attempt to increase student motivation in engineering courses. The genesis ofthis pedagogical innovation was in the fall of 2013. At that time, faculty from the Department ofEngineering Education and Leadership (E-Lead) taught a required Introduction to EngineeringLeadership seminar course. However, retention in that course was low and the students thatremained heavily critiqued the course. Because E-Lead seeks to emphasize student leadershipdevelopment by encouraging students pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Engineering Leadership(BSEL) to take ownership of not only their education but also the education of their peers, thefaculty offered the students critiquing the course an opportunity to perfect the curriculum andinstructional methods
. Hood Community College. Pam has 38 years of Head Start experience and 29 years as an Early Childhood Instructor. She developed early childhood science curriculum for the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Head Start on Engineering: Early Findings (Work in Progress)Head Start on Engineering (HSE) is a collaborative, NSF-funded research and practice projectdesigned to develop and refine a theoretical model of early childhood, engineering-relatedinterest development. The project focuses on Head Start families with four-year-old childrenfrom low
curriculum. However, in FlightDynamics and Control I and II courses, there are typically no hands-on laboratory or co-curricular elements that demonstrate engineering and scientific principles/theories using real-world problems [1-2]. Such conventional curricula norms in Flight Dynamics and Control I andII courses are challenged in this work.KU student evaluations from 2005-2010 consistently point to the lack of real-world experiencesin many fundamental engineering disciplines. Many laboratory and design experimentsunfortunately take place within the confines of closed space, using pre-defined inputs andoutputs, and a monotonous approach to the completion of an experiment. The majority of classprojects are limited to theories and mathematical
opportunities are discussed.The second year activities have continued to focus on the achievement of the five objectives ofthe grant project. These are: a) create and implement a new Associate of Applied SciencePhotonics and Laser Technology (AAS PLT) program; b) fully equip an Optics and PhotonicsLaboratory for education and training; c) train faculty to teach core courses in the AAS PLTprogram; d) perform outreach activities to local high schools to promote the new program; e)educate 30 or more students or workers by the end of the project.Objective a) has been fully met by the end of year two in the grant project. The program has nowbeen offered for a full two academic years, and all the program curriculum was developed andtaught at least once. The
sized microrobot navigating inthe human’s GI tract. In particular, we built a simulation module in Webots 3D simulator, wherethe microrobot navigates along the GI tract and detects abnormality through an onboard camera.Using the case study and the laboratory module, we teach students building components of amicrorobot, and basic behaviors for robot navigation and detection.IntroductionIn the same way MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) technologies provided new medicaldevices in the 80s, recent development in nanotechnology is enabling the manufacturing ofnanobiosensors and actuators to improve cell biology interfaces and biomolecular applications.As a consequence, nanorobotics and nanomedicine have evolved from pure science fiction to arapid
in the school ofengineering and is offered with the support of the Fuqua School of Business and the School ofLaw. The program prepares engineering and science graduates to become future industryleaders. The core curriculum consists of marketing, finance, intellectual property and businesslaw, and management, similar to key courses in an MBA curriculum. Technical electives provideflexibility to focus on technology management, innovation management, operationsmanagement, entrepreneurship, financial engineering or master’s courses in specific engineeringdisciplines.Dartmouth’s Master of Engineering Management (M.E.M.) program5 is a professional degreeprogram administered out of the Thayer School of Engineering. M.E.M. engineering andmanagement
model ofmanuscript submission and peer-review in the conduct of scientific inquiry.1 The pedagogicalframework draws from the “writing across the curriculum” (WAC) movement’s premise thatverbal and visual composition are an analog for thinking and that communication assignmentscan be used to mediate student learning in complex problem-solving situations.21.1 CPR Components that Enable Learning -- Four structured workspaces perform in tandemto create a rich series of activities that reflect modern pedagogical strategies for usingcommunication in the learning process. Table A summarizes these stages in a typical CPRsession. Table A: Four Structured Workspaces of CPR SEGMENT ACTIVITY
, manyengineering programs have incorporated international service projects4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11.. In his Ph.D.dissertation regarding humanitarian aspects engineering in the engineering curriculum, Page 15.896.2Vandersteen provides and eloquent history of the evolution of engineering education discussinghow the profession has evolved to see the interconnection between technology and humanity.He further states that the “2000s (have seen an) increased interest in social, environmentalimpact of engineering”12. In fact, six years after the advent of ABET‟s EC-2000, thefundamental change in engineering accreditation, the International Journal for Service
Engineering,learning experiences or not, and which factors were most http://www.westpoint.edu/cfe/literature/hitt_10.pdfimportant in designing an immersion chiller. Survey [4] Sundararajan, S., & Faidley, L. E., & Meyer, T. R.results indicated this was a very successful project for (2012, June), Developing Inquiry-based Laboratoryproject-based learning. Nineteen out of nineteen students Exercises for a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Paper(100%) agreed that the design completion of immersion presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio,chiller aroused their curiosities of heat transfer; nineteen Texasout of nineteen students (100%) liked this project; Eighteen [5] J. M. Chicharro , A
. 8 Figure 11. PSDBPSK of the Simulink simulation (top) and the PlutoSDR transmitter (bottom) both with rb = 1 kb/sec.The PSDBPSK of the PlutoSDR transmitter is a double-sided power spectral density centered at 0Hz or baseband because of the frequency translation from the carrier frequency fc by thePlutoSDR receiver, as shown in Figure 11 (bottom). Since the data rate rb is also 1 kb/sec, thePSDBPSK of the PlutoSDR transmitter shows periodic nulls every ±1 kHz center at 0 Hz.It’s All in How You Do ItDigital communication systems have been taught in the undergraduate curriculum with theapproach of integrating an analytical solution with Simulink simulation for over a decade.Course materials have been
challenges, many engineering colleges and departments are utilizing advisoryboards, and these boards of external advisors are becoming an important part of mostacademic institutions.NU’s School of Engineering, Technology and Media (SETM), since its inception in 2002,has organized and used advisory boards to guide the development and ongoingmanagement of its programs. In addition to assisting in design and development ofcurricula and in specifying and acquiring appropriate resources, these advisory boardscan also serve as an effective mechanism for transferring best practices and ‘lessonslearned’ from industry to academics. In this paper, the roles and responsibilities ofseveral advisory boards constituted within the engineering school will be
their attitudes on ethical issues.From students’ own discussions and from Goulet’s experience, it appears that studentattitudes and perceptions can be favorably impacted by clearly and forcefully settingstandards of appropriate behavior and by integrating ethical and legal decision-makinginto the curriculum. In that manner, ethical behavior is something that is done, rather thanstudied. Wankat and Oreovicz have proposed strategies for instilling honest behavior inengineering students by stressing (as did Goulet) the Engineering Code of Ethics; byreducing anxiety that might foster unethical behavior; by faculty always being a presencein the classroom and laboratory; and by structuring engineering education in such waysthat unethical behavior is
attitudes also have broad implications inengineering such as design bias [4], algorithmic bias [5, 6], hiring/management bias [7], as wellas other types of workplace bias [8]. These ethically and economically relevant topics to allfields of engineering can be difficult to integrate into courses that are already laden with contentand technical skill development [9]. On the other hand, students find stand-alone ethics trainingless relevant to their field [10]. The most common method for balancing these opposites isintegrating a module into an engineering design course that uses a case study approach. Thetopics covered are canonical (i.e. Space Shuttle Discovery O-rings) and are almost alwaysassociated with ethical behavior in regards to job
ouridentity requires that we consider who we want to be not only within communities of practice,but also in response to others.8 Thus, identity formation is relational, discursive and responsiveto the broader social environment.12 In this study, I examine how elementary teachers negotiate the inclusion of ‘teacher ofengineering’ within their existing identities as ‘elementary school teachers’ when a newelementary engineering curriculum created an institutionalized turning point. Many factors mayimpact the sense making when teachers incorporate a teacher-of-engineering identity. Two ofthese are that: 1) most practicing elementary teachers have not been exposed to engineering orlearned engineering pedagogy in their pre-service education or
25 new courses. He has supervised over 35 Industrial Design Projects. He is a returned Peace Corps Volunteer. He is dedicated in helping his students to succeed.Dr. Otsebele E Nare, Hampton University Otsebele Nare is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Hampton University, VA. He received his electrical engineering doctorate from Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, in 2005. His research interests include System Level Synthesis Techniques, Multi-Objective Optimization, Device Modeling and K-16 Integrative STEM education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Engineering Economy Taught Across
Paper ID #41801Meritocracy and Colorblindness: The Perpetuation of Whiteness in EngineeringEducation Through False NarrativesDr. R. Jamaal Downey, University of San DiegoDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an associate professor with joint appointment in the Department of Bicultural-Bilingual Studies and the Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio. Dr. Mejiaˆa C™s work examDr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated
project/group presentation (which incorporates both teamwork and communication skills) and the lectures from outside speakers were deemed the mostbeneficial parts. A ’00 graduate described the group project as the “lynch pin” of the program,providing participants with “real-life experience on an actual business case in a restricted timeperiod.” A ’95 graduate admitted that while the group work was the most frustrating part, it wasthe most beneficial in the long run because it “forced us to integrate the principles we werelearning into a real life example.” Another ’95 graduate found the lectures most beneficial“because it struck a desire for continuous learning in business and leadership.” An interestingcomment from a ’99 graduate was that
is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Prof. Perez has been teaching the Basic Engineering (BE) – BE 1301 course for over 8 years. Lead the design for the development of the new Basic Engineering course (now UNIV 1301) for engineering at UTEP: Engineering, Science and University Colleges. Developed over 5 new courses, including UTEP tech- nology & society core curriculum classes specifically for incoming freshman with a STEM background. Prof. Perez was awarded the 2014 ”University of Texas at El Paso award for Outstanding Teaching”. Prof. Perez has over thirteen years of professional experience working as an Electrical and Computer Engineer providing technical support to faculty
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Additive Manufacturing in Manufacturing Education: A New Course Development and ImplementationAbstractIn this paper, the importance of incorporating Additive Manufacturing (AM) as part ofmanufacturing curriculum in engineering education is emphasized. A new senior level electivecourse on Additive Manufacturing has been developed and offered as part of the manufacturingsequence to students of all engineering discipline at Mercer University School of Engineering.To provide hands-on experience to students taking this course, a low-cost rapid prototyping (RP)lab has also been developed consisting of CAD software, 3D scanners, 3D printers, CNC mill,and digital
sustainable and resilient urban water infrastructure systems, including water supply, stormwater management, flood control, and wastewater collection. Dr. Burian currently serves as the Director of the USAID-sponsored U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Water and an Associate Director of the Global Change and Sustainability Center at the University of Utah. During his career, Dr. Burian has been involved with several engineering education endeavors including serving as the Co-Director of Sustainability Curriculum Development at the University of Utah, an Assistant Mentor and Mentor for the ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop, the Secretary/Treasurer for the ASEE Civil Engineering Division, and a frequent collaborator on
has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan Lisa Lattuca, Professor of Higher Education and member of the Core Faculty in the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. She studies curriculum, teaching, and learning in college and university settings, particularly how facDr. Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering and an Engineering Education Faculty Member at the University of Michiganˆa C”Ann Arbor. Dr. Mondisa holds a PhD in Engineering Education, an MS in Industrial
Paper ID #14739Problem-based Learning in a Supply Chain Management CourseDr. Ekaterina Koromyslova, South Dakota State University Ekaterina Koromyslova is an Assistant Professor in Operations Management at South Dakota State Uni- versity. She holds PhD in Economics and two MS degrees in Business Economics and Operations Man- agement. She has over five years of college teaching work experience in Operations Management and Supply Chain Management fields. Her industry experience is an analyst-consultant in business processes improvement area for manufacturing companies and a deputy head of a customer service department in a
Paper ID #24485Completing a Lab in 50 Minutes: Optimizing Student Attention SpanJennifer Felder Marley, Valparaiso University Jennifer Marley is an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at Valparaiso University. She received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from North Carolina State University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering: systems from the University of Michigan. Her research interests include power system optimization and the integration of storage devices and renewable generation.Dr. Doug Tougaw, Valparaiso University Doug Tougaw is a professor of Electrical and
integrating project management processes in undergraduate education. Her main goal is to understand how work management and product development practices widely used in industry can be modified and adapted to streamline undergraduate STEM education.Dr. Aparajita Jaiswal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Aparajita Jaiswal is an Intercultural Research Specialist at the Center for Intercultural Learning, Mentoring, Assessment and Research (CILMAR), Purdue University. She completed her Ph.D. in 2022 from the Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University. Her research interest lies at the intersection of Intercultural learning, Sociology of learning, Human-computer interaction, and STEM
learning, and collaborative learning (Smith et al 2005).Problem-based learning (PBL) starts when students are confronted with an open-ended, ill-structured, real-world problem and work in teams to identify learning needs and develop a viablesolution, with instructors acting as facilitators rather than primary sources of information (Prince2004). There are numerous PBL teaching models, and are all equally valid and appear to workdepending on factors and prevailing circumstances such as: 1) characteristics of the curriculum,2) attitudes, knowledge, and skills of the academic staff, 3) underpinning academic culture ofteaching and learning, and, 4) socio-economic background and abilities of the student body(Smith et al 2005; Prince 2004; Prince and
. Midkiff, C., J. Parker and S. Bell, Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Reform at The University of Alabama,Proceedings of the 1997 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference, pp. 150-156, Marietta, GA, March, 1997.9. URL: http://www.me.ua.edu/ME360/plc; ME 360 - Programmable Logic Controller Module.10. Parker, J. and D. Schinstock, Introduction to Hydraulic and Logic Systems in a Controls Course, 1996 ASEEAnnual Conference Proceedings, CD-ROM, Paper 3266, Washington, DC, June, 1996.11. URL: http://www.asme.org/students/design_contest/Y2001index.html; 2001 ASME Student Design Contest.JOEY K. PARKERJoey K. Parker is currently an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Alabama, wherehis teaching responsibilities include control
-0423059; seewww.LEGOengineering.com)resulting in the new Robocart curriculum. The previous curriculumhadbeenshown effective in addressing middle-school engineering standards12, where teacherswere successfully implemented it with studentsin after-school programs. The pedagogical model (see table 1 below) was used in developing the instruction andactivities for the Robocart curriculum, which sharesmany features of Bybee’s 5E pedagogicalmodel6. By building upon and improving thepreviouscurriculum, the development of theRobocart curriculum focused on making strong connections with STEM concepts, integrating theRoboBook’s data collection and display capabilities, and building formative assessmentstrategies seamlessly into the RoboBooks
requirements including integrated communication and interpersonal Page 13.592.2skills were founded on complaints from industry and were a “response to a known fact: studentswho graduate with engineering degrees are not well prepared to be working engineers” (p. 151).The simulator-based approach presented in this paper concentrates on developing an innovativemeans of incorporating items (a), (b), (e), and (k) from the ABET criteria to assist in thedevelopment of educational experiences that will translate well to industrial application: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and
M.S. and Ph.D. in Physics from Michigan State University. Before starting at Duke, she worked for Horizon Research, Inc. as an external evaluator for STEM education projects.Dr. Alicia Nicki Washington, Duke University Dr. Nicki Washington is a professor of the practice of computer science and gender, sexuality, and feminist studies at Duke University and the author of Unapologetically Dope: Lessons for Black Women and Girls on Surviving and Thriving in the Tech Field. She is currently the director of the Cultural Competence in Computing (3C) Fellows program and the NSF-funded Alliance for Identity-Inclusive Computing Education (AiiCE). She also serves as senior personnel for the NSF-funded Athena Institute for
AC 2011-2251: ”TUNING” ENGINEERING PROGRAMS IN THE CON-TEXT OF ABET ACCREDITATIONMary Eileen Smith, Ph.D., Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Mary E. Smith has been employed with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board since 1987 and now serves as Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Academic Planning and Policy. She is responsible for the administration and management of matters related to the Board’s higher education academic planning and policy functions, and she provides leadership on key projects, reports, and studies that cut across divisions of the agency. She has taught at The University of Texas at Austin, and she currently is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Communication at St. Edward’s