Region Distinguished Teacher Award. He teaches courses in both analog and digital electronic circuit design and instrumentation, with a focus on wireless communication. He has more than 15 years experience in the development and delivery of synchronous and asynchronous web-based course supplements for electrical engineering courses. He has published over 35 papers and presented his research work at regional, national and international conferences. He also runs several exciting summer camps geared towards middle school, high school, and community college students to expose and increase their interest in pursuing Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Dr. Astatke travels to Ethiopia every summer
softwarefactory [21]; teaching large scale teamwork in a small college environment by usingmulti-semester, multi-course projects [22]; collaboration between a graduate Education courseand an undergraduate SE course [23]; a collaboration between two graduate Distributed SoftwareDevelopment courses at two different universities [24]; and a collaboration between threeundergraduate courses in the areas of marketing, computer science, and product design [25].Unlike [11] and [12], the work described in the current paper evaluates the collaboration betweentwo undergraduate courses. Compared to [11], [12], and [14–16], we evaluate the collaboration interms of specific skills and knowledge that the collaboration promotes for students in bothcourses. We also make
. This paper is focused specifically on thedescription and evaluation of the impact that technical and career-development seminars andpanels have on building ACCESS scholar’s knowledge and skills in the cybersecurity area.In general, during their first year in the ACCESS program, Cohort 1 students were verysuccessful. Eight out of nine Cohort 1 students had paid internship positions in summer 2021 andone student had a paid research position during the whole 2021 calendar year. All Cohort 1students maintained GPA higher than 3.00 and made progress towards their graduation. Eight outof nine students have their scholarship renewed for the 2021/22 school year. (The only studentwhose scholarship was not renewed, due to personal reasons, decided to
engineering undergraduate students into the College’sscholarship – such as conducting research and presenting the findings. In this paper theprograms implemented for each strategy are presented followed by results documenting theimpact of the strategy on retention and student success. Finally, the conclusion sectionsummarizes the highlights of the accomplishments and the challenges faced. This paper willhelp serve as a resource for others planning similar programs for engineering undergraduatestudents. The University of Cincinnati (UC) is an urban, comprehensive, research-intensive, publicinstitution with over 42,000 students. The UC College of Engineering and Applied Science(CEAS) has over 3,000 undergraduate and 650 graduate students, and grants
“effective” practice is considered to be one that supports and better preparesstudents, especially those designated as URM, to score higher on these “objective” measures[11]–[14]. Less dialogue has invited instructors and administrators within higher education torethink whether these instruments, the measures themselves, may be imperfect and biased. Whilegrades have a strong place in the logistics and culture of higher education in the United states(see Appendix A and B for information on American grading practices), now is the time toconsider their flaws and limitations, as well as explore new grading practices that may reducetheir inequitable impact on students who are already marginalized in STEM disciplines.In this paper, I argue that the very
developed around questions conceptual change has not beenbroadly utilized in engineering education research. The purpose of this paper is to present thetwo leading theories of conceptual change, examples of current research in this area, and howthey can be applied to engineering teaching and learning.Why Does Conceptual Change Matter?It is worth briefly presenting the argument for considering conceptual change in engineeringeducation research. Although students’ scores on concept inventories surprise many instructors,the implications of low conceptual understanding in engineering are not often discussed. In thehighly regulated apprenticeship system of engineering, graduates who are adept at calculationsmay be all that is needed. While the complete
design, assistive technologies, alternate energytechnologies, and integration of engineering and general education.Mercer Engineering Entrepreneurship Education Program (MEEEP)15The purpose of Mercer University’s School of Engineering is to educate a student who isprepared to be practicing engineer, one who can responsibly contribute to a global society that isbecoming ever more dependent on technology. While the focus of the engineering school is toeducate engineers, its graduates may enter many fields of graduate studies, especially thoserequiring the disciplined problem solving methods developed in the undergraduate curriculum.The engineering graduates have entered professional graduate programs in medicine, law, andbusiness, as well as
incorporating them into existing curricula andthrough non-classroom activities.” In other words, not just the curricula should change, but thecontent of each engineering professor’s course should evolve.In its 1995 report on reforming engineering education, the National Research Council proposed“a period of experimentation and self-assessment,” and suggested changes such asmodularizing the curriculum, exploring educational innovations and practices in othercountries, and requiring “the study of science, technology, and society (or equivalent) forundergraduates.” It also recommended re-examining the four-year undergraduate engineeringdegree; in the words of Norman Augustine, former president of the National Academy ofEngineering, “It is time for the
Paper ID #25985A Qualitative Investigation of Students’ Problem Solving Strategies in a Spa-tial Visualization CourseMrs. Adetoun Yeaman, Virginia Tech Adetoun Yeaman is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). She received her MS degree in 2013 in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering and her BS degree in Biomedical Engineering in 2011, both from Virginia Commonwealth University. She is currently a Graduate Teaching Assistant. Her research interests include empathy, design education, spatial visualization and multimedia learning. Address: Virginia
interdisciplinary experience of the authors and avoid creating silos within differentsections of the course.Future WorkWe argue that CSPs are a promising area for enhancing engineering education and we lookforward to investigating these methods. Future work will focus on identifying appropriateexamples for teaching energy concepts through CSP, developing and offering the course, andmeasuring the impact of CSP on student learning. One of our major challenges will bedetermining how the examples identified in this research can best be integrated to achieve ourdesired learning outcomes. We anticipate that we will need to overcome our own biases aboutwhat counts as engineering and that by working as a group we can collectively broaden our owndefinitions of
focused research remains a priority [9].Wright College, an urban Hispanic Serving open-access community college within the CityColleges of Chicago (CCC) system, understands and appreciates the opportunity and need todevelop equitable frameworks that are focused on access and excellence. In the past eight years,Wright College and CCC have adopted many of the best practices to improve student access andsuccess. Wright College prioritized equity work and inclusive excellence, by integrating diversityand equity within mission and operations [10]. These efforts set the foundation for an innovativeengineering transfer program. Through NSF-HSI funded research, Wright College found successin developing aspiring engineers and computer scientists. Diverse
provides training for fortune 500 companies throughout the world. Page 26.372.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Comparing Engineering and Non-Engineering International Programs to Determine Value and Future DirectionsIntroductionInternational programs are a common approach to achieving a variety of global competency-related learning outcomes [1]. Such programs are generally designed to meet lofty goals such asproviding an in-depth understanding of people and their culture in such a way that disciplinespecific practices are compared and contrasted, personal
technicians. To attract students to the field, Clough arguesthat civil engineering students must be trained in new and creative approaches to usingtechnology and that this training must include practical experiences in industry [13]. Further,prospective students must be made aware of what it is that civil engineers do. When theyunderstand that civil engineers work on things that most directly affect quality of life, they canbegin to connect their own values and passions to the profession as they see that their work canhave a direct impact on improving life for others. Oscar Suros, inducted into the HispanicEngineers hall of Fame in 1998, draws on a model his company uses to familiarize students withthe profession of civil engineering and the actual
the analysis, results, conclusions, andrecommendations are provided as a basis for recognizing the potential impact of socialnetworking in forming teams and in conducting classroom discussions. These results could alsobe used to determine better ways to present materials and provide information to improveacademic performance. Investigation of factors that influence academic performance is importantin order to know what may improve the success rate of engineering students. By improving thesuccess rate of students, more students will remain and graduate in engineering.IntroductionAmongst graduating high school students, the number of students interested in engineering isdeclining; and, of the students who enter engineering, only fifty percent
previously andshown above in Table 1, and with the leeway to add other types of communications not alreadyexplicitly included, each Lead Faculty designated a small subset of technical communicationsdeemed to be most valuable for their program. Some examples of these subsets are shown inTable 2, where CIS, CSC, ENM and WCM stand for BS in Computer Information Systems, BSin Computer Science, MS in Engineering Management and MS in Wireless Communicationrespectively. Undergraduate Graduate Technical Communications Programs Programs CIS CSC ENM WCMLab report
to how the rehearsal process begins. In professional practice, the table read is anopportunity for the actors to begin to explore their characters and for the designers and directorto share their initial ideas. As such, it gives us a forum in which to discuss the responsibilities ofeach theatrical position, helping students to later choose their role for the final sceneperformance (one of actor, designer, director). The table read also serves the purpose to explorecritical analysis and its application within theatrical practice: the need to make use of extra-textual resources (e.g., historical research) to deepen the interpretation of the play; howindividual words, lines and scenes contribute to the construction of character, theme and story
Paper ID #31565Evaluation of Engineering Problem-Framing Professional Development forK12 Science Teachers (Evaluation)Miss Meg E West, The Ohio State University Meg E. West is an engineering education graduate student at The Ohio State University. She is a graduate teaching and research associate for the Department of Engineering Education.Dr. J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University Dr. Hylton is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Coordinator of the First-Year Engi- neering experience for the T.J. Smull College of Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He previously completed his graduate studies in
which even technological problems canhave negative impacts on society. These connections between design, technology, ethics, and thepublic are essential to the foundation of engineering education. Faculty in higher education arepoised to create opportunities for students to build an understanding of social issues through thedevelopment of skills in civic engagement (enabling engagement in moral, social, and politicalissues), in addition to the core skills of engineering practice, will allow students to create holisticsolutions to address systemic challenges.Civic engagement in society can take a variety of forms, with the most basic indicators beingrates of voting in political elections. The National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement
’ courses, for a total of 158 semester hours.Finally, all cadets must take 15 semester hours of physical education, military art andscience and Air Force Operations courses, participate in either intramural orintercollegiate athletics, and have significant leadership responsibilities in theirsquadron. Is it any wonder many cadets appear fragmented when managing their time,and feel they must practice “academic minimalist” survival skills just to graduate? [2] Unfortunately, this “academic minimalist” mindset runs counter to both our AirForce Academy Faculty Educational Outcomes and specific portions of the ABETCriterion 3 requirements. Both require our engineering graduates to become “life-longlearners.” In addition, the ability to “frame and
Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and a deputy editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach.Dr. Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor - Engineering Education at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research in practice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University
fall completed and presented their course assessments to theentire faculty team. Table 2: UT Tyler Program Educational Objectives1. Graduates have the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to become engineeringleaders and assume responsibility for multidisciplinary engineering design; project,construction, and asset management; and ethical decision making in professional practice.2. Graduates continue to grow intellectually and professionally through participation inprofessional society activities, continuing engineering education, graduate studies, and/orself study during their professional career.3. Graduates have effective oral, written, and graphical communication skills.4. Graduates become registered engineers.The
-12 science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, particularly as it relates to increasing interest and participation by females. Dr. Klein-Gardner serves as the director of the Center for STEM Education for Girls at the Harpeth Hall School in Nashville, TN. Here she leads professional development opportunities in science, technology, engineering, and math- ematics (STEM) for K-12 teachers and works to Identify and disseminate best practices from successful K12, university and corporate STEM programs for females. This Center also leads a program for rising 9th and 10th grade girls that integrates community service and engineering design in a global context. Dr. Klein-Gardner continues to serve
first five I2V workshops have been successfully completed12.The workshops were developed in partnership with and hosted at five institutions: University ofMaryland, College Park; University of California San Diego; University of Central Florida;University of Florida; and Illinois Institute of Technology. The workshops were generallyorganized through the entrepreneurship programs at each host institution. The all-day eventswere designed for sophisticated, technology-oriented undergraduate and graduate students andinterested faculty and alumni seeking to develop technology-based products and businesses. Theprogram provided a roadmap to tech business plan development, and a venue for technologyentrepreneurs to advance their ideas and start their
, and postdoctoral scholars as well asstaff sought educational and outreach opportunities. Through a partnership with _____faculty applying for a Research Center, the XXX received four-year support from theHoward Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) to hire a part-time coordinator, expand theprogram, and create summer lab research opportunities at ______ for high schoolstudents.HHMI funding also provides travel support for XXX directors to learn from otheroutreach centers and disseminate our work at conferences, and support for programevaluation to explore ways to improve the program and document its effects onparticipants. This paper describes our partnership model, findings from the 2008formative evaluation, and plans for improvement.Community
SPSU. This historical datademonstrates a continuing confusion about engineering technology and the role of an1 SPSU is an unit of the University System of Georgia located in Marietta, Georgia. Its vision is to be acomprehensive university with a unique purpose. Through a fusion of technology with the liberal arts andsciences, we create a learning community that encourages thoughtful inquiry, diverse perspectives, andstrong preparation of our graduates to be leaders in an increasingly technological world. The university –faculty, staff, students, and graduates – aspires to be the best in the world at finding creative, practical,and sustainable solutions to real-world problems and improving the quality of life for people around theglobe.2
first decade of this century. A systems engineer is acutely aware of this issue when considering every aspect of managing a business and designing a product. For managing a project, system engineering forces the manager to define the goals and objectives of the project. The project manager with an understanding of the systems viewpoint is capable of knowing the difference between the long-term goals and short-term goals, and can focus on the long-term goals when making strategic decisions. Indeed, the issues of life cycle development are prominent within the literature on project management, and hence they have had an impact on systems thinking by project managers. Another important focus of systems in engineering is from
recognition of the importance of diversity and inclusion in engineering education hasgrown in recent years [1], little is known about the best practices for supporting neurodiversestudents [2-3]. It has been suggested that neurodiverse students benefit from course assessmentsthat allow for a more flexible mode of expressing knowledge [3]. However, evidence forimproved learning outcomes on different types of course assessments is largely anecdotal.Characteristics associated with different forms of neurodiversity, such as attention deficithyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum, depression, and anxiety, are suggested to benormally distributed in the population [2]. Indeed, research suggests that these conditions arebest conceptualized as
. Craven, Elizabeth Hutchins Tennessee Tech University, kcraven@tntech.edu, ehutchins@tntech.eduAbstract - The first-year experience course is a program Index Terms - Advising, High impact practices, Professionaldesigned to help new students build the academic, social, development, Student successand professional connections needed for a successfulcollege experience at Tennessee Tech University. In this BACKGROUNDone-credit hour course, students are introduced to manyIn the fall semester of 2006, Tennessee Tech University beganaspects of higher education and the engineering conducting a first-year experience course for all incomingprofession. Course sessions are geared
. Research interests include human elements of safety and quality in food and agricultural systems and best practices for introducing new and complex information to learners.Dr. Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State University Ann Gansemer-Topf is an Assistant Professor in Higher Education and Student Affairs. She teaches courses in program evaluation and assessment, student affairs and higher education. Her research interests focus on examining the micro (student) and macro (institutional, state, federal) factors that impact student success and student learning. She has presented at several regional and national conferences and her research has been published in journals such as Research in Higher Education, Journal of the First
StateUniversity. He served as a lead drivetrain engineer in his university’s Formula team.Pedro Cordeiro Povoa CupertinoPedro is pursuing a BS in Aerospace Engineering at Wichita State University. He is a ResearchAssistant and CAD (Computer Aided Design) Instructor at the National Institute for AviationResearch, with research interests in Lean, CAD/CAM, Project Management, andEntrepreneurship.Adam Carlton LynchDr. Lynch received the BS and MS degrees in Industrial and Systems Engineering from theUniversity of Southern California. He received his Master of International Management from theThunderbird School of Management. He completed a PhD in Industrial, Systems, andManufacturing Engineering (ISME) from Wichita State University (WSU) in Kansas. Dr