. Among these, teachers areconstantly faced with maintaining student engagement while providing similar learningopportunities as traditional in-person instruction [2]. Despite tremendous efforts by manyteachers, significant learning losses are projected amongst students impacted by pandemicmandated school closures [3], [4].Within science
) was the test case in this researchpaper. To ensure that the online platform provides the students with the same quality classes as thetraditional classroom, the course has to be structured to meet the quality standards. Quality matters at theUniversity of Florida is the resource used to ensure that best practices in learning are being implemented. The elements of accelerated UF+QM Rubric matters Rubric were used to provide the studentswith an effective learning experience. The various elements used were factors that focus on 1) Preparingfor success 2) Guiding students and their learning path; 3) Teaching effectively online. The online platform used to deliver the course has been Canvas. The course shell was modifiedfrom the
program needs.1. IntroductionThis paper summarizes three cases which each address diversity and inclusion while directlysupporting traditional course content within the civil engineering curriculum. The casesidentified were: Flint Water Crisis (Environmental Engineering), Robert Moses & The SouthernState Parkway’s Bridges (Transportation Engineering), and Hurricane Katrina Levee Failures(Geotechnical Engineering). The paper also suggests teaching interventions and directly mapsout the content in each case study as it pertains to ABET outcomes and traditional civilengineering course subject matter. A select case and teaching intervention were implementedduring a pilot initiative within the Roger Williams University Spring 2021
DisparitiesIntroductionIn the U.S., the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant distress for many families andindividuals, but perhaps predominantly among marginalized communities of color [1]. Beyondthe medical toll, the negative impacts on social and economic conditions have been devastatingfor many ethnic and racial minorities. Many of these are young people and some are students inengineering [2]. The challenges of navigating higher education and professional formation inengineering are formidable enough for those lacking the expected social capital for academia [3].However, the challenges are intensified as the pandemic conditions threaten family, livelihood,and economic and social well-being. From our vantage point of several years of research ondiversity
and in their future careers.1.0 IntroductionTo properly contextualize Carnegie Mellon’s work around DEI, we need to situate it within alarger movement that has gained traction and momentum around engineering and social justice[1]-[3]. These happenings build upon the seminal work of Baillie [4], Riley [5], and their jointwork with their collaborators [6]. This has sprung a series of engineering and social justice-related or -infused courses, seminar series, and workshops across engineering campuses such asthose at the University of San Diego [7], Colorado School of Mines [8], Purdue [9], Stanford[10], the National Academies [11], and others. The most recent illustration is a series of global,humanitarian, and peace engineering programs that
-wide with more than 2500 codes from more than 1500organizations [1]. The list is of interest in that it is not an engineering society exclusive list,there are many professional organizations beyond those associated with engineering that havesome written rule of ethics. The list is not limited to professional organizations but includesprivate industry and their interpretation of guidelines for use in conducting business [2]. It isinteresting to note that in the case of industry, the code may extend beyond guidelines forconducting business, and may include what form of punishment will imposed in the case ofviolation of the guidelines such as termination of a contract or employment [2].For engineering programs planning to submit a request for
is likelyhighly dependent on the foundation they have brought to the course. More general academicskills and attributes such as motivation, self-regulation, self-efficacy, sense of belonging andmindset also influence how students engage with the course.Existing research demonstrates the importance of math and physics preparation to studentsuccess in mechanics [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Problem solving skill is also clearly an importantcomponent to success [5]. The correlation of spatial abilities to broader measures of success andretention for engineering majors in general is well-established [6]. However, existing studiesexploring the importance of spatial abilities to success in mechanics courses find mixed results.Many fundamental concepts
is a standardized test used to assess studentknowledge near graduation in seven different disciplines, including civil engineering. Studentsare encouraged to take the exam at most universities, and some require it for graduation.Fourteen topic areas are tested on the multiple-choice exam [1]. Programs prepare students totake the exam in various ways, including: requiring specific courses in the curriculum, requiringstudents to take a course on every FE topic, providing optional review sessions outside of normalclass, requiring students to pass a university-version of an FE-style exam before graduation, orrequiring an FE-style review course or seminar.Few studies have directly linked student perception of successfully passing the FE exam
accomplished bydelivering course lecture content to students outside of the classroom, freeing up in-class time forhands-on activities [1]. This concept has experienced a rise in popularity in recent years due tothe availability of widely disseminated video lecture content and proven benefits to studentengagement in the classroom [2]. Because lecture content is moved outside of the classroom, in-class time is typically devoted to problem solving sessions and more active learning approaches.It has been shown in the literature that the primary benefits of this method come not from anincrease in effectiveness of out-of-class lectures, but from the increase in time devoted to hands-on practice, active learning [3], and instructor-guided practice [4]. This
Professional Engineers (SHPE), and Society ofWomen in Engineering (SWE)).ParticipantsSix WOC students from the College of Engineering at a large, research-focused Midwesternuniversity self-selected to be interviewed for this study. All participants were at least eighteenyears old at the time of the interviews. Table 1 shows the racial identification information ofeach participant. To protect the participants’ anonymity, pseudonyms replaced their names, andsome demographic information was excluded to avoid inadvertently identifying information inthis manuscript. Table 1: Participant Self-Reported Racial Identification Information Participant Pseudonym Self-Reported Race Aalyah