theory in practice. The course relies on ongoing reflective analyses to help students link the theories and practices of effective peacebuilding to explorations of personal beliefs.Community-Partnered Research and OutreachWe envision a reimagined framework for how universities engage in societally-relevant researchand a new process for developing a cross-trained community of practice of individuals effectiveat community-partnered research. Our vision for growing partnered research involves engagingacademic researchers from multiple disciplines with practitioners working in communities,fostering a professional identify that values convergence, and providing opportunities forresearchers and students across disciplines to engage in societally
: An International Journal, vol. 25, no. 5/6, pp. 253-278, 2019, doi: 10.1108/TPM- 05-2018-0035.[12] V. Bodolica and M. Spraggon, "Incubating innovation in university settings: building entrepreneurial mindsets in the future generation of innovative emerging market leaders," Education+ Training, 2021.[13] L. Bridgestock, "Six reasons to participate in student competitions," 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.topuniversities.com/blog/six-reasons-participate-student-competitions.[14] A. James and S. D. Brookfield, Engaging imagination: Helping students become creative and reflective thinkers. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.[15] C. Kayastha, "Enabling innovation through community and
framework for such reflection is the threequestions of what went right, what went wrong, and what might be done differently. Most of thelessons learned again focused on the need for care, attention to detail and the challenges oftroubleshooting a project. The question of troubleshooting a project is an interesting one thatdoes not seem to be much researched in educational literature. The logical chain of deductionabout where to look for problems, what to check first, is often a matter of implicit understandingand heuristic rules developed through experience. It would be useful to have an explicit set ofrules and experiences to pass on to students. For example, it was at first a humorous comment totry turning the computer off and on again, but one
) surgery, and deposit of micro-size peptide dots on biological substratesusing jet ink technology. At the conclusion of the internship experience, the student prepares areport on the project and presents it to the faculty advisor and the industrial mentor.The student and industrial partner mutually agree upon the level of student participation in theinternship program. Specifically, the student may work part- or full-time. Three BME IndustrialInternship Courses at 3, 6, and 9 credit hour levels have been established. Each semester, allinterns, with the faculty advisor’s approval, register for the internship course at the credit hourlevel that reflects the degree of their participation in the program. For instance, if during asemester a student is
-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35163Benedict College Scientific Village), fused with critical pedagogy and hands-on laboratoryresearch, on the collegiate success and retention of minority students in the STEM disciplines.In the next section, we summarized our results. Faculty mentor and student reflections were notincluded. We compared the participants’ performance with control group and participants’placements up on completion of their study.2.0 Summary of Quantitative Data Analysis on SV Participants’ Academic Achievement,Scientific Engagement, and OutcomesWe collected data at all stages of the program including pre and post annual interviews, surveys,graduation, and retention rates on the BC Scientific Village cohort and
directly reflect how student’s perform on specific learning outcomes. However,these projects accounted for 60% of students’ final grade; therefore, course grades suggest thatthe developed food-themed projects helped students continue to perform individually andwithout in-person support structures at levels similar to students who work on projects in teamswith in-person support structures. Student perception was compared between the courses with team-based model projects andindividual-based physical-model projects. Here, Likert-scale anonymous course evaluations (1-strongly disagree, 2 - disagree, 3 - neutral, 4 - agree, and 5 - strongly agree) were compared forinstructor-taught courses with team projects (Fall 2018 and Fall 2019 semester) and
Engagement Survey? Secondary 1. How did students evaluate these engagement strategies in terms of their level of engagement? 2. What were the self-evaluation of students in terms of staying engaged (affective, cognitive, behavioral) and learning propensity? 3. What challenges primarily hindered their engagement in their learning environment?Theoretical Framework:Engagement research has been around for decades and has been established to be an importantforerunner for learning and achievement [6,11]. For this study, engagement is defined in thecontext of affective (interest, excitement, belonging, motivated, persistent, joy, etc), cognitive(self-directed/regulated learning, reflective, task specific-design solutions, etc), and
Average # of Semesters (excluding summer) Award Year # of Awards Mean Median 2012-13 1 12.0 12.0 2014-15 2 13.0 13.0 2015-16 2 4.5 4.5 2016-17 1 8.0 8.0 2018-19 1 10.0 10.0 2019-20 17 10.9 8.0 Overall 24 10.4 8.0Raw averages shown in the “Mean” column do not reflect the change that we are hoping to see;the overall average for the last eight
some concern about the project being viable. Instead of being cancelled, it was decided to just relax the requirement to use the university making facilities. Even with the pandemic restrictions, student survey results suggest the project was still successful, possibly because it allowed them to exercise autonomy and make connections within the class. Figure 5: Questions reflecting senior student ability to help junior design
; interactions with city construction-in-progress teams(engineers, managers) and city leaders (councilman) and staff.Friday: Field trip to university’s aviation and flight control center adjacent to the suburbanairport. Final presentations and check out.Each day, students had classroom time to work in small teams and individually. The aim of theseclassroom sessions was to help participants reflect on their transportation related experiences andinteractions with experts to further develop and articulate their understanding of localtransportation and construction industry and related careers (West, 2018). All meals, breakfast,lunch, and dinner, and snacks were provided.Data Collection and MethodsA pre-post survey was developed (NAE, 2008, 2013) to elicit
misunderstanding and misinterpretation that is detrimental to the learning process. It is difficult for any person to unlearn old information once viewed as accurate, impacting their learning ability within that concept [12].The knowledge types of students possess often reflected in their goal orientation and motivationwithin a classroom space. Svinicki [13] talked about how students' goal orientation andmotivation influence their learning, either positive or negative. Svinicki speaks of two types ofstudents, Performance Oriented and Mastery Oriented. Performance-Oriented is focused ongrade achievement and course requirements over true content competency and understanding.These students are often less willing to take on challenges to
standards for educational programs is a professionalresponsibility of the academic community, as is establishing accreditation criteria to ensure qualityis sustained—enter ABET. This paper summarizes the major efforts that led to Associate’s degreeprograms in cybersecurity, along with the motivation to create the first ABET Associate’s Cyberse-curity Program Criteria. It discusses the process to develop these cybersecurity criteria, describesthe current criteria, and presents the current status of the effort. In essence, this process reflects thematuration of the cybersecurity discipline.1 IntroductionCybersecurity professionals at all levels of preparation are in high demand, with predictions thatthere will continue to be a global shortage in
T-test.Project Manager Reflections Upperclassmen Project Managers were given a reflection assignment followingcompletion of the course. Assignment prompts were “What were your group dynamics like”,“What would you do differently if you were to be a PM again”, “What advice do you have for afuture PM starting out in your role”, and “What do you think your strengths and weaknesses areas a PM?”. Project managers noted the importance of communication, organization, timemanagement, and the ability to relate to team members. Most project managers struggled withthe balance of being a friend versus a Project Manager. Some project managers felt they instilledthe wrong dynamic by being too friendly. Students were able to realize the importance
them. Insome instances, the lack of engagement might be because students are not aware of the HIEP theycan participate in during their program. Acknowledgments This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1927218. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.REFERENCES[1] Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.[2] French, B. F., Immekus, J. C., & Oakes, W. C. (2005). An Examination of Indicators of Engineering
focused on faculty development and providing faculty with information, theselessons learned are more from our reflections as a Center. • “There is a thing as too many workshops” at least from the facilitator perspective. In addition to the Summer Workshop Series featured here, we also moved our New Faculty Workshop to Zoom in July and were facilitating multiple workshops per week. For our small Center (3 faculty members working on both this series as well as the New Faculty Workshop), the large number of workshops led to stress and burnout for our Center members. • Overall, the workshops were well received by the faculty; multiple faculty members reached out before the end of the summer or fall to
goldmining (ASGM); b) collaborative activities among students; c) sessions of a creative capacitybuilding (CCB) workshop; and d) group and individual reflections on what was learned everyday. The faculty and graduate students presentations included definitions on how to view ASGMas a socio-technical system, problem definition as the core pillar of global socio-technicalcompetency, mercury use in ASGM, risk communication in ASGM, interactions between largescale mining and ASGM, listening and trust building, and environmental and public healthdimensions of ASGM. The collaborative activities included re-evaluating design proposals ofsolutions that the 2020 cohort inherited from the 2019 cohort to three ASGM problem areas:back health of miners carrying
other teachers as they taught in ways designed to foreground students’ funds ofknowledge and home languages. For over one year, they participated in ongoing professionaldevelopment in which they reflected on student work or transcripts of their own teaching anddiscussed and identified ways for better supporting Latinx students who were receiving ESLservices. MethodsFor the trimester reported in this comparative case study, we observed each teacher daily for aminimum of four instructional units. These instructional units were each comprised of oneengineering design challenge and ranged from a few days to a few months in duration. Thisstudy also draws from four interviews per teacher, which were designed
alternate pathway, i.e.roadmap, for STEM Ph.D. students that is scalable and reflective of the evolving employmentlandscape and workforce needs. The pedagogical implications of these innovations will beinvestigated via original pedagogical research hypotheses and application of a detailed evaluationand assessment component. Expected outcomes include the development of strategies to broadenparticipation of female and veteran students in doctoral programs at our university, and thepropagation of successful strategies to other universities.The PAtENT Program’s Innovative RoadmapThe PAtENT program will ensure students do not enroll in additional coursework, but insteadoffer an alternative pathway toward the doctoral degree. The PAtENT program thus
-reported increased learning interest and self-motivation forevery participant. The project’s objectives were articulated to the students through aseries of assigned questions related to the rotation of the designed physical model.Students had to make assumptions, complete analytical calculations, and discuss therelationship(s) between their theoretical values and experiential data.Project reports plus pre- and post- project surveys were collected from each group afterthree-weeks’ work. In the report and the surveys, students’ comments reflected theirviews about this project-based learning. The corresponding learning outcome results havebeen assessed, as well.Students at Purdue University Kokomo campus are commuters. The typical
%). This was worthwhile to note, as such activities requiring management ofa moderately sized set of data from a mechanical test could be an essential skill for a well-trainedmaterials engineer or researcher. Reflection by the authors on other courses within the programhas noted a shift towards students being provided with heavily-processed data to analyze in theirlab reports and they are rarely asked to collect and process moderately sized raw data sets.3.2 Teaching Team ObservationsThroughout this study, informal, virtual drop-in office hours were made available to the students2-3 times each week, in addition to the formal tutorial sessions covering each module activity.These informal sessions provided an opportunity for the authors to make some
systematically captured and incorporated in thecourse development.Samples of mind-map, design document, mock session effectiveness rubrics, content andworkbook review rubrics which are some of the important deliverables in the coursedevelopment of Introduction to Engineering, which reflect the course refinement, arediscussed in the following sections. The data captured and used in reporting the study aresecondary in nature and are taken from publications of the institute available with openaccess. Also, students participating in giving feedback were given clear indications ofpurpose of the feedback and were also given the option not to participate.4.1. Mind mapAs part of course development the working team consisting of faculty members and
regarding the project is shown in Table III below. Table III. Project Evaluation Regarding The Learning Objectives O1. Master the fundamental concepts of OO design and syntax of (four) UML models The classes are identified with correct attributes, and operations and defined in correct UML notations. The class model was developed with correct relations. All states were properly defined and captured the key observable transitions. Sequence of functions were identified in the proper use cases and reflected in the related scenarios. Control flow was modeled with correct activities and execution sequences are captured in the activity diagram. O2. Understand and implement the modeling skills with the instructions. Each element as well as
organizations across campus: “People use it as a springboard more often thannot. Most of our mentors are a part of multiple clubs, both within engineering and outside… I’malso a part of clubs for chemical engineering, so I’m also in leadership in one of our science peerorganizations on campus that’s not associated with the College of Engineering.” Another benefit most often noted by the peer mentors was improved communicationskills. Amber reflected: “Public speaking and putting presentations together and learning how topresent myself in a meeting or interview, over the phone, I guess, just presenting in front of agroup of people and to speak loudly and be well versed.” Paul discussed how this benefit wasmore than a matter of being an
acombination of Likert scale questions and open-ended essay questions with a focus oncontrasting student opinion between online and in-person course delivery. Throughout thesurvey, students are asked to self-reflect about topics such as understanding of concepts, courserigor and level of retention in an online environment as compared to a traditional in-person class.The questionnaire data has provided the team with a valuable combination of quantitative andqualitative data with which to draw meaningful conclusions. One of the major takeaways fromthis research is that although students are highly adaptable and can adjust to the remote aspectsof a flex model, their perceived ability to engage with their professor and peers in an onlineenvironment is
.[11] R. M. Stwalley III, "Definition, mission, and revitalization of cooperative education programs," in ASEE 2006 Chicago Proceedings, 2006.[12] G. Bolton, "Narrative writing: reflective enquiry into professional practice," Educational Action Research 14, no. 2, pp. 203-218, 2006.[13] M. Haddara and H. Skanes, "A reflection on cooperative education: from experience to experiential learning," Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education 8, no. 1, pp. 67-76, 2007.[14] R. M. Stwalley III, "Professional career skills in senior capstone design," in ASEE Capstone Conference - Columbus, Washington, DC, 2016.[15] R. M. Stwalley III, "Assessing improvement and professional career skill in senior capstone design through course
Reality course taught in the Computer Science Department at the same university, oras part of independent research projects involving electrical and computer engineering students.This reflects the strong educational impact of this project, as it allows students to contribute to theeducational experiences of their peers. During phase IV, the VR experiences are played bydifferent types of audiences that fit the player type. The team collects feedback and, if needed,implements changes.The pilot VR Lab, introduced as an additional instructional tool for the E&M course during Fall2019 and Spring 2020, engaged over 100 students in the program, where in addition to the regularlectures, students attended one hour per week in the E&M VR lab
. To assist in keeping students engaged and avoiding passive lecture settings, a variety ofactive learning education theories are possible fits for FYS. A possible learning theory relevantFYS is Kolb’s model [8]. Specifically for FYS, Kolb's concrete experience and activeexperimentation stages are best suited [9]. Keeping within Kolb’s theory, and to promote activelecturing, engaging activities were implemented from various active learning domains. Theseactivities took the form of brainstorming, case study reflections, scavenger hunts, think-pairshares, etc. We also wish to maintain and build a sense of community within the students thatleads to social networking development [10]. Within this social knowledge network, as soon asstudents begin
customers (engineering students and faculty in ourcase). Through this process, as educators understand more about what the customers needed, theeducators revise the design. In our application of this process, we interviewed more than 100 engineering students(most in their third or fourth year) who had not seen the films—about one-third of theinterviewed engineering students were women. The rationale behind selecting the students whohad not seen the films (our prototype) was to discover what the students reflected on as beingimportant in learning to write as engineers. In particular, we asked students about the following: 1. Biggest challenges faced when called upon to write an engineering report 2. Biggest surprises about engineering
Research Workforce Working Grouprequired IDPs for their postdoctoral researchers (Austin) [8] and the National ScienceFoundation included the IDP as one of the tools in their career development website [9]. As wecan see, both NSF and NIH, as well as many universities, have embraced the IDP as a keycomponent for enhancing STEM graduate and postdoctoral programs. In fact, in studies ofreflection as pedagogy the IDP is considered a self-reflection tool. Researchers such as McMillanand Hearn have reported that it enhances self-motivation and achievement [10].Taking all these factors into consideration, and the fact that there is not a similar tool as ‘myIDP’for undergraduates, we developed an instrument customized to fit the goals of bachelor's
team of researchers at a Southwest Hispanic-Serving Land-GrantUniversity embarked on an National Science Foundation-funded study to provide workshops forfirst year engineering students to introduce them to metacognitive awareness learning strategiesthat have the potential to help their study skills, and in turn, their academic performance. Toassess if these strategies were utilized and if they were helpful for students, we collected pre- andpost-intervention surveys and reflective writing journals. The survey items came from themetacognitive awareness inventory (MAI) [1] to measure pre- and post-knowledge andregulation of cognition. These surveys were administered to the introductory level engineeringclasses at the beginning and end of their