Paper ID #36525Introducing Production Concepts – A Hands On Learning ExperienceDr. Scott Schultz, Mercer University Dr. Scott Schultz is the Associate Dean and Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering in the Depart- ment of Industrial Engineering at Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. He also consults at the Mercer Engineering Research Center in Warner Robins, Georgia. He comes from an Industrial background with thirteen years of experience with Ford Motor Co. in Dearborn, MI and Windsor, Ontario and two years of experience at the North Carolina State University Furniture Manufacturing and Management Center. Ten
Paper ID #40588Understanding buoyancy with building a miniature concrete canoeDr. Helen Yoonhee Jung P.E., California Baptist University Professor of Civil Engineering, Gordon and Jill Bourn College of Engineering, California Baptist Uni- versity. Licensed Professional Engineer. University of California, Los Angeles Ph.D. Civil Engineering 2009. University of California, Los Angeles M.S. Civil Engineering 2005. University of California, Los Angele B.S. Civil Engineering 2002.Jakob Yovanovich, California Baptist University Student of Civil Engineering, Gordon and Jill Bourn College of Engineering, California Baptist Univer
Paper ID #39126Building a Statewide Experiential Learning Portfolio in CybersecurityDr. Luiz A. DaSilva, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Luiz A. DaSilva is the inaugural executive director of the Commonwealth Cyber Initiative (CCI). He is internationally recognized for leadership and innovation in wireless communications and networks research. His 24 years of experience in academia include 18 years as a professor at Virginia Tech, where he is currently the Bradley Professor of Cybersecurity in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. His most recent position prior to CCI was as the
Paper ID #38426Building a Communication-Integrated Curriculum in Materials ScienceDr. Jennifer C. Mallette, Boise State University An Associate Professor at Boise State University, Dr. Jenn Mallette teaches technical communication at the undergraduate and graduate level. She also collaborates with faculty in engineering to support student writers. Her research focuses on using writing to improve the experiences of underrepresented students.Harold Ackler P.E., Boise State University Dr. Harold Ackler is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Micron School of Materials Science and En- gineering at Boise State University. He
Paper ID #37779Towards a Transformative Collaboration: Technical Writing, Engineering,IndustryDr. Naqaa Abbas, Texas A&M University, Qatar Dr. Naqaa Abbas is Instructional Assistant Professor at Texas A&M University Qatar. She teaches first year English writing and technical communication courses. Dr. Mary Queen is Instructional Assistant Professor at Texas A&M University Qatar. She teaches first year English writing and technical commu- nication courses. Dr. Reza Tafreshi is a Professor at Texas A&M University Qatar. He teaches in the program of Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Patrick Linke is Program Chair and
Confidence at the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity and Gender,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 810–832, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11162-014-9333-z.[8] T. J. Weston, “Patterns of Switching and Relocation,” in Talking about Leaving Revisited, E. Seymour and A.-B. Hunter, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 55–85. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2_2.[9] M. M. Camacho and S. M. Lord, “"Microaggressions" in engineering education: Climate for Asian, Latina and White women,” in 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Rapid City, SD, USA, Oct. 2011, pp. S3H-1-S3H-6. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142970.[10] V. Ray, “A Theory of Racialized Organizations,” Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 26– 53, Feb. 2019, doi
actions of the virtualexperiment.References:[1] K. Achuthan, D. Raghavan, B. Shankar, S. P. Francis, S. P., and V. K. Kolil, “Impact ofremote experimentation, interactivity and platform effectiveness on laboratory learningoutcomes,” International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18(1), 38, 2021.[2] D. A. H. Samuelsen and O. H. Graven, “Remote laboratories in engineering education - anoverview of implementation and feasibility,” Engineering Innovations for Global Sustainability:Proceedings of the 14th Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering andTechnology, San Jose, Costa Rica, July 20-22, 2016.[3] L. F. Rivera and M. M. Larrondo-Petrie, “Models of remote laboratories and collaborativeroles for learning
Paper ID #37638A Method for Deducing the Self-Diffusion Coefficient of a Single AnalogMolecule within a Liquid-State FlowMr. Philip Troy Brown, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Philip Brown is a mechanical engineer conducting research in the field of molecular hydrodynamics at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, where he also serves as the President of the Society of Student Veterans in Engineering (SSVE) and the assistant program manager for the Shaping Experimental Research for Veteran Education (SERVE) STEM engagement program. Prior to beginning this research, he spent 6 years in the United States Navy
Paper ID #36663A Comparison between Blended and Online Teaching Method for StaticsCourse: a perspective in a Community CollegeDr. Edwin Lim, University of Georgia Edwin Lim is a lecturer at the School of Environmental, Civil, Agricultural and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Georgia. His research interests are in the field of engineering education, earthquake engineering and reduce order finite element modeling. Prior to arriving at UGA in Fall 2022, he taught engineering mechanics, numerical method, materials science, and fundamental engineering courses at Tacoma Community College. He holds a Ph.D. and M.S
Paper ID #40082Board 115: LESSONS LEARNED: A 360 Degree Review of Faculty Develop-mentResourcesDr. Randy McDonald, Texas A&M University Dr. Randy McDonald is the Director of Learning Design and Distance Education for the College of En- gineering at Texas A&M University where he leads a design team in the development of online programs for academic and workforce education. Prior to coming to Texas A&M, Randy worked at Stephen F. Austin State University for twenty-five years in a variety of roles including tenured faculty member in the College of Education, director of instructional technology and distance
Paper ID #39783What If They Choose: Surfacing Insights Associated with a Pedagogy forDoctoral EducationDr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the
Paper ID #39942Organizational Barriers to Conducting Engineering Education Research inEducation-adjacent IndustriesDr. Nikitha Sambamurthy, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand Nikitha Sambamurthy is the Editorial Director at zyBooks, at Wiley Brand. She completed her Ph.D. in engineering education at Purdue University, and has since been dedicated to bridging engineering education research and engineering education industry. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Organizational Barriers to Conducting Engineering Education Research in Education-adjacent IndustriesAbstractEngineering
Paper ID #37790Rock, Paper, Scissors, Code! Laying a Foundation for Writing Algorithms(Resource Exchange)Rachelle Pedersen, Texas A&M University Rachelle Pedersen is a Ph.D. student at Texas A&M studying Curriculum & Instruction (Emphasis in En- gineering & Science Education). She has a M.S. in Curriculum & Instruction from Texas A&M University and a B.S. in Engineering Science (Technology Education) from Colorado State University. Her research focuses on motivation and social influences (e.g. mentoring and identity development) that support un- derrepresented students in STEM fields. Prior to
Paper ID #36787Strengthening Undergraduates’ Appreciation of Engineering Ethics througha Simulated Stakeholder Meeting on Offshore Wind Energy DevelopmentDr. Maija A. Benitz, Roger Williams University Dr. Maija Benitz is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Roger Williams University, where she has taught since 2017. Prior to joining RWU, Benitz taught at the Evergreen State College in Olympia, WA, after completing her doctoral work jointly in the Multiphase Flow Simulation Lab and the Wind Energy Center at UMass Amherst. She teaches in the first-year curriculum, as well as thermodynamics, sustain- able energy, fluid
backgrounds in education. He received his BA from Central College (Iowa) in 1993 and his PhD in social and personality psychology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2007. Prior to his career in psychology, he spent six years as a teacher, coach, and social worker. Chris is a second generation educator whose grand- parents were tenant farmers in Iowa and Nebraska. He tries to emulate their hard work and persistence in the pursuit of social justice. One of his favorite childhood memories is eating his paternal grandmother’s homemade fruit pies with plenty of ice cream.Delaram A Totonchi, University of VirginiaJoshua Davis, University of VirginiaMichelle Francis, University of VirginiaEmma HuelskoetterYoi Tibbetts
Paper ID #39389”I haven’t really made those connections that maybe most would theirfirst year”: A qualitative study of the COVID-19 pandemic and studentsocial capital among 3 Cohorts of first-year engineering majors.Dr. Patricia Wonch Hill, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Hill is an applied sociologist, evaluator, and researcher whose primary scholarship is in gender, STEM and broadening participation in K-22 education and in professorate.Dr. Lance C. P´erez, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Lance C. P´erez is the Omar H. Heins Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln where he
to the Early Experiences, Undergraduate Research, and Culmination areas.Using the experience gained during the development and implementation of the first series, asecond series of workshops were developed and held during the third year of the grant. Thesecond series had topics that covered all areas of a student’s research journey, but this series had alarger focus on beginning a research project (Early Experiences and Bridge to Research) anddissemination of research outcomes (Undergraduate Research).Advertising the workshops to the student population was accomplished using several methods. (a) (b)Figure 2: Example graphical abstracts used for workshop promotion: (a
be noted that both groupsconsider years of experience an essential factor to consider, however, it can be seen that for bothparticipants, early career (1-5 years) and mid-career (11-15 years) are the groups that have thehighest scores when asked the importance of years of experience. Factor: Years of experience100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% (a) 1-5 (b) 6- (c) 11- (d) 15- (e) 21- (f) 26+ (a) (b) 1-5 (c) 6- (d) 11- (e) 15- (f) 21- (g) 26+ 10 15 20 25 None 10 15 20 25 Faculty experience Industry experience (1) Not important (2
Civil Engineering Education,” 2019.[25] National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2019.[26] B. J. Call, W. H. Goodridge, and M. Scheaffer, “Entrepreneurial curriculum in an Engineering Technical Communication course: Looking for impact on creativity and mindset,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2016, vol. 2016-November, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757370.[27] L. Liu, J. A. Mynderse, A. L. Gerhart, and S. Arslan, “Fostering the Entrepreneurial Mindset in the Junior and Senior Mechanical Engineering Curriculum with a Multi-Course Problem Based Learning Experience
que cómo lo está aprendiendo en la calle y en la vida que no tieneciencia.” (Family 51). [Now I think that engineering is in everything. It’s just that you thinkbecause you learned it outside of school, during your everyday life, that it doesn’t connect or itdoesn’t have as much value.] Through the preliminary analysis, several themes emerged fromthese case studies about the ways the families came to understand engineering through theprogram and how they connected this understanding to their own interests, beliefs, and values:(a) everyday problem solving, (b) family relationship building, (c) child skill development, and(d) pathways to equity. These themes highlight the broad ways that families interpretedengineering, the unique ways they
://peer.asee.org/revealing-the-invisible-conversations-about-isms-and-power-relation s-in-engineering-courses.[18] B. Momo, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, J. A. Mejia, and S. M. Lord, “Broadening the engineering canon: How Culturally Responsive Pedagogies can help educate the engineers of the future,” Murmurations Emerg. Equity Educ, vol. 2, pp. 6–21, 2020.[19] B. Khan, C. Robbins, and A. Okrent, The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2020. National Science Foundation, 2020.[20] J. Miller, Engineering Manhood: Race and the Antebellum Virginia Military Institute. Lever Press, 2020.[21] S. Hacker, Pleasure, Power and Technology: Some Tales of Gender, Engineering, and the Cooperative Workplace. Routledge, 2017.[22
(a) (b)Figure 2. Peer Feedback results from 2021 for (a) IVE and (b) non-IVE teams. (* denotes astatistically significant difference between the two surveys; α = 0.05)The four primary categories of team dynamics (Communicate, Adapt, Relate, and Educate[CARE]) and overall team satisfaction from 2021 are summarized in Figure 3. Teams generallyshowed slight improvements in all areas over the course of the project, but the changes were notstatistically significant. The only exception was that the IVE teams showed significant growth inthe Adapt category. While the results of the IVE teams were not compared to the non-IVE teams,the values shown in Figure 3 are relatively similar for the two different
established.So far, there has been support from organizational structures and changes in individual coursessupport existing learning outcomes.References[1] K. Haas, “Sankey Diagram Analysis: Undergraduate Program Updates 2017-2019,” 2020.[2] N. Desai and G. Stefanek, “A Literature Review of the Different Approaches That Have Been Implemented to Increase Retention in Engineering Programs Across the United States,” in ASEE Zone II Conference, 2017.[3] Georgia Institute of Technology, “Deliberate Innovation, Lifetime Education: Final Report of the Commission on Creating the Next in Education,” 2018.[4] K. D. Hall, D. G. Linzell, B. S. Minsker, J. F. Hajjar, and C. M. Saviz, “Civil Engineering Education Summit: Mapping
engineering disciplinesnot seen in the original projects. The key focus on this project remains on the design process,where students are doing a basic design and looking at tradeoffs. Additionally, it functions toallow students to begin working and getting familiar with their teams.Alternate Project 2 design: E85 production from corn productThe full Project 2 document is located in Appendix B, the background reads: Biofuels provide an interesting opportunity that could be used to replace some of the more traditional fuels used in automobiles and manufacturing. However, to do so we must have more production facilities to convert biological and agricultural products into the fuels necessary to operate our world. […] This
allow them toact upon their values? The newly developed Engineering Ethics course tackles this questionusing four basic approaches: a.) Ethics Theory, b.) GVV, c.) Contemporary Issues, and d.)Debates. Importantly, the new course motivates students to identify opportunities to voice theirperspectives, but it does not dictate for the students what those perspectives should be.(a) First, students learn fundamentals of deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics to providethem with frameworks for thinking about ethical action and character. This foundation in moralphilosophy is developed further in later senior-level courses as students incorporate ethicalanalysis into their undergraduate theses.(b) Once a student knows what they think is correct
, "Exploring the Theoretical Social Capital “Deficit” of First-Generation College Students: Implications for Engineering Education," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 30, pp. 822-836, 2014.[9] O. J. S. O. Adesope, E.R. Ewumi, A., Minichiello, M. Asgha, C.S. Clairborn, "Investigating Factors that Predict Academic Success in Engineering and Computer Science.," presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 7/26/21-7/29/21, 2021.[10] S. B. Dailey, W. Eugene & A.D. Prewitt, "The development of social capital in engineering education to improve student retention," presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Southeast Section, Louisville, KY, 2007.[11
customs of African American people can enrich STEMeducation [8][14][15]. The takeaways from these proven approaches are (a) the need to reframe the causeof difficulty for African American students learning STEM, (b) embedding cultural knowledge of AfricanAmerican people increases African American students’ engagement and comprehension, and (c) AfricanAmerican cultural knowledge transforms conceptions of STEM knowledge and teacher practice. Adjapong& Emdin [16] and Brown’s [17] work has shown that when African American students are given theopportunity to participate in the learning setting in a way that is natural to them, previously excludedstudents engage at a high level, demonstrating competence and enthusiasm.One way for African American
detailed discussion of the coding scheme and the features discussed above, see [13].Second, we coded the segments for which the content category was identified as “standards” forwhich we used the following definition: Any response that refers to an established statement of expected behavior for individuals within a group associated with a profession or discipline. (a) Refers to documents that are specifically called “Codes of Ethics” (b) Refers to documents that describe membership or participation rules (c) May includes group-based standards such as those for accreditation (d) Must be codified in a shared form of communication (typically writing) but does not need to be formally published.Our coding of “standards” includes not
/docview/2522431819.[5] M. Caskey, D. Stevens, and M. Yeo. “Examining doctoral student development of a researcher identity: Using the draw a researcher test,” Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, 2020. Available: http://impactinged.pitt.edu/ojs/ImpactingEd/article/view/92.[6] L. Hall and L. Burns. “Identity development and mentoring in doctoral education,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 49-70, 2009. Available: https://meridian.allenpress.com/her/article-abstract/79/1/49/31955/Identity-Development- and-Mentoring-in-Doctoral.[7] C. Cass, A. Kirn, M. A. Tsugawa-Nieves, H. L. Perkins, M. Bahnson, R. Mills, and A. B. Parker. “Board 18: Engineering Doctoral Students
fed into a manufacturing process. The manufacturing processtransforms the inputs into a completed workpiece, along with scrap and waste, using theinstructions programmed into its control system. Figure 2(a) illustrates the relationship of thesecomponents. For example, sheets of metal (input) fastened by fixtures (input), feed into awelding process, during which an industrial robot welds the sheets to form an automobile bodyframe based on the instructions from a control system. Outputs include completed auto bodyframes and scraps.A cyber-physical system (CPS) is comprised of physical, cyber, and control systems. Figure 2(b)shows these concepts as applied to manufacturing. The physical system refers to the machine andthe wireless sensors used