AC 2008-1891: INTEGRATING TECHNICAL, SOCIAL, AND AESTHETICANALYSIS IN THE PRODUCT DESIGN STUDIO: A CASE STUDY AND MODELFOR A NEW LIBERAL EDUCATION FOR ENGINEERSDean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma’s research and teaching focus on interdisciplinary design collaboration and the expertise that enables it. With a BS in mechanical engineering and another in general studies and a PhD in interdisciplinary social sciences, Dean has worked as a member of design teams in contexts as diverse as the U.S. and European automotive industries; Sri Lanka’s renewable energy sector; and STS, engineering, and design curriculum planning. He teaches across Rensselaer’s Product Design and
instructors to teach the hands-on aspects of the course. In addition, the instructorsintended to learn about the current BIM practices in the AEC industry. These objectives were tolearn how and why the local AEC industry is implementing BIM today and help them tounderstand the potential and limitations of the technology, and finally to learn what the local andnational/international AEC industry needs from graduating CEE students in terms of BIMunderstanding and tools.In order to realize these student and instructor learning objectives, multiple types of activitieswere deemed necessary. The first offering of the course included the following activities: ‚ Bi-monthly hands-on computer face-to-face laboratory sessions with an Autodesk
Paper ID #18326An Integrated Curriculum for Technical Writing in Higher Education in ChinaProf. Feifei Zhong, Southwest Jiaotong University Mrs. Feifei Zhong is a lecturer teaching non-English majors English in the School of Foreign Languages, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China. She received her Master’s degree in Applied Linguistics from Southwest Jiaotong University in 2007 and joined Southwest Jiaotong University since then. Her research interest is in effective English learning strategies. She was the first place winner of university- wise Teaching Competition in 2007 and 2013.Prof. Gene Hou, Old Dominion
Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2558 A review of the literature showed that the teaching methodologies of lectures,experimental laboratories, design projects, case studies, games, and internships could all be usedto achieve the project goals. An analysis of the use of these methodologies, along with the resultsfrom earlier evaluations of the use of case studies in engineering classrooms, showed that casestudies are the best candidate for meeting the educational objectives (Raju and Sankar, 1999). A case is typically a record of a real-world problem that has been faced by engineers
ranconcurrently. K-14 teacher participants derived from middle schools and community colleges,and undergraduate participants came from both the lead home and partnering institutions. EachREU and RET was teamed with a research mentor (i.e., lead researcher) and an graduate student.REU and RET participants had primary research responsibilities which were carried out over afive-week period. In the remaining sixth week, participants rotated through each laboratory togain familiarity with all research areas. In addition to scientific research; weekly technicalprograms, enrichment activities, and trips were conducted, the goals of which were to fostercreativity and innovation, diversity in thinking, and entrepreneurship; and to broaden participantimagination
assists theGK-12 Teacher with AP Biology and Introductory Biology and also helps another teacher withMarine Biology. As with the K-6 model, details of the plan are left to the Fellow and GK-12 Page 8.905.6 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Teacher and are tailored to the needs of the individual schools and teachers.Fellows who serve as “teaching assistants” focus their efforts on laboratory exercises where active“hands-on” learning is emphasized (Theme 1). Fellows can and have assisted with
fulfilling some objective or solving a problem, such as minimizing logic circuits.There is a measure of interaction between students and the instructor. This interaction usuallytakes the form of questions and comments that seek clarifications, elaborations, and additionalexamples. The instructor attempts to answer as many of those requests as possible, but is alsoexpected to cover a number of pre-determined subjects in each lecture. Lectures are accompaniedby laboratory-based activities (labs). In each lab the students, individually or in groups, arerequired to carry out certain experiments with real components and instruments, as well asdesign, build and test, their own simple or complex circuits. The labs allow the students not onlyto experience
productsand systems. Many attempts to cross this gap are used by educators, including in-classdemonstrations, laboratory experiments, videos and computer graphic simulations1-4, in responseto the President’s Information Technology Advisory Council (PITAC) recommendation5 for thedevelopment of technologies for education and training that use simulation, visualization, andgaming to actively engage students in the learning experience. In the same report, PITAC alsorecommended the development of educational experiences that provide learners with access toworld-class facilities and experiences using either actual or simulated devices. The nationalscience standards also challenge science educators to rethink the teaching of science6-7.As science can be
University in 1987 and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 1997.Prof. John W. Lawson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo John Lawson is Associate Professor in Architectural Engineering at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, where he primarily teaches structural design courses to undergraduates. He obtained his Bachelors of Science in Architectural Engineering from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, and his Masters of Science in Structural Engineering from Stanford University. He is a licensed Professional Engineer and Structural Engineer in California and Arizona with over 25 years of design experience. c American Society for Engineering Education
chemical engineers in the U.S. go intoindustry after they graduate, we agreed there would be advantages to finding ways for them tointeract meaningfully with industry professionals. A recent paper on the advantages of EducationalIntensification strengthens the rationale for creating such a program: “… increasing the interactionintensity between industrial practitioners and students better prepares the students for professionalcareers in many ways, including exposing them to the corporate work environment, teaching themvarious communication styles, and introducing them to practical technical approaches withcommercial components” [6].A second reason for adding an Industry Energy Program is that REM students are typically earlier inthe process of
recognition and/or classification.Figure 1 captures the essential subject matter necessary for the course on applied AI to delivermeasurable course outcomes. The activities conducted during this course fall in the categories ofproblem-based, project-based, and self-directed learning. The laboratory and project activities ofthe course emphasize the integration and testing of physical systems by providing the necessaryinsight into the building blocks displayed in Figure 1. Figure 1: Background preparation Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 2Section 2 overviews the course setup in
subsequent undergraduate research. The Research Methods course will be broadly focused by providing a general approach toresearch and graduate school preparation appropriate for all majors in the Engineering College.Alternative approaches from the literature that are used to teach students how to conduct researchwill be compared and contrasted. Course topics will include: finding a research mentor,literature search skills, using the scientific method for approaching a research problem,developing a research methodology, writing a funding proposal, delivering a researchpresentation, and selecting and applying for graduate school. The motivation for this work,course details, learning objectives, course schedule, and course assignments will be
, CampbellUniversity’s implementation of the LWTL first-year curriculum was ongoing during the 2016-2017 academic year, but no LWTL-style offerings in sophomore, junior, or senior years were inplace.It was decided to limit class size to 24 students for Campbell University’s LWTL courses, sothree sections of the first-year engineering course were required to accommodate all interestedstudents. This is somewhat smaller than most Louisiana Tech LWTL course sections (most ofwhich have 40 students each), but Campbell University does not plan to implement an in-classTA. An in-class TA is standard at Louisiana Tech, and removing the in-class TA lowers themaximum number of students that can reasonably be supervised using laboratory equipment persection, but allows
unsuitable soils areUnion relied on certifications revolving found. While engineers in the office are oftenaround laboratory testing and not actual field (but not always) consulted, they often rely onwork. This is in a large part due to the fact the information relayed to them by the fieldthat the in the field evaluation of soils there is technician to give a recommendation. It isnot a trade organization acting as governingbody (such as the American Concrete therefore paramount that the training aInstitute, American Institute of Steel technician receives is adequate so that theyConstruction, or the American Welding can properly
AC 2007-1327: DEVELOPMENT OF SCADA EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEMSTHROUGH STUDENT PROJECTS TO ENHANCE THE AUTOMATIONCURRICULUM IN A MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYPROGRAMAndrew Otieno, Northern Illinois University Andrew Otieno is an associate professor in the Department of Technology at NIU. He has done extensive research in experimental and theoretical analysis of metal machining problems. His research and teaching interests include machine vision, manufacturing processes, finite element analysis, and manufacturing automation. Page 12.539.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Development of SCADA
recently the topics of globalization3 of science, technology, and engineering have beendelineated in such popular works such as “The World is Flat4,” by Thomas Friedman, “A WholeNew Mind Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age5,” by Donald Pink. Theformer work in particular has been the focus of considerable attention in academia as well as theASEE organization where the Keynote discussion in the 2005 Annual Conference noted thetrends on engineering graduation rates.The full-time as well as any adjunct faculty teaching in an engineering technology curriculumshould be focused on administrating course lectures, homework assignments, course termprojects and classroom instruction via worked examples in these areas. It is strongly
AC 2009-1123: COMPUTER FORENSICS: SEIZING AND SECURING DIGITALEVIDENCESaleh Sbenaty, Middle Tennessee State University Dr. Saleh M. Sbenaty is a professor of Computer Engineering Technology, earned his Ph.D. and MS degrees in electrical engineering from Tennessee Technological University and his BS degree in electrical engineering from Damascus University. Dr. Sbenaty joined MTSU in 1993 and has been teaching graduate and undergraduate courses in electronics and computer harware. He is actively engaged in curriculum development and assessments for technological education. He has authored and co-authored several industry-based case studies and participated in three major NSF-funded
paperprovides details of laboratory exercises and a senior project that is implemented using both softcore and hard core processors on three different FPGA boards. Advantages and disadvantages ofeach of these implementations will also be presented. The paper will also detail the challengesinvolved in using continually-evolving embedded processing tools and the efforts made to reducetheir learning times.IntroductionThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires providing studentswith a significant hands-on design experience. Graduating electrical engineering students shouldhave the ability to design, test, and verify the correctness of operation of systems, subsystems,and components for real-time application.The aggressive
and philosophy both demanded that his students must have contiguous space for dailyinteraction and so, with the active encouragement of NSF, an entire floor of the engineering building wascleared and turned over to the Center and its crossdisciplinary mission. The mission of the Center for Biofilm Engineering is to advance the basic knowledge, technology andeducation required to understand, control and exploit biofilm processes. In achieving this mission, the Centeris meeting three major objectives: (1) demonstrate the basic scientific understanding and technologicalfeasibility of systems and protocols that control and exploit biofilm processes, (2) create an engineeringeducation based on teaching and research at the interface of life
electrolysis, thermal management, loop heat pipe, two-phase heat transfer and fluid flow, and porous material. Prof. Chuang received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Aerospace Engineering from National Cheng-Kung University in Taiwan. In 2003, he received his doctoral degree in Mechanical Engineering from Penn State University. In 2004, Prof. Chuang led research projects at Penn State as a Postdoctoral Scholar to study water distribution in a PEM fuel cell using neutron radiography sponsored by both General Motors and Toyota Motors. Between 2005 and 2011, Prof. Chuang worked at the fuel cell laboratory in General Motors leading efforts in material development, cell integration, and stack diagnostic. Between 2007 and 2011, Prof
technology at Korea Tech in 2008 and a master degree in manufacturing engineering technology at Oregon Institute of Technology in 2014. His research interests are focused on 3D printing of piezo-, pyro-, and dielelectric materials for pressure/temperature/strain sensors and energy storage. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 4D Printing of Pressure Sensors Devices for Engineering EducationAbstractThis paper elaborates on the development of laboratory project modules in the Industrialmanufacturing and systems engineering department at The University of Texas El Paso based onFour-Dimensional (4D) printing technology. These modules are aimed at introducing the studentsto interdisciplinary
wasperformed using Smart Grid Laboratory at SUNY Buffalo State. The testbed was developedusing various state-of the art laboratory modules, such as microgrid controller, Double-FedInduction Generator (DFIG), photovoltaic systems (PV) with grid inverter, underground linemodule, and a number of smart meters and sensors. Monitoring and control utilized SupervisoryControl and Data Acquisition System (SCADA).The project resulted in a testbed to demonstrate the effects of distributed renewable resources onthe balanced operation of the distribution system/microgrid as well as transactive energy in termsof automatic switching operations as applied to residential microgrid. The project was part of asenior design course with associated assessment of student
from the University of Missouri–Columbia. He is currently a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the American Nu- clear Society (ANS), the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), and a student branch advisor for the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME),Dr. Nazli Aslican Yilmaz Wodzinski, Minnesota State University, Mankato Nazli A. Yilmaz Wodzinski graduated from Clemson University with a Ph.D in Civil Engineering in 2014. She joined Minnesota State University, Mankato as a post-doctoral teaching fellow for 2015-16 Acedemic Year. She is still serving at the same institution as an Assistant Professor at the Department of Mechanical and
Exposition, 2015.2. Radian G. Belu, Eric Carr, Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, and Michael G Mauk P.E.. "A New Approach in Teaching “Measurement Laboratory” Courses Based on TRIZ". 2011 Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011, June.3. Jerry Keska. "Instrumentation Emphasis In Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Programs". 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, 2010, June.4. Doebelin, E. O., Measurement Systems: Application and Design, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 720-722.5. Haladay, D., and Resnick, R., Fundamentals of Physics, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1981, pp. 485-488.6. http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm555.pdf7
academies.Mr. Cary Edward James, University of Maine Mr. Cary James has a BS in chemistry and an MS in Plant Pathology. He has received numerous teaching awards including the Siemens Award for Advanced Placement Teacher of the Year for Maine 2009, Pulp and Paper Foundation Maine Teacher Award 2009, New England Institute of Chemistry Maine State Teacher Award 2011, New England Water Environmental Association Public Educator Award 2013, and has received the Francis Crowe Society Honorary Engineering Degree from the University of Maine 2010. Recently he presented a lecture on High School Students as Water Researchers at the Climate Change and the Future of Water Conference in Abu Dhabi. His students have excelled in many
(ASHRAE), and a student branch advisor for the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME),Dr. Nazli Aslican Yilmaz Wodzinski, Minnesota State University, Mankato Nazli A. Yilmaz Wodzinski graduated from Clemson University with a Ph.D in Civil Engineering in 2014. She joined Minnesota State University, Mankato as a post-doctoral teaching fellow for 2015-16 Acedemic Year. She is still serving at the same institution as an Assistant Professor at the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering. Yilmaz Wodzinski offers a broad range of courses to engineering program students and conducts research on renewable energy, water treatment and water resources.Dr. Namyong Lee, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Namyong Lee
Paper ID #27114Assessing the Effectiveness of a Large, Open-Ended Design Project in a Junior-Level Engineering Technology CourseDr. Robert Scott Pierce P.E., Western Carolina University Robert Scott Pierce is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina Univer- sity. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993. Prior to his teaching career, he spent 14 years in industry designing automated equipment.Dr. Wesley L. Stone, Western Carolina University Dr. Wes Stone is an associate professor in the School of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University in
) under the Louis Stokes Alliance for MinorityParticipation (LS-AMP) project. These students had completed their second year at thecommunity college, and plan on pursuing a bachelor’s degree in an engineering discipline. Thecourse started with project-based teaching of fundamentals of electrical circuits, electronics, andinstrumentation followed by introduction to mechanical design. It concluded with design projectsusing the skills that students learned from the aforementioned subjects. The projects aimed atpromoting active learning, research, problem solving, and understanding the design process. Thepilot course was used to evaluate the instructional materials to be utilized later in developing anew junior level course in the computer
is measured at leastthree times throughout the curriculum using a variety of direct assessment instruments such as inclass exams, laboratory reports, and homework. A summary of the courses in which eachprogram outcome is assessed is given in Table 2. Notice that we only measure outcomes in coreengineering and BME courses that all students will be taking, simplifying the assessmentprocess. Also, there can be a tendency to try to measure every possible outcome that is relevantfor a particular course, but this approach is overly cumbersome5. Meaningful conclusionsregarding student attainment of program outcomes can be drawn with a focused set of measures.To keep the system simple and manageable by our small faculty, we aim to assess (measure
AC 2007-831: PROJECT-BASED SOFTWARE APPLICATION ANALYSES INUNDERGRADUATE HEAT TRANSFERMichael Langerman, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Langerman is professor and chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department and Co-director of the Computational Mechanics Laboratory at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. His career spans 32 years including sixteen years in higher education. His primary academic interest is in thermal science.William Arbegast, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Mr. Arbegast is the director of the Advanced Material Processing (AMP) center at the South Dakota School of Mines & TechnologyDaniel Dolan, South Dakota School of Mines and