Paper ID #38818Using a scenario-based learning approach with instructional technologyto teach conflict management to engineering studentsOlivia Ryan, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Olivia Ryan is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. in engineering with a specialization in electrical engineering from Roger Williams University. Her research interests include developing professional skills for engineering students and understanding mathematics barriers that exist within engineering.Marin Jayne Fisher, Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech Marin is a
solution based on strengths and weaknesses anddecide whether their solution is good enough to meet the criteria and stay within the constraintsor if they need to use the feedback to redesign their solution. Our research looks at the intersections of solution generation and argumentation (i.e.,EBR). With the above frameworks in mind, we undertook our research on the question: Whatinitiates the need for middle school students to use evidence-based reasoning while they aregenerating a solution to an engineering design problem in a STEM integration unit?MethodologyThis research follows the naturalistic inquiry methodology25,26 with lenses of STEM integrationframework21, A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering24, and Toulmin’s Argument
Paper ID #11415Improving Learning in Continuous-Time Signals and Systems Courses ThroughCollaborative WorkshopsDr. Mario Simoni, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyProf. Maurice F. Aburdene, Bucknell UniversityDr. Farrah Fayyaz, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and TechnologyDr. Vladimir A Labay, Gonzaga University Currently, Dr. Vladimir Labay is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Gonzaga Uni- versity in Spokane, Washington, USA. Dr. Labay was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada and earned a B.Sc.(E.E.) and M.Sc.(E.E.) from the University of Manitoba in 1987 and 1990, respectively. After grad
studying these curricula, we noticed that studentscan be “hands on but not minds on”, in the process of solving the tasks. In particular, GuidedContent and Guided Practice tasks are lacking in the assessments. This implies that in realitystudents have limited opportunities to reflect or make inferences, given these items. In order tosolve problems in the context of applying engineering design in the science classroom, thestudents will need to have the opportunities to use the guided information to solve the problems,rather than being asked to simply record the observations or perform calculations. The intersection of TAGS and POD clearly demonstrated a lack of higher-level cognitivedemands in several important areas. For example, Evaluate
fundamental to keep the levelof development of humanity in order to achieve the social development similar to thetechnological. However the present challenges of engineering education institutions are notlimited only to the formation of a professional for a new global work market, but also to defeatthe crises of education in which they are inserted. The crucial problem is the necessity of thinkagain the kind of education which has fragmented knowledge that drives people to an inability ofarticulating its several parts. Education must promote the natural ability of the mind to set and tosolve problems and by inter-relation to stimulate the full usage of general intelligence [04].4. University at present worldPeople live today in a world of no
learn from the core tenants of engineering.In this paper, we discuss a game developed in a Maker Space designed to embody the ideas ofbroadening contexts and participation in engineering. The goals of this game is to showcase thehumanistic side of engineering by facilitating a thought experiment how human motivation andinterest can be used to solve our society’s problems. Staying true to the aforementioned aspectsof making (i.e. learning and expression) players of the game would get to learn about differentaspects of engineering, and at the same time be able to color their end products with theirpersonal expressions.All players will work with a game kit which allows them to create a story of how an engineerwould use an engineering habit of mind
by Evrekli et al.8 has been applied in this study. Evrekli et al.evaluated the reliability of the scoring system and determined it to be consistent in areas such asinter- and intra-rater reliability, and variances. The scoring system is depicted in Figure 1 andTable 1. In this Work in Progress paper, mind maps have been evaluated by one rater, the author. Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 1 Table 1. Mind map scoring system (adapted from Evrekli et al.7) Component
AC 2009-973: INTEGRATING HISTORICAL TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIRIMPACT ON SOCIETY INTO TODAY'S ENGINEERING CURRICULUMWilliam Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington University. He obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management, and Ph.D. in Engineering Management at Walden University. He holds a Professional Engineer license and has 30 years of industrial experience as an Engineer or Engineering Manager at General Motors, Cadnetix, and
curriculum was formed in the crucible of the cold war.8 Since that time, Page 13.684.2radical changes in transportation, communication, and computer technology9 leave us in a verydifferent world. Popular books such as The World is Flat,10 A Whole New Mind,11 and The Riseof the Creative Class12 suggest that returns to innovation and creativity are especially importantin a world where routine analysis and engineering tasks can be outsourced globally for dimes onthe dollar. Scientific discovery and the integration of technology in everyday life are occurringat an increasing rate. These trends demand a more direct involvement of engineers in
“ .-. —_ .._ ,_. .—— .--—. ——— —.—. ——--—. — . . . . . . ——. —— . ..-.. —-— — .—. . .. Session 1626 Home Experiments in Mechanical Engineering Latif M. Jiji, Feridun Delale and Benjamin Liaw The City College of The City University of New York Abstract This paper describes 14 experiments in mechanical Engineering which students can perform at home using readilyavailable supplies. The experiments are designed for
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Leadership as Principled NonconformityFour years at MIT permanently solders some primary circuits of the mind, and perhaps for that reason some modes of thinking seem permanently closed to me. --Richard Meehan, Getting Sued and Other Tales of the Engineering Life, p. 18As a recent review article in the Leadership Quarterly (2014)1 reported, “Leadershipdevelopment has emerged as an active field of theory building and research, providing a morescientific and evidence-based foundation to augment the long-standing practitioner interested inthe topic” (p. 63). Like many of the papers submitted to the Engineering
) to serve as teachers, mentors, and team leaders – and there are tremendousbenefits for these students as well. Benefits to 1st and 2nd Year Students Benefits to Upperclassmen • development of basic engineering skills • learning by teaching & problem-solving • community of like-minded students • mentoring and being a role model • motivation for further learning • developing leadership skills • connecting w/ academically useful upperclassmen • belonging and running community • learning to deal with failure • resume, internships, moneyFor an extracurricular community like this to thrive, it is important to instill in these students ashared set
physical stamina and analytical minds. The first restriction eliminatedthe women who were about half of the population from the workforce, and the secondrestriction eliminated a large number of disfranchised who were not considered brightenough. As engineers, we should not feel guilty, as this was the norm in most professionsin their early days. Over decades, things have changed. Physical strength is not a pre-requisite and mathematics and science are not in the monopoly of a select group. We,therefore, expect to see a fair representation of all in this profession. In this presentationwe look at the present status of equal opportunity in engineering education and discussways by which such opportunities can be afforded to people who have not
lot of questions and looked for specific directions. In addition, theytried to “follow the rules” and looked for the “right” answer. When specific rules and directionswere not provided in nearly all cases, they gradually began to think more openly and came upwith ideas that they would have previously considered as “unacceptable” solutions. Page 10.971.9 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationAs the class progressed, students were observed to be more open-minded. They developed betterteaming
, workshops, and playingspaces. It demands strenuous efforts and experts to intercede with stories, admonitions,or principles when students fail, as they must, if they are to learn. Most of the learningthat results in the expertise of the practicing scientist, engineer, or poet is accomplishedthrough hands and minds on a task. Just think of the contrast between the activities ofapprentices in a workshop and the passivity of pupils in a lecture hall.If we refocus our efforts on learning, professors can exploit information technology toprovide data, scholarly references, and simulated problems for cognitive workshops. Inthose workspaces, student investigators will work side by side with faculty. Togetherthey will learn to create, evaluate, improve, and
others.(10) Coping strategies for stress relief isdependent on an individual’s preferences, however, reliance on peers has been reported to be themost common approach used by engineering students.(3)(5)(10)Due to its importance, institutions, departments, and professors have developed programs and/orincluded assignments to promote wellbeing and stress management techniques to students. Someexamples include meditation (mindfulness(11)(12)(13), Tamarkoz(14), Yoga(15)), a resilienceprogram(16), dance movement therapy(17), engaging in acts of kindness and giving(18), anassignment consisting of developing an actual plan for mental wellness(19), and increasing student-faculty interaction through informal social events.(20) It is worthwhile to mention
proponentsof this initiative. Much has been learned from the experiences of the past – and these hard-learned experiences should guide the preparation of future editions of the CEBOK. A relevantquotation (from Adlai E. Stevenson) comes to mind: “We can chart our future clearly and wiselyonly when we know the path which has led to the present.”As the CEBOK has evolved, numerous papers have been published discussing various aspects ofits three different editions. A new paper titled “The Role of the Civil Engineering Body ofKnowledge in ASCE’s Raise the Bar Effort” is also being published and presented at the 2019ASEE Annual Conference [1].Planting the Seeds (1995-2001)Although the origins of maintaining a current and relevant engineering education
the risk ofcardiovascular disease significantly, which was the reason collaboration began between theCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences and the Mechanical Engineering department to patent aTai Chi (T-ball) design. T-ball design project is a part ofProgram proposed by Dr. Goh and his coworkers [3]. Tai Chi, a mind-body harmony exercise, is an ancient Chinese healing/martial art [4, 5],which is practiced by millions of people daily across the world. It is said that around 250 Millionpeople practice Tai Chi in their lifetime. If those who have ever practiced Tai Chi were thepopulation of a country, it would be the 5th largest country in the world by population after India,China, USA and Indonesia. Since the customer base of the T-Ball
AC 2011-1000: ENERGY HARVESTING FOR ENGINEERING EDUCA-TORSEric C Dierks, The University of Texas at Austin Mr. Dierks is currently a Master’s student at The University of Texas at Austin working on powering structural health monitoring systems through energy harvesting and scavenging. He also earned a BSME from the same university in 2008. Following this he worked for the Institute for Advanced Technology in Austin modeling, simulating, optimizing, and testing battery-inductor pulsed power supplies for electro- magnetic rail guns for the US Army and Navy. There, he also briefly served as a reviewer for Carnegie Mellon’s autonomous platform demonstrator robotic program.Jason M Weaver, The University of Texas at
andentrepreneurship to improve our economy and address the major problems we face as a society.We feel that engineers have both a responsibility and a critical role to play in identifying andhelping to resolve the challenges we face as a society in resource use, technology use or in socio-economic issues. Understanding how engineers contribute to innovations that address theproblems or challenges of our society is, in our minds, an important task which is why we haveparticipated in this journey. We are pleased to share our discussions with you and look for yoursupport in continuing our research and entering into the dialogue with us. Page 24.1217.3
by studies ofprofessional designers.In another view, Ahmed’s series of studies of design maturation among working engineers(descriptive design) found, for example, that analogous reasoning becomes much moresophisticated in experienced designers since novices work with far less experience and technicalknowledge.1,2 Experts used analogies a lot for analysis and evaluation, whereas novicesprimarily used them for generating concepts and a cognitive “safe haven.” [All analogies wereused only in conceptual design and none in detail design and only one was transferred from adifferent knowledge domain] Expertise does bring habits of mind, however, and Ahmed doesnot compare differences in creativity, which might not always be as one sided.Further
AC 2009-1691: USING MOVIES TO EXPLORE ELEMENTS OFTECHNOLOGICAL LITERACYJohn Blake, Austin Peay State University JOHN W. BLAKE is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. He served as department chair from 1994-2005. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee. Page 14.1328.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Using Movies to Explore Elements of Technological LiteracyAbstractTo reach the goal
course expectations. It was not until the latter third of the coursethat students were able to formulate a clear definition in their own minds of concurrent engineering. Becauseof the general feeling of apprehension, students tended to wait to be told what to do, and to be anxious aboutassignments. It was difficult for students to take initiative when faced with risk, especially for the in-class casediscussions, which involved as many as thirty students. An interesting side effect to the team building sessions at Penn State was a noticeable improvement incase discussions held during the class periods following the team building activities. The students were lessapprehensive and more willing to volunteer their opinions. The result was a
adding extreme constraints often prompts Convergent X creative solutions as it forces your mind to focus on the core of the problem. One example is Ernest Hemingway’s challenge to write a complete story in six words. In that vein, summarize everything that you have learned in your engineering courses in six words (not six words per course; six words total!) 2 Choose a person who inspires you and ask them two questions: (1) Divergent What inspires you? And (2) How do you use that inspiration to fuel your own creativity. Write a summary of their answers in a 1-page memorandum. 3 Making remote associations between words or concepts can help
Retention of Information – Improving the Engineering Outcomes C.K. Waters1, P. Rojeski2 1 Mechanical Engineering, N.C. A. &T. State University, Greensboro, NC, 27411, 2 Civil and Architectural Engineering, N.C. A. &T. State University, Greensboro, NC, 27411ABSTRACT The educational outcomes for civil engineering require students to meet specificperformance standards at the time of graduation. Courses involving these performance standardsare taken several semesters prior to graduation; therefore the challenge is to encourage thestudents to maintain their proficiencies until their senior year and beyond
of a theorem. In other words, we are comfortable withstudents learning mathematical facts without necessarily having seen the proofs.Technique and TechnologyA fair amount of the discussion at the workshop, within our group and others, centered aroundthe use of “technology” in the math courses for engineers. In the discussions, “technology”meant a number of different things, from numerical methods to graphing calculators to symbolicmanipulation packages. We’d like to emphasize here some points to be kept in mind whenthinking of the introduction of these tools into math courses. Here are some questions and ourresponses:“Why should I learn to do it by hand?”• sense of form of mathematical expressions, understanding of what manipulations are
Page 5.344.5groups, new friends and get involved in other activities that contribute to forming acollege life. It is important not to spread the minorities so thinly that they will feelisolated. It is a good idea to assign good numbers of minorities to the same floor.Technology is growing very fast particularly in information technology and internet-related applications. Attendant to the growth, are many opportunities for developingsmall businesses. The idea of starting one’s own business is a fact that can be stressed tothe independent-minded individuals, and also to those who have entrepreneurial skills toencourage them while at college.ConclusionThe need for improving minority representation in engineering programs in colleges
problems.The Civil and Environmental Engineering department introduces freshmen students to structuralmeasurements using a bridge module. Bridges serve as aesthetic icons, engineering achievementsand defining structures for their communities. They tend to leave a lasting impression on thehuman mind. They are also reminders of historic battles and patriots honored. A recent article inCivil Engineering (1997), [3] reported the new ISTEA (Intermodal Surface TransportationEfficiency Act) provisions for historic preservation and restoration of old bridges in this country.Elementary, junior and high school students in recent years are being exposed to various hands-on bridge projects [4,5]. Thus bridges are a powerful tool for exciting and exposing students
Engineering Connection. Identify and describe how you will explicitly address theways in which your lesson or activity is representative of the processes, habits of mind andpractices used by engineers, or is demonstrative of work in specific engineering fields. At leastone of those must be within the first four listed, below; i.e., do not only check “other”. Check allthat apply: Use of an engineering design process that has at least one iteration/improvement Attention to specific engineering habits of mind Attention to engineering practices (as described in the NGSS/Framework and as practiced by engineers) Attention to specific engineering careers or fields related to the lesson/activity
Paper ID #8324Educating the Global Robotics EngineerProf. Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Prof. Michael A. Gennert is Director of the Robotics Engineering Program at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where he is Professor of Computer Science and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing. He has worked at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA, the University of California/Riverside, General Electric Ordnance Systems, Pittsfield, MA and PAR Technology Cor- poration, New Hartford, NY. He received the S.B. in Computer Science, S.B. in Electrical Engineering, and S.M. in