©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #42765 Commission Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on streamlining student outcomes assessment processes and has been an invited presenter at the ABET Symposium on multiple occasions. He was named an ABET Fellow in 2021. Estell is also a founding member and current Vice President of The Pledge of the Computing Professional, an organization dedicated to the promotion of ethics in the computing professions. Estell is Professor of Computer Engineering
Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. Gibson contributes to multiple NAE and cross-Academies initiatives, focusing primarily on the Cultural, Ethical, Social, and Environmental Responsibility in Engineering program. Gibson completed her M.S. from the Colorado School of Mines as a member of the inaugural cohort in Humanitarian Engineering and Science (HES). In the HES program, Gibson specialized in Environmental Engineering and conducted research under the NSF-funded ”Responsible Mining, Resilient Communities” project in Colombia. She was named Outstanding Graduate Student in HES. Gibson earned her B.S. in Biological/Agricultural Engineering and minor in Sustainability from the University of Arkansas, along
universities and the influence of the politics of these areas. Thisincludes managerial ethics and the impact of local/state/national politics on academia. “My concerns are on ethical principles of some people involved in academia, groupism.”Analysis of Question Set #1 (Questions 1& 2)Though some of the responses to these questions may have been influenced in how respondentsresponded to a set of Likert scale questions regarding their perceptions of their preparedness toteach, there are still some important notes regarding the responses. For instance, while none of theLikert scale questions mentioned positional availability, a plurality of responses to the questionregarding concerns for academia mentioned the difficulty to achieve a faculty
research instrumentThis study aimed to gain insight into the factors influencing students' decisions to pursuegraduate studies in engineering. We conducted a survey in the Faculty of Engineering at aresearch-based university in Ontario, Canada. The survey sought correlations between students'intersectional identity factors and family background, their perceptions of the Faculty ofEngineering’s resources and support systems, their lived experiences of discrimination,inclusion, equity, and equality, and their decisions to (re)consider graduate degrees. The surveywas created and administered through REDCap, a secure online platform designed for creatingand managing databases and surveys on the web. Ethics approval had been sought from andgranted by
-approved pre- and post-surveys were used to assess the impact of the modules on students’ perceptionof knowledge related to sustainable manufacturing practices in engineering. Their overall improvement inEOP learning objectives was seen across the curriculum, each bar showing a percentage of increasedperception of knowledge in different topic areas (Fig.5). EOP topics such as design thinking related tominimizing environmental and social impact, recognizing local and indigenous practices and use of locallysourced materials was improved by 75% and 38% for first-years and sophomores, respectively. Likewise,recognizing the ethical implications and describing the negative and positive impact of design work onsociety, a skill in social responsibility
such tools to complete school assignments (creative writing,coding, etc.) [9][10] [11]; other studies surveyed the concerns regarding ethics, academicintegrity, equity of accessibility, new opportunities such tools present [12][13], as well aspolicies and guidelines provided by universities [14]. While the majority of research focus isgiven to students' use and how to address the associated risks and concerns, relatively less focusis shed on its use for instructional design purposes [15] [16]. The authors are curious about theother side of the story: Can it assist us educators as a “subject matter expert”, with its access toand “comprehension” of a vast library of knowledge? And how can we leverage its evolvingpower in curriculum and course
Academy of Engineering, Volume 49, Number 4, Winter 2019. 9. C. O. Hilgarth, "Should We Consider Transforming the Definition of Technological and Engineering Literacy,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 10.18260/1-2—33964, ASEE, 2020. 10. J.A. Stieb, “Understanding Engineering Professionalism: A Reflection on the Rights of Engineers,” Sci Eng Ethics 17, 149–169, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9166-x [Last accessed 7 October 2024]. 11. L. Callaway, “The Origin of the Word Engineer: A Linguistic Exploration,” Symbol Genie, September 27, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://symbolgenie.com/origin-word- engineer/ [Last accessed 7 October 2024]. 12. A. Portillo-Blanco, H
understanding that our work could provide a framework fornational-level data efforts.Establishing values a prioriEstablishing the values guiding data work a priori ensures that data practices are ethical,responsible, and aligned with the goals and values of the group [25], [26]. ECEP centers equityin all BPC work across the Alliance. This is also an explicit goal of the CMP project, intended toensure that data is not collected for the sake of gathering numbers but for the purpose ofdiscovering which students do not have access to, or are engaging in, high quality computing.State teams are asked to establish their state’s BPC goals as a condition of membership in theECEP alliance; however, the CMP encourages teams to bring new people to the team
takes his ethical stances into conversations around tough issues to make sure all voices are included. In his professional life, Carr has convened numerous diversity leadership forums in STEM education – bringing together over 100 deans and diversity administrators to talk about underrepresented students persistence, diverse faculty recruitment, and creating inclusive campus climates. Carr has also been a champion for access to opportunities for those from historically oppressed groups. He worked to see outreach efforts exponentially expand to Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, and Tribal Colleges and Universities. His efforts transformed the way the National Science
affective domainwas published in 1964 and focused on students’ attitudes, values, and interests, and how thoseare developed through teaching and learning methods [6]. In the engineering contextspecifically, the affective domain frequently focuses on collaboration, confidence, curiosity,persistence, motivation, and professional ethics [7] [8]. Wilson, in their essay in [4, p. 57], refersto affective outcomes as the “great mediators of engagement”, and argues specifically thatstudents’ sense of belonging and feelings of academic fulfillment can lead to improved academicperformance. Improvements to student affect in the classroom can quickly erode whentransitioning to new environments, like the workplace: “the road of affect is continually in needof
scenario. Many of thesedesired goals are difficult to attain in a traditional classroom setting and may not be realized tillstudents complete their senior capstone design projects. Capstone projects are the culminatingexperience for undergraduate civil engineering students. Performance on these projects mayserve as an individual assessment tool to evaluate student learning outcomes in accordance withthe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). The ABET student outcomesinclude a student’s ability to solve problems, apply new knowledge, design, communicate bothwritten and orally, conduct experiments, function effectively as a member of a team, andrecognize ethical and professional responsibilities. One of the main challenges for
3competency in these professional skills. These skills are assessed in ABET [7] Criteria 3 StudentOutcomes 1-7, specifically: 2. An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. 3. An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. 4. An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgements. 5. An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks
Paper ID #41539Neurodivergent and Neurotypical Students in a First-Year Engineering DesignCourse: Identity, Self-Efficacy, and ExperiencesDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and the Director for the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program. The IDE program houses both an undergraduate IDE degree accredited under the ABET EAC General criteria and a new PhD degree in Engineering Education. Dr. Bielefeldt conducts research on engineering ethics
overall plays a major role as it can be seen as almost the foundation for communication. If you are aware of aspects such as the culture of one, it can lead to better conversations. No further questions at this time.” (Student 2) “What I learned about myself is that many people may look at myself and think in many different ways. Then I may see myself in a different light. I believe through life everyone has their own trials, culture, ethnics and experiences that all reflect who and how they are today. Being able to understand all perspectives and ethics is valuable to understanding each person's perspective.” (Student 8) “I learned about myself using the three stages of adulthood and
audiences. University engineeringprograms can fill this gap to promote their educational programs to youths in their regions. Theycan begin to integrate skill development with their outreach sessions to promote desiredengineering skills, or habits of mind, such as problem solving, collaboration, creativity,communication, ethical considerations, innovative thinking, etc. [3]. Recognizing the importanceof this preparation, the College of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno coordinatedsummer camp programming for middle and high school students to introduce them toengineering disciplines and get them excited about pursuing an education in this field. TheCollege of Engineering summer camp program primarily focused on exposing students
-grant and Hispanic Serving Institutions. Subbian’s educational research is focused on asset-based practices, ethics education, and formation of professional identities.Francesca A L´opez, Penn State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Appreciative Inquiry as an Intervention for Equity-Centered Engineering Education Research and Praxis1. IntroductionAppreciative Inquiry (APPI) is an asset-based research approach that has been used in a range ofdomains, including organizational development, public health, and education, to study andfacilitate social change in organizations and communities [1], [2], [3]. APPI is grounded in socialconstructivist theory, which suggests
well as retention and diversity concerns within engineering education and engineering as a profession.Brock E. Barry, U.S. Military Academy Dr. Barry is an assistant professor and course director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engi- neering at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. He predominately teaches in the area of engineer- ing mechanics. His current areas of research include professional ethics, economic factors influencing engineering education, identity development, and non-verbal communication. Dr. Barry is a licensed professional engineer with multiple years of consulting experience.Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Kerry L. Meyers is an Associate Professional Faculty member in the
to group participants[29].Co-op work term reports from IEEQ participants fulfill a written requirement of the IEEQprogram and are submitted to the program director upon completion of the work term. Theydescribe the nature of the work carried out and are also a reflective account from the student’sperspective of how the term fulfilled their professional and personal goals. Four of the sixparticipants submitted co-op reports for our analysis. This study complied with the university’sethics review process ensuring respondents’ anonymity, confidentiality and opportunity towithdraw without penalty, and was approved by the university’s human ethics committee. Eachparticipant in the research group has been assigned a pseudonym. For the purposes of
expectations, capacitybuilding, sustainable development, policy work [46], increasing ethical concerns, quality focusand cultural literacy, require greater participation of the engineering profession. To compete onthe global stage, attract investment, establish first-rate centers of research, and fully developproduction facilities in many countries of the hemisphere requires collaboration of manystakeholders. In short, we must recognize that a knowledge society rests on a foundation ofeducational and research excellence [56].Quality Assurance/Accreditation: The Platform for MobilityImplementation of free trade agreements demands mutual recognition of educationalqualifications of many professional groups, including engineering. It becomes axiomatic
report on the findings from the study using narrative vignettes.Introduction According to ABET’s EC 2000 accreditation guidelines set in 2000 1, 2 students must notonly meet with competence the basic “traditional” engineering knowledge of mathematics,science, and engineering and experience in engineering problem solving and system design, butnow are also mandated to be able to function on multidisciplinary teams, to communicateeffectively, and to understand a wide range of issues in engineering. These issues include:professional and ethical responsibility, the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context, and knowledge of contemporary issues. Service-learning has the potential tomeet these objectives and have been shown
should be used by all engineers in their daily work. Using these methods will lead to a sustainable future for all. The need to introduce green engineering concepts to undergraduate students has become recognized to be increasingly important.1 This need is being driven in part through the US Engineering Accreditation Commission Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) criteria 2000. Based on this criteria chemical engineering departments must incorporate “ethics, safety and the environment” into the curricula. An additional criterion that must be satisfied is to prepare students with a broad education to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global context. In addition, there has been a large amount of
will be effective problem solvers, capable of applying logical, critical, and creative thinking to a range of problems. 4. Graduates will be able to work both autonomously and collaboratively as professionals. 5. Graduates will be committed to ethical action and social responsibility as professionals and citizens. 6. Graduates will be able to communicate effectively in professional practice and as members of the community. 7. Graduates will demonstrate an international perspective as professionals and citizens. Page 7.177.9 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
andTechnology (ABET) requires institutions to develop assessment processes which candemonstrate “that the outcomes important to the mission of the institution and the objectives ofthe program are being measured”. 1 Page 7.1007.1 Perhaps the most recognized and valid method to quantify maturation of college students’intellectual abilities relies on developmental process models such as Perry’s Model of Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationIntellectual and Ethical Development 2 and King and
: "An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility"Program Outcome #7 : "An ability to communicate effectively"Program Outcome #8 : "The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context"Program Outcome #9 : "A recognition of the need for, and ability to engage in life-long learning"Program Outcome #10 : "A knowledge of contemporary issues"Program Outcome #11 : "An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice"Program Outcome #12 : "A knowledge of
ensuring data privacy and personal data by almost all online service, with the same usedthe user’s privacy is important but rarely considered. to train models that support machine learning algorithms. TheMachine learning elicits ethical issues due to its ability to data upload aims at pattern extraction and developing models.learn patters that could allow the sharing of user information The privacy problem stems from threats of possessingto third party agencies. massive private data exposed to insider or outsider threats in Numerous concerns have been raised concerning the possibility of hacks targeting these organizations.machine learning, and data privacy
“ Interaction during exam oral increased my motivation to learn”. 6. Oral exam administrator competency in both behavioral (tone, helpfulness, etc.) and technical aspects (questioning, accuracy of feedback, content knowledge, etc.).The surveys aimed to elicit students’ insight about the impact of oral exams on their learningexperience, how they prepared for the oral exams, and what they felt were the main benefits anddrawbacks of oral exams.To study the impact on academic performance within the class, a fewclasses conducted semi-experiments. There is no rigorous control group. The semi-experimentconducted is elaborated on in a later section. Ethical Approval:Ethical Approval was granted for the study by UC San Diego’s Institutional Review