: 1. What did you know about STEM (in general, engineering in particular) research or advocacy before participating in the PROMISE AGEP? 2. Do you do any work, formal or informal with STEM research or advocacy? 3. How has the PROMISE AGEP influenced your participation in STEM research or advocacy? 4. Are you working in an area of STEM research of advocacy now? 5. Do you have any plans to do any work in STEM research or advocacy in the future?Representative informants were chosen by using homogeneous sampling, which is a purposivesampling technique,14 which according to Welman and Kruger10 is the most important kind ofnon-probability sampling. The selection of the representative informants being
. Sustainability is an important aspect to consider in the methodology oftoday’s engineering challenges and there is a very real demand in industry for graduates whohave had training in sustainability and understand the systems approachUpon finished the program, the students should be able to: • Apply the knowledge and methods of the social and natural sciences to understand and analyze engineering problems and to provide solutions • Develop interdisciplinary critical thinking, communication and problem solving skills for sustainable development projects • Build leadership in planning, building and implementation of sustainable developmentCurriculum Development sustainable system engineering baccalaureate programThe curriculum for the SSE program is
sessions, created engineering graphics tutorials, and recorded solutions for homework and example problems. Students have recorded final presentations for classes, design competition entries, and promotional videos for philanthropic and extra-‐curricular organizations. Numerous other schools have constructed Lightboards from our plans and specifications, which we have offered as open-‐source hardware ( http://lightboard.info ). Neither we nor the other schools have yet completed assessments of effectiveness of Lightboard videos as a learning tool, as compared to other methods of video creation. At the present time, we and other early adopters of the
, tasks, and strategies. Metacognitive regulation includes planning,monitoring, control and evaluation.MethodsInterviews were conducted with second year students in bioengineering (BIOE) and mechanicalengineering (ME) at a southeastern land grant institution. The first part of the interview revealedthemes that allowed us to construct motivational profiles of students’ future goals in terms oftheir possible selves and Future Time Perspectives.6 In the second part of the interview, studentswere asked about their perceptions about solving problems in terms of their objectives andperceived instrumentality (i.e. how useful problem solving is to their future career).Coding of the second part of the interviews was completed by one of the authors using
Figure 3-Shake tableThe two-story large scale frame structure is shown in Figure 4(a) and consists of reinforcedconcrete slabs supported by a steel moment frame. The structural system can be altered byattaching additional braces in the lower and upper stories, such that moment frame and braced Page 26.417.5frame behaviors can be studies. Stiffness eccentricity can also be studied. The total height is 9 ft.,plan dimensions are 6 ft. by 4.5 ft. and the diaphragms 18 inches thick. A computational model isshown in Figure 4(b). (a) Photograph (b) Computational model (ETABS3)Figure 4-Two-story large scale
visitors a year, and has a mammoth collection of 26 million artifacts. Gangopadhyay is responsible for a vast array of onsite, online and offsite programs, products and experiences for a diverse set of audiences including students, educators, youth, families, adults as well as for higher education and organizational leadership. Gangopadhyay led the visioning of a dynamic education strategic plan at The Henry Ford as well as the conceptualization and development of many paradigm-shifting educational products and programs. She spearheaded and developed game-changing curricula, Innovation 101 and Be an Innovator series which are currently being enthusiastically adopted and implemented by educators nationwide. This
that purpose. A third component is beliefs – knowledge and conceptions that arestated as being true about the world or about a domain, such as engineering. The fourthcomponent is action possibilities – plans, intentions, strategies, and behaviors that the individualfeels are possible or impossible in the role. These four components emerge continuously throughsocial interactions in different contexts, and interact in a dynamic fashion among themselves, andwith analogous components that belong to other important roles of the person. The four components interact dynamically to form the basis for motivated decisionmaking and action in the role. For example, a student might have a particular set of beliefs aboutthe field of engineering such
Paper ID #16271From Workplace to Classroom - Document Workflow and Engineering Com-munication PedagogyDr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assess- ment and Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include tech- nical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on
to engineering materials which include metals, ceramics,plastics, and composites in two 100-level courses. Primarily, the contents of these coursesconsisted of topics such as the nature of materials, structure-property relationships,manufacturing methods, and techniques of determining engineering materials’ propertiesaccording to industrial procedures described in the standards such as those of the AmericanSociety for Testing and Materials. These same students, according to their academic plans, wererequired to take a freshman technical design graphics course, where they are introduced to 3Dprinting. Thus, it seemed reasonable to synergistically utilize the skills acquired from two tothree freshman courses in a project-based learning
for human use B 5 Nanostructure synthesis and characterization C 3 Development of SPASER technologyFor this study, we employed a mixed methods research plan which included survey data andcontent analysis methods. The surveys employed are evaluative rather than predictive, andrequired trainees to rate their performance and their team’s performance in a number of differentcategories. The surveys were compiled from important elements of teamwork as found inliterature. The same survey was sent to participants each week for four weeks, so short-termlongitudinal data on the same criteria is collected. The survey protocol is given in Appendix A.As a
simplifies the designprocess, so pre-planning a modeling strategy is not necessary as compared to history-basedmodeling. Users working on existing models do not need to understand the modelingstrategy used to create the model, and do not need to search through the feature tree toidentify specific feature parameters in order to make a change to the geometry. The directmodeling approach facilitates quickness and responsiveness-to-change, making it an idealapproach where speed and flexibility are important3. Due to the absence of the history tree, models created using the direct modelingapproach exhibit greater interoperability. Files can be saved in standard formats such asSTEP, Parasolid, or ACIS, and imported into other CAD packages without loss
recorded or included in this study.FindingsThe main findings for the instructors’ experiences are reported in 7 categories grouped accordingto timing: 1) Before DH session (interview), 2) During DH session (video recording), and 3)Reflection after DH session (interview) (Table 2).Table 2: Capturing the findings Time Category Description 1. Before DH A. Past experience Instructors’ experience before, during and session teaching DH further the DH session / Future plans for using them in their classrooms B. Preparations Meetings, planning, and discussions regarding
laboratories.To fulfill our third goal, we plan to hold a pilot phase, which is scheduled from April to May2016. In this phase, all remote labs will be presented to international partners – secondaryschools from Romania and Slovenia. Apart from this, the Austrian Federal Ministry ofScience, Research and Economy held a month-long contest in October 2015 to involvestudents into science projects. Applicants were between 10 to 18 years old and it was hoped toboost their interest in STEM subjects. We found this to be a great opportunity to promoteremote labs to a wider audience and to get first impressions of how students use them. Thus,we took part in the contest with already existing remote labs and provided a survey for thestudents to fill out for each lab
training, culminating in the 10-week charity bike ride.During the training months, riders train by riding 2000 miles with their team, raise at least$4500, and volunteer for 50+ hours in their community. The Texas 4000 training programincludes a comprehensive curriculum based around Eight Foundational Skills – Self Awareness,Communication, Resiliency, Efficient Planning, Peer Respect, Situational Leadership, TechnicalKnowledge & Skills, and Vision & Action.Goals of interaction between the BME CUReS REU Site and Texas 4000The interaction of the BME CUReS and Texas 4000 was intended to be mutually beneficial in anumber of ways. The first is that the Texas 4000 riders and riders-in-training get to interact withcancer researchers. This allows
in responsefollowing the event. Question 3 was not directly tied toan activity, requiring students to extrapolate from theirexperiences. The other two questions (2 and 6) wereanswered correctly by more than 80% of students atthe start.Student inspiration is more difficult to track, in partbecause we did not link responses from specificstudents between surveys. Hence, the lack ofsignificant change on these questions could represent asubset of students with increased interest and anothersubset with decreased interest, cancelling one anotherout. In relating biomechanics to careers, our activitiesmay have communicated the relevance ofbiomechanics to athletics, but in the future we plan tocreate clearer links between biomechanics andadditional
overallpopulation is consistent with MMA’s series of 5-year plans which targeted overall growth from800-1200 and then from 1200-1600 students.Figure 2 is a highlight of the enrollment data for females only.Figure 2, Historical female enrollment as a percentage of overall enrollment from 1980 to 2015 3The greatest growth in female enrollment as a percentage of overall enrollment occurred in the1990’s. The decline in the percentage of women observed from 2003 through 2008 was as aresult of a corresponding growth in overall enrollment and the inability of the AdmissionsDepartment to keep up with the numbers of female applicants. Since 2010, the number ofwomen enrolled at MMA has more than doubled, from 109 to
years. He has 7 US patents, of which 3 have been commercialized by the university. This research work is a collaboration with the Children’s Services Council of Broward county in FL.Dr. Diana Mitsova, Florida Atlantic University Diana Mitsova has a background in research design, statistical and spatial analysis, as well as environ- mental planning and modeling using geographic information systems, and interactive computer simula- tion. Her primary area of research involves the impact of urban development on ecosystems and other environmentally sensitive areas.Her recent publications focus on the impact of climate-related stressors on coastal communities and the implementation of planning approaches related to
service environments.The course covers the following topics: Introduction to modern manufacturing Basics of manufacturing systems Manufacturing strategies Demand planning and forecasting Material Requirements Planning (MRP) Factory dynamics and variability laws Lean manufacturing and Six Sigma methodologyStudent learning is assessed through homework assignments, lab reports, a course project, andexams. Students work in groups for both the lab reports and the course project.In order to investigate how learning soft skills impacts students on solving technical problems inmanufacturing systems, we brought in the teaching of soft skills to the course as students wentthrough the physical simulations. Student soft skills
, with 29 participants (47%) identifying as female. Weekly surveys were used to collectquantitative data on what types of workplace activities participants engaged in (e.g., teammeetings, project budgeting, CAD modeling, engineering calculations) and qualitative data onwhat challenges they experience in their early work experience.In this paper, we present a descriptive analysis of the data to identify patterns across participants.Preliminary analysis of the quantitative data suggests that the most common activities for ourparticipants were team meetings and project planning (mentioned by >70% of participants)compared to formal presentations and project budgeting (mentioned by <30% of participants).Preliminary analysis of the qualitative
experience. Additionally, the planning of the sessions and exercises inspired thefacilitators to become metacognitively aware of their own research methods and processes.Reflections and Future WorkThe diversity of research areas, career goals, and personalities among the three facilitatorscontributed greatly to the intellectual merit of the workshop. Inclusion of these multipleperspectives ensured that the workshop topics were broadly applicable. Admittedly, some of ouradvice was a matter of personal opinion; therefore, further exemplifying the value of includingseveral experienced viewpoints in the sessions.The peer-led aspect of this workshop was likely a significant portion of its success; however, weacknowledge the potential benefits of
remain enrolled in the engineering college and maintain a cumulative GPA of 3.0 orhigher have their scholarships renewed. Students who fail to meet the GPA requirement are given aone semester probation prior to the removal of their scholarship.The summer bridge component consists of a one week program, which requires students to move intotheir campus housing one week early. The students participate in planned programing from 8:30 am to8:00 pm for the week prior to the start of their first semester in college. The programming consists offacilitated ice-breaker and team building activities, fieldtrips, a team design project, projectpresentations, exposure to campus resources and faculty, hands-on activities facilitated by industrypartners, and
itis open source, relatively easy to use, and can be implemented on different platforms. Thedeliverable of the project is a real-time image classifier that can work as a PC program oran android App.2.2. Proposal Phase: Since TensorFlow is mostly written in Python, a brief introductionof Python is presented in the classroom, followed by the introduction to deep learning andCNN. The instructor then demonstrates how to install TensorFlow on Windows. Eachstudent is asked to submit a proposal to identify the classes he or she plans to work on. Thestudent also need to justify why the chosen classes are important and a software applicationshould be created to automatically classify them. The proposal is reviewed by acomprehensive face-to-face
philosophy implored in the program is based on self-awareness, intention, andchoice. Observation and the natural skills and abilities that helped get the faculty members tothis point in their careers are emphasized in the coaching process. Meeting them “where they areat” is a common principle. Initially, there was no planned structure for each person; the coachallowed each individual faculty member to choose the agenda and topic to work on for thesession. The essence of the coaching perspective is that other people are full of potential. Theyare naturally talented, innately resourceful, and destined for greater things. They are also fullycapable of making their own decisions, solving their own problems, and seizing their ownopportunities and are
conversations around student retention with different groups. Faculty developmentoften is engaged in disseminating pedagogy through workshops, programs, and consultationswith the CTL. How else might the CTL be involved through additional change strategies and bepart of the process and conversation?This work in progress describes the approach the CETL at USI is taking to be part of theconversations and working groups that contribute to retention and academic success of ourengineering students. A systematic plan has been developed to proactively involve CETL inprocesses with faculty and academic units to gain deeper understanding of student successchallenges, develop buy-in, articulate retention goals, and help faculty identify the need andopportunities
mission, would you approve it? Why or why not? 2. If you were planning this trajectory, would you be worried about the lifetime of the spacecraft? Why or why not? What if the trajectory had the same altitude around Earth? 3. If the goal of the fly-by was to fly in-between Saturn’s rings, would you have the spacecraft perform this fly-by? Why or why not?The questions were evaluated on two dimensions: “correct answer” (yes/no recommendation)and “correct reasoning.” The “correct answer” was marked as no answer, correct, or incorrect. Ifthe student provided the correct “correct answer”, the “correct reasoning” was evaluated ascorrect or incorrect. The three questions spanned the semester and increased in difficulty intandem to the
course content to global engineering settings.• Students will be prepared to fulfill Northeastern University’s mission “to create and translate knowledge to meet global and societal needs.” Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education Session CEED 442 Lesson Plan Time: 30-‐45 min Procedure: • Opener/Game • Global Engineer Discussion • Why
, students begintransitioning from the construction phase into the testing of their prototypes, developing a plan ofexperimentation to test the feasibility and performance of the critical customer requirements setforth at the beginning of the course sequence. This experimental data is then compared withtheoretical predictions generated as a part of the engineering analysis during the design phase. Atthe end of the semester, each team presents their final prototype and comparative engineeringanalysis to the ME senior students and available mechanical engineering faculty.During the 2017-18 academic year, a number of Mechanical Engineering senior capstone teamschose to enter an existing campus-wide “Shark Tank”-style business competition hosted by
of EER&I research, audiences that need to be aware of the impact onengineering education, potential systematic processes for documenting impact, and plans forpiloting some processes for documenting impact. Metrics ranged from the relativelystraightforward measures of the number of engineering education programs and productivity ofthose programs and individual researchers, which could be expected to have impact, to the moresubtle changes in attitude toward EER&I and extent of implementation of the results of EER&Iresearch, which would reflect the impact. Some of those subtle changes include attitudes towardwho can/should be an engineer and how the engineering culture, and courses, can change tobroaden participation in engineering
(IDEs)For this study, an Individual Design Experience (IDE) was developed to mitigate pre-existingdisparities in hands-on prototyping tasks in introductory engineering design courses. The IDEproject required students to create a child’s pull toy manufactured primarily out of wood andcomplied with ASTM toy safety standards. IDE learning objectives were: (1) to develop andexecute a manufacturing plan to create complex shapes from common stock materials, e.g., stocklumber, dowels, and rounds; (2) to identify and use common hardware like screws and springs tocreate a multi-part assembly; and (3) to confidently use hand tools and low precision powertools, e.g., power drill, band saw, and sanders. Evaluation of the IDE was consistent with
involved with all threepathways because it is not only a Patent & Trademark Resource Center, but it also subscribes tomajor business databases.) The ecosystem also identifies areas of possible engagement includingthe LaunchLab, the prototyping labs, the Technology Transfer Office, the Entrepreneurship andInnovation Law Clinic, the new business incubator, the Statewide Business Plan Competition,the I-Corps program, and other initiatives. Speaking to the leaders of each program is imperativeso that they know that they can turn to the libraries for assistance. Additionally, sending outemails regarding workshops, Federal Register notices, and database announcements can raiseyour visibility as well. Attending programs that are sponsored by the