received from area industrial partners, who wanted to pursue MSV-related projectsand saw a need for training in this new area. Identifying careers in MSV presented a challenge atthe time of concept. The careers in the Modeling, Simulation, and Visualization (MSV) areamight not have a single specific Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code in the Bureauof Labor Statistics and Occupational Outlook Handbook5, because MSV skills are skills whichare used across a variety of disciplines. However, it can be helpful overall to consider suchcareers as equivalent to an advanced area in engineering and other professions requiring theskills and knowledge of MSV. Industrial Engineering Technology, Industrial Technology, andIndustrial Engineering are a
has been no different for Texas A&M’s ElectronicSystems program. To address this, the faculty has identified a need for a unique “sellingproposition” as one possible solution. The idea of careers in electronic product and systemdevelopment has resonated well with new students and transfer students as well as their parents.While this concept of product development careers is not new in mechanical and manufacturingprograms2,3, very few electronics programs have adopted this concept. However, over the pastsix years, our electronics program has been steadily moving in this direction. In addition, anemphasis in product development lends itself well to the programs’ existing interest inentrepreneurship education as evidenced by efforts at other
the wind flow effects on tall structures, a civil engineering student wrote,“This subject is ideal for my major, as I am a civil engineer. Since I am doing my internship in astructural engineering firm, and structural engineering is what I hope to do as a career once Igraduate, wind pressure study on buildings are very important to me and my future success”.Assessment Process – Performance Indicator IThe first performance indicator focuses on the ability of students to recognize the attributes of alifelong learner. This task was accomplished using a survey conducted after students havecompleted their research projects or solved an open-ended design problem. Completion of thesurvey was mandatory as no grade was issued for those who did not
discuss possible future directions of theresearch.II. Rationale and Model Descriptions Why even investigate a potential link between intellectual development and learningstyles? A common goal of engineering educators is to demonstrate that graduates have theability to solve current engineering issues, which include ill-defined problems[2]. In order toacquire this ability, most students must undergo some form of intellectual development duringtheir college career. There are multiple perspectives on how intellectual development, defined inthis paper as the progression of one’s views of knowledge [10], [11], can be evaluated in theoverall learning process[12]. While most courses tend to focus on teaching technical knowledge,some
studentsuccess.” Shuman, et al, (1999) studied the issue of engineering attrition at the University ofPittsburgh by focusing on student characteristics and educational initiatives. They found,as did Budney, et al (1998), that the first semester is critical to student success. Surveysof engineering leavers indicated the principal two reasons for leaving engineering as“came to dislike engineering/studying engineering” and “lost interest/developed newinterests”. They also found that although a high percentage of the students talked tosomeone before leaving engineering, very few sought career counseling services.Following their studies, the COE implemented a number of actions to improve student
Page 25.886.2discovery based approach and a hands-on robotics program will improve students‟ STEMattitudes, math performance, and intentions to pursue STEM education and careers. The theoryof planned behavior5 was used to guide the measurement of students‟ STEM educationoutcomes.A Guided Discovery Approach to STEM EducationTraditional approaches to STEM education can result in disinterested students who may notpursue college-level STEM education and a competitive and hostile educational environment.6We propose that a guided discovery approach is more effective in engaging diverse students inlearning STEM concepts. This engagement will result in increased STEM knowledge andacademic self-efficacy among diverse elementary students.Bruner‟s7
” examines the alignment ofengineering practice and engineering preparation to determine how well engineering students areprepared for their careers. Our eventual aim is to suggest ways that engineering educators mightbetter design curriculum and pathways to engage, retain, and eventually produce successfulengineers.Our analysis pulls from qualitative data collected over the past two+ years of a three year study,including surveys of engineers (n=162), interviews of engineers and their managers (n=100), andsix workplace case studies (with over 53 hours of observation and more than 50 interviews). Asof this writing, the final stage of data collection has begun, which will launch a secondquantitative survey of practicing engineers.Survey questions and
are usually restricted. This raises the question of whichimprovement programs are being implemented and how successful have they been? Anengineering management study (Loendorf18, 2008) was conducted in 2008 with its mainobjective to answer these questions in a definitive manner.Knowledge about the improvement programs most frequently used by manufacturers is a keyaspect that must be included in the management courses associated with the engineering andengineering technology curriculum. Exposure to this important information better preparesgraduates for the challenges that they will encounter during their real-world engineering andmanagement careers in manufacturing. To meet that objective, various engineering andengineering technology courses
-supported opportunities, and 3) year-round advising support on career opportunities. This paper focuses on the challenges we faced indeveloping and maintaining the META program and presents the positive outcomes, such asstrengthened industry and community college relationships, engaging student activities, studentinternships, and the increase of students entering SMET fields, particularly civil engineering.The paper reflects plans for sustainability by further collaborations with our community collegeand industry partners.IntroductionRepresenting a joint effort of New Mexico State University, Santa Fe Community College(SFCC), Luna Community College (Luna CC), and five regional civil engineering industrypartners, the Minority Engineering Transfer
from California Polytechnic State University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University. His research and teaching interests include energy systems, engines for alternative fuels, and building energy efficiency. Prior to his academic position James developed advanced powertrains for General Motors. Page 15.1287.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 UFAST – Practical Advice for Accelerating New Faculty ScholarshipAbstractThe issue of accelerating faculty scholarship is a key item especially for new/untenured faculty.New faculty future career success
spent much of his career conducting research on stars that pulsate and working with NASA spacecraft. Later he became involved in managing scientific projects. He served as the director of a scientific research center for a major corporation and operated his own consulting firm. In recent years he has been focused on issues of space science education. He was in charge of education activities for the Hubble Space Telescope and later became the Director of NASA’s Origins Education Forum. He has served as the Assistant Director for Maryland Space Grant Consortium since March, 2006.Guangming Chen, Morgan State University Dr. Chen is an associate professor in Industrial Engineering
. Keith’s passions include risk management and professional workforce development. Page 24.424.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Development of Graduate Leadership and Management Programs for Working ProfessionalsProblem DefinitionCompanies in industry have increasing come to realize the need for skilled professionals in themanagement of technical projects and programs [1,2]. For this reason, companies andorganizations around the world are increasingly adopting project management as a formal careerpath. As a result, the career and professional development
Paper ID #9004Be the Leader of Your Class: Applying Leadership Behaviors to Manage Stu-dent Conduct and PerformanceProf. Ralph Ocon, Purdue University Calumet Page 24.223.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Be the Leader of Your Class: Applying Leadership Behaviors to Manage Student Conduct and PerformanceAbstractUniversity faculty, especially those who are just beginning their careers, are confrontedwith many professional challenges. The criteria required for promotion, includingscholarly activities
-baccalaureate preparation has drawn close attention. Women, racial/ethnicminorities, and low income students are well-represented in communitycolleges, but only a small number of these populations graduate withassociate’s degrees in engineering and engineering technologies. Researchhas shown that an interest in engineering as a career impacts persistence.Yet women and other underrepresented students are less likely than theirwhite male peers to have been socialized to do hands-on activities orencouraged to use toys, tools, or gadgets that might promote their interest inengineering. First generation and low income community college students areunderrepresented in engineering because they face barriers to entering andcompleting an engineering
Paper ID #9217Cloud Computing for Education: A Professional Development Program forHigh School TeachersDr. Reza Curtmola, New Jersey Institute of Technology Reza Curtmola is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science at NJIT. He received the B.Sc. degree in Computer Science from the ”Politehnica” University of Bucharest, Romania, in 2001, the M.S. degree in Security Informatics in 2003, and the PhD degree in Computer Science in 2007, both from The Johns Hopkins University. He spent one year as a postdoctoral research associate at Purdue University. He is the recipient of the NSF CAREER award. His
speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering. Page 23.21.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A Better Mousetrap: Why Did They Come?AbstractAn Academic Success and Professional Development Class, FSE 394, has been offered for over10 years for engineering and computer science students at Arizona State University (ASU).Seminars were first held for 22 students with scholarships from one NSF S-STEM program, withan emphasis on females and underrepresented minority students and both transfer and non-transfer students. The seminars have now grown to a
10.538.9responding to the prompt below, Emma, a sophomore student, spoke about how important her “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”industrial mentor was to the team, and to her. She learned a lot from her mentor, making her feelmore like an engineer herself. Prompt: One goal for PMT/VITDP is to prepare students for engineering careers. Describe some specific examples of what you are learning about engineering practice. How are you learning this (or how did you learn this) and from whom? I feel that this project is very helpful in giving me an idea of what a real engineering
successful in an engineering career. They are alsointerested in learning things that will be of value to their prospective employers and will be seenas such on their resumes.Engineering students have heavy demands on their time and as a result have limited time toinvest in activities that they see as irrelevant to their interests. They also value flexibilityconcerning when they will need to spend time on school work and predictability in how theyshould spend their time to achieve good grades. We have also found that engineering studentsfind fulfillment in fabricating hardware to test their ideas, although this may be very intimidatingto them if they have not had successful experiences doing it previously. Related to this, they arevery interested in
) to analyze, solve, and present solutions to engineering problems. 2. Become an effective team member. 3. Develop the communication skills necessary to package acquired technical and professional abilities that are required to succeed in engineering practice. 4. Understand the engineering profession enough to commit to a major and create an education/career plan. 5. Develop motivation for self-responsibility, life-long learning, and self-development of a person of good character.Course Outcomes: Upon completion of the course, students will be able to 1. Document a rational for selection in their chosen major
balance between a number of opposingforces. A minimum of fundamentals in science and math are required to prepare students fortheir sophomore engineering coursework, and exposure to the nature of engineering and itsopportunities is needed to enable students to identify an appropriate career path. However, theacademic rigor of the first year in engineering is overly challenging and even shocking for manystudents. Still, calls for engineering education reform speak of educating students in areas ofcommunication, ethics and professionalism, design, working in teams, leadership,entrepreneurship, and global understanding (to name a few), all of which vie for curriculum time.As we seek to transform the first year we also need to keep an eye to current
at Geneva College. Ourprimary vehicle for doing this has been a term paper assignment requiring the students to relatethe second law of thermodynamics to issues that are ordinarily the domain of the liberal artsfaculty. While the particular contours of the assignment are unique to the mission of Geneva, theauthors believe that their approach is adaptable to a wide variety of institutions.The first author developed a term paper assignment in 1991 requiring students to “consider thedevelopment of technology in terms of entropy and the second law of thermodynamics” in thelight of biblical teaching and requiring them to consider how their conclusions would “influencetheir career choice and professional activities.” The second author began
contemporary engineering education. Thus, gaining background in theory andpractice of constructive learning uniquely prepares engineering graduate students who planacademic careers. This presentation describes a novel approach in which engineering graduatestudents learned about learning theory through study, discussion, and practice in a constructivistenvironment.The approach was developed as a training program for engineering graduate studentsparticipating in the NSF-funded Research Communications Studio (RCS) Project at the Universityof South Carolina. These graduate students mentor small groups of engineering undergraduateresearchers who meet in weekly Studio sessions to develop their research and communicationsabilities. The graduate student
much less rigidly than previously. Taking advantage of this opportunity, thefaculty of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University ofIowa has developed a new undergraduate curriculum that permits students exceptionalflexibility, consistent with their career goals as well as their possible additional aspirationsfor learning while at university.The process began in 1997, when the College of Engineering Faculty redesigned the corecurriculum. Math and science classes were modified, the engineering core courses werestreamlined, and the College Faculty introduced the notion of “Elective Focus Areas,” orEFAs. The concept of EFAs is that students should have between 15 and 21 semesterhours (out of 128 s.h. for graduation
coursework and incorporating engineering standards and realisticconstraints that incorporate most of the following considerations: economic;environmental; sustainability; manufacturability; ethical; health and safety; social; andpolitical.” [ABET, Criterion 4, p. 30.] This is a tall order for engineering faculty schooled in the engineering sciencemodel, and whose career advancement depends upon state-of-the-art research in a narrowarea of expertise. Unlike the faculty of other professional educational programs (e.g. law,medicine, and architecture), engineering faculty are by and large not practitioners of thediscipline they teach, or if they are, they practice a fragment of the discipline ofengineering that is not typical of the careers
approach withquestions.Starting at 9:00 a.m. on the day of the event, volunteer greeters were stationed at the bus drop-offlocations to meet the buses and direct participants to the designated check-in/information boothwhere they received a student bookstore bag with a CSU, Chico pencil, a checklist and map ofall the booths they could visit, and a list of competition times and locations. After participating ina booth’s activities, each participant received an initialed check-off on their booth checklist.Children who visited 15 or more booths were instructed to stop by the Careers Path table toreceive their choice of an ASCE activity book or book cover developed by the ASCE Committeeon Career Guidance. High school students also received the Career
century skills will be comparedto the skills sets defined in a framework developed by the Partnership for 21st Century Skills(see Table 1) LEARNING AND INNOVATION SKILLS 1 Creativity and Innovation 2 Critical Thinking and Problem Solving 3 Communication 4 Collaboration INFORMATION, MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY SKILLS 1 Information Literacy 2 Media Literacy 3 Information, Communications, and Technology Literacy LIFE AND CAREER SKILLS 1 Flexibility and Adaptability 2 Initiative and
AC 2011-2745: INNOVATIVE SENIOR PROJECT PROGRAM PARTNER-ING UNIVERSITY AND CORPORATE PARTNERSEric Paul Pearson, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Electronic Systems Eric P. Pearson is the Sector Director of Development Programs for the Electronic Systems Sector of Northrop Grumman Corporation. After several years as an organizational Staff Manager and the Antenna Integrated Product Team lead for major radar programs he began the development of Internship, Co-op, New Graduate Engineering rotation and Early Career Leadership Training Programs. Eric carries a pas- sion for assisting soon-to-be and recent university graduates as they develop their technical, professional and leadership skills through their early careers in
curriculum, an increased responsibility for self-directed learning is highly desirable. Students about to embark on a career must independently beable to meet professional development demands in a rapidly changing engineering environment.Students who arrive in class with assigned reading completed, notes reviewed, and prepared forclassroom activities are developing the ability to be self-directed learners. Limited classroomcontact time can be much more effectively utilized by focusing on concepts and applicationsidentified by students as needing further review and explanation. This paper describes changesimplemented to a Civil Engineering “Structural Design of Foundations” course at a Penn StateUniversity’s College of Engineering. These included
, someresearchers have begun to address this issue. A research brief by the Southern RegionalEducation Board (SREB) matched PLTW participants with career and technical educationstudents with similar demographics and fields of study. SREB found that PLTW students whoenrolled in two or more PLTW courses did significantly better in mathematics and science on theHigh Schools that Work (HSTW) assessment than career/technical students in comparable fields(Bottoms & Anthony, 2005). Differences between PLTW students and similar career/technicalstudents were also found for subsequent course-taking behavior, with PLTW students morelikely to complete the four years of mathematics and science (Bottoms & Uhn, 2007). However,this may not have been an appropriate
students atfive different sites each summer. The program has five primary goals: 1. Increase students’ enthusiasm for research that turns into a desire to pursue postgraduate education. 2. Develop a high level perspective of the issues and opportunities of earthquake engineering in a global society. 3. Attract exceptional undergraduates, particularly underrepresented students (women, minorities, and persons with disabilities) into STEM careers, primarily the field of Page 25.1493.2 earthquake engineering. 4. Cultivate students’ professional selves, including networking skills, presentation skills