3413 ChE’s Teaching Introductory Computing to ChE Students -- A Modern Computing Course with Emphasis on Problem Solving and Programming David E. Clough Department of Chemical Engineering University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0424AbstractAn easy recipe for fomenting heated debate among ChE faculty is to inject the topic ofintroductory computing for ChE students into a discussion. Most faculty will have strongopinions that are only muted by the
students from Page 9.1183.1grades 9-12 were equally represented. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright À 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationCOURSE CONTENTIn the fall semester students are introduced to philosophy of the mind as they explore machineconsciousness. These issues are revisited and applied to content presented throughout the rest ofthe course. Next, the students explore the history of artificial intelligence. While they do notwrite computer code, they do use a variety of classical AI software applications. Then
Paper ID #12648A Virtual Company-based Integrated Learning Methodology to Produce In-dustry Ready GraduateDr. Samuel H. Huang, University of Cincinnati Samuel H. Huang is Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director of Intelligent Systems Labora- tory at the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, the University of Cincinnati. He was previously Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Toledo (1998 – 2001) and Systems Engineer at EDS/Unigraphics (1996 – 1997, now Siemens PLM Software). He received the B.S. degree in Instrument Engineering from Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, P. R
2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Literature Review of Student Success in Statics Courses Calvin Cuddy1, Dr. Jessica Deters2 1: Undergraduate Researcher, Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2: Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-LincolnAbstractThis literature review is part of a larger project aimed to improve statics student success at theUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln. This paper is an examination into methods of increasingoutcomes and student success in Statics. An analysis of 45 papers was completed, 23 of whichshowed positive results by
“what could happen (if wanted and nounknowable events intervene)” rather than attempt to predict the future.One successful example of this approach was its use in the construction circa 1993-94 of theBoeing list4,5 of “Desired Attributes of an Engineer” (Fig. 1). The original purpose in creatingthis list was to establish a basis for an on-going dialogue with academe at a time when muchlegitimate criticism was leveled at various potential employers for a seeming propensity for“changing their minds all the time” and sending often contradictory messages to schools Page 10.265.2regarding “what industry needs”. Rather than provide schools with
were needed that not only obliterated conventional disciplinary boundaries but, moreimportantly, also helped cultivate a mind-set that facilitated voluntary transitioning betweenthinking like an engineer, a technologist, and a scientist. It may seem heretical, even a littledaring to suggest this, especially because traditional college education cultivates and promotes‘branding’iv. It is, however, envisioned that such a mind-set shall be compatible with anemerging manufacturing environment in which heretofore unfamiliar paradigms shallincreasingly become commonplace and where tolerance for and acceptance of trends that are notcontemporaneousv shall become compelling. There indeed is enhanced recognition inmanufacturing circles of the critical
PBSL activities to answer our research question 1 and 2 respectively. The PUI/LIA universities typically have a high ratio students who are U.S. residents, manyof whom will pursue professional careers and advanced degrees after receiving their B.S.degrees. Successful completion of this series of projects will better prepare students for theircareers, strengthen relationships between local community organizations and our institution, andhelp produce excellent, civically-minded next generation STEM workforce.References[1] Swan, C., Paterson, K. and Bielefeldt, A. R., Community Engagement in Engineering Education as a Way toIncrease Inclusiveness, chapter 18, Cambridge Handbooks of Engineering Education Research, 2014.[2] Kolmos, A., Graaff
andinstitutionalization of this cross-college collaboration between engineering and foreignlanguages.Course Design Page 10.375.1Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright @ 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Spanish: Culture, Language, Technology (FLS 212) was designed specifically toencourage engineers to study a foreign language. Components of the course wereincorporated with just this end in mind. First, the prerequisite for the course wasdeliberately set at two years of high school Spanish: a level that would not intimidateprospective students. At the
Stephen Coveys’s book The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People5were presented on three consecutive class periods, one per period. The three habits presentedwere:‚ Habit One: Be Proactive‚ Habit Two: Begin with the End in Mind‚ Habit Three: Put First Things FirstStudent discussion followed each presentation. The students were broken into small groups andhad to decide upon courses of personal action to take as a result of their discussion.We had a certified financial planner come in and make a presentation. This was done bysomeone who is an excellent and provocative speaker. He presented a number of issues that areimportant to new engineers. Many of them had not thought about these topics before. As aresult of this
Public Policy Colloquium 2011Legislative Update Legislative VisitsState of Initiatives relevant to engineeringEDC/ASEE positionsTrips to Congress and leave behinds Talk of your state PA leave behind -names of 21 Deans/Directors 30,000 students $400+ million in research; $3 billion for Univ. 7,000 graduatesUniversity /ASEE Values- Ask your CongressmanSupport the development of technologyand the creation of good jobs throughengineering innovation Graduate Research in all technical fields including energy, sustainability and innovation (NSF, NIH, DOE, DOD 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 research). Undergraduate Engineering Education K-12 STEM EducationUniversity ASEE Values-State of the UnionCutting the deficit
comprehensive review inherent in capstone design projects, the paper describes theproject portfolio approach that expands the traditional project report into a broader spectrum ofcommunication activities to more fully capture the design cycle. It provides strategies formeaningfully implementing such assignments and summarizes the results of portfolio use overtwo years of capstone design sequences in a materials science and engineering curriculum. Thisapproach leverages and expands the kinds of assignments common to many design courses(proposals, progress reports, final reports) to provide assessment information directedspecifically to ABET. By carefully designing and evaluating capstone assignments with the fullrange of Criterion 3 outcomes in mind
process to address social issues in a way that keeps the design process in the hands of communities that face the social problems.Mr. James Holly Jr, Purdue University James Holly, Jr. is a Ph.D. Student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received a B.S. from Tuskegee University and a M.S. from Michigan State University, both in Mechanical Engineer- ing. His research interest is exploring formal and informal K-12 engineering education learning contexts. Specifically, he is interested in how the engineering design process can be used to emphasize the hu- manistic side of engineering and investigating how engineering habits of mind can enhance pre-college students’ learning abilities.Mrs. Kayla Renee Maxey
Paper ID #27291Outcomes-based Design of a New Graduate ProgramDr. Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University Ann D. Christy, PE, is a professor of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering and a professor of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University (OSU). She earned both her B.S. in agricultural engineering and M.S. in biomedical engineering at OSU, and her Ph.D. in environmental engineering at Clemson University. She worked for an engineering consulting firm before entering academia and continues to collaborate with the consulting industry. She has taught courses in bioenergy, biological en
Session 1313 Expanding Our Students’ Brainpower: Idea Generation and Critical Thinking Skills Julie L. P. Jessop University of IowaAbstractHow do we teach our students to think? This is not a skill that they can pick up by doing “X”number of homework problems; it is the product of good habits that must be practiced and honedon a daily basis. It is a state of mind that continually questions “Who? What? Where? When?How? Why?” In light of this reality, we developed this segment for the “Introduction toLiterature Review and
together to build, acquire tool safety, understand how to use tools, electronics, anddevelop a fictitious company that uses ROV’s for some particular challenge. Many of thestudents also join the engineering club to enter challenges using their underwater robots.These tasks require all students to communicate, strategize, plan, and decide upon solutions tocomplete the challenges15.ConclusionsSTEM programs should be started at the elementary school level because it is easier to align theyounger fresh minds on the path of STEM education by displaying it in different playful ways.After the Elementary School STEM education, the students need to be introduced to their careerpath to choose the field of study in STEM areas that they want to explore for
Session 3448 Cutting Speed Sensitivity of Tool Life Zhongming (Wilson) Liang Purdue University Fort WayneIntroduction Taylor equation is one of the important topics in mechanical engineering technologycourses of manufacturing processes, machining and tool design. It is important because it dealswith cutter life in machining. Cutter life affects manufacturing in two ways. First, a longer cutterlife means lower cutter cost per workpiece. Secondly, a longer cutter life means less frequentchange of the tool and hence a smaller amount of tool change
Session 1520 Computer Circuit Lab Experiments Using Limited Lab Resources Christopher R. Carroll University of Minnesota DuluthAbstractLab experiments in which students design and test functional parts of digital computersare useful endeavors that demonstrate how computer functions can be implemented andthat reduce the mystery that surrounds computer circuits in students’ minds. However,generating lab assignments that both involve significant processing functions and requiremanageable amounts of hardware is a daunting task for course instructors
Chemistry & Biochemistry that the AURAS seminar was making a meaningful difference inthe success rates of its majors. The department took the step of requiring that its chemistrymajors and biochemistry majors enroll in the AURAS section on General Chemistry I. At theurging of the Internal Advisory Committee for AURAS, the sustainability of the AURAS effortshave been under consideration even during the 2nd year of implementation of the ESP courses.Efforts toward sustainability are focused on making less labor-intensive the instructionalinterventions. With this in mind, the AURAS seminar for Chemistry for Engineering wasreduced to a 2-hour seminar in Fall ’12. The results of this modification are not yet available, but student satisfaction
Paper ID #44672The Green Seaport Power System Project as an Academia-IndustryInternational PartnershipDr. Taufik Taufik, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Taufik received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering with minor in Computer Science from Northern Arizona University in 1993, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of Illinois, Chicago in 1995, and Doctor of Engineering in Electrical Engineerin ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Green Seaport Power System Project as an Academia- Industry International Partnership
Paper ID #30869Four Complications in Designing a Validated Survey to Gather Informationon Student Reactions to Reflection ActivitiesKenya Mejia, University of Washington Kenya Z. Mejia is a second year PhD student at the University of Washington in the Human Centered Design and Engineering program. Her work focuses on diversity and inclusion in engineering education focusing on engineering design education.Dr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is a Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the Univer- sity of Washington. She is interested in all aspects of engineering
often first discuss careers in general. As would beexpected, few in the lower level mathematics courses were interested in engineering, whilealmost all of the students in Calculus III intended to be engineers, while a few of these studentswere pursuing physics or mathematics. An effective message for many of the students in the lowlevel mathematics classes is to discuss careers. The students are asked about their career choiceand why they chose it. To open their minds to other possibilities, suggestions are made thatperhaps instead of a physical therapist, they might want to be an engineer involved in biomedicalengineering or environmental issues. Instead of being a pharmacist, perhaps the student shouldconsider Chemical Engineering and be able
will also be presented. Thiscourse represents an application of engineering assessment that is of direct benefit to students.IntroductionA one credit course, primarily focusing on assessment, was developed at the University of NorthDakota to evaluate students coming from industry into UND’s Corporate Engineering DegreeProgram (CEDP). The CEDP is a videotape program coupled with required on-campus labsleading to an undergraduate degree in engineering. Many of these students are graduates oftechnical colleges and have ten to fifteen years of industrial experience. With an investment ofresources in mind (students’ time, company funds for tuition reimbursement, etc.), UND facultybegan asking “why should these students (with so much industrial
Paper ID #43651Teaching Effective Communication for TeamworkDr. Joanna Tsenn, Texas A&M University Joanna Tsenn is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She earned her B.S. from the University of Texas at Austin and her Ph.D. from Texas A&M University. She coordinates the mechanical engineering senior capstone design program and teaches senior design lectures and studios. Her research interests include engineering education with an emphasis on capstone design and teamwork.Jonathan Weaver-Rosen, Texas A&M University
. Easy to say, buthow to make students’ minds follow that path of thinking when the vast majority of theirengineering learning effort is spent on learning mathematical principles with a goal of using themfor optimization and numerical assessment. Consequently, the students are examined and gradedalmost exclusively on performance that is based on the mathematical knowledge, memorization ofprocedures and data. Despite its abstract nature, mathematics based engineering knowledge iseasily quantifiable, and there is a lot of historical experience available in teaching it. On the otherhand little learning time and grading effort is accorded to development of creativity, inventivenessand learning logical methods of designing. It is somewhat
- Hulman Institute of Technology in 1987 where he is now a professor of Physics, Optical Engineering, and Associate Dean of Faculty. Siahmakoun is a SPIE Fellow (The International Society for Optical Engineering), OSA Senior Member, and Founding Director of Micro-Nanoscale Devices and Systems (MiNDS) Facility since 2003.Prof. Wonjong Joo P.E., Seoul National University of Science and Technology Wonjong Joo is a professor of Seoul National University of Science and Technology (Seoul Tech) and was a vice president of ABEEK (Accreditation Board of Engineering Education in Korea) for 2012- 2014. He has been a director of Seoul Tech’s Innovation Center for Engineering Education (ICEE) & Hub Center for 8 years and was a
performancegoals.ConclusionsEach experiment designed with a single goal in mind. The experiments addressed dataacquisition, sensors and actuators, plant modeling and system identification, disturbancerejection, command following, and tracking for electro-mechanical plants. The developedlaboratory was successful to improve the students understanding and provide them with essentialskills needed to be a successful engineer in industry. Students prefer learning by hands-on Page 12.688.8experience and the feedback from them has been very positive. More funding is available for thelaboratory development and maintenance due to the fact that the course is used by
recruit future leaders Access to engineering faculty and universities from around the world Ability to set quality benchmarks for global engineering education Help shape the future of engineering education through the participation in the international research project of the program Access to a like-minded global network Gaining of global visibility among students Increased global marketing exposure Achieved preferred partnership status at universitiesGovernance StructureThe day to day business of the GEIP will be conducted by a part-time Secretariat, fundedby Continental, and housed at one of the member institutions (currently at Georgia Techin Atlanta, Georgia, USA). The money will be made available to
Session 3530 Uncovering Obstacles to the Assessment Momentum E. W. Nault, Ph. D., M. S . Leonard, Ph. D., P.E., J. Joseph Hoey, Ed.D. Clemson University/Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractWhy is the practice of assessment inconsistently applied across engineering programs withinthe same university and among engineering disciplines across the country? EngineeringCriteria 2000 1 which mandates programmatic assessment was initially adopted for applicationin 1996. Yet, six years after the adoption of the new criteria, why do we still experience highlevels of faculty resistance to program assessment? This
contents from electromagnetics, solid-state physics, electronics, and circuit analysis intothe design and analysis of three- and four-terminal semiconductor devices starting with the basic pnjunction. The course was also designed with ABET EC2000 in mind. The new approach wasoffered in Fall 2000 semester with 22 students, and an assessment of student satisfaction with thecourse and with their learning is reported.1. IntroductionThis report describes the redesign of a required, senior course in semiconductor devices wherestudents are asked to assimilate a diversity of knowledge types. That is, instead of teaching thecourse as a traditional engineering science course with fundamental engineering principles withproblem solving, the new course asks
, however,curricular-level educational reform is hard for an individual instructor to implement. It is far Page 7.1131.1easier to influence pedagogical outcomes in one’s own classroom – at the course level, than atthe departmental level. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationMethodologyWith this in mind, the authors focused on a 3-credit-hour (2 lecture and 2 laboratory hours)course in Manufacturing Processes taught to junior mechanical engineering students. Course-level competency gaps were