Engineering, The State University of New York (SUNY) at Buffalo and from 2008 to 2012, I was an assistant professor in the Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Dakota State University (NDSU). Previously, from 2004 to 2008, I worked for Magma Design Automation, San Jose CA, where I received the outstanding technical contribution award in 2007. During the Summer of 2001, I worked on analog circuit synthesis and layout at NeoLinear Inc., Pittsburgh PA. During 1996-1997, I was an Erasmus graduate student at the University of Patras, Greece. I serve on the technical program committee of several conferences including NOCS, SOCC, and ReConFig. I am a senior member of IEEE and a member of ACM and Eta Kappa Nu. I
Enrichment and Professional Development Activities on REU Students”, paper #38362, ASEE 2022 Annual Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 26-29, 2022; accessed at https://peer.asee.org/evaluating-the-impact-of-enrichment-and- professional-development-activities-on-reu-students.pdf (4) Holly C. Gaede, “Professional Development for REU Students”, in ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 1295: Best Practices for Chemistry REU Programs, Chapter 3, pp 33-44 (2018). (5) Anthony Carpi, Darcy Ronan, Heather Falconer, and Nathan Lents, Nathan, “Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM: mentored undergraduate research at a
,” which is building an online history of the development of the NSDL. She is also PI on ”Learning from the Best: How Award Winning Courseware has Impacted Engineering Education.” This research focuses on determining how high quality courseware is being disseminated and how it is impacting the culture of engineering education as measured by changes in student learning, teaching practices, and the careers of the authors of these materials.Prof. Joseph G. Tront, Virginia TechSarah Giersch, Broad-based Knowledge, LLC Sarah Giersch is a Consultant for Broad-based Knowledge, LLC (BbK), where she conducts quantita- tive and qualitative evaluations for BbK’s higher education clients. Giersch also consults in the areas of
AC 2010-1963: DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATIONALDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS AT ARESEARCH EXTENSIVE UNIVERSITYSunni Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology Sunni H. Newton is currently in her 4th year of Georgia Tech's PhD program in industrial organizational psychology, with a minor in quantitative psychology. She attended Georgia Tech as an undergraduate, double-majoring in psychology and management. She worked for several years as a graduate research assistant in a psychology lab where she helped conduct studies on adult learning. She currently works as a graduate research assistant in Georgia Tech's Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) where
Paper ID #44706Designing an Iterative Research Kit Exchange Program for Remote HighSchool Science (Evaluation)Karl Benjamin Ernsberger, Graduation Solutions, LLC Karl Ernsberger began developing novel learning experiences as an undergraduate at Embry Riddle Aero- nautical University, setting up his own Senior Thesis program with the GSIS department chair to manage a nonprofit office in Iraq during the 2007-2008 invasion. Since that experience in creating his own learn- ing environment, he has spent 12 years in Secondary education on two continents, developing and testing learning systems in STEM classrooms. Karl holds a
in part to thepromise that the flipped classroom design holds for engineering faculty to find a compromisebetween the long-venerated lecture format and the research-based instructional practices ofactive learning. In its idealized form, the flipped design allows instructors to maintain delivery ofcritical theoretical and background information by presenting this material to the students outsideof the formal classroom setting, thus preserving classroom time for more active learning andproblem-based activities [2], [3].Despite the enthusiasm around the flipping movement, there remains relatively littlecomprehensive research on student outcomes in flipped engineering courses, with most availableengineering-related publications focusing on the
mental habits that foster curiosity, the ability to make connections, and the ability to createvalue when engaging with engineering problems. To best support the growth of an EM inengineering students, researchers have begun to design and implement teaching practices gearedtowards instilling this mindset in their students. However, there is still a dearth of research onassessing teaching practices that provide support for integrating EM into engineering courses.Thus, this work in progress reports the initial efforts to design an engineering-specific teachingpractices assessment tool to serve in a larger project that addresses engineering teachingpractices that infused EM mindset EM development. We conducted a literature review of STEMteaching
need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning; j. a knowledge of contemporary issues, especially those impacting Southwest Florida; k. an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for bioengineering practice; l. an understanding of entrepreneurship and the ability to write a business plan; and m. an ability to define a community problem and to use an engineering design process to deliver a solution. From Program Criteria for Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering Programs Drafted by Bioengineering Working Group, 8/12/05. Revised by Bioengineering Working Group, 8/11/06. Revised to include common outcomes and to better incorporate ABET program
students have in idea generation and development and the impact that instruction canhave on their incorporation of best practices.IntroductionTo solve major challenges of the 21st century, engineers must be prepared to use designprinciples that lead to innovative solutions [1]. ABET also emphasizes the importance of trainingundergraduate engineering students to develop design skills [2]. In a design process, ideageneration and development are important steps that contribute to the innovative designoutcomes [3]. However, research indicates challenges for students in generating creativeconcepts for open-ended design problems [4]. Successful implementations of creative ideas can lead to innovation. Ideally, ideageneration and development
’ understanding ofresearch, increasing both their general knowledge of research careers and their ability to designand perform research. While even in the most poorly designed research experience this mayoccur to some extent, the optimal method for delivery and preparation of students for soundresearch in engineering and science is not clear. Many research experiences are 8 to 10 weeksummer programs. Within these relatively short time frames the programs should carefullyconsider organization and structure in order to maximize impact. However, our knowledge onhow to best deliver research training is incomplete. The impact of experience in a research lab is likely to depend on a number of programfactors: organization, nature of interactions with the
, professional development, STEM edu- cation, intercultural training, e-portfolios best practices, and training evaluation and measurement. He has had the opportunity to present at regional, national, and international conferences his works and collabo- rations in these areas. In the field of e-learning and development, he has collaborated with organizations such as Johns Hopkins, Special Olympics, and the Graduate School at UMBC. Currently, he is one of the members of the Learning Transformation Research Group at Virginia Tech. In addition, Mr. Nino is a certified public translator, conference interpreter, and copywriter. In 2011, he founded Surplus Solutions, offering a wide variety of solutions to businesses, including
in graduateschool [15]– [4], very few scholars in engineering education research have characterizedstudents' expectations of graduate school and how these expectations do not align with their livedexperiences. Previous work has neglected the impact of misalignments between expectations andexperiences on students' ability to persist, except for Zerbe and Sallai's paper [17]. They foundmisalignments in students' expectations on the psychological level, such as feelings of malaise,the anticipation of being overworked, and the expectation of not having a work-life balance.However, less attention was paid to sociological or policy expectations or misalignments.The present work builds on our group's ongoing exploration of graduate attrition. In
Engineering Education Center dedicated to engineering education related initiatives and research focused on building diversity and enhancing the educational experience for all engineering students. Dr. Shehab teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in ergonomics, work methods, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Her current research is with the Research Institute for STEM Education, a multi-disciplinary research group investigating factors related to equity and diversity in engineering student populations.Ms. Cindy E Foor, University of Oklahoma Cindy E. Foor is the Associate Director/Research Associate for the Research Institute for STEM Ed- ucation (RISE) at the University of Oklahoma. Her
14.1107.3TongaProject DescriptionThe first project that was undertaken by the class was to design a process that could be used inthe Kingdom of Tonga to extract the oil from a coconut and convert the oil into biodiesel. Asubstantial amount of research was available for the process of converting vegetable oils intobiodiesel, as well as the process of extracting the oil from coconuts. The purpose of this projectwas to combine the two processes and show how simple biodiesel production could beimplemented in Tonga.Students were divided into six groups that each focused on one specific aspect of the process: oilextraction, conversion to biodiesel, separations following conversion, waste management, addedvalue (such as soap), and economics. Throughout the school
Paper ID #16011The Prototype for X (PFX) Framework: Assessing Its Impact on Students’Prototyping AwarenessMs. Jessica Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a third-year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship and the design process. She is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow and Dr. Timothy Simpson on a project devoted to understanding how prototyping processes affect product design. Jessica is interested in exploring how a structured prototyping methodology, Prototype for X, could increase the end design’s desirability, feasibility, and
Paper ID #15980Design, Implementation, and Outcomes of a Comprehensive Professional De-velopment Program for Post-Graduate Studies in EngineeringProf. Laleh Behjat Dr. Laleh Behjat is an associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Calgary. Her research interests include designing computer chips, electronic design automation and developing software for computer hardware. She has won several awards for her work on the development of software tools for computer engineering. In addition, Dr. Behjat has a passion for increasing the statues of women in Science, technology
Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Research Projects and Lessons Learned from Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program in Automated System DesignAbstractAutomated systems affect the way we do things and impact our daily lives. Designing andbuilding automated systems is complex and requires an integrated skill set. The knowledgeneeded cuts across multiple disciplines of mechanical engineering, control/electrical engineering,and manufacturing engineering. U.S. manufacturers are
certified as an EFL and ESL teacher as well as a School Principal. Ari’s research and language revitalization interests include Mikasuki, Salish Ql’ispe (aka Salish-Pend d’Oreille, Montana Salish, and Flathead Salish) and Safaliba. His ethnographic work documents situated practice in grassroots policy initiatives and school-based activism among the Safaliba in rural Ghana. His language documentation includes conceptual metaphors and formulaic language in Salish Ql’ispe and Safaliba. He also explores applications of task-based language teaching in the pedagogy of revitalization. His practitioner papers analyze integrated content and language instruction, academic English instruction for graduate students, and asset-based
. The future of engineering education: Part 6. Making reformhappen. “Chemical Engineering Education, (2000), 34(3), 208-215.8. Visscher-Voerman, I., & Gustafson, K.L. “Paradigms in the theory and practice of education and trainingdesign.” “Educational Technology Research and Development,” (2004), 52(2), 69-89.9. Sinclair, A. “Assessing the Impact of Teaching Methods on Learning Outcomes.” An unpublished M.S.Directed Project Report, WWW University College of Technology Graduate Program, (2006).10. Gronlund, N. E. How to write and use instructional objectives, Sixth Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.(2000).11. Smith, L. S., & Ragan, T. J. Instructional Design. Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. (2005
relevant to their specific project and appropriate to their currentphase of the design process and personal development.Table 3 Required Professional Development Activities for First-Time EPICS Students First-Semester Student Required Professional Development Hours Introduction to EPICS 5 part YouTube series includes overview, course structure, grading, resources, and safety/emergency procedures. Wallet Project TA-led small group activity gives hands-on experience through a complete design cycle. Design Process Module 3 part YouTube series includes design process overview, phases and tools, and best practices. Design
Session 1654 Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Multidisciplinary Teamwork and Teaching of a Small Product Realization Course Robert S. Weissbach, Jana G. Goodrich, Ralph M. Ford Penn State Erie, The Behrend CollegeIntroductionThe Small Product Realization course has been offered for two semesters (Spring 2003 & Fall2003) at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. The course is 3 credits, meeting for 50 minutes3 times a week. In addition to the scheduled class periods, the students spend one weekend at thebeginning of the semester attending a seminar at an off-campus location. This weekend
undergraduate students to learn through research, and in developing active and place-based teaching methods for environmental engineering courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Concerning Professional Licensure for Civil Engineering Faculty: A Matter of Best PracticeAbstractProfessional licensure is expected in some engineering fields (civil engineering), but is superfluousin some other engineering fields. Professors may describe the importance of taking theFundamentals of Engineering exam before students graduate as the first step towards the goal oflicensure, but then describe how licensure is not useful to professors. As a result, engineeringstudents may receive
the norms and values of the research community. Even if the participants’ first drafts werechanged significantly after feedback from a trusted mentor or advisor, this demonstrates anaspect of discourse enculturation.Viewed through academic literacies theory, the narratives employed by these graduate studentsare meant to strongly align with disciplinary values and norms in order to argue most effectivelyfor the merit of the research proposals. The graduate students are practicing their academicliteracy through the use of both disciplinary language and jargon and the types of activities thatthey perceive best demonstrate the intellectual merits and broader impacts of their researchproposals.The distribution of themes across the broad
, Tutoring, and Mentoring (ATM) program was designed andlaunched. Each year, the FS2 leadership team selects peer mentors (one for each cohort of 15freshmen) from top performing, upper-division students in engineering and CS. The peermentors reach out to their cohorts to meet several times a semester. These peer mentors helpnew students build their aspirations and academic confidence by welcoming and orienting themto the campus and its culture, and sharing with them their own academic/personal experiencesand coping strategies.Faculty and peer mentoring are best practices as recognized by the National Research Council,especially for first-generation students and groups underrepresented in STEM.12 The closepersonal relationship that develops between
2006-178: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION BEST PRACTICESTUDY FOR FIRST-YEAR, MULTI-DISCIPLINARY COURSESElise Barrella, Bucknell University ELISE M. BARRELLA is a senior Civil and Environmental Engineering major at Bucknell University. Upon acceptance to Bucknell, she was selected to be a Presidential Fellow, which provided a stipend to support her research on this project. The best study practice was conducted at The University of Queensland, Australia while Elise was studying abroad for the Spring 2005 semester. In addition to her fellowship research, Elise is vice president of programming for Bucknell's student chapter of ASCE, a member of Delta Gamma sorority, and a teaching
several federal agencies including NSF, USDA and NASA. He recently received an NSF-IGE award for launching a new Gradu- ate for Advancing Professional Skills (GAPS) education program, which integrates project management training with thesis research for graduate students.Dr. Ann M Gansemer-Topf, Iowa State University Ann Gansemer-Topf is an Associate Professor in Higher Education and Student Affairs, and Faculty Fel- low in the Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching at Iowa State University She teaches courses in program evaluation and assessment, student affairs and higher education. Her research interests focus on examining the micro (student) and macro (institutional, state, federal) factors that impact
that students are bettersupported in developing their researcher identities when approaches to their writing developmentfocus on the practice of writing more than the quality of its products [19]. Specifically, Lin [1]demonstrates the significance of this approach for EER students.Writing in graduate school can be isolating, demoralizing, and difficult. Challenges withcommunication may impact a student’s progress to degree substantially. Because the practice ofappropriate communication (communication recognized as effective by experienced researchersin the discipline) is an essential element of developing a researcher identity, challenges withsuccessfully developing the communication milestones of the degree—the qualifier exam ordissertation
vision and our future.Prof. Oscar Antonio Perez, University of Texas, El Paso Mr. Oscar Perez received his B.S. and Masters in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at El Paso with a special focus on data communications. Awarded the Woody Everett award from the American Society for engineering education August 2011 for the research on the impact of mobile devices in the classroom. He is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Mr. Perez has been teaching the Basic Engineering (BE) – BE 1301 course for over 7 years. Lead the design for the devel- opment of the new Basic Engineering course (now UNIV 1301) for engineering at UTEP: Engineering, Science and University Colleges
extremelysmall…the two, for all practical purposes, are essentially unrelated.”4Does that mean that engineering faculty have to make a choice between what is consideredtypical engineering research - Boyer’s Scholarship of Discovery, Integration, or Application - orconcentrate on teaching? Prince, et al.,5 argues that SoTL is the means most likely to achieve alink between teaching and typical engineering research.Boyer’s fourth definition of scholarship, SoTL, has been guiding the course of the engineeringeducation community. There are several definitions to what SoTL is. Richlin states a scholarlyteacher investigates in the literature what has been tried to attempt to solve specific teachingproblems, then selects and applies a method that has the best
research as it relates totechnology and engineering education and the contribution of this model to understandingstudent attitudes in the domain of engineering and design thinking. While collaborative learningis important the present research is an opportunity to assess its impact on students beyond theacquisition of new knowledge.Introduction Collaboration is frequently listed among skills required for graduates to succeed in the21 century workforce. Engineering standards include developing “an ability to function on stmultidisciplinary teams” as well as “an ability to communicate effectively.” Active learningapproaches, including collaborative learning practices, foster student engagement and learningthat is better aligned with the