another clone of the engineering managementprograms [3]. It was thoroughly researched and planned in order to have an integratedcurriculum that satisfied the current and future needs of industry in Southern California. Thepurpose of this paper is three-fold: to determine which universities offer integrated curricula, topresent the need for our program, and to discuss how our program is innovative. Page 4.320.1II. Integrated Engineering CurriculaA. Hypothesis. Engineering/technology management graduate programs are one of the fastestgrowing programs world-wide. Their growth rate since 1990 has been 8.3% per year [3]. Mostof these programs either
. Dr. Al-Khafaji is the Executive Director of the Center for Emerging Technologies in Infrastructure and a Professor of Civil Engineering at Bradley University. He earned his BS in Civil Engineering and MS degree in Construction Management from Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan. He received a second MSCE in soil dynamics and a Ph.D. in Geotechnical Engineering from Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan. Dr. Al-Khafaji is the co-author of 11 engineering textbooks including Nu- merical Methods, geotechnical, Statics and Dynamics, and software application. These books were used internationally by major institutions. He is also the author of many significant publications in internation- ally
identified ten challenges that civil engineers would face in aglobally growing market. Endersbee4 maintains that civil engineering is an internationalprofession that will have to deal with increasing world population, substantial advances inagricultural practices, urbanization, mobility in location of world manufacture, issues oftransportation in cities, advances in computer and communication technologies, the increasingworld demand for electricity, the impact of energy use on the climate, implications of possibleclimate change, and the different laws at the international level. These challenges are a realitytoday, and civil engineers and constructors entering the job market must be well prepared to meetthem by educational programs that emphasize
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education” • Four to six years of professions experience as an engineer (generally under the supervision or observation of a PE) • Successful completion of the Fundamentals of Engineering Exam (FE Exam)– the national exam by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying2 typically taken by engineering students during their senior year • Graduation from an ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) accredited engineering program (many states accept graduates of ABET accredited engineering technology programs) – there are exceptions to this requirement based on engineering experience as one example • Successful completion of the PE Exam – in most
B.A. degree in Physics from the University of Chicago and an MS and PhD from Texas Tech Uni- versity in Physics. He worked as a Technology and Applications Engineer for ISI Lithography and was a post-doctoral research fellow in Chemical Engineering at the University of Texas, prior to his faculty appointment at TTU.Dr. Tanja Karp, Texas Tech University Tanja Karp received the Dipl.-Ing. degree in electrical engineering (M.S.E.E.) and the Dr.-Ing. degree (Ph.D.) from Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany. She is currently an associate pro- fessor of electrical and computer engineering at Texas Tech University. Since 2006 she has been the orga- nizer of the annual Get Excited About Robotics (GEAR
Paper ID #35680Cybersecurity Issues in Crowdsourcing Engineering InitiativesDr. Donna M. Schaeffer, Marymount University Dr. Donna M. Schaeffer is a Professor in the School of Technology and Innovation at Marymount Uni- versity.Ms. Jillian Drake, Marymount University Ms. Jillian Drake is a Doctorial Student in the School of Technology and Innovation at Marymount University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Cybersecurity Issues in Crowdsourcing Engineering Initiatives Abstract As crowdsourced
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationwith their own profile. This is why we believe that students can be challenged by being bombardedor peppered with numerous facts, relationships, problem-solving tools, ideas, etc. instead of the(opposite) approach of measured attention to a relatively few, carefully delimited topics.Table 1. Characteristic Periods in the Evolution of Introducing Engineering, IE, Required of Freshman Engineering Majors (and Others) at Wilkes University Period (Year) A (1980–85) B (1986–93) C (1994–98) D (1999–2002) Introduction Technological
power and renewable energy systems.Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is an Associate Professor in Electrical Engineering and holds an adjunct appointment in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Washington. She received her B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University and her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Georgia In- stitute of Technology, both in Electrical Engineering. She also holds an M.Ed. from the University of Washington (2008). Her research interests cover affective outcomes in engineering education as well as (chemical and biological) sensors research which cross-over into her work in community based partner- ships and community outreach
AC 2011-2900: ENGINEERING ENERGY SOLUTIONS: FACILITATINGHANDS-ONLeslie Wilkins , Maui Economic Development Board Leslie Wilkins has served as the Vice President of the Maui Economic Development Board since 1999. She was hired to design, launch and direct the Women in Technology Project with a mission to engage girls/women and under represented populations into the Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) pipeline. In its tenth year, the program serves annually more than 14,000 students, educators and industry members throughout the state of Hawaii from elementary school to job placement.Diana Papini Warren, Maui Economic Development Board Diana Papini Warren is a Project Manager with the Maui Economic
of Engineering and Design at Eastern Washington University, where he has taught several courses in Computer Engineering Technology and Electrical Engineering. Currently, he is an associate professor of Electrical Engineer- ing at Eastern Washington University. His research interests are in the areas of speech and image signal processing, signal processing in communication systems, photoacoustics, and embedded systems.Claudio Talarico, Eastern Washington University Claudio Talarico is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Eastern Washington University. Before joining Eastern Washington University, he worked at University of Arizona, University of Hawaii and in industry, where he held both engineering
Paper ID #39363Exploring the relationship between key constructs of self-assessmentcomponents, motivation, and self-regulation in engineeringTaiwo Raphael Feyijimi, University of Georgia Taiwo is a current Master’s student in the College of Engineering with an emphasis in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Georgia, Athens GA. He had is Bachelors degree in Physics education from the Obafemi Awolowo University (O.A.U.), Ile-Ife, Osun, and an associate degree in Elec- trical and Electronics Technology Education from the Federal College of Education (Technical), Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria.Mr. Olanrewaju Paul
that more diverse approaches toproblem solving contribute to product innovation, global competence, and other successfulcorporate outcomes [2]–[5]. The National Academy of Engineering’s vision for the Engineer of2020 states that while engineers will be “grounded in basic mathematics and science,” they willalso “expand their vision of design through a solid grounding in the humanities, social sciences,and economics,” and emphasize “creative processes that will allow for effective development andapplication of next-generation technologies to problems of the future” [6, p. 49]. The engineer willbe required to have the ingenuity of Lillian Gilbreth, the problem-solving capabilities of Gordon Moore, the scientific insight of Albert
Paper ID #23727Comparing Peer Evaluations of Teamwork Behavior by K-12 Students versusFirst-year Engineering StudentsDr. Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Daniel M. Ferguson is CATME Managing Director and a research associate at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-Professional Studies Program [IPRO] and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes and
environment, structural monitoring and the measurement of human motion.Dr. Mark Petovello, Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary Dr. Mark Petovello is professor in the department of Geomatics Engineering at the University of Cal- gary. His research investigates new positioning technologies, including satellite-based navigation, inertial navigation and multi-sensor integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 WORK IN PROGRESS: Not all those who wander are lost: Route finding in first year engineering designAbstractA geomatics-themed project was piloted in a cornerstone engineering design course with a totalof 700 students. This paper reports on the structure and
M.S. degrees are in ma- terials science and engineering from Stanford University and her B.S. degree in metallurgical engineering from the Michigan Technological University.Dr. Lizabeth T Schlemer P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is currently a visiting professor in engineering education at Cal State LA. She is also a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 26 years and has a track record of using innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading to support students success. Currently her research is in the area of social justice in Engineering Education.Dr. Yevgeniya V. Zastavker
University Elliott Clement is a doctoral student at Oregon State University. His current research is using grounded theory to understand identity and motivation within the context of capstone design courses. He is also part of a research team investigating context-specific affordances and barriers faculty face when adopting evidence-based instructional practices in their engineering courses.Dr. Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor - Engineering Education division at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research in prac- tice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and
work explores the effects of mobile educational technology, online learning and distance education; metacognition and self-regulation, and contemporary engineering practice on engineering student learning and professional identity development. Angie graduated from the United State Military Academy at West Point with a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering. She later earned a master's degree in mechanical engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in engineering education at Utah State University. In 2021, Angie's research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award to critically examine the professional formation of undergraduate student veterans and service members in
Paper ID #32300Creating the Skillful Learning Institute: A Virtual Short Course forBuilding Engineering Educators’ Capacity to Promote StudentMetacognitive GrowthDr. Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patrick Cunningham is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technol- ogy. His professional development is focused on researching and promoting metacognition, self-regulated learning, and reflection among students and faculty in Engineering Education. Dr. Cunningham has been a PI/Co-PI on two NSF-funded grants and led Rose-Hulman’s participation in the Consortium to Pro- mote
The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American Academy in a Turbulent Era.Dr. Rosario A. Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Rosario A. Gerhardt is Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In addition to her engineering research interests, she is also interested in improving diversity at the K-12, undergraduate, graduate and faculty level. She has been primary organizer as well as a faculty mentor for several Future Faculty Workshops. She also worked in the Office of Institute Diversity at Georgia Tech on a part-time basis from 2011-2015. She was named Senior Goizueta Faculty Chair in 2015. c American Society for Engineering
, Puerto Rico, 1999.17. National Academy of Engineering, “The Engineer of 2020.” The National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2004. www.nap.edu18. Brackin, P. and Sexton, S., 2008, “Robotics-Centered Curriculum: 2006-07 Annual Assessment Report.” Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology, 49 pages. Page 13.855.19
Paper ID #42171”I’m Not Like a Human Being”: How the Teaming Experiences of AfricanAmerican Females Reveal the Hidden Epistemologies of Engineering CultureKaitlyn Anne Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno Ms. Thomas is a doctoral student at University of Nevada, Reno in Engineering Education. Her background is in structural engineering. She received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in civil engineering from Southern Methodist University. Her research focus is in epistemology and epistemic injustice.Dr. Kelly J Cross, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Cross is currently an Assistant Professor in the Biomedical Engineering
people learn and apply a design process to their work. He is interested in the intersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Me- chanical Engineering (Design Thinking) from Stanford University. Dr. Lande is the PI on the NSF-funded project ”Should Makers Be the Engineers of the Future” and a co-PI on the NSF-funded project ”Might Young Makers Be the Engineers of the Future?”Dr. Shawn S Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State
carry specific stimulating molecules and addressingmolecules, are taken up by targeted immune cells, triggering an increased and more specificimmune response1. Although nanoscience promises major benefits for health and may makepossible a wealth of new technologies, there have also been concerns about possible harmfuleffects of nanomaterials on health2-3.The emerging field of nanoscale science and engineering provides tremendous potential to allowscientists and engineers to improve existing products or to enable completely new applications.In order to realize this potential, the workforce needs to be trained and educated in theinterdisciplinary fields that provide the intellectual foundation for nanotechnology4. For thisreason, there is a large
gain additional credentials andnecessary knowledge to pursue their passion for engineering. Some challenges includeacceptance of these methods as demonstration of competence and preparedness for a rigorousengineering program. While we have not experienced this resistance to date, the population sizehas been small. As it continues to grow, we expect there to be healthy debate about thisapproach.i President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Engage to excel: producing one million additionalcollege graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Executive Office of thePresident of the United States, 2012
the author of many books and articles on education. His work broadly centers on K-20 education and the nexus of media, technology, humans, and society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Reflective Faculty Peer Observation in EngineeringAbstractIt is now widely held that student evaluations of teaching provide an insufficient measure ofteaching effectiveness, particularly when they are the only metric used. One alternative measureis faculty peer observation. We have developed a novel faculty peer observation protocol focusedon self-reflection and formative feedback for STEM faculty. Engineering faculty have found theprotocol helpful and used the method to expand professional networks
AC 2012-5025: INCORPORATING SCREENCASTS INTO CHEMICAL EN-GINEERING COURSESDr. Janet L. de Grazia, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet deGrazia is a Senior Instructor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at the Uni- versity of Colorado. She teaches a number of courses in the department, including a course on technology for non-engineers. As Chair of the Undergraduate Committee, her interests lie in curricular innovations and the use of technology in education. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Colorado in chem- ical engineering.Dr. John L. Falconer, University of Colorado, BoulderDr. Garret Nicodemus, University of Colorado, BoulderDr. Will Medlin, University of Colorado, Boulder
, provide work that is meaningful,valued and biophysically compatible for every individual.“’ These are lofty statements and are notalways easily put into practice. The principal of sustainability does, however, serve as anideological foundation on which the course content for Introduction to EnvironmentalEngineering can be built.Design Project The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) strongly encouragesintegration of design throughout the undergraduate curriculum. ABET’s goals along withpositive experiences the author has had with design projects in other courses led to the integrationof a sustainable design project into the course. The students must design a “Center forSustainable Education”. The facility must utilize
(Air Liquide, Michelin, L’Oréal, Pechiney…)· energy (TotalFinaElf, nuclear energy…)· technology (Alcatel, Alstom, Dassault, Sagem, Thomson…)· communications (Hachette, Havas, France Télécom, Vivendi…)· food/drink (Lyonnaise des Eaux, Pernod-Ricard…).Excellence in engineering education· strong scientific and technological course content· world-renowned laboratories, teachers and researchers (the “Fields Medal”, the equivalent of the “Nobel Prize” in mathematics, has almost found a permanent home in France)· engineering courses in France generally also include elements of the social sciences and training in management.Industrial involvement· engineering programmes in France include training-periods in industry which are integrated
2677 Development of a Maintenance Engineering Laboratory B.R. Upadhyaya, J.W. Hines, J.P. McClanahan, N.A. Johansen Nuclear Engineering Department, The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleAbstractThe paper outlines the development of a senior-level laboratory for demonstration and hands-onactivities related to various maintenance technologies. This laboratory has been developed aspart of a course entitled Introduction to Maintenance Engineering, which is designed forseniors and first-year graduate students in engineering. The course and the accompanyinglaboratory were developed at The University of Tennessee
. The survey askedquestions relating to the following aspects of using Blackboard Collaborate: Technology,Accessibility, Participation, and Learning. All “questions” are actually statements written in theaffirmative toward Collaborate such that answers that strongly agree or agree with the statementProceedings of the 2013 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 3are a 1 or 2, respectively and answers that disagree or strongly disagree with the statement are 4or 5, respectively. An answer of 3 means the student feels neutral and neither agrees nordisagrees with the statement. Student