from the Reflective and Perceptual sub-scales of the instrument.14• Moral Disengagement: 24 item scale that measures eight interrelated moral disengagement mechanisms.15Engineering Ethics Scenarios: • Ethics Knowledge Questions: We are using the same five knowledge/scenario questions that were employed in the earlier SEED research project.16-17 The format of these items is similar to questions that appear on the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam. They are multiple- choice format; each has a preferred answer. • Engineering Ethics Scenarios: We have adapted three situational-judgement situations focused on ethical issues in engineering practice adapted from prior work by Jesiek et al.18 Each multiple-choice question
absence.Furthermore, the increasing social statistics reflected more and more parents are concerned withtheir children’s safety and how the baby-sitters have treated them. A domestic service robot canfulfill these demands easily. Therefore, home monitoring and surveillance is a good example ofthe basic applications that robots can easily do for us, and it can serve as the first step for thosewho are willing to learn mobile robotics from the scratch to finished products.In this RET project unit, students will learn how to build the robot which can patrol and monitorour house condition when we are away from home. The challenge of this research project is two-fold. First, the robot must be able to move freely and patrol the area autonomously. Second, it mustbe
exploring the adoption and acceptance of such technologies is useful, so is theimportance of studying the impact of feedback, and its form, on student learning using the COIframework. Previous studies (Ice, Curtis, Phillips & Wells3; Dias & Trumpy4) offer a deeperunderstanding on students’ experience and sense of social presence as a result of audio feedbackstrategies, reflecting students’ value for effectiveness and efficiency in the context of audio-based feedback.Feedback to Improve Students’ Perception of EngagementHarper5 proposed that instructors are in search of meaningful methods for promoting interactivityand engagement. Proper attention to instructional design informs us that appropriate and regularfeedback is a necessity for
Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is the Director of the INSPIRE Institute for Pre-College Engineering Education and is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 High School Students’ Reflections about Participation in Engineering Service Learning Projects (Work-in-Progress)IntroductionThere
, sediments, and tastes and odors. They calculated on the cost to treat one liter of water,and reflected on which scenarios would be most appropriate for each of the purification methodsused in class.In a follow up class, the instructor created a table that the class collectively completed thatincluded the method, whether the method was effective at removing various contaminants. Aguided discussion on water quality and the biological, chemical, and physical contaminants thatcontribute to water quality ensued.Seven purification in total were used: solar water disinfection (SODIS), ultraviolet (UV)disinfection using SteriPEN, membrane filtration using the LifeStraw family size hanging filter,boiling, filtration using a Katadyn filtration system
out how the professional uses the specific method beingcovered in class. Essentially, they are asking, “How do you do this at General Motors?” as anexample. After each of the five conference calls, the student group writes a reflective paperabout what they have learned. This method differs from the traditional case study approachbecause the students do not just read what is written, but can ask initial questions and ask follow-up questions to get a better understanding of what is important by the inflection of the mentor’svoice and hearing the mentor convey it in his/her own words.This research is for the purpose of sharing best practice with other instructors and understandingthe key factors to the program’s success. With this preliminary
“green screen”; developing a threestep iterative process for videos based on story boards; and changing how concepts wereidentified. In the first year students selected from a list of relevant concepts, in the second yearconcepts were represented mathematically. During both years the videos were scored usingrubrics on both accuracy of conceptual understanding and production values, and were also peer-evaluated. Comparisons of video scores to performance on standard exams and the results ofconcept inventories are presented. We also reflect on the value of videos for self-explanationand for engaging with conceptually difficult material. Example student videos will be used toillustrate both correct and incorrect conceptual explanations.Introduction
manifested because it’s the right thingto do, it reflects authentic leadership and not just literature and business cards. This authenticleadership leads to authentic values-driven culture.The values-driven culture is essential for safety because the safety professional or projectengineer is not omnipresent to the workers to direct every behavior. Every individual mustbecome a leader. Authentic leaders can exist at all levels of an organization; a forklift driverdoes not need the title CEO or foreman to manifest his actual values in voluntarily instructing anew employee in the virtues of inspecting the truck’s brakes every day whether the rules requireit or not.Organizational leaders, including those directly responsible for safety, must act
to completion”. One student did note, though, that the unstructured natureof the project “was sometimes challenging, as five voices clashed and caused a lot of tension -especially in the last few weeks”.In general terms, these evaluations reflect the experience of Chieffo and Griffiths in a study ofover 2,300 students – 93% of students that studied abroad generated unique, qualitativecomments about their program experience, while only 57% of their on-campus did so. In general,the comments of the former group were more introspective and related to personal gains, whilethe latter group commented primarily on classroom learning and logistics [26]. Of the 15students participating in on-campus projects advised by the author during this time
and consistency in the problemposed. The briefs selected referenced a similar artefact, though outlined differing themes. Thecontrol (a) and experimental (b) briefs implemented entailed; Design and make a mirror; (a) for bathroom setting to hold personal grooming items with a marine theme, (b) for a utility setting to include storage for small personal items to reflect favourite pastime.Implementation of TasksThe participants were arranged in groups of between four and seven students. All instructionsand time guidelines were read aloud to ensure no misconceptions or misunderstandingoccurred. All participants commenced the control design based task; phase one. A periodsubsequent to phase one, all participants
Engineering Global Centrism Engineering Global Prep6.0 DiscussionThe results of this study, which furthers initial results reported in a previous conference paper[25], indicate that the NanoJapan students made sizable gains on all of the EGPI subscales, butonly differences on the Engineering Ethics and Humanity subscale were statistically significant. .The difference between groups may reinforce the importance of aspects of the NanoJapanprogram that encourage students to reflect on culture differences between the US and Japan,which they were of course experiencing daily as part of their research assignments. This findingsuggests that international experiences that combine intensive language and culture instruction,hands-on, cutting-edge research
at improving entering students’ college readinessand mathematics placement. The small scale intervention, A Bridge to Calculus, is intended toimprove students’ placement from College Algebra into Calculus 1. The target population forthis effort are students with high school experience in a Calculus course but whose performanceon placement exams does not reflect this experience. At our institution this is a significantnumber of students and the goal of the project is to develop methods to address and acceleratestudents in this category. The course design, to take advantage of the students’ prior experience,emphasizes practice and mastery using a modified emporium course design and the ALEKSsoftware1. This intervention runs as a summer course
, NY.Students are asked to reflect upon the “master list” of 3P impacts. For the campus parkingexamples covered in class (small-scale projects) only a few impacts are likely to be significant. Itbecomes readily apparent that many more will apply to these larger projects, makingsustainability evaluations more challenging which further addresses the third lesson objective.When concluding the in-class lesson, it is important to re-state for students that quantifying the3Ps is difficult, especially considering multiple perspectives. As is commonly done withalternatives analysis for large-scale infrastructure projects, meetings with stakeholders can beconducted to gather input. Sustainability Index scores are not absolute – there is inherentuncertainty in
size(0.2=small effect size, 0.5=medium effect size, 0.8=large effect size). For both pre- and post-course surveys, student respondents were separated from faculty respondents and analyzedaccordingly.Students. Compared to before the course, student scores after the course reflected substantialincreases in self-assessed knowledge in all areas of product commercialization (Figure 1). Theareas in which students made notable gains included overall product commercialization (p<0.0001,d=2.7), regulatory issues (p<0.0001, d=1.47), assessing the market landscape (p<0.0001, d=1.66),evaluating the business opportunity (p<0.0001, d=1.85), IP issues (p<0.001, d=1.27), andreimbursement issues (p<0.0001, d=1.87). In addition, students
, and digital art. Each ofthese areas, and related others within the computer graphics umbrella, struggle with thechallenge of accurate assessment of student artifacts.An additional advantage of the application of ACJ in graphics fields is the positive results thatemerge from the use of peer evaluation in student learning. Evaluation by peers providesopportunities for higher-order cognitive understanding of learning outcomes and applications,and provides students an opportunity to reflect on their individual efforts (Jones & Alcock, 2014;Seery & Delahunty, 2013). Comparative judging approaches provide the ability to assess thebroader and more divergent results that often occur in graphics-related artifacts, therebyenriching the deep
instructional tools selected byfaculty. Course embedded indicators on tests, assignments, and projects are used to evaluateCEE Department outcomes. If average student performance for an embedded indicator tool ismeasured as 75% or higher, it is concluded students have collectively achieved appropriatelearning requirements and met departmental standards. Example work from three students(good, average, poor) for each tool is included with an embedded indicator summary thatprovides an assessment of student performance and is mapped to reflect linkage with appropriateDepartmental outcomes. Results from embedded indicators and other measures aresystematically evaluated to ensure overall performance standards are met and to formulatesolutions in the event
Teammates 2% 20% 78%The results show a much greater spread of answers from students. While students still tend tograde their follow students very high, an average of 10% of students for each rubric elementwere given ratings of “Beginning” or “Developing”, compared to less than 2% using theprevious rubric. The new rubrics provide instructors with more useful information to use whengrading and to share with students when mentoring them for improved teamwork.ConclusionsRevising a program’s existing assessment practices may take a lot of time – developingperformance indicators that accurately reflect the outcome, are measurable, and follow Bloom’sTaxonomy, along with creating grading
ofdesign for manufacturability and assembly methods, and promotes teamwork. Challengesassociated with 3D printing desktop catapults include time and material for 3D printing. It iscritical for the instructor to work closely with students to challenge design decisions and providefeedback concerning manufacturability, assembly, and catapult performance. To assist inlearning project management, it is recommended to create a timeline that highlights criticalmilestones. After completing the catapult project students were asked to provide reflection statementsregarding aspects that were easy, difficult, and what they learned about design. Below are a fewsample student comments. 1. What was the easiest part of the catapult design project?“Giving
, 250, 1e. 250, 1, 25f. 250, 25, 16. Regarding the main stages of LCA, drag and click the following terms to their appropriateareas.Interpretation, Impact assessment, Inventory analysis, Goal and scope definition7. Regarding the main processes, inputs, and outputs in a product’s life cycle, drag and click thefollowing terms to their appropriate areas.Transportation, Material extraction, Use, Materials and energy, End of Life, Emissions andwaste, Manufacturing8. Characterization is best defined as…Select one:a. The process of converting indicator results of different impact categories by using numericalfactors based on value-choices.b. The process of multiplying all substances by a factor which reflects their relative contributionto the
ofEngineering Practice,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition [17] andan online discussion of, “Nursing Should be a STEM Discipline! Author Regards FlorenceNightingale as First Environmental Engineer,” which appeared in Reflections on NursingLeadership in February, 2018 [18].ResultsThe 2013 NAE report, “Messaging for Engineering: From Research to Action,” included anumber of calls to action [3]. Of great relevance to the members of ASEE was a call to include arecurring session on “messaging” at the annual ASEE conference and at the yearly EngineeringDeans Council Public Policy Colloquium. A search of the ASEE PEER document repositorywith the phrase, “changing the conversation,” identifies a total 214 publications from
methodology.The interviewees were asked questions in three broad areas: their personal definition of missionand their organizations’ definition of mission engineering; desired and actual competencies; andtheir vision for the future. Initial findings reflect the commonality across all organizations so thatpredominant organizations in the dataset do not dominant the results at the expense of insightsprovided by the set of organizations.There is also a rich body of work in the open source literature over the last ten years describingmission engineering applications, methods, and tooling. This literature search includes both peerreviewed journals and conferences as well as education courses and in-house publications andtraining. Finally, we have provided
seatedperson in an office room, (2) tested and validated the accuracy of the system against a manualregistry record, and (3) conducted a parametric study calculating and comparing the cooling loadfor maximum versus partial occupancy level.Initial consideration of the obtained energy savings due to the usage of chair sensors clearlydemonstrates this system as a viable and low cost tool that can help building operators to lowerthe building energy consumption. A simple and low cost system was able to accurately detect alloccupants present in an office room. Results shown in Table 4 reflects an average of 15%savings in cooling loads. However, these savings were based on a predetermined occupancyschedules for a small office containing four chairs only
with a CNC router (each of which includes a sensory pad related to the animal’stexture) and 3D printed plates and rotating shapes. Figure 4 included a number of ADL featuresthat required users to buckle, open, tie, insert, button, zip, and latch. Figures 3 and 4: Example therapy boards from Fall 2017Research MethodologyData for this investigation was collected from students’ self-assessments, written reflections, andpost-course interviews (audio recorded and transcribed). These interviews were semi-structuredin nature, following a general outline of questions related to the project’s learning outcomes,format, instructor’s role, and social responsibility; the students were encouraged to provide inputon any topics they found
consumption in residential and commercial buildings has increased significantly over thelast decade contributing to 40% of the US primary energy usage. Heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) for these buildings contribute to more than half this amount. A reductionin the HVAC energy consumption load would reflect a significant reduction in the total energyconsumed. Programmable thermostats are used to reduce energy consumption. However, howefficient the thermostats are in terms of representing the room temperature defines the level ofcomfort for the occupants inside the space. An increase in the variance between the thermostatvalue and the overall temperature distribution in a space would indicate inefficient representationand would
friends with my mentor from three years ago and reach out to her for advice and previous mentees reach out to me often. The bonding has resulted in success that would not have happened without the program and community.Mentoring was prioritized by many of the women since they recognized the sustained impact oftheir efforts. They often viewed themselves as aspirational role models for the first-year studentswith whom they interacted. One student contextualized the importance of her work in terms offacilitating the growth of others: I think that I really prioritize mentoring. I think that it's something very important to me because just reflecting on my past year of mentoring, it's been very rewarding in the fact
program. Hence, the present study is motivated by these factors, and the overall interest inmaximizing the students’ writing capabilities as stimulated by a program in mechanicalengineering. An effort is made as part of this study to capture some of the long-term impacts of theefforts in the thermo-fluids lab course, through a survey of student perceptions of their abilitiesand experiences. The data included in this study was administered to seniors in a post-requisitethermo-fluids course asking them to reflect back on their technical writing skills and the coursesthat impacted such skills. This cohort of students had directly been impacted by the technicalwriting efforts described in this study, and hence could provide such insight
and the ways in which this identity is influenced by students’ academic relationships, events, and expe- riences. Dr. McCall holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures
observational reflections from the instructional designer, course evaluationsprovided by students, and course quality reviews conducted by online learning managers.Preliminary results indicate that establishing collaborative partnerships between faculty membersand instructional designers allows for the development of higher quality online courses.Additionally, stronger relationships between the design team have extended beyond the initialcourse design project, allowing for continued revisions for further improvement of the coursesand the undertaking of new design projects. It is expected that establishing a well-definedcollaborative course design model to be rolled out at the university will help to increase onlinecourse quality.Overview of the Faculty
experience may lead them to share or disclose information they maynot have, potentially leading the interview process. The process of developing and validating aninterview protocol has proved to be an excellent opportunity to introduce engineering researchersto qualitative, educational research.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.#1738209. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. ReferencesAmerican Academy of Arts & Sciences. (2017). The future of undergraduate education, the future of
engaged in the design project. We estimateda student’s degree of engagement by the activity of their log files and selected the five most activestudents from each school. The average of design actions was 1104 and 1723 from the middleschool and high school, respectively. Given that the time for the design challenge and learningcontext were kept as similar as possible it is not clear why the average operations are notablydifferent between schools. This may reflect different levels of engagement between the high schooland middle schools’ students or that the high school students felt more comfortable with thesoftware and therefore made more design actions. Note that camera and note actions were notincluded in these tallies as both tend to be