Conference Session

Mechanics Concepts II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert E. Efimba P.E., Howard University; Tori Rhoulac Smith, Howard University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

a question is worth one point. Anynumerical answers should be given to no more than 3 significant digits, with units (if any).1. A pound of sugar has a mass of _________slug = __________kg and weighs __________N2. A meter stick has a length of __________mm = _____ins = ______ft3. In scientific notation, 0.0004567 = _______ and 199.62 = _________4. When a = 2, b = 5, c = -8, evaluate a + b x c – a = _________ b – c + a/(b-2a) = _____________ 0.5sin(a)cos(a) = ________ sin (2a) = __________________ arcsin(a/b) = _________ (between 0 and 90) degrees = _______ rad5. Give all possible solutions for these equations 3x + 7 = -8, x = _______________________________________ x2 – 7 = 9, x

Conference Session

FPD VI: Presenting "All the Best" of the First-year Programs Division

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Scott Moor, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

B showsthe rubric for the final report. The rubric for this stage uses the two Problem Definitionexpectations from this final rubric plus an expectation for the overall presentation and format ofthe memo. Students continue to work in their self-selected pairs for this assignment. Page 25.845.6Table 2: Problem Definition Worksheet Overall Goals Write a paragraph succinctly describing the key aspects of the project objective. Make your definition precise as possible and include any major constraints. Detailed Goals

Conference Session

New Trends in ECE Education II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bonnie H. Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technology; JillL L. Auerbach, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

as the one shown in Figure 4. Page 25.89.4Figure 1: Partially pre-wired protoboard for a state machine implementation.12 X=1 A (00) X=1 X=0 X=1 C B (10) X=0 (01) Figure 2: State Transition Diagram for X=0 example system..12

Conference Session

Learning and Assessment I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sriram Sundararajan, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

(i) A recognition of the need knowledge of mathematics, engage in life-long learning (b) An ability to design and (d) An ability to function on

Conference Session

Development of Manufacturing Engineering Laboratories I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. Kozak, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

are loaded into the fixtureC. Fine tuning the use of the measurement systemD. Analyzing charts that show operator/part interactionsE. All of the aboveAnswer Key: E8 %EV isA. the repeatability percentB. the reproducibility percentC. the error value percentD. the total variation percentE. the equipment volume percentF. A and CAnswer Key: A9 In our example, since we had only one operator we could not determineA. the repeatabilityB. the reproducibilityC. the %EVD. the %AVE. answers B and CAnswer Key: B Page 25.101.1010 The standard method described in the exercise is to measureA. 5 parts 2 times by 3 operatorsB. 5 parts 3 times by 2 operatorsC. 10 parts 3 times by 2

Conference Session

Improving the Pedagogy of Laboratory Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas F. Schubert Jr. P.E., University of San Diego; Frank G. Jacobitz, University of San Diego; Michael S. Morse, University of San Diego; Truc T. Ngo, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Page 25.1307.5In order to assess the impact of a prototype exemplar on design creativity, a two-prongedapproach was used: A. A survey, focusing on the design process, work distribution within a team, and student perceptions concerning the influence of the prototype exemplar (if applicable) and/or the influence of other student designs on a team’s final design. B. Photographs of the student racers were taken at the end of each of the three design phases and an analysis of the design progression through those photographs was performed by the investigators.A. Survey dataAt the end of the laboratory meeting, students were asked to complete a short survey. Twodifferent survey instruments were

Conference Session

Arduinos, Microcontrollers, Inexpensive Robotics, and Other Tech Bytes

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yan Xu, Del Mar College; Muhittin Yilmaz, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Allen Babb, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Mohamed Abdelrahman, Texas A&M University, Kingsville

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

to thirteen per semester, a total of six students including onefemale attended the course during the Fall 2011 semester, with three students from EngineeringTechnology, one student from Electrical Engineering and the remaining two students fromComputer Science disciplines.Two-student teams were formed to brainstorm, conduct research, design, build, and test a robotand compare performances. Two robotic kits, i.e., LEGO Mindstorm and Boe-Bot, weredistributed to each team and two engineering challenges were assigned to reinforce engineeringdesign methodologies, technical knowledge and hands-on skills on robotics: a) the challenge-1;and, b) the challenge-2. The teams were asked to design and build two robots with differentdesign, hardware, and

Conference Session

Contextual Competencies

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christel Heylen, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven; Jos Vander Sloten, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

technical report of 6 pagesmaximum. (a) (b)Figure 1. Students are preparing (a) and conducting (b) the experiment to measure propulsive force generated by a chemical reaction and exhaust of water. Page 25.588.5The outline of the report is predefined by the didactic team. Furthermore the students arereminded of the feedback they received on their literature assignments and of the guidelineson writing style in the manual of the course.The report is graded by the didactic team on the content as well as the writing style. Thestudent teams receive feedback on

Conference Session

Global Engineering Models: Curriculum Development, Improvements, and Partnerships

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kurt M. DeGoede, Elizabethtown College; Momodou Jain

Tagged Divisions

International

: Educational Effects on Project Members and Their Peers. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering 2009, 4 (1), 15- 30. 8. Dukhan, N.; Schumack, . M. R. Reflection-based assessment of service learning in undergraduate engineering. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering 2010, 5 (2), 32-43. 9. Riley, D.; Bloomgarden, A. H. Learning and Service in Engineering and Global Development. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering 2006, 2 (1), 48-59.10. Mehta, Y.; Sukumaran, B. Integrating Service Learning in Engineering Clinics. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering 2007, 2 (1), 32-43.11. Braskamp, L. Developing Global Citizens. Journal of College & Character 2008, 10 (1

Conference Session

Outstanding Contributions to Student Learning through Laboratory Experiences

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy John Worm P.E., Michigan Technological University; John E. Beard, Michigan Technological University; Wayne Weaver, Michigan Technological University; Carl L. Anderson, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Education," Technology Review, MIT, October 1987.[2] Weaver, W. W., Anderson, C. L., Naber, J. D., Keith, J. M., Worm, J. J., Beard, J. E., Chen, B. "An Interdisciplinary Program for Education and Outreach in Hybrid and Electric Drive Vehicle Engineering at Michigan Technological University", 2011 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference,[3] Naber, J. D., Worm, J. J., Allen, J., Anderson, C. L., Beard, J. E., Burl, J. B., Keith, J. M., Hackney, S. A., Weaver, W. W., Woychowski, T., Smith, R. (2010). "Curriculum and Delivery in Engineering for Hybrid Electric Drive Vehicles, Meeting the Needs of the Automotive Industry for New Engineering Talent and Retraining", Ed. Naber, J. D., Worm, J. J., Society of Automotive

Conference Session

Design Cognition I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason A. Foster, University of Toronto; Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto; Robert Irish, University of Toronto; Geoffrey Samuel Frost, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Page 25.662.8university campus so that: (a) students could appropriately dispose of their devices, and (b) theuniversity’s cleaning staff would not have to contend with over-filled garbage cans that were notdesigned for the disposal of mechanical equipment.5 Assessment of Student LearningAs mentioned previously, the primary goal of gamifying the activity was to enhance studentfocus and engagement. Anecdotal evidence from the classroom instructors suggests that this goalwas largely met. However the activity also has associated learning objectives, and the investmentof effort to gamify the activity needs to have a payoff in terms of those objectives.In the absence of a formal, longitudinal, and experimental approach to assessing changes

Conference Session

New and Innovative Ideas

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Thomas Malcolm, University of Virginia; Jennifer L. Chiu, University of Virginia; Edward Pan, University of Virginia; M. David Burghardt, Hofstra University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design™ into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12,(4), 495-547.15 untambekar, S., Stylianou, ., bscher, R. ( 00 ). Improving navigation and learning in hypertext environments with navigable concept maps. Human-computer Interaction, 18, 4, 395-428.16 Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Goldstein, J. (2007). Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry curriculum: lessons learned from two teachers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16,(1). 81-130.17 Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical

Conference Session

The Transition from Secondary to College Mathematics

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sabina Jeschke, RWTH Aachen University; Olivier Frédéric Pfeiffer, Technische Universität Berlin; Omar Musa Hasan, American University of Mdaba; Erhard Zorn, Technische Universität Berlin

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

. Kato, O. Pfeiffer, E. Zorn, Pre-Freshmen Students Gearing up with Early Bird, Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE6 http://www3.math.tu-berlin.de/OMB/7 https://www.tu9.de/8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux9 A. Heck: Introduction to Maple, 3rd ed., 2003, Springer, New York.10 Maple User Manual, Maplesoft, a division of Maple Waterloo Inc., 2011, www.maplesoft.com.11 L. Bernardin, P. Chin, P. DeMarco, K. O. Geddes, D. E. G. Hare, K. M. Heal, G. Labahn, J. P. May, J. McCarron, M. B. Monagan, D. Ohashi, S. M. Vorkoetter, Maple Programming Guide, Maplesoft, a division of Maple Waterloo Inc., 2011, www.maplesoft.com.12 D. E. Knuth, Computers & Typesetting, Volume A: The TeXbook, 1986, Addison

Conference Session

Progress in Manufacturing Education III

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Peter Vogt, University of Utah; Stacy Bamberg, University of Utah; Debra J. Mascaro, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

experimentations over the internet,” (Vancou- ver, BC, Canada), 2011. Academic community;Current status;Cutting edge technol- ogy;Experimental setup;Federal research;Integrated assessment;Laboratory course;Learning outcome;Learning strategy;Real-time learning;Remote experimentation;Remote laborato- ries;Remote location;Research activities;Single computer;Sustainable solution;.[14] F. Coito and L. B. Palma, “A remote laboratory environment for blended learning,” (Athens, Greece), pp. University of Texas at Arlington; Univ. of the Aegean (Inf. and Commun. Syst. Eng. Dept.); Technol. Educ. Inst. of Athens (Department of Informatics); ARRI – Automation and Robotics Research Institute at UTA –, 2008. Blended learning;Data ac

Conference Session

Design Across Disciplines

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Taskin Padir, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

2 ECE 2 MEGrade Distribution: The number of students receiving A grades in their project work was foundto be 79%. The percentage of B grades was 14% and the number of C grades was 7%. This gradedistribution appears to indicate grade inflation. The large number of A’s relative to the number ofB and C’s is related to the number of projects that were judged to be worth 1 unit (9 credit hours)per student. In this review, it was determined that 29% of the projects completed weremarginally worth 1 unit or did not worth 1 unit at all. However, It must be emphasized that an Agrade should reflect one unit of excellent work by the student, a B grade should reflect one unitof

Conference Session

Research in Assessment

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Chong, University of Toronto; Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2012-4488: EVOLVING A RUBRIC FOR USE IN ASSESSING ENGI-NEERING GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES IN A STUDENT SENIOR RESEARCHTHESISMr. Alan Chong, University of Toronto Alan Chong is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Communication program at the University of Toronto, housed in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, where he teaches technical communication to undergraduate engineering students. He has spent the last five years working with engineering faculty to conduct research on and develop integrated courses in engineering design, research and communication, focusing on designing tools for better assessment and instruction, and improving students’ critical thinking skills.Ms. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto

Conference Session

Manufacturing Education for Emerging Technologies and Competitiveness

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

at two different sets of data for the same subject and topic. There aremultiple variables, such as instructor delivery styles, diverse student body, differentmathematical background and varied fundamental knowledge (Narayanan, 2007, 2009, 2010 &2011).Analysis Once the course has been approved and implemented, assessment analysis can be carriedout using Washington state university’s critical thinking rubric. An example of what assessmentmay look like has been shown Appendix B. The assessment matrix utilizes a 5 point likertscale. A score of 5 may indicate that students have understood the content at the desired level.A score of 1 may be indicative that the instructor has to put in much more effort tocommunicate at the

Collection

2012 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Jeffery S. Thomas

be added as time allows.MethodA total of 147 students in eight laboratory sections were divided into 49 teams of three. Fifty-two components was made available to the student teams during the class period, and highresolution photographs of each item were made available on the class web site so the studentscould continue their investigations outside of class.Each student team chose three failed components and then tried to determine the mechanicalfailure mode for each component using the failure taxonomy5 provided in Appendix B. Thetaxonomy contained a list of primary identifiers, failure modes, and definitions. It was chosenbecause of its integration with the RED software. This was most likely the first time the studentshad seen a failure

Conference Session

Impacts on Engineering Education Through Collaborative Learning, Project-based, and Service-learning

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fanyu F. Zeng, Indiana Wesleyan University

Tagged Divisions

International

AC 2012-4073: BUILDING A COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION TO OBTAINAND SUSTAIN STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR A COLLABO-RATED LABMr. Fanyu F. Zeng, Indiana Wesleyan University Fanyu F. Zeng is an Assistant Professor in business information systems at Indiana Wesleyan Univer- sity. His research interests include software development, programming, database management, database performance, data mining, software project management, teaching methods, and international cultures in high education. Page 25.275.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Building a Comprehensive

Conference Session

FPD VIII: Crossing Bridges and Easing Transitions into the First Year

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle M Fitch, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University; Dimitris C. Lagoudas P.E., Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

offered by the mentoring program; however, there were nostudents in either class that took advantage of these services. As for the office hours provided bythe mentoring program, only 29% and 21% of the honors and regular sections, respectively,visited the mentoring office. Office hours were more publicized, as approximately half of bothclasses said they knew about the availability of the mentoring program’s office hours.Figure 4 shows the comparisons between 2010’s survey responses3 and 2011’s responses fromthe student panel, (a), and other mentor activities, (b). In order to address these concerns in the Page 25.353.7future, the first mentoring

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching and Research in Physics or Engineering Physics I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jian Peng, Southeast Missouri State University; Santaneel Ghosh, Southeast Missouri State University; Ken Surendran, Southeast Missouri State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

- vancement, Tucson, Ariz.; ”Faculty Research Award,” Southeast Missouri State University, COSM, 2010; ”Tony B. Award,” Association of laboratory Automation, 2010, 2011; Center of Nanoscale Science and Technology-University of Maryland, College Park (CNST-UMD) Scholarship, 2009-2011; and Marquis ”Who’s Who in America,” 2009. He has involved both undergraduates (22 to date) and graduates (five) in his research projects. He has established a laboratory for Nano-biotechnology and micro- and nanoflu- idics at Southeast and created and developed interest at the pre-college level by incorporation of science in K-12 classroom.Dr. Ken Surendran, Southeast Missouri State University Ken Surendran is a professor in the Department of

Conference Session

Empowering the User Learning Experience: Evolution in Library Design

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill H. Powell, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

Books at Faculty Fingertips – With Robot Help. July 24, 2011. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Available: http://chronicle.com/article/A-High-Tech-Library- Keeps/128370/17. Winterman, Brian, J. B. Hill. Continued Viability: A Review of the Life Sciences Library at Indiana University in a Time of Institutional Change and Proposed Branch Library Downsizing. Science & Technology Libraries 29:3, 200-215, 2010. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2010.49772518. Lessin, Barton. Merging Science/Technology Libraries. Science & Technology Libraries. 21:1-2, 3-15, 2001. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J122v21n01_0219. Zhou, Jian-zhong (Joe), Leilani Hall. op. cit, 2004.20. Dodd, Jeff, John Forys. Barbara I Dewey

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ana T. Torres-Ayala, University of South Florida; Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Student

● Redirect student’s questions to other students ● Let students vote on an office hour time ● Ask students to submit questions before class3.3 Providing Motivating Feedback and Grading Schemes3.3.1 Avoid grading on a curve “Grading on a curve” is a grading method that assumes grades in a class should bedistributed along a bell curve or some other predetermined distribution. The average score for atest becomes a B or C and the rest of the scores are distributed accordingly. This grading schemecauses only a few students to receive As or Fs and most receive Bs or Cs. This practiceencourages performance mentality by forcing students to focus on how their performancecompares against their classmates’ performance. Grading on a curve also

Conference Session

Design in Freshman and Sophomore Courses

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Eric C Pappas, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

year’sdesigns will use primarily the lower body. The final completed prototype from 2010-2011academic year (the second year for the project) is provided in Part B of Figure 3. The studentsare provided with the following information about the vehicle at the beginning of the project: A client with cerebral palsy would like a human-powered vehicle to use for exercise purposes. The design should accommodate his or her unique needs allowing for both inside stationary use and outside transportation use. The seat should be adjustable to allow for future growth spurts, and the bike should provide adjustable tensioning to allow for strength training. The bike should have brakes on all wheels, storage appropriate for the client’s intended use, and

Conference Session

Laboratory Exercises for Energy, Power, and Industrial Applications

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

stepper motor shown in Figure 5. is operated by the laboratory setup similar to the onepresented in Figure 2. Conveniently, the same setup can be used to operate this bipolar steppermotor as well as the linear stepper motor. Then, another bipolar stepper motor is disassembled toexpose the rotor with the permanent magnet and a bearing (Figure 6a) and the stator with eightwindings corresponding to two phases of the stepper motor (Figure 6b). Figure 5. Bipolar Stepper Motor Used to Verify the Correct Operation of the Microstepping Drive and Software a b Figure 6. Bipolar Stepper Motor: Rotor (a) and Stator (b)Then the bipolar

Collection

2012 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

James A. Lee; Michael J. D'Agostino

Designing a Zero-Waste Concrete Mix Testing Lab James A. Lee1 Michael J. D’Agostino2Abstract – A zero waste laboratory to mix and test the engineering and performance properties of concrete wasdesigned and tested at Wentworth Institute of Technology. To achieve the design, recycling and reuse opportunitieswere developed for both plastic and hardened concrete used from testing as well as other residual aggregate solids.Processed water waste was minimized by the design of a settling and filtration recycling system. Both reductions inraw material consumption and economic savings realized by avoiding waste streams were measured in the study.The laboratory is used extensively by students preparing for

Conference Session

Learning and Assessment I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert G. Ryan, California State University, Northridge

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

. TORGteam leaders are identified, responsibilities of each team member aredefined, etc.)Budget/Schedule - If appropriate, a project budget and schedule are clearly B/Sdescribed using appropriate tools (e.g. Gantt chart, spreadsheet, etc.) Page 25.223.4 Table 1 Performance Criteria for Oral Presentationsperformance criterion, to range from 0 to 3, which can be assigned by the course instructor basedon the importance of that criterion to the particular project. The rating given for eachperformance criterion is multiplied by the weighting factor, and then the weighted scores aresummed over all the criteria to

Conference Session

Off the Beaten Path

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Summer Dann , Louisiana State University; Paige Davis, Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

ratio one means a student successfully completes courses on thevery first attempt. It provides a comparison measure for those students repeating classes Page 25.732.13multiple times for earning a (D)FW where only grades of A,B or C are acceptable tomove on. Student grades were tracked through second calculus and the second physics –the engineering preparatory courses. Based on placement, students may take up to 4math classes in completing the first two years of the curriculum: college algebra, collegetrigonometry, a combined algebra/trigonometry course, calculus I and calculus III. Forphysics, students could start in either Physics 1100 or

Conference Session

FPD III: Innovation in Design in the First Year

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Lau, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Tara Lynn Sulewski, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

AC 2012-2991: DESIGN OF A ZERO ENERGY HOME AS A FIRST-YEARDESIGN PROJECTProf. Andrew Lau, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andrew (Andy) S. Lau is Associate Professor of engineering and Coordinator of first-year seminars for the Penn State College of Engineering. Lau is a 1977 graduate of Penn State with a B.S.M.E. and was a Research Fellow and 1983 graduate of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, with an M.S.M.E. He has worked since 1977 as an engineer in the areas of solar energy applications in buildings, simulation of building energy use, and general consulting in the energy field. Most recently, his work has involved green buildings, engineering ethics, and sustainable design. He is a licensed

Conference Session

Track 3 - Session 2 - Faculty Development

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Prasad Edamana, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT M), India; Ajit Kumar Kolar, Indian Institute of Technology Madras; Pramod S. Mehta, Indian Institute of Technology Madras; Sujatha Srinivasan, Indian Institute of Technology Madras; Jefferey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Track 3 - Faculty Development

conversation to talk about observations andideas based on the video. This was highly appreciated by the participants.Data Acquisition and AnalysisIn order to analyze the impact of the various FDPs conducted in association with Texas A&M,feedback from the ninety participants of the FDPs was requested to have a database to facilitatefuture activities. One-fifth of the FDP participants responded to the questionnaire that asked:(a) To what extent had participants incorporated learning outcomes for their courses and reflections about applying learning outcomes in teaching–learning processes?(b) To what extent had participants incorporated ‘active and cooperative learning methodologies’ and reflections on its application?(c) To what extent had