2030 and even 2050. Think of 2030,two decades will have flown by, or looking back we may reflect on 1990. Times were verydifferent then and will likely be even more different in the future. Today there are newcompanies, new ‘toys,’ high technology cellular devices, marvelous digital cameras, andpolitically significant social movements all catalyzed by these innovations. Have oureducational methods changed in parallel?What of 2031? The US will likely no longer be a primary ‘top-of-the-heap’ nation; what isthe U.S. prognosis? In particular, education practices have not experienced major curricularearrangements since the traumas of Sputnik. U.S. science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) rankings are below world-class. Our students
Paper ID #11613Arguing to Solve Food Engineering ProblemsProf. Tammara Ram´ırez Apud L., Universidad de las Americas Puebla I am a research professor imparting university level complex thinking. My speciality is the design of learning environments based on troubleshooting for critical thinking development.Dr. Judith Virginia Gutierrez Cuba PhD. Science, Engineering and Technology Education. Postdoctoral Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.Dr. Nelly Ramirez-Corona, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Nelly Ram´ırez-Corona is currently a Full Time Professor of Chemical Engineering at Chemical, Enviro
AC 2011-1000: ENERGY HARVESTING FOR ENGINEERING EDUCA-TORSEric C Dierks, The University of Texas at Austin Mr. Dierks is currently a Master’s student at The University of Texas at Austin working on powering structural health monitoring systems through energy harvesting and scavenging. He also earned a BSME from the same university in 2008. Following this he worked for the Institute for Advanced Technology in Austin modeling, simulating, optimizing, and testing battery-inductor pulsed power supplies for electro- magnetic rail guns for the US Army and Navy. There, he also briefly served as a reviewer for Carnegie Mellon’s autonomous platform demonstrator robotic program.Jason M Weaver, The University of Texas at
Paper ID #25514Board 26: What Features of the Problem Solving Studio Most Impact theStudents’ Experience?Miss Carmen Angelica Carrion, Georgia Institue of Technology Doctoral studies in Science Education. Specifically in informal settings and through the application of problem based and project based learning.Prof. Joseph M LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology Joe Le Doux is the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Learning and Experience in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. Dr. Le Doux’s research interests in engineering education focus on problem-solving, diagrammatic reasoning
AC 2012-5048: REDESIGNING BME INSTRUCTIONAL LAB CURRIC-ULA USING PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND BACKWARD DESIGNDr. Barbara Burks Fasse Ph.D., Georgia Institute of Technology Barbara Burks Fasse is a Senior Research Scientist in the Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at Georgia Tech. Fasse studies the efficacy and value of student-centered learning initiatives, specifically problem-based and project-based learning, in classrooms, instructional labs, and undergraduate research experiences. She joined the BME faculty in 2007 following ten years in Georgia Tech’s College of Com- puting, where she was a member of the NSF-funded ”Learning By Design” problem-based learning cur- riculum development and research project
central to his area of study. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress Tackling the Problems of Knowledge Integration and Barrier of Active Learning in a CDIO Course of Embedded Operating Systems: The Flipped Classroom ApproachI. Introduction Higher education institutions in Taiwan have been trying to respond to a variety ofinbound pressures (political, economic, social, technological, etc.) and transform themselvesto a more agile entity to serve students’ needs, including learning, living, and partnership.Universities need to be more concerned about how well the students are prepared to get intothe global
Biological Engineering (FAIMBE), USA. He received several awards and honors including Lee Kuan Yew Fellowship, NUS Outstanding University Researcher Award, JSPS, ASME Best Paper Award, IES Prestigious Engineering Achievement Award, and ASEAN Outstanding Engineering Award.Xavier Fouger, Dassault Systemes Xavier Fouger, Director, Dassault Systemes Global Learning leads the PLM Academy, an organization supporting skills in Product Lifecycle Management and 3D technologies through global education and certification programs. He promotes lifelong learning through a network of 140 partners providing education services and thousands of academic institutions. He led scientific and technological co
AC 2009-2390: MAINTAINING THE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PIPELINEDouglas Sugg, United States NavyBruce Galloway, United States NavyJohn Fishell, STEP Page 14.856.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Maintaining the Scientist and Engineering PipelineAbstract:Technology is advancing at an ever increasingly rapid pace. This is particularly true in theDepartment of Defense (DoD). Test and Measurement Systems (TAMS) require a continuedinflux of scientists and engineers properly trained to advance the TAMS support structures fornew and advanced technology applications while maintaining existing support structures forcurrent equipment. The demand for
impact of advising interventions on the academicsuccess of engineering and applied science pre-majors at a large, multicultural, top-tier researchuniversity. There is a growing body of literature addressing the impact of specific academicinitiatives with respect to how higher education students are taught math, science, andengineering subjects, though there is less focus on the value of intensive psycho-social supporton the retention and advancement of students pursuing the science, technology, engineering andmath (STEM) disciplines. This paper seeks to address that issue and illustrate how earlyadvising interventions can improve retention and graduation rates.Kitzrow notes that colleges and universities in the United States have seen enormous
Session 3663 Theoretical Foundations for the Foundation Coalition Core Competencies Jeffrey Froyd, Karen Frair Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology/University of AlabamaAbstractThe Foundation Coalition was funded in 1993 as the fifth coalition in the National ScienceFoundation's Engineering Education Coalitions Program, and is currently in the seventhyear of a ten-year project. The member institutions have changed since its formation andnow include Arizona State University, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Texas A&MUniversity, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, the University
Paper ID #37157What makes a solar engineer?Dr. Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State University Hazleton Dr. Joseph Ranalli is an Associate Professor at Penn State Hazleton, teaching in the Alternative Energy and Power Generation Engineering program. He previously earned a BS from Penn State and a PhD from Virginia Tech, both in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include solar energy and enhancing the use of technology resources in engineering education.Mesude Bayrakci Boz, Pennsylvania State University Hazleton Dr. Mesude Bayrakci Boz is an assistant professor engineering at Penn State Hazleton. She holds mas
ASEthe developed world though sustainableengineering solutions while addressing the needsof the world’s poor through development of Global Standardappropriate technology. Sustainable design can of Livingbe characterized as maintaining or improvingmaterial and social conditions for human health Engineering at the Crossroadsand the environment over time withoutexceeding the ecological capabilities that Figure 1. The Appropriate and Sustainablesupport them. Appropriate technology can be Engineering (ASE) Concentration aims tocharacterized as being small scale, energy address our needs
Revolution: Reasons it began in England. James Watt and the first true steamengine; use of new engines to mine more coal, produce cheaper iron. Rediscovery ofcement/concrete; setting underwater allowed development of canal system. Development ofrailroads. Cast iron as the first new structural material in thousands of years. Development ofglass technology to allow larger pieces, more windows. Concurrent developments in America;copper boom in Michigan corresponding with invention of telegraph. • On the Metamorphoses of Iron of Iron and Steel, by P.C. Grignon in 1775, available in Sources for the History of the Science of Steel 1532-1786, Ed. C.S. Smith (1968) • Excerpts from At Home: A Short History of Private Life by Bill Bryson (2010
educational intervention modules for SMEs as well as for engineering and design undergraduates for Interregional EU application. He lectures in design for sustainability across a number of courses in UL, and endeavours to link academic research with industry, through seminars and onsite coaching. He believes that the application of sustainability strategies is not just a moral obligation in manufacturing, but also helps secure competitive advantage. He holds a PhD in Design and Ergonomics from Brunel University.Stephen Burke, University of Limerick Stephen Burke graduated from the University of Limerick with a 1st Honours in Technology Education in 2002. He has served for two years as a teaching
the earth. This equation states that a country’s impact on the environment is equal tothe country’s population multiplied by an affluence term and a technology term. The affluenceterm is the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of the country. The technology term is theamount of environmental impact per unit of GDP.6 Put in different terms, environmental impactcan be seen as the product of the number of people consuming, the amount and type of goodsthose people are consuming, and the impacts associated with the life cycle (creation, use, anddisposal) of the goods or products consumed.So, what can engineers do to help? Engineers as a profession are responsible for creating andmaintaining the technological systems that are causing the
Globalization of Engineering Ethics Education Nael Barakat, Ph.D., P.Eng., Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Matthew C. Carroll, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Lake Superior State University 650 W. Easterday Ave., Sault Ste. Marie, MI. 49783 Voice: 906.635.2031 – Email: nbarakat@lssu.eduAbstract Borderless ethics and the attempt to develop a global engineering code of ethicshave formulated significant driving forces behind trends in engineering ethics education.This is because engineering is no longer limited by borders and therefore the differencesin culture and values from one country to another become
AC 2010-648: MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH TO ENGINEERINGEDUCATIONIlya Grinberg, Buffalo State College Ilya Grinberg graduated from the L’viv Polytechnic Institute (L’viv, Ukraine) with an MS in EE and earned a Ph.D. degree from the Moscow Institute of Civil Engineering (Moscow, Russia). He has over 30 years of experience in design and consulting in the field of power distribution systems and design automation. He has over 30 published papers. Currently he is Professor of Engineering Technology at Buffalo State College. His interests are in the field of electric power distribution systems analysis, design automation, and systems engineering.Mohammed Safiuddin, State University of New York
Engineering Education, 2007 A New Multidisciplinary Engineering Education Initiative at Philadelphia UniversityAbstractPhiladelphia University is developing a new engineering school based on a strategic decisionmade three years ago to re-engineer its School of Textiles and Materials Technology and expandundergraduate educational offerings beyond its legacy B.S. textile engineering program. Today,the school has re-emerged as the School of Engineering and Textiles, currently offeringbaccalaureate degrees in Industrial and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, andGeneral Engineering with a choice of minor concentration tracks in Industrial, Mechanical,Environmental, Textile, or Architectural Engineering
Paper ID #7727A Successful Engineering Program-Corporate PartnershipDr. Scott Danielson, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Scott Danielson is the associate dean for Academic Programs in the College of Technology and In- novation at Arizona State University’s Polytechnic campus. Before assuming that role, he had been the interim chair of Engineering Department for half a year and the chair of the Engineering Technology Department for over twelve years. He has been active in ASEE in the Mechanics Division and the En- gineering Technology Division. He has also been active in ASME; awarded the Ben C. Sparks Medal
,learning and communications that are not found in conventional U.K full-time under-graduateprogrammes. These teaching methods range from text-based to internet-based delivery and havea strong emphasis on employment-based project work.The undergraduate course provides a ‘mainstream’ first degree in chemical engineering forindustry-based students who have some prior qualifications and experience. The postgraduatemasters-level courses are designed for a wider range of professionals with backgrounds inengineering and/or chemistry. They provide a technology-based version of an MBA and featurea strong multi-disciplinary theme that integrates advanced process technologies, managementand business (with a strong emphasis on the process of innovation) and
Paper ID #35344Benefits of the virtual platform for K-12 STEM OutreachMelanie Villatoro P.E., New York City College of Technology Melanie Villatoro, an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Management and Civil En- gineering Technology at NYC College of Technology, is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of New York. Prof. Villatoro is passionate about student retention and performance, as well as STEM Outreach in K-12. She has served as Project Director for the National Transportation Summer Institute sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration multiple years. Prof. Villatoro leads a STEM
dialogue that can lead to the implementation ofinnovative programs for first-year engineering students. Such topics include developingeffective advising techniques, creating learning communities, using technology in the classroom,and addressing the needs of students from diverse backgrounds.For the past two years, a first-year engineering workshop entitled Dialogue on EngineeringEducation: the Role of the First Year has been held at the University of Notre Dame to engageengineering educators on these and other topics. It was conceived as a way for those involved infirst-year programs to discuss current pedagogical approaches and to engage in an open dialogueon issues that pertain specifically to first year engineering education. The workshop
in the FPD, CIP and ERM. He is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and listed in the Book of Great Teachers at Purdue University. He was the first engineering faculty member to receive the national Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers.Mr. Andrew Pierce, Purdue
meta-cognition.Dr. Wade H Goodridge, Utah State University Wade Goodridge, Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Technology Education at Utah State University, has taught Solid Modeling, CAD, Introductory Electronics, Surveying, Statics, teaching and Learning, Assessment and Evaluation, and Introductory Engineering courses at Utah State University. Goodridge has been teaching for the Utah State College of Engineering for more than 15 years. He holds dual B.S degrees in industrial technology education and civil engineering from Utah State University, as well as an M.S. and Ph.D. in civil engineering from Utah State University. His research interests include spatial thinking/spatial ability at a
ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION: PROCESS AND CHALLENGES Tamer Ceylan University of Wisconsin-Platteville E-mail: ceylan@uwplatt.edu Phone: (608) 342-1367 ABSTRACT This paper summarizes the important aspects of the experience gained before, during, and after the recent ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) accreditation visit for the engineering programs at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. From an engineering educator’s perspective, it provides information on the critical process issues and challenges with the
level of 50-60% agreement, and our results greatly exceed that threshold. Page 26.875.4Collaborator RecruitmentCollaborators have agreed to support two testing phases in 2015, as well as validation studies in2016-2018, each recruiting significant and representative samples of their engineering student orpracticing engineer populations. These samples will be combined for testing purposes. Academic Collaborators include faculty and researchers at Carnegie Mellon, Georgia Tech University, Lawrence Technological University, Lehigh University, Penn State University, Purdue University, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Saint Louis
year bachelor’swas economically non-competitive. It is proposed that engineering reconsider adopting a five yearformat, leading to a master’s degree, not a bachelor’s degree. The ultimate goal is to provideadditional technical expertise, but also to add the breadth that could make engineering a moreattractive educational experience, leading to expanded career opportunities. with a greateremphasis on leadership of technical activities to support lifetime career development.Engineering EnrollmentsThe number of freshmen entering engineering schools, in the United States, has not substantiallyincreased in over twenty years. This during the greatest explosion of technology the world has everseen. In 1982, 114,517 freshmen engineers were enrolled
Session 1639 ENGINEERING ECONOMY - A Historical Perspective Gerald J. Thuesen, William G. Sullivan Georgia Institute of Technology/Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityThe purpose of this paper is to acquaint the reader with the accomplishments and contributionsmade by four individuals in the field of engineering economics. These “pioneers” of theprofession enabled the field to develop from its infancy in the 1870's to become a criticalcomponent of engineering practice and education. Their introduction of fundamental ideas, thedevelopment of methodologies of
Paper ID #8324Educating the Global Robotics EngineerProf. Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Prof. Michael A. Gennert is Director of the Robotics Engineering Program at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where he is Professor of Computer Science and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing. He has worked at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA, the University of California/Riverside, General Electric Ordnance Systems, Pittsfield, MA and PAR Technology Cor- poration, New Hartford, NY. He received the S.B. in Computer Science, S.B. in Electrical Engineering, and S.M. in
2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Introducing Deep Learning to Undergraduate Engineering Majors Lin Zhang University of Central ArkansasAbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) is one of the fastest growing technologies. The undergraduatestudents, especially those majoring in engineering, are demanding more encounters with AI.Deep learning (as one of the most popular and fundamental subcategories of the AI) isintroduced to the undergraduates through a 4-course education. The students will acquireintuitions on the concepts, the theoretical/mathematical backgrounds and practical