size of minority groups, which prevents a moredetailed empirical analysis by race, first-generation status, and economically disadvantagedstudents.References1 Clayton, A. B., & Worsham, R. E. (2024). Preparing Students for Postsecondary Success: The Effects of College Advising on College Readiness. Innovative Higher Education, 49(1), 1-24.2 2 Vedogbeton, H., Brown, C., Somasse, G. B., & Krueger, R. (2023, June). Improving the Experiences and Retention of Black Students in STEM Education. In 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.3 Kurlaender, M., Reed, S., & Hurtt, A. (2019). Improving College Readiness: A Research Summary and Implications for Practice. Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE.4 Gottfried, M. A
wolfram— alpha. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(8):1061–1071, 2010. [3] Earl B Hunt. Artificial Intelligence. Academic Press, Inc., 1975. [4] Department of Defense. Summary of the 2018 department of defense artificial intelligence strategy: Harnessing ai to advance our security and prosperity, 2018. [5] Alan Turing. Intelligent machinery (1948). B. Jack Copeland, page 395, 2004. [6] Feng-hsiung Hsu. Ibm’s deep blue chess grandmaster chips. IEEE micro, 19(2):70–81, 1999. [7] Nuria Haristiani. Artificial intelligence (ai) chatbot as language learning medium: An inquiry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 1387, page 012020. IOP Publishing, 2019. [8] Martin Buehler, Karl Iagnemma
. W. Reeve, C. Rottmann, Q. Liu, V. Hue, and S. McCullouch, “Engineering Leadership Education: Catalyzing Long-Term Personal and Professional Growth,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), Nov. 2019, doi: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.13869.[9] J. N. Magarian and R. S. Rahaman, “What Engineering Leaders Lead: The Career Outcomes of an Engineering Leadership Program’s Alumni Community,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/what-engineering-leaders-lead-the-career- outcomes-of-an-engineering-leadership-program-s-alumni-community[10] D. L. Kirkpatrick, “Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level model
value of integrating system-based, collaborative learning environmentsinto engineering curricula in order to bridge theory and practice more effectively. Overall, thiswork highlights the promise of LS in enhancing student engagement, motivation, and careerreadiness—advancing the broader goal of training engineers who can thrive in complex, real-world contexts.References[1] M. A. Alrizqi and A. Godwin, “Data-Driven Analysis of Engineering Curricula: A Cross- Disciplinary Study of Complexity in Seven Programs and Its Impact on Student Pathways and Career Outcomes,” in 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society For Engineering Education, 2025.[2] H. Petroski, Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment
Museum” [20]. The time in Mexicoincludes living with host families and collaborating with students at Mexican universities ineducational and research undertakings. Fall commitments for the participants are “an onlinelearning community and writ[ing] a research proposal on the research problem identified while[the student was] in Yucatan” [20] and presenting their proposal as a research poster. Theseactivities were offered through the ELCIR project from 2015 to 2019 with marked success forparticipants by exposing them to research and international contexts early in their academiccareers [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20]. Therefore, outcomes for students similar to those reported in [11,12, 13, 14, 15] were expected for the summer 2022 IRAP cohort.2.2
, 2023).[24] S. Donohue, “Student Water Scholars and Broader Impact Outreach: Motivations and Hindrances toParticipation,” University of New Mexico Shared Knowledge Conference, 2022.https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/skc/2022/posters/25/ (accessed Feb. 14, 2023).[25] Lee, Y., Kothuis, B. B., Sebastian, A., & Brody, S. Design of transformative education and authenticlearning projects: Experiences and lessons learned from an international multidisciplinary research andeducation program on flood risk reduction. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.AppendixDetails concerning the FNI flood studyFreese and Nichols (FNI) requested interviews to be conducted with residents using two onlineinstruments–an online survey that allows
manufactur- ing, non-destructive inspection and evaluation, and vehicle autonomy. Dr. Gray came to the Engineering Education department as an instructor in 2018, and was promoted to Associate Professor of Practice in August 2019. Dr. Gray is primarily focused on pedagogy of first-year engineering students, but maintains an undergraduate research group with interests in automotive systems, communications, computing, and non-destructive inspection.Desen Sevi Ozkan, Tufts University Desen is a postdoctoral researcher in the Tufts Center for Engineering Education Outreach and the Insti- tute for Research on Learning and Instruction. She holds a Ph.D. in engineering education from Virginia Tech and a B.S. in Chemical
and tools to investigate the role of so- cial media in engaging public and under-represented communities towards STEM education and informal learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Curating Tweets: A Framework for Using Twitter for Workplace LearningABSTRACTCybersecurity is a rapidly evolving field where professionals constantly need to keep up with newtechnologies and retrain. In this paper, we present a study that analyzed social media data and use thefindings to aid professionals and students to learn more effectively using Twitter. We analyzed 23,000cybersecurity related tweets posted on Twitter across two hashtags #cybersecurity and #infosec
teaching an introductory probabilities and statistics class for the college of engineering, a simulation class for industrial engineers, and an analysis of network data class for the graduate program. At Illinois, he is serving as the faculty advisor of the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers, and was awarded the 2020, 2023, and 2024 Faculty Advisor award for the North-Central region of IISE. Dr. Vogiatzis was awarded ASEE IL/IN Teacher of the Year in 2023, and received a Runner-up recognition for best case study by INFORMS in 2023.Ann Jeanne FredricksenDr. Jennifer R Amos, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr Amos joined the Bioengineering Department at the University of Illinois in 2009 and is currently a
apply feminist theories to engineering education.Ms. Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan Elizabeth is a graduate student at the University of Michigan studying Engineering Education Research under doctoral advisor Aaron Johnson. Her research focuses on weaving macro ethics into existing aerospace engineering curricula and institutional support methods for working class engineering students. Elizabeth earned her undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan in 2019 with foci in Biomed- ical Engineering and Applied Mathematics.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Fac- ulty member of the Engineering
Wenderoth.References[1] Z. S. Wilson, S. S. Iyengar, S.-S. Pang, I. M. Warner, and C. A. Luces, “Increasing Access for Economically Disadvantaged Students: The NSF/CSEM & S-STEM Programs at Louisiana State University,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 581–587, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9348-6.[2] M. Walpole, “Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–73, 2003, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2003.0044.[3] M. L. Strutz and M. W. Ohland, “Low-SES First-generation Students’ Decision to Pursue Engineering,” presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2012, p. 25.907.1-25.907.15. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available
, practices,facility characteristics, inspections, and engineering controls [3,4]. For example, national studiesin 2002 and 2022 found that only 81% and 83% of educators respectively had the appropriateeye protection for all students engaged in science and engineering activities in their courses [4].Furthermore, a national study published in 2022 by the International Technology andEngineering Educators Association (ITEEA) in collaboration with the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) and the National Science Education Leadership Association(NSELA), discovered a number of alarming safety deficiencies among P-12 programs andeducators providing engineering instruction in the United States (U.S.) [3]. Further analysesfound that teachers who
traditional LIWC analysis with the standard dictionarygives a psychologically verified and impartial look at the language, while with the customdictionary it gives a measure of the known signposts for a topic. The MEM analysis gives theemergent themes within the topic. When these two a priori and in vivo thematic computationalmethods arrive at similar landmarks, researchers can be confident that although this took lesstime, the adventure has not only been worth the computations, but it has also arrived in thecorrect place.6 References[1] ASEE, “Engineering by the Numbers, 2010,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC, Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, 2011.[2] ASEE, “Engineering &
was a recipient of the Ap- prentice Faculty Grant from the Educational Research Methods ASEE Division in 2009. She also has been an Electrical Engineering Professor for two Mexican universities. Dr. Mendoza is interested in sTEm education, socioeconomically disadvantaged students, Latino studies in engineering and computer aided/instructional technology in sTEm.Dr. Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is a Professor of Computer Science and Women’s and Gender Studies at the University of Oklahoma. Her research foci are diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering education and introductory software engineering education. She has a particular interest in how organizational
, Director of Centre for En- gineering Education ResearchDr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is a 150th Anniversary Professor, the Director of the EPICS Program and one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has held courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is a registered professional engineer and on the NSPE board for Professional Engineers in Higher Education. He has been active in ASEE serving in the FPD, CIP and ERM. He is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and
role of empathy in various domains, including engineering ethics, design, and diversity, equity, and inclusion. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue Uni- versity’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the 2021 division chair-elect for the ASEE Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering and Society division and is the Editorial Board Chair for the Online Ethics Center.Mr. Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez, Purdue University at West Lafayette Aristides Carrillo-Fernandez is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. He previously worked as an export business development manager at a Spanish radio
a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA).Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan Aileen is faculty in Engineering Education and Biomedical Engineering. Previously, Aileen was the Associate Director for Academics in the Center for Entrepreneurship and was responsible for building the Program in Entrepreneurship for UM undergraduates, co-developing the masters level entrepreneur- ship program, and launching the biomedical engineering graduate design program. Aileen has received a number of awards for her teaching, including the Thomas M. Sawyer, Jr. Teaching Award, the UM ASEE Outstanding Professor Award and the Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award. Prior to joining the University
articles, and 154 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 35 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 58 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and 118 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di- rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of over 1,000 students annually. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Use of a Design Canvas in a Robotics Workshop and Analysis of its Efficacy (Fundamental)1. IntroductionAdvances in science and technology are shaping every aspect of
about smartness, diversity and inclusion, and engineering culture. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Studying Smartness in Engineering Culture: An Interdisciplinary DialogueAbstractThis theory paper contributes to the study of smartness in engineering culture from differentdisciplinary perspectives. We are interested in the construct of smartness, which is a powerful,yet implicit, driver of students’ experience in engineering education. Smartness in engineeringculture can be linked to both the broad narratives and norms that overarch engineering at asocietal level (e.g., engineers are smart) as well as the more specific, individual beliefs thatindividual
and in experiential learning for undergraduates in science and engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Specifications Grading in an Upper-Level BME Elective CourseRecent trends in BME education emphasize aspects of the engineering profession such as designprocess, entrepreneurial mindset, and active problem-solving. However, the grading strategy inmost traditional BME courses revolves around assigning points to student work based onapparent quality or degree of completion. Awarding “partial credit” is time-consuming and oftenis not closely mapped to learning objectives [1]. As a result, students often focus on how manypoints they earned relative to their perceived level of effort
. During these two growing seasons of 2016and 2017, tomatoes have performed substantially better than previous seasons and 2019 growingseason, with minimal root damage.H. Pedagogical Aspects and Some Suggestions for Student Design Project Advisors [4, 21]Pedagogy refers to the “interactions between teachers, students, and the learning environmentand the learning tasks.”This broad term includes how teachers and students relate together aswell as the instructional approaches implemented in the classroom. Some of the pedagogicalapproaches that may be used are:(a). The “Teacher-Centered Pedagogy” positions the teacher at the centre of the learningprocess and typically relies on methods such as whole-class lecture, note memorization, andchorus answers
with Project WET at the University of Arizona Maricopa County Cooperative Extension as a curriculum developer and professional development faciltator.Prof. Clark Miller, Arizona State University Clark A. Miller is Professor and Director of the Center for Energy & Society at Arizona State University. He holds a PhD in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University.Carlo Altamirano-Allende c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Building Youth’s Socio-Technical Engineering Knowledge through Engagement in a Community Solar Energy ProjectThe 21st century has seen increased public and research attention to engineering as a socio-technical field, requiring knowledge not only
identity.Robert Renaud PhD, University of Manitoba Dr. Robert Renaud is cross-appointed as an Associate Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education, and is the Head of the Department of Educational Administration, Foundations, and Psychology at the University of Manitoba, in Winnipeg, Canada. He teaches assess- ment, program evaluation, and research methods. His main areas of research interest include program evaluation, student assessment, teaching effectiveness, and quantitative methods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Determining the Dependencies of Engineering Competencies for Engineering Practice: An Exploratory
determine if the current ABET CivilEngineering Program Criteria (CEPC) should be changed to reflect one or more of the 24 outcomesof the second edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge published in 2008. After twoyears of work, a proposed CEPC has been approved by the relevant ASCE committees andforwarded to ABET for approval and incorporation into accreditation criteria. A paper chroniclingthe committee’s efforts through a review of the literature, the committee’s methodology andprocess, and the key issues that emerged was presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference inIndianapolis. This paper updates that effort by presenting the resulting proposed criteria, thechanges generated by constituency feedback, progress on the Commentary, the