streaming video on the ERC website.Graduate students are challenged to make the mentees a full participant in laboratory activities,help plan a research project that builds on mentees’ individual interests, and teach mentees basiclaboratory safety, research methods, and ethics. Graduate students are also responsible formaintaining contact with mentees through graduation from high school or college, continuing toencourage their scientific and engineering interests, and updating them on laboratory and Centeractivities. REU students assigned to the same laboratories as Young Scholars also take part inthe Scholars’ mentoring.Research Experience for TeachersOnce facet of the FREEDM precollege program is the Research Experience for Teachers (RETs).Middle
thatdesign is a timeless endeavor and failure an ageless problem.In order to introduce the required ABET criteria concerning knowledge of engineering andcontemporary issues; the senior seminar was revised to include a section on this subject area. Aquestionnaire distributed to both graduate and the undergraduate class was designed to measurestudent perceptions of various engineering and ethical issues. This knowledge of contemporaryissues held by engineering students could prove to be beneficial to them as they graduate andbecome employed by organizations.FindingsTabular results of the study are found in Tables 1 and 2. Different findings are shown below
Virginia’sDepartment of Science, Technology and Society (STS) which is housed in the School ofEngineering and Applied Science. The multidisciplinary STS department “advancesunderstanding of the social and ethical dimensions of science and technology2”. This paper willdescribe the development of course and its goals, expand on the course syllabus and choice oftexts, discuss the in-port field experiences, and summarize the assessment of both the studentsand the course. Page 15.481.2Course development and details The home institution of the course faculty member is the Colorado School of Mines(CSM). A Humanitarian Engineering Program3 has been developed at
feasibility of the design,and make decisions leading to an optimal system design. System integration, human factorsengineering, computer-aided design, maintainability, and fabrication techniques are addressed.This course provides an integrative experience in support of the overarching academic programgoal, and is often interdisciplinary in nature. Students spend extensive time in projectdevelopment laboratories fabricating and refining their final products.The course learning objectives are: • Apply the Engineering Design Process to design and build creative solutions for open- ended engineering problems. • Work effectively within a multidisciplinary design team in a professional and ethical manner. • Develop and conduct experiments
abide by a published code of ethics. In today’s competitive work place, many students continue on after their Bachelor degrees for graduate education. This trend is no different in Geospatial Technology fields. Acknowledging this trend, the proposed curriculum is also designed to prepare students for graduate-level education. In this respect, the proposed curriculum will emphasize the acquisition of research skills and effective writing and communication. Even if students do not choose to continue on for graduate education, these skills will enable them to be leaders and innovators in their careers. Furthermore, in preparing students for graduate education, this curriculum fits within the institutional vision for increased
thefollowing: is the research question significant, and is the work original and important; have theinstruments been demonstrated to have satisfactory reliability and validity; are the outcomemeasures clearly related to the variables with which the investigation is concerned; does theresearch design fully and unambiguously test the hypothesis; are the participants representativeof the population to which generalization are made; did the researcher observe ethical standardsin the treatment of participants; and is the research at an advanced enough state to make thepublication of results meaningful.Design and reporting researchWhen preparing their manuscript, authors should familiarize themselves with the criteria andstandards used by the journal to
) can include both written rulesand unwritten norms that govern interaction. These are necessary to mediate social orderand help regulate larger questions of justice, ethics, and morality. Division of laboracknowledges that subjects require the assistance of others to realize their goals and thatpower relations among subjects are often unequal.Identifying and Negotiating Contradictions While CHAT can be helpful in describing the component forces influencinghuman activity, it may be most useful in highlighting situations where these forces act incontradiction to each other [24]. The concept of contradiction in CHAT highlights pointsof tension, potentially creating transformative changes in activity patterns[12]. Engestromhighlighted
of our efforts toenhance graduates’ skills in communication, multidisciplinary teamwork, lifelong learning, andawareness of social and ethical considerations in addition to a firm grasp of science,mathematics, and engineering fundamentals. Page 24.873.7Future directions may include comparison of student performance in Senior Capstoneexperiences with or without participating in this model of long-distance collaboration.Figure 3: Student outcome assessment results. Percentage of students rating their perception of their ability for each outcome for one year without collaboration (2012) and one year with collaboration (2013). Each graph is
evaluated at the program level (during thecapstone project), or through performance in co-ops and based on surveys and feedback from theindustry (indirect measures). An example of the latter includes creative thinking and problemsolving skills, communication skills (both verbal and written), and ethical behavior. In someclasses, pre- and post-learning assessments were conducted, to identify the type and amount ofknowledge students started with, and compared to the amount they ended the class with, with theassumption that the difference represents what they have learned in this particular class. Thesepre- and post-learning tests served as a confirmation on the sufficiency and quality of the“supply” of knowledge students learned and retained from
thenecessity of methodologies for a wide range of processes to determine the best parameters forproduction of multiscale composites. Thorough understanding and further verification of thesemultiscale materials were attained through the application of statistical modeling of processesand property variations.CurriculumThe REU site guided students through a combination of seminars and lab experiences. Theseminars provided fundamental knowledge to assist in their research and included topics inResearch Methods and Ethics, Health and Safety, Statistical Analysis, Engineering DataAnalysis, Experimental Design, and the use of statistical software packages. Seminars onTechnology Entrepreneurship and Commercialization (TEC) were used to enhance
Page 24.953.3to situate each and all the unit processes on the site.The program outcomes mapped to this course include: • An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs • An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams • An ability to communicate effectively • An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility • Knowledge of contemporary issues • A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learningDescription of online modules and assessment of student’s mastery of materialAfter careful discussion between the prerequisite course instructor and the design instructor,specific topics were chosen that covered technical content required for the
, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability;(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; and(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems.(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;(g) an ability to communicate effectively;(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context;(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning;(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues;(k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary forengineering practice.Additionally, Criterion 5-Curriculum states that: Students must be prepared for
integration of students and development of student-faculty bonds. It is expectedthat eight seminars will be held per academic year. Potential seminar topics are: (1) The CSET-STEMProgram, (2) Applying for Graduate School and Financial Aid, (3) Finding a Mentor, (4) Ethics, (5)Public Speaking, (6) Understanding Group Dynamics, (7) Managing Intellectual Property, (8) TimeManagement, and (9) Technical Writing.(b)Graduate School and/or Employment Preparation -- Scholars will be urged to register with the SCState Career Center. This will ensure that they are prepared to connect with graduate schoolrepresentatives and employers.(c)Academic Mentors – Each scholar will choose an academic mentor from a list of available mentors.This list will include faculty
learned what it takes to master a new language and complete a project to specifications. 5. Since every student had mastered a programming language prior to taking this class, it contained few difficult concepts and was therefore amenable to the inverted classroom format.AssessmentStudent work from this class is used for ABET assessment of student outcomes (c) and (e). (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and Page 24.1125.7 safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (e
strongly encourage cooperation with industry, c) Maintain closer relationships with industry, d) Has more manufacturing faculty and students, e) Place a greater emphasis on teaching, f) Provide numerous, well-equipped facilities, and g) Produce graduates with more knowledge on materials and processes.Nelson6 analyzed inputs from directors of ABET accredited programs to identify key technicalcompetencies for manufacturing graduates. Among 264 competencies, the highest rankedcompetencies related to quality, communication, and personal ethics. Baird7 proposed a Page 24.1166.3laboratory exercise to simulate mass production environment
systemof training and the universities can show a good example. Moreover, the university often Page 24.1272.6faces the need to change the program contents taking into account the customer requirements.Thus, some very important topics are withdrawn, such as education ethics, education 5philosophy, oratory art, and etc. The program should also include the classes from the leadingprofessors and practitioners.The university also wants the employer to evaluate the results of the workforce participationin the program, and their practical implementation in the
events. Training sessions were centered on (butnot limited to) the following topics: History of ISE Departmental missions and initiatives Discussion of 2020 Preeminence Strategic Plan IIE Ethical Canons Academic culture Recruitment Materials Role plays of scenariosRoles of POs. The POs’ roles included communicating on a regular basis with the first yearstudents, which meant orchestrating ways to disseminate information and follow up quickly andefficiently. POs also ensured the students attended monthly seminars, information sessions, falland spring career fairs, pre-advisement meetings with their respective advisors, providedeffective sources to obtain tutoring for difficult
, reviewing literature, working witha team, and giving presentations. Rather than focusing on “hard” (technical) skills, the skillsemphasized in this class are related to the ABET “professional” skills: an ability to function on Page 24.1314.2multidisciplinary teams (3d); an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (3f); anability to communicate effectively (3g); the broad education necessary to understand the impactof engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (3h); arecognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (3i); and a knowledgeof contemporary issues (3j).5In
from their competitors. In the end, theremodeled restaurant brings in a lot of satisfied customers.Issues for class discussion: leadership, mentorship, work ethics, service value, marketcompetition.Educational ApproachesA number of teaching strategies can be explored using film and film clips. Most commonlymovie material can be shown to stimulate group discussion (but groups should be small). In thisapproach material is shown to the group and the trigger questions are posed either before or afterthe viewing. These questions need to be focused and tailored to the particular teaching goals toeliminate any potential runaway discussions, which may be inadvertently triggered by the detail-rich film material. Another alternative is to use the whole
Page 23.1103.10determine if students are being honest regarding this ethical issue.5.3 Location and CollaborationDuring analysis, researchers suspected a correlation between the location where studentscompleted their homework and how they completed their homework. Specifically, theresearchers tested the hypothesis that students completing homework on campus were morelikely to collaborate with other students than those completing their homework at home. Table 1shows the results from a correlation analysis. The highest values were found from studentscompleting their homework at home (67% of respondents), where a correlation of 0.39 wasfound with those completing their homework alone, and a -0.38 correlation was found with thosecompleting their
topicsmight exist across content areas. “Technology and Society” concerns the relations betweenhumans and technology. This includes issues such as ethics and responsibility and the historyand evolution of technology. The “Design” section focuses on the methods though which Page 23.1160.6engineers create new technological products and systems. Content would include designmethodologies, cost-benefit analysis, and design evaluation. “Products and Systems” addressesthe systems nature of technology, and includes topics such as the flow of energy, materials, andinformation in systems, feedback and control, and the specific technologies characterizingmodern
researched personality inventory available. 27 The alignmentof each personality measure to the study context is explained below. AgreeablenessAgreeableness refers to an individual’s tendency toward being honest, considerate, trustworthy,helpful, understanding, decent, and generally likable. 27 Although not yet explored,agreeableness is likely to relate positively to leader coaching behavior as there is some researchsupport linking agreeableness to leadership. Agreeableness has been found to be the personalityfactor most strongly affiliated with the idealized influence element of transformational leadershipand is positively associated with ethical leadership. 28, 29 Individuals exhibiting a propensity foragreeableness more often utilize
desktop computer for each seat.9 Thirteen sections of the course wereoffered, each containing approximately 36 studentsThis course was the first in a two-course sequence and focused on problem solving via computerprogramming in MATLAB and C/C++. Additional course topics included engineering ethics,technical communication, Microsoft Excel, and engineering design.Inverted Classroom ApproachEach day’s work was divided into two primary components: preparation and application (Table1). The preparation component was to be completed prior to the beginning of class. Eachpreparation assignment consisted of some combination of the following: watching videos,reading book sections, completing tutorials, or working problems. A breakdown of thepercentage of
applicationsto real world energy problems. Additional emphasis is placed on the need for domesticenergy independence and on worldwide energy availability, as well as in the ethical useof energy resources. As these modules are taught in our curriculum, assessment datawill be collected and reported on in a future article.Bibliography1. Bioengineering educational materials bank, http://www.bioemb.net, accessed January 2013.2. Materials digital library pathway, http://matdl.org, accessed January 2013.3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology open courseware site, http://ocw.mit.edu, accessed January2013.4. Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching site, http://www.merlot.org,accessed January 2013.5. Hydrogen Education at Mississippi
, 2012. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference[7] C. K. Drummond, "Team-based learning to enhance critical thinking skills in entrepreneurship education," Journal of entrepreneurship education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57- 63, 2012.[8] E.-K. Chung, J.-A. Rhee, and Y.-H. Baik, "The effect of team-based learning in medical ethics education," Medical teacher, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1013-1017, 2009.[9] C. Rodríguez-Sabiote, E. M. Olmedo-Moreno, and J. Expósito-López, "The effects of teamwork on critical thinking: A serial mediation analysis of the influence of work skills and educational motivation in secondary
leaders expressed strong concerns about encouraging their students to applyfor the BOAST program without knowing ahead of time what participation would mean forstudents in terms of time and effort commitment; therefore, randomization of schools withapplicants was decided to be ethically questionable. As a result, analysis to create like-school-pairs was performed to approximate random assignment to reduce the potential for unobservedvariable bias. Of particular concern were differences between treatment and control groups instudent interest in STEM; thus, the opportunity was similarly advertised at schools in bothconditions as a set of STEM-focused activities occurring outside regular school hours. It isunknown the extent to which student
forstudents in the early stages of their learning journey with limited practical experience. Inconclusion, our study underlines the need for a cautious and conservative approach to theincorporation of ChatGPT in engineering education, particularly in tasks that are relevant onreasoning, with human educators continuing to play an irreplaceable role. To help facultiesteaching similar subjects, we recommend the following strategies:Discuss AI’s Limitations and Ethical Issues. It’s vital to teach students about AI’s shortcomings,such as biases, inaccuracies, and mistakes. This can lead to a more comprehensive understandingof what AI can and cannot do.Host Workshops on ChatGPT and Other AI Tools. Offer workshops or seminars that givestudents practical
students based on this informationaiming for a diversity of social styles on each team. Instructors were directed to be intentionalabout scaffolding and facilitating teamwork, with a recommendation to have students create ateam contract with a focus on ‘team growth’ and a reflection assignment later in the semester.Weekly instructor meetings covered a range of topics, including the week’s content anddiscussions on any team conflicts that arose in class. Topics addressed included challenges withteam communication, student workload division, student attendance, and the instruction ofcontent related to team growth, risk mitigation, and engineering ethics. Instructors activelyexchanged ideas and best practices each week. However, in Fall 2024, only
andcompatibility, and disease specificity (Figure 1). These constraint lists show that the studentsunderstand that their proposed engineering solution for type-1 diabetes treatment needs to beoptimized for safety, efficiency, and patient need. One interesting and relevant constraint thatmakes appearance in the BME 3010 list is ethical collection of cells. This shift suggested that asstudents’ progress from their sophomore to junior year, they develop a deeper awareness ofethical considerations and the complexities involved in BME solutions.In their final submissions, students were asked to create engineering schematic to representphysiological processes involved with their biomedical scenarios. Our content analysis of BME2010 (Appendix Table 1
meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors (Student Outcome 2) an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts (Student Outcome 4)It is common practice for undergraduate engineering programs to use the senior capstone projectto assess the abilities of students to meet these ABET student outcomes [7]. Considering the mid-twentieth century definition of engineering as “applied science”, capstone projects are a logicalplace for students to