research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Gatekeepers to Broadening Participation in Engineering: A Qualitative Investigation of a Case Site in Virginia (Work in Progress)AbstractTo broaden participation in engineering
where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. Page 26.643.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Students’ Varied and Changing Views of Social ResponsibilityAbstractEngineering students have been found to have a wide range of opinions on their socialresponsibilities as engineers. These ideas relate
Paterson is an associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and director of Michi- gan Tech’s D80 Center which offers contribution-based learning, research and service opportunities for students with the poorest 80% of humanity. Dr. Paterson is a noted educator, workshop facilitator, and public speaker on community engagement, and leads several initiatives for learning engineering through service, recently leading ASEE’s newest division, Community Engagement in Engineering Education. He is PI on several research projects assessing the impacts of community engagement on students, faculty, and communities around the world.Dr. Annie Soisson, Tufts University Dr. Annie Soisson is the associate director of the
Teachers Make Lousy Students – And What You Can Do About ItAbstractA pre-engineering program was included in the College’s Research Experience for Teachers(RET) program to further equip participants with an understanding of engineering. The programdescribed the fields of engineering and engineering technology allowing participants to exploreengineering disciplines and design processes. The overall goal of the pre-engineering programwas to help teachers better understand engineering and engineering technology so that they couldappropriately address engineering and technology related topics in their classrooms. Theprogram content was provided using a variety of means including instructor led presentationsand projects
Paper ID #37940Centering Social Justice and Diverse Voices in EngineeringEthics CurriculaCortney E Holles (Teaching Professor) Cortney Holles is a Teaching Professor in the Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at Colorado School of Mines where she has taught and developed the required first-year ethics and writing course for STEM majors since 2004. She also teaches science communication and service learning. She defended her educational criticism/action research dissertation on “Faculty-Student Interaction and Impact on Well-Being in Higher Education” and earned her Ed.D in 2021. She is now engaged in the action
Paper ID #36878Improving Gender Equity in Engineering—Perspectives from Academia andLiteratureBrianna N. Griffith, University of Arkansas Brianna Griffith currently serves as a graduate research assistant at the University of Arkansas while pursuing a M.S. in Engineering Management. She received a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Arkansas in May 2022. .Dr. Eric Specking, University of Arkansas Dr. Eric A. Specking serves as the Assistant Dean for Enrollment Management and Retention for the Col- lege of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Specking received a B.S. in Computer Engineering, a
. Topics include best safety practices with respect to; riskmanagement, lockout/energy isolation, fluid power and electrical symbols, basic circuit designand machine design, and sequence of operation involved with automation controls andmechanical motion.Collaborations with industry partners have helped influence courses in the newly establishedgraduate certificate in Manufacturing Engineering and the Master of Science in ManufacturingEngineering at Michigan Technological University. This assessment reviews how courseassignments and student evaluations will be used to assess the level of meeting course learningobjectives.Industry 4.0 Concepts CourseWith Industry 4.0 being a popular advanced manufacturing topic, Industry 4.0 STEM educationresearch
the Information Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers project, Learning through Engineering Design and Practice (2007-2011), a National Science Foundation Award# 0737616 from the Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings. This project is aimed at designing, implementing, and systematically studying the impact of a middle-school engineering education program.Johnny Thieken, Arizona State University John Thieken, MEd., is currently a high school mathematics teacher at the Paradise Valley School District and a doctoral student in the PhD in mathematics education at Arizona State University. He has as Bache- lor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Northern Arizona University and
platform to streamline the competitors. company's supply chain. To evaluate and compare the potential benefits and Which option do you think would be the best fit for the risks of each option, I would conduct a thorough company's new business strategy and why? How analysis of each option's feasibility, potential return on would you go about evaluating and comparing the investment, and alignment with the company's strategic potential benefits and risks of each option? What goals. This could include reviewing market research on factors would you consider in your decision-making the demand for recycled materials, analyzing the costs process, and how would you
Design Course,” ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference &Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2009, pp. 1-11.Appendix A: Excerpt from the 2014 SyllabusCOURSE RULES:1. Pre-lab worksheets are available on Moodle for each experiment. These will be due by the end of class the week before you do the experiment. Here is the procedure that you should follow for completing the pre-lab: a) More than one week in advance, you should download the pre-lab for your assigned experiment, read the lab manual section, and review the relevant course material. Also complete the pre-lab as best you can, following good formatting practices for tables and graphs. b) Go to the professor’s office hours
designed to take, at most, one ninety-minutelecture. The “Water Filtration Activity” was first implemented in the engineering design coursein Spring 2022. (See Appendix C.) It is designed to take a maximum of two ninety-minute lectures.In addition to engaging students in STEM, the activities also bring awareness to potential socio-economic differences and public policy. This is a work-in-progress and the research teamhypothesizes that there is also the potential for an understanding of diversity, equity, and inclusion.The activities are presented to first-year courses but are also part of upper level courses. It ishypothesized that by repeating the activities, students will gain a deeper understanding of diversity,equity and inclusion.Literature
program designed to identify, recruit, mentor and graduate Black, Hispanic and Native American students who are enrolled in the college. Bitsie-Baldwin has held this position at K-State since 2005. Bitsie-Baldwin holds a B.A. in mathematics with a minor in secondary education from Fort Lewis College, Durango, Colorado, and an M.S. in mathematics from Kansas State University. She has also completed course requirements for a Ph.D. in the field of geometric topology. Her professional memberships include the NAMEPA, American Society for Engineering Education, and the American Indian Science and Engineering Society. American c Society for Engineering
- Page 4.230.7engineering in the early 1990s, from which some of them graduated, were in place as a result ofthe pipeline. Students also analyze more recent engineering education reforms such as systemicreform through the Engineering Education Coalitions. By making visible images of educationreform that engineering faculty face, the main goal here is to help students understand disputesand struggles among their professors over education reform while helping students constructalternative pathways into their engineering careers.20th century U.S. Through case-studies in 20th century history of engineering, we show studentsthe origin of a key divide in contemporary engineering, between design and manufacturing. Thisis the best example in the U.S. of
programs mustdemonstrate that their graduates have…” and presents a list of eleven specific outcomes, nowwell known as ABET (a-k) Outcomes4. At Iowa State, we decided that the ABET (a-k)Outcomes are too complex to measure directly.Accordingly, we identified fourteen unique “ISU Competencies” as necessary and sufficient tomeasure the ABET (a-k) Outcomes.5, 6 The fourteen ISU Competencies have been mapped tothe ABET (a-k) Outcomes that we adopted for the ABE program and validated throughengagement with contributing constituents (Table 1). Each of the ABET-aligned Competencieshas an independent set of observable and measurable Key Actions (Table 2). A web-basedassessment tool for the Competencies and related Key Actions is now in use for students
. Both researchers then reviewed the data together for inter-raterreliability.Students were asked to respond, in writing, to seven, open-ended questions: background story,reason for choosing the institution and the program, impact of the program, impact of thefinancial support provided by the program, plans after graduation, and best program memory aspart of the program evaluation process. The question of interest related to the value-addedprogram activities was the students’ responses to “best program memory” (RQ1, RQ2). Promptsfor “best program memory” were: “talk about working with your mentor, interaction with othersin the program, etc.” The prompts served as stimulants to recall types of most-memorableexperiences. Woike’s21 study on the
devices, an optional 4-day course on engineering of musicalinstruments, and an opportunity for students to get together and speak about their experiencesthrough guided storytelling. We will report on the results of these programs at a later date.BibliographyASEE (2014). Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering,Engineering Technology, and Computing Students. https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles.Alon, S. (2005). Model mis-specification in assessing the impact of financial aid on academicoutcomes. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 109–125.Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2005). Assessing the “mismatch” hypothesis: Differences in collegegraduation rates by institutional
student of today to approach designchallenges in a holistic manner; which ensures long term impacts of designs are well researchedand addressed. Because engineers will be designing for a global community, engineeringstudents must be able to identify the multiple effects of their practice around the world.Engineering education should use globalization as a driver to help students become moreconnected with the world and other professions, and to ensure that as practicing engineers theywill provide the best possible solutions for the context of a problem. Currently, our educationsystem does not adequately prepare future engineers to address challenges on this scale
in undergraduate and graduate curricula.”In this course we make extensive use of historical examples and case studies to highlightengineering in the context in which it is practiced. These case studies illustrate how great worksof engineering integrate scientific skills and innovations, are a product of social needs andconditions, and can symbolically manifest the individual vision of the engineers. A central focusof this course is for students to experience engineering as a creative discipline, allowing foraesthetic exploration within a set of constraints. Students examine the interplay betweeneconomy, efficiency, and elegance, and critically examine the idea of structural art.Recent Course EnhancementsWe are currently in the first year of
Director of Diversity and Inclusion at CISTAR, an NSF Engineering Research Center.Kristin Everett Dr. Everett is an educational evaluator and researcher and the lead evaluator at Everett Evaluation. She works with a variety of education programs and projects, including STEM, engineering education, teacher professional development, after school programs, and health education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Value of Assessing, Reporting, and Discussing Culture of Inclusion with a Scale Designed for an Engineering Research Center (Experience)AbstractThere is a common need
embedding a learning style approach within a variety of teaching strategies 4 – 13.Still others have looked at applications of psychological (personality) types within these as wellas other educational domains 14 – 18. In this paper, the research base on learning styles andpsychological types will be outlined.Additional emphasis will be placed on the critical role that these approaches can play in terms ofScience, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology (SMET) education. Specific examples ofteaching and learning strategies that utilize these approaches and that have been designed for usein the science and engineering classroom will be shared. Central to each strategy is the fact thatwhen students’ individual style and/or type preferences are
process, starting with simulationand then after the project had been successfully designed and tested, moving on to a specifichardware implementation. Perhaps a comparison of processors and FPGAs could beimplemented by having parts of the class use different implementation platforms, or evenpartition the design between the two. Unfortunately, such a complete version of the material hasnot yet been offered, and may not be practical in a ten week term.Conceptual Learning ExperimentIn the process of developing this course, the question was posed, “how will it affect studentunderstanding of fundamental concepts?” The question of how this hands-on course wouldcompare with a more theoretical course was also raised. Fortunately, a tool exists for
because data can be integrated from almostany source. ArcView simplifies complex analysis and data management tasks by allowing usersto visually model the task in a logical work flow through data integration and spatial analysisusing industry-standard programming languages5.The nature of construction – large amount of field data, changing of location, changing over time– best meets the data requirements of using GIS/GPS. With increasing of demands fromconstruction industry, the education of GIS/GPS for construction graduates is not adequate.Students must learn two major concepts: one is about GIS/GPS operations, and the other is aboutspatial data management. However, the focus of applications should be on enhancing students’background to meet
Paper ID #14106Automated Identification of Terminological Dissonance in IT and adjacentfieldsMs. Jessica Richards, BYU Graduate student in Information Technology with a background of interdisciplinary work between com- puting and media fields. Highly interested in streamlining the collaborating of technical and creative minds.Joseph J Ekstrom, Brigham Young University Dr. Ekstrom spent more than 30 years in industry as a software developer, technical manager, and en- trepreneur. In 2001 he helped initiate the IT program at BYU. He was the Program Chair of the Informa- tion Technology program from 2007-2013. His research
Engineering Education’s (ASEE), Going theDistance report, 53.6% Hispanics, 61.4% Native Americans, 61.7% African Americans and 49%Female students who enter engineering programs do not graduate in this major.1 This translatesto an engineering workforce that comprise of about 6% Hispanics, 0.3% Native American, 4%African Americans and 13% females according to the latest National Science Foundation’sreport.2 With such high attrition rates among minorities and underrepresented groups, changingthe current engineering workforce’s diversity portfolio is of grave national importance andrequires a plethora of high impact approaches. In the aforementioned ASEE report, over 60strategies and best practices were proposed. High impact practices included first-year
the the Systems Development and Maturity Laboratory (http://www.SysDML.com/), which seeks to advance the state of knowledge and practice in how we manage system lifecycles. He teaches courses in Project Manage- ment of Complex Systems, Designing and Managing the Development Enterprise, Advances in System of Systems Engineering, and Systems Thinking. In addition, he is a National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration Faculty Fellow, Editor-in-Chief of the Systems Research Forum, and Associate Editor of the IEEE Systems Journal.Dr. Brian Emery White, Complexity Are Us - Systems Engineering Strategies Brian E. White received Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in computer sciences from the University of Wisconsin, and S.M
simulation. However,this is not the best way to enhance the students’ learning as they mentioned that building a Page 15.875.3hands-on experimental lab environment is a challenging for many institutions due to spaceconstraints, budget limitations, maintenance difficulty. Other people also worked on networkingcourses which do not have focus on wireless networking11,16,19,20. There is a need to create morecomprehensive, dedicated course to teach wireless networks technologies that could givestudents a practical experience. This paper discusses how this course is offered to satisfy thisdemand and provide college graduates a practical hands-on
research project was to understand the ways in whichnew engineers drew from the learning and knowledge they had developed while studyingengineering in the CEAS at the University of Colorado Boulder. The data for this project is aseven-minute transcription of the student’s response to the following request during an interviewfor a research project on learning ethnographies of new engineers: “Tell me about yourexperience studying engineering as an undergraduate.” Instead of talking about her classes, whatshe learned, or her area of expertise, she talked about the dynamics of her experiences andinteractions with her peers and professors. This discourse shifted from focusing on academiclearning as it applies to the professional engineering practice to
art, shell structural design, alternate pedagogies for interdisciplinary education, and investigations to fos- ter creativity and innovation in engineering curricula. Mac Namara co-authored a book Collaboration in Architecture and Engineering released in 2014 and her research has been published in engineering and architecture education journals, nationally and internationally. She has received awards for innova- tive teaching from Princeton University, Syracuse University, and the American Society for Engineering American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020
materials being evaluated and theselected learning goals. The validity of this curriculum-analysis procedure has been verified by aresearch study using assessment items and student work. The results of this study suggest thatthis procedure is an effective tool for analysis of mathematical content of assessment items andof a set of standards. The analysis of student work also suggests that student thinking does notalways reflect the standard identified as best aligned with the learning goals of an item4.The National Research Council (NRC) also commissioned a curriculum study to evaluate thequality of evaluations of a total of 19 curricula, including 13 mathematics curricula supported bythe National Foundation (NSF), and 6 commercially generated
objectives, design learner-directed experiments and assesslearning (figure 1). Topics are chosen based on participating engineers’ research and experienceTwo well established lesson plan approaches are utilized: the Learning Cycles lesson approach22and Inquiry-based instruction23. Engineers practice teaching using few technical terms, real-world analogies and multi-media to ensure understanding for audiences with limited education.Engineers learn to use assessment practices such as graphic organizers to ensure families makesignificant knowledge gains24. Engineers also design a pre/post assessment in order to measuretheir effectiveness. Weekly preparation includes a reading assignment, instruction planning andreflective practice. Engineers are