: energy resources, energy conversion systems,energy conservation, and environmental pollution. During the course, exercises and teamprojects were assigned to design renewable and traditional energy conversion systems. Thispaper describes the assignments and projects used in the course to enhance the design experienceof the students. Detailed descriptions of each design project and the student design solution weregiven.Introduction Energy affects the lives of everyone in so many ways, economically, technically, andenvironmentally. Thus, integration of energy and its many aspects such as energy conservationtechnologies and environmental impacts of energy generation, in the educational curriculum ofscience, technology, and engineering
from the prevalent practice of teach-ing engineering in an apprentice mode by practicing engineers with students taking no formalcourses in mathematics and sciences. We see that since inception of formal engineering educa-tion, the engineering education community has struggled with the delineation of science, engi-neering, and vocational-technical education.As elaborated in sections 3 and 5, the evolutionary forces in engineering education is towardgreater generalization in basic engineering courses as it permits teaching of a greater amount ofknowledge in a compact form. Without such generalization the problems of already overburdenedengineering curriculum and the growing graduation time would become a lot worse. The abstrac-tion that occurs
, rather than having to immediately solvein a more “public” fashion. Also, candidates may prefer explaining problems with a pencil on thepaper or on a computer using an integrated development environment. Next, they suggested usingproblems actually encountered at the company, since many puzzles are not reflective of real-worldsituations. Such tasks are seen as giving an unfair advantage to candidates just out of school.Finally, they propose problem solving “as colleagues, not as examiners” a recommendation whichhighlights that rather than an intense interrogation the process should be balanced, and shouldinvolve working together to solve issues, and that this could even be accomplished with other“potential teammates.”In addition to the two
PC to teach computer networking and operating systems”, Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information Technology Curriculum, Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 2003.2. A. Gaspar, S. Langevin, W. Armitage, R. Sekar, and T. Daniels, “The role of virtualization in computing education”, Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education Portland, Oregon, USA, 2008.3. J. Ekstrom, M. Bailey, “Teaching Web Deployment with OS-virtualization”, Proceedings of 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, Texas, USA, 2009.4. P. Li, “Integrating Virtualization Technology into Remote Lab: A Three- Year Experience”, Proceedings of 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, Texas, USA
considered important forstudent retention.There were four primary objectives for each student to reach during the course. (1) Understandwhat industrial and manufacturing engineers do. (2) Experience how industrial or manufacturingengineers learn. (3) Appreciate why industrial and manufacturing engineers lean systems. (4)Practice self-directed learning. These objectives were conceived to lead each student into theknowledge and engage each student in the activity of either the industrial engineering curriculumor the manufacturing engineering curriculum, as the two options available in the Department. Page 7.1026.1 Proceedings of the 2002
. By themselves they do notgive much information other than how capable a student is of preparing for a test of thatmagnitude. But coupled with high school ranking, performance and historical information; theycan give a clear picture of an individual student’s academic preparation. Every study on theacademic preparation of under-represented minorities in New Mexico, over the past 20 years,independent or otherwise and regardless of what variables are used (i.e. dropout, GPA, ranking,ACT scores, number of students taking honor courses, number taking advanced placement tests,etc…), indicates that a big disparity in academic preparation for these students versus others doesexist.Let us emphasize that this analysis provides information on academic
Page 13.826.5and needs. The literature in quality engineering is full of references to the fact that the user of asystem must be an integral and an indispensible component in the decision-making process3. Inthis respect, EWB-USC functions predominantly as a technical planner, system integrator, andfinancial fundraiser (see “Partnering Organizations” and “Initial Design Preparation”). 5.1 Participatory Model From the start, we became aware that the any approach to solving the problem should be performed cooperatively; as opposed to EWB-USC defining La Estanzuela’s “problem”, doing the work, and imposing the “solution” without further consultation4. For example, the villagers served as guides for the
in certain cases by the President of the hosting university. The President isresponsible for managing the university in accordance with the programmes and policiesapproved by the Board.Director of the Satellite Network 7The network director is responsible for the integrity of thenetwork and supported by a few technicians in charge of operating the network for the benefitof the satellite network participants.Director of Postgraduate Programmes 7The director is responsible for implementing theprogrammes recommended by the curriculum committees and approved by the Board ofTrustees.Director of General Programmes 7The director is responsible for implementing therecommendations of the advisory consultative committee on general programmes once
currently an Associate Professor and the Bioengineering Undergraduate Program Director. Dr. Molitor’s research interests include molecular mechanisms of cellular excitability, computational modeling of neuronal function, auditory neuroscience and treatments for traumatic brain injury. He has supervised the thesis and dissertation work of numerous graduate students working in these research areas. His educational interests include preparing high school and first year college students to study engineering mathematics, and the teaching of science and mathematics to young children.Dr. Joan N Kaderavek, University of Toledo Joan Kaderavek, Ph.D., has been awarded the title ”Distinguished University Professor” of Early Child
amongst students. An important question that we believe should be addressed is: Are all newly Page 22.1587.5coined terms buzzwords? The word “sustainable” is being used frequently in the contextof manufacturing nowadays. The popularity of this word has a lot to do with the fact thatall over the world there is now a realization that activities of one generation can adverselyaffect the earth and what is left of this earth for future generations. Hence, whether“sustainable” is a buzzword is debatable; it appears to convey a new idea that was notconsidered important only a few years back. Similarly, words that become integral partof our lingo for years
leverages the strengths and expertise of professionals trained in different fields”[6]. This innovative model for integrating team science training within an existing biodesigneducation program was previously described, along with preliminary evidence of effectiveness[2]. The team science model for the EIH program and evaluation activities were adapted from thepre-pandemic learning environment to the remote-learning environment instituted during thepandemic, allowing for comparison of outcomes before and during the pandemic.MethodsPrevious course adaptations around team science were made and tracked by the teaching teamduring each of three academic years (Y1: 2018–2019, Y2: 2019–2020, Y3: 2020–2021) [2].Impacts of adaptations on team functioning
integrated STEM curriculum development as part of an NSF STEM+C grant as a Postdoctoral Research Assistant through INSPIRE in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University Her current research interests focus on early P-12 engineering education and identity development.Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Campbell University Jacqueline Burgher Gartner is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University in the School of Engineering, which offers a broad BS in engineering with concentrations in chemical and mechanical.Dr. Michele Miller, Campbell University Dr. Michele Miller is a Professor and Associate Dean at Campbell University. Prior to joining Campbell in 2017, she was a professor of mechanical engineering at Michigan Tech
instructs students in engineering design, engineering graphics, and drafting. His research interests include economical design of mechanical and structural systems, low-velocity impact with friction, and effective curriculum delivery methods. Dr. Osakue can be reached at osakueee@tsu.edu. Dr. Jonathan J. Lewis is an Associate Professor and Graduate Faculty in the Department of Industrial Technology at Texas Southern University, Houston Texas. He is also the coordinator of the Graduate Program and Construction Technology Concentration in the Department. Dr. Lewis has been teaching technology courses for more than 25 years.Dr. Jonathan J. Lewis, Texas Southern University
was chosen because it is the first course in the mechanicalengineering sequence, and because virtually every mechanical engineering probleminvolves materials selection or materials troubleshooting elements. Before describing thecourse and the results of an initial trial implementation, we describe principles of problem-based learning (PBL). Practices and principles of problem-based learningPreparing for professional practice in any discipline requires that students learn to thinklike successful practitioners in that field. PBL is an instructional strategy in which a unit,course, or curriculum is organized around problems authentic to practice rather than subjectmater content. Rather than studying concepts, principles and
the instructors during these uncertain times.The curriculum for the two electrical and computer engineering (ECE) courses taught at the largeresearch institution covers the fundamental concepts of electrical analog and digital circuits andprovides an opportunity for students to explore the applications of circuits in the real world. In anormal learning environment, ECE courses tend to be difficult due to higher expectations forproblem-solving, math, and scientific concepts, and adding external factors such as the pandemicadds more complications. The focus of this research work is to study the second-yearengineering course and present the challenges associated with the delivery of the course content,teaching engineering concepts and
so well defined that the content and coverage of the course have been almostfixed for many decades. Most of the textbooks are similar. On the other hand, due to theadvancement of technology, MoM has found many new applications. Mechanicalengineering students are having more and more employment opportunities in emergingtechnologies other than conventional industries such as automobile companies. There isa need to expose students to many applications of MoM in real life especially inemerging technologies. The work reported in this article is part of the department’s effort in incorporatingemerging technologies into undergraduate curriculum, which is supported by a grant fromthe National Science Foundation. For this particular course, the
Paper ID #33454Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Care in Chemical EngineeringMrs. Kristen Ferris, University of New Mexico Kristen Ferris is a student in the Organization, Information, and Learning Sciences program at the Uni- versity of New Mexico. Her research interests include faculty mindset change, change management, and organizational citizenship behavior. Much of her research is part of a National Science Foundation grant at UNM where the chemical and biological engineering department is redesigning curriculum to support diverse student retention and graduation. She intends to further her knowledge in the
guiding the learningprocess. This learning format provides various benefits for the instructors as well as students. Some of those potential benefits includeflexibility [3], increased peers’ interaction [4] and increased interaction with instructor [5]. Based on the benefits identified inprevious studies, a freshman level civil engineering course was converted into a partial flipped format. This paper aims to evaluatestudent perspectives on partial flipped geographic information system (GIS) course.Geographic Information system (GIS) is a freshman-level software-based course in the civil engineering undergraduate curriculum atthe Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. This two-credit course provides an introduction to GIS software, basic principles
AC 2008-2537: ASSESSING COGNITIVE REASONING AND LEARNING INMECHANICSChris Papadopoulos, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Chris Papadopoulos earned BS degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Carnegie Mellon University, and a PhD in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University. He previously served on the faculty of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, where he is currently a research associate, grant writer, lecturer, and director of educational programs. His research interests include biomechanics, nonlinear structural mechanics, computational mechanics, engineering education, and engineering ethics. He is an active member of American Society for
of a community and is coordinatedwith an institution of higher learning and with the community; helps foster civic responsibility; isintegrated into and embraces the academic curriculum of the students enrolled; and includesstructured time for the students to reflect on the service experience.”2According to studies done at the Higher Education Research Institute of the University ofCalifornia, Los Angeles3, certain things must be done to ensure that a service-learningexperience is effective. The first is that students must receive sufficient training through coursematerial before engaging in the service. The second is that instructors must engage students inconversation about their service. The last is that students must reflect on their
Management faculty at Northern Arizona University in 2007. His engineer- ing career spans a wide variety of design and forensic engineering experiences. He spent the first eight years of his career performing structural consulting engineering in Chicago. This work culminated with design work on the Minneapolis Public Library and the Overture Center for the Arts in Madison Wiscon- sin. He was also involved with forensic investigations in Iowa and Wisconsin and participated in structural coordination efforts at Ground Zero in September of 2001. He holds professional engineering licenses in the States of Arizona an Illinois. He is currently working on a Doctorate of Education in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in
taught since 1984 and PMS hasbeen integrated into the curriculum since approximately 2000. Two PMS packages are taught inthe course, Primavera and Microsoft Project, both of which are the most frequently used PMS inthe construction industry7,11,13. Since 2002 the CPMS course has been a ‘stacked’ class in whichboth undergraduate and graduate students can take the class for credit towards their respectivedegrees. During the Spring 2014 semester a self-teaching active learning method was employedwith the graduate students, in regards to learning the Primavera PMS. The two graduate studentsenrolled in the course were required to teach the undergraduate students (29 undergraduates)how to develop a construction schedule in Primavera. This was the only
/writing across the curriculum (WID/WAC) style course that isrequired for all graduates from his institution’s systems engineering undergraduate program. Roughly, theoverall objective of this course is to engage students in policy-relevant analysis related to criticalinfrastructure systems. The analytical tools studied in the course include: risk analysis, uncertaintyanalysis, benefit-cost analysis, and multi-criteria decision analysis. The principal learning objectives ofthe course are: • To decompose the design or operational objectives of an infrastructure system into fundamental objectives that can guide relevant decision-making processes. • To formulate and evaluate infrastructure system projects of the students’ choice that
Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies for the college.Dr. Jennifer Harper Ogle, Clemson University Dr. Jennifer Ogle is currently an Associate Professor in the Glenn Department of Civil Engineering at Clemson University. She specializes in transportation infrastructure design, safety, and management, and has been the faculty advisor for the Clemson Engineers for Developing Countries (CEDC) program since 2011. During this time, the CEDC program has tripled in growth and has been recognized by the Institute for International Education (IIE) with the Andrew Heiskell Award as a model program, and was also recognized by the State of South Carolina for the Service Learning Award in 2011. Dr. Ogle was also recognized in 2012
correctly perceiving theirexpectations despite their repetitive efforts to convey these expectations. This study used bothquantitative and qualitative methods to understand both sides - the instructor’s expectations ofstudents and the students’ perceptions of the instructor’s expectations -in an open-ended, student-centered classroom. Four students and the instructor were interviewed throughout an upper-division undergraduate mechanical engineering course. This paper describes the research methodsand preliminary results from this study. With the increasing integration of project-centeredpractices in the engineering classroom, the results of this study are anticipated to be beneficial toother instructors who are trying to transition students from
Session 3548 MiniTab in Assessment of the Dynamics Course Zhongming Liang Purdue University Fort WayneAbstract For better interpretation of assessment data, the author uses MiniTab, a statistical analysissoftware package, for evaluating students’ learning outcomes with multiple statistical measuresin several his courses in the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) program, such as thedynamics course discussed in this paper as an example. The better assessment and follow-upactions have indeed led to improvement of students’ learning and satisfaction
methodology used, and lessons learned for future research.1.0 IntroductionWhile cognitive issues have always existed in engineering education, the scholarly application ofpsychological principles by engineering educators themselves is relatively recent. This jointstudy between the University of Wisconsin-Platteville and Pennsylvania State University-GreatValley was initiated in Summer/Fall 2001 to support the on-going interest in the integration ofcognitive style research into the engineering classroom. In particular, the cognitive styles of 44undergraduate students enrolled in an Introduction to Environmental Engineering course wereassessed using the Kirton Adaption-Innovation (KAI) Inventory3,6. The students’ cognitive styleswere then
(CALS), and theICBE components of a collaborative 2009-2010 TEL project. Briefly, the ICBEcomponent was to build upon the Feedback Manager module developed under theprevious ICBE TEL grant with the desired outcomes of further adoption anddevelopment of the tool, continued faculty input, and assessment of the impact of thetool. The TEL CoE/CALS component focused on scaling up the use of Moodleknown as Engineering Courses on the Web version 2 (eCOW2) within the CoE andCALS at an enterprise level with a surge of faculty support and technical assistance tofurther adopt the available tools in Moodle and integrate effective instructional designand delivery principles to positively affect student learning. Discussion of the twoimplementation
chemistry curriculum is arranging student lab teams so that each person has a turninvestigating and monitoring the safety issues specific to a lab session [2]. Other appropriatepractices that include training teaching assistants in safety protocols [3], organizing a lab spacewith safety in mind [4], or making use of a virtual lab.In civil and environmental engineering, there can be many types of lab spaces. It depends on thefaculty members’ areas of interest and program emphasis. However, various types of labs can begrouped into three major categories based on the particular hazards they contain. In laboratoriesthat involve construction, materials and machinery, students encounter hazardous physicaldevices. In environmental and biological labs
engineering. Additionally, he has extensive experience in teaching embedded systems and senior design courses.Dr. Rania Hussein, University of Washington Dr. Rania Hussein is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering de- partment at the University of Washington, where she also serves as the founder, principal investigator, and director of the Remote Hub Lab (RHLab). With her research focus on embedded systems, medical image analysis, digital twinning, and remote engineering, Dr. Hussein is committed to developing inno- vative solutions that enhance equity and access in engineering education and telehealth practices. Her work in promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education