, faculty cancreate a concrete, measurable representation of student outcomes with respect to ABET a-k.Such portfolios, when combined with targeted assessment rubrics, can provide meaningfulavenues to track program development and success over time.In recent years, these capstone courses have been the subject of extensive discussion amongengineering educators. The design, development, teaching, and assessment of these courses haveprovided a rich focus for presentations at both FIE and ASEE conferences as well as for articlesin the Journal of Engineering Education, the International Journal of Engineering Education,and many disciplinary educational journals. In fact, the subject is so critical to engineering
and rigorously keeping them focused on relevant curricula is the key.In order to successfully and consistently engage their students, educators must be armed with techniquesand strategies adapted for teaching effective online courses.6 The often missed opportunity foruniversities moving courses from onsite to online is the chance to evaluate their practices and onlytransport over the ones which show the most promise of student engagement and a robust fitness for theonline delivery environment. However, initial attempts to adapt onsite teaching methods to onlinecourses achieved little more than copying onsite practices into the digital environment. The sageremained on the stage, simply changing the performance venue. Unfortunately this does
taught in both the Fall and Springsemesters. The students each purchase the Sparkfun Inventor's Kit 4.1 (Sparkfun, Niwot, CO)which contains an Arduino Uno style development board as well as a breadboard and anassortment of sensors, motors, and other elements. Each weekly module starts with tutorialvideos. A one hour class on Mondays reviews this material in an active-learning style, wherestudents sit in their project groups to complete exercises. Each week has a 2 hour laboratory inwhich an individual programming assignment is competed followed by a homework assignmentdue the following week. The course has 3 individual exams, the first in week 4 on Arduino C++programming, the second in week 8 on Arduino C++ programming, and the third during
Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in e-Learning and Other Educational Experiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.3. D. Laurillard, “Technology Enhanced Learning as a Tool for Pedagogical Innovation,” J. of Philosophy of Education, pp. 521-533, Jan 2009.4. A. M. Adams, “Pedagogical Underpinnings of Computer-Based Learning,” JAN, pp. 5-12, Mar 2004.5. D. Huffman, F. Goldberg, and M. Michlin, “Using Computers to Create Constructivist Learning Environments: Impact on Pedagogy and Achievement,” J. Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 151-168, 2003.6. C. Salzmann, D. Gillet, and Y. Piguet, “Massive Online Laboratories for MOOCs: A First edX Scalable
, to the teaching of writing. Better writing notonly makes for better students, it creates better teachers, better parents, better employees,and better citizens. Investment in writing today will have a cumulative effect on oureconomic growth, and on the strength of our democracy long into the future.”4 Now thequestion is how we teach writing to our technical students. Some of our colleagues inengineering and technology like to leave it our presumed expert colleagues in Englishdepartment. They would like to see that when the students get passing grades in English101, English 102, and possibly in a course like technical communication, they learned tocommunicate effectively so that the faculty in the technical discipline could concentrateon
Engineering Education. He is Founding General Chair of the IEEE International Electro Information Technology Conferences. Hossein served as 2002/2003 ASEE ECE Division Chair. He was IEEE Education Society Membership Development Chair and now serves as MGA Vice President (2013/2014) and Van Valken- burg Early Career Teaching Award Chair. Dr. Mousavinezhad received Michigan State University ECE Department’s Distinguished Alumni Award, May 2009. He is recipient of ASEE ECE Division’s 2007 Meritorious Service Award, ASEE/NCS Distinguished Service Award, April 6, 2002, for significant and sustained leadership. In 1994 he received ASEE Zone II Outstanding Campus Representative Award. He is also a Senior Member of IEEE, has
its steering committee for several years. He has invested over twenty-five years in the development and maintenance of a multimillion dollar manufacturing laboratory facility complete with a full scale, fully integrated manufacturing sys- tem. Professor Harriger has been a Co-PI on two NSF funded grants focused on aerospace manufacturing education and is currently a Co-PI on the NSF funded TECHFIT project, a middle school afterschool pro- gram that teaches students how to use programmable controllers and other technologies to design exercise games. Additionally, he co-organizes multiple regional automation competitions for an international con- trols company. c American Society for
Paper ID #26161Assessment of Concept Mapping Models and Structured Content ModelsDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several
that a significant portion of students are visual, sensing, and active learnerswho are at a disadvantage when taking traditional engineering lecture courses that do not allowthem to experience the technology and concepts being taught in class1,2,3. It is necessary forthem to touch, feel, and see examples before they can fully understand and process the course Page 12.525.2concepts. To assist in the teaching of smart materials and to expose SMA to a wider, STEMbased student body, a series of demonstrations and experiments have been developed eitherdirectly or with the support of The Smart Materials and Structures Laboratory in theDepartment of
involves the basic design of a learning device to teach auser the name of numbers and how to spell them. The facilitator leads the participants tothe development system described earlier. In preparation for the workshop, eachparticipant has been provided with a laboratory station fully equipped to develop a toy.Since the identity of the numbers will be encoded in a binary fashion, the binarynumbering system is briefly taught to the workshop participants. Once the binarynumbering system has been demonstrated, binary patterns are assigned to the individualnumbers. These binary patterns will be set on the toggle switches to identify the numberof interest.The binary numbers are read by the microcontroller through a program developed withthe C
, and the scholarship of teaching and learning. He serves as editor of the Journal of Engineering Education and as a member of the College Teaching and Accountability in Research editorial boards. He is a Carnegie scholar and an IEEE fellow. Professor Loui was associate dean of the Graduate College at Illinois from 1996 to 2000. He directed the theory of computing program at the National Science Foundation from 1990 to 1991. He earned the Ph.D. at M.I.T. in 1980.Renata A Revelo Alonso, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Page 23.719.1 c American Society for Engineering
8.233.1this auxiliary information is problematic. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education A second issue that arises is that while universities are in the forefront of many uses forcomputers, industry is marching to its own developments, using computers intensively for manyroutine tasks. Many modern-day engineering workspaces in industrial settings have beenobserved to contain only computers, to the almost-total exclusion of books and paperwork. It isimportant for students to have some introduction to such a mode of work, which again raisesmany teaching issues.Implementation Summary
programs. He has been ME evaluator for ABET over the last 12 years.Dr. Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University Karinna Vernaza joined Gannon University in 2003, and she is currently an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Notre Dame. Her B.S. is in Marine Systems Engineering from the U.S. Merchant Ma- rine Academy. Her primary teaching responsibilities are in the solid mechanics and materials areas. She was awarded the 2012 ASEE NCS Outstanding Teacher Award. Vernaza consults for GE Transporta- tion and does research in the area of alternative fuels (biodiesel), engineering education (active learning techniques
funded by the National Science Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Arizona Board of Regents, Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Arizona Department of Education, among others. She has a special interest in sup- porting exemplary and equitable science education for traditionally underserved populations.Dr. Steven D Hart, U.S. Military Academy LTC Steve Hart is currently assigned as the ERDC Engineering Fellow and Director of Infrastructure Studies at West Point. He has taught numerous civil engineering courses including innovative courses on Infrastructure Engineering and Critical Infrastructure Protection and has authored numerous articles and a book chapter on
3) long-termsustainability of the outreach program.II. Project DescriptionThe engineering outreach programs that are most frequently cited as good models of K-12engineering outreach efforts are those developed by centers dedicated to outreach (ex: the Page 8.386.1Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory at the University of Colorado and the Center for “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Initiatives in Pre-College Education at Rensselear Polytechnic Institute). These centers
Session 3225 Instructional Modules to Support Senior Capstone Design Classes Gary Kinzel, Blaine Lilly, Anthony Luscher, James Piper, Rachel Murdell The Ohio State UniversityAbstractIn senior capstone design courses, the instructor typically presents lecture material in addition toguiding the students in design. The lecture material often includes a wide range of topics, and it isdifficult to identify a single textbook that covers all relevant areas. This makes it difficult for newfaculty to teach capstone design courses and considerable effort is required to develop the lecturesfrom varied sources
. Page 25.425.95. Colburn, A., “A guided primer.” Science Scope, 42-44, 2000.6. Gleixner, S., Douglas, E., and Graeve, O., “Prime Modules: Teaching Introduction to Materials Engineering in the Context of Modern Technologies.” Proceeding for the 2007 American Society of Engineering Education National Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 2007.7. Gleixner, S., Douglas, E., and Graeve, O., “Engineering project laboratory modules for an introduction to materials course.” Proceeding for the 2008 American Society of Engineering Education, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2008.8. Douglas, E., Gleixner, S., Graeve, O., “Project Based Modules for Teaching Materials Chemistry.” http://www.engr.sjsu.edu/sgleixner/PRIME/, 2006, (Mar. 23
with a quality pre-engineering program.. Implementing and maintaining such aprogram using the latest equipment and software requires a permanent National TechnologyTraining Center that has been established at RIT. In addition a program of developing similarcenters at affiliate universities around the country has begun to better serve schools in theirhome state.Such centers serve teachers, college professors, and high school students as a place for ongoing,year-round, classes, projects and a laboratory setting for the development and revision ofcurriculum and teaching strategies. Bringing teachers, professors and high school studentstogether in a place devoted to the encouragement of engineering studies will ensure interactionamong these groups
instruction with faculty, they learn about theprescribed course content through lecture, supplemented by computer laboratory, library, video, andgroup case study interaction. By breaking up instruction through different teaching methodologiesand physical location throughout the West Lafayette campus, students better learn and retain coursecontent while having an intense instructional period during a given weekend. For any given coursetaught in this format, students have appropriately 32 hours of contact time with their instructor whileon campus. Students continue their studies in their home area and are in contact with the WestLafayette faculty on a weekly basis using distance education technology. Distance education mediainclude the completion of
almost an year now, teaching both undergraduate and Postgraduate courses in English. Published pa- pers in intramural and extramural publications. Presented papers at several conventions, conferences and seminars.Mr. Amithraj Amavasai Page 22.577.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY FOR NON- ENGINEERING AND NON-SCIENCE MAJORSAbstractThis paper focuses on developing best practices for providing non-science and non-engineeringmajors with a basic level of engineering and technological knowledge for successfully
atthe University of Arkansas. She serves in multiple roles in the department including her role as aCourse Assistant for the Introduction to Industrial Engineering course and her role as a ResearchAssistant for the System Design and Analytics Laboratory. She is a member of the university’schapters of the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE) and the Society of WomenEngineers, and has presented at events hosted by the American Society for EngineeringEducation (ASEE) and IISE.Mr. Brandon CriselBrandon Crisel is an Advanced Instructor and Undergraduate Advisor in the Department ofIndustrial Engineering. He teaches courses including Statistics and Computing Methods. Hisengineering research has focused on systems reliability, but his
conducted in a computer laboratory – a setting that has more distractions than thetraditional lecture room and therefore not the optimal venue for student note taking. Note taking,per Piolat, increases both students’ attention in class and their performance on tests, but it canalso interfere with students’ efforts to comprehend lecture content.1 In a separate study Kiewrareported that students typically record only about one -third of the important points in a lecture.2The goal of this paper is to show that guided note taking – faculty generated partial notes thatstudents actively complete during a lecture – improve students’ comprehension in a lecturelaboratory setting. In addition, this study furthers the author’s research in innovative
modifications to curricula in conformitywith standards of neighboring Arab countries;(iii) availability of more qualified teachers;(iv)provision of special education for physically and/or mentally challenged students and; (v) theemergence of a more concerned general public with educational issues.(2)Teaching learning Issues: Despite progress made over the last three decades; there remainsmore difficult, harder to overcome, intrinsic traits that have persisted over the years. In otherwords, it is the traditional approach to teaching, practiced on a large scale- where students arebombarded with information, and little attention, if any, is given to proper learning. The viewshared by many is that: teachers are primarily dispensers of information in a
Robotics as a Vehicle for Engineering Education Gregory E. Needel Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY 14623An important factor in an engineering education is the students' ability to apply their theoreticalknowledge to solving real world problems. Unfortunately, many schools are unable to providefull laboratories for experimental experiences due to a variety of constraints. This is a seriousproblem for educators who wish to provide practical learning for their students. One of the morecommonly employed methods of providing a “hands-on” approach to learning is through the useof educational
MA 119) as a prerequisite (or a satisfactory score on the Manuscript received February, 14, 2014. This work was supported in part college mathematics placement test). The course consisted ofby the CETL of the Queenborough Community College Sunil Dehipawala teaches at the Physics Department of the Queensborough 3 class hours, 1 recitation hour and 2 laboratory hours (4Community College. (All corresponds should direct to Suni Dehipawala: credits).Phone 718-281-5720; e-mail: sdehipawala@ QCC.CUNY.EDU). The study population consisted of two Physics 201 sections Vazgen Shekoyan is at the Physics Department of the Queensborough
methodsof delivering instruction, motivational theories on learning, evaluation of teaching effectiveness,and efficiency of teaching methods. In addition, teaching assistants who interact directly withstudents should undergo an orientation to teaching in order to become more effective at deliveringmaterial to students. In the same way that faculty instruction in the classroom is assessed, thesame should hold for all other methods of instruction including tutoring sessions and laboratoryexperiences.More emphasis should be placed on funding to enhance faculty knowledge and learning. Thisincludes workshops, seminars, and specialized training that will be directly disseminated tostudents through classroom or laboratory learning. Faculty research
course.Steps in Planning a Course (The New Professor’s Handbook): 1. For each course, determine the backgrounds and interests of the students likely to enroll. 2. Choose the objectives of the course based on these backgrounds and on the knowledge and skills which you deem appropriate to teach, as well as on your interest and expertise. 3. Choose the scope and content of the course based on time and money constraints. 4. Develop the learning experiences to achieve the objectives, within the scope previously determined. These experiences may include in-class activities such as lectures, recitations, and group meetings, as well as out-of-class activities such as required readings and homework assignments. 5. Plan feedback and
AC 2011-620: NANOTECHNOLOGY IN UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION:DEVELOPMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL MODULESF James Boerio, University of Cincinnati F. James Boerio joined the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Cincin- nati in 1970. His main research interests are in surface properties of materials, surface characterization, and adhesion. He currently serves as Director of the School of Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati.Dionysios D Dionysiou, University of Cincinnati Professor Dionysiou is currently a Professor of Environmental Engineering and Science at the University of Cincinnati. He teaches courses on drinking water quality and treatment, advanced unit operations for water
Columbus Laboratories, Rockwell International, and Claspan Corporation. He joined the University of Cincinnati in 1985.Xuefu Zhou, University of Cincinnati Xuefu Zhou received the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering in 2002 and 2006, respectively, both from the University of Cincinnati where he joined the faculty as an assistant professor in September 2005 and became an associate professor in September 2010. From July 1995 to August 2000, he worked as a R&D Engineer, then Senior Engineer and Project Manager in the industry designing and developing distributed computer control systems, real-time embedded systems for various process controls. He is a senior member of IEEE and a member of ASEE
Diploma on Structural HealthMonitoring for Civil Engineering and Architecture ProgramsAbstractIn this paper we present a challenge-based teaching model for a full semester ofspecialization in the Civil Engineering program in our University. In this minor orspecialization diploma, students develop competencies associated to Structural HealthMonitoring (SHM), Instrumentation and non-destructive testing of Structures.During a ten week period, several modules are taught to students with material aboutCivionics, SHM, damage detection in Structures, non-destructive techniques and Loadtesting of real structures. For this purpose a on campus bridge was instrumented withsensors for deformation, inclinometers, accelerometers and displacement sensors