include materials science, the neuroscience of learning, humanitarian engineering, and undergraduate research involvement. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Implementing Entrepreneurial Mindset Learning Activities in Several Engineering CoursesThe entrepreneurial mindset is characterized by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network(KEEN)’s 3C’s, which are curiosity, connections and creating value. Entrepreneurially MindedLearning (EML) activities are designed to inspire curiosity and teach students to integrateinformation from many sources to gain insight and encourage them to create value by identifyingopportunities and working in a team. To foster an
Michigan University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Quantum and Classical Supervised Learning Study of Epitaxially–Grown ZnO Surface Morphology Andrew S. Messecar* Steven M. Durbin Robert A. Makin Dept. of Computer Science College of Engineering Dept. of Computer ScienceWestern Michigan University University of Hawaiʻi Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, MI 49008 Honolulu, HI 96822 Kalamazoo, MI 49008*Email: andrew.s.messecar@wmich.eduAbstractMaterial synthesis parameter spaces typically have a very high dimensionality and are oftenintractable
betweenengineers, healthcare and legal professionals.AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank Dr. David W. Craig and Dr. Xiaowu Gai for their contributions to the development of thisinterdisciplinary class.References[1] Andrade, G., “Medical ethics and the trolley Problem”, 2019.[2] Berman JJ. “Concept-match medical data scrubbing: how pathology text can be used in research”, 2003.[3] Chen M, Gonzalez, S Vasilakos A et al., Body area networks: a survey. Mobile Netw Appl 2011; 16:171–93.[4] Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress, “Principles of Biomedical Ethics”, 2008.[5] Christenhusz, G. M., Devriendt, K., & Dierickx, K. “To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethicalreflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts.” European
acknowledge the Cal Poly Pomona SPICE Grant, Mr. Mark Bailey, and Mr.Tristan Sherman.References1. Asp, L.E., Bouton, K., Carlstedt, D., Duan, S., Harnden, R., Johannisson, W., Johansen, M., Johansson,M.K.G., Lindbergh, G., Liu, F., Peuvot, K., Schneider, L.M., Xu, J. and Zenkert, D. (2021), A StructuralBattery and its Multifunctional Performance. Adv. Energy Sustainability Res., 2: 2000093.https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.2020000932. J. Lee et al., "High-Endurance UAV Via Parasitic Weight Minimization and Wireless EnergyHarvesting," 2021 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech), Irvine, CA, USA,2021, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1109/SusTech51236.2021.9467437.3. Kudebeh, K., Baez, J., Austin, L., Yu, Z., Lo, A., Dobbs, S., and Rico, J
-120, 1992. 6) Franklyn-Stokes, A., and S. E. Newstead. Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology 88:229–42, 1996. 7) Hardigan, Patrick. “ First and Third-Year Pharmacy Students’ Attitudes towards Cheating Behaviors”. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68(5), article 110, 2004. Page 24.978.7 8) Harris, C.E., M. Davis, M.S. Pritchard, and M.R. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? and When?” Journal of Engineering Education, Pp. 93-96, 1996.9) Carpenter, Don., Harding, T and et al, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Towards Cheating”. Journal
set of knowledge. Since these skills and knowledge can be nested, they can be representedby a tree. The depth and number of nodes are different for each tree.Definition 1. Let S a set of nested Skills. S = {s1 , s2 , s3 , . . . , sn }S is the set of all nodes of tree shown in figure 1. Skills S11 S12 ... S1δ s211 s212 . . . s21π1 s221 s222 . . . s22π2 s2δ1 s2δ2 . . . s2δπδ Figure 1: Skills Tree StructureDefinition 2. Let K a set of nested Knowledge. K = {k1 , k2 , k3
Engineering Education, 34(1), 26-39. 5. Stern, F., Xing, T., Muste, M., Yarbrough, D., Rothmayer, A., Rajagopalan, G., Caughey, D., Bhaskaran, R., Smith, S., and Hutchings, B. (2006). "Integration of simulation technology into undergraduate engineering courses and laboratories." International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(1), 28-48. 6. Busch-Vishniac, I., Kibler, T., Campbell, P. B., Patterson, E., Guillaume, D., Jarosz, J., Chassapis, C., Emery, A., Ellis, G., Whitworth, H., Metz, S., Brainard, S., and Ray, P. (2011). "Deconstructing Engineering Education Programmes: The DEEP Project to reform the mechanical engineering curriculum." European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(3), 269-283. 7. Cheah, C., Chen
., Tavener, S., Voss, K. Armentrout, S. Yaeger, P. and Marra, R., 1999, "Using Applied Engineering Problems in Calculus Classes to Promote Learning in Context and Teamwork," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 2, 12d5-14.3. Barrow, D.L. and Fulling, S.A., 1998, "Using an Integrated Engineering Curriculum to Improve Freshman Calculus," Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Conference, Seattle, WA.4. Hansen, E.W., 1998, "Integrated Mathematics and Physical Science (IMPS): A New Approach for First Year Students at Dartmouth College," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 2, 579.5. Kumar, S. and Jalkio, J., 1998, "Teaching Mathematics from an Applications Perspective," Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE
, pinpointing underutilization of key tasks that have been linked tosuccessful problem solutions as well as identifying errors committed in each segment of theprocess. The complete assessment consisted of eight stages and a measure of solution accuracy.Next, the assessment tool was modified into a form that could be used to assess problemsolutions in the absence of a complete recording of the problem solving process. This ensures atool that is more generalizable to the target user group of instructors and education researcherswho would not necessarily have access to a complete digital recording of student problemsolving attempts. To accomplish this, the first two of Pretz et al.’s stages were combined forsimplicity, and two stages were eliminated due
in Odense, Demark in the mid-1970’s, and it is now a program of the U.S.Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through the currentfederal transportation law, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). Thedesignated funding available to SRTS projects was eliminated in MAP-21, but those activitiesremain eligible for funding through the Transportation Alternatives program.SRTS accomplishes its goal by improving safety and physical infrastructure and by removingbarriers that currently prevent students from walking or biking to school. Schools form an SRTSaction team consisting of members with expertise in transportation, engineering, education,public health, and public safety. The SRTS planning process
Engineering Education 93, 223-231 (2004).2. King, D. B. & Joshi, S. Gender differences in the use and effectiveness of personal response devices. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17, 544-552 (2008).3. FitzPatrick, K. A., Finn, K. E. & Campisi, J. Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum. Advances in Physiology Education 35, 280-289 (2011).4. Karaman, S. Efffects of audience response systems on student achievement and long-term retention. Social Behavior and Personality 39, 1431-1440 (2011).5. Draper, S. W. & Brown, M. I. Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of
University of Hertfordshire, (b) LEED Building site with sample features, (c) PFNC Design for an $8,000 home using shipping containers for low income families in Mexico, and (d) Thinnest house in the world designed by Polish architect J. SzczensyStudents are then asked to consider the typical home designed in the 1950’s, such as the one inFigure 4. During this time, home designs have one bathroom for the use of the entire family.When this is placed in contrast to the number of bedrooms and baths in their Dream Home,students are asked, “Why do they need so many bathrooms?” given that people today are notdifferent physically from those in the 1950’s. Students quickly realize that the needs of theindividual have not
] Hunley, S., Whitman, J., Baek, S., Tan, X., and Kim, D., 2010, “Incorporating the Importance of Interdisciplinary Understanding in K-12 Engineering Outreach Programs using a Biomimetic Device,” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY.[7] Porche, M., Mckamey, C., and Wong, P., 2009, “Positive Influences of Education and Recruitment on Aspirations of High School Girls to Study Engineering in College,” Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX.[8] Taylor, B. A. P., Williams, J. P., Sarquis, J. L., and Poth, J., 1990, “Teaching Science with Toys: A Model Program for Inservice Teacher Enhancement,” Journal of Science Teacher Education 1(4
Engineering Education at Purdue University. He keeps a balanced life connecting with nature, staying mentally, physically, spiritually, and socially active, constantly learning and reflecting, and challenging himself to improve. He is interested in learning/teaching collectively, engineering philosophy, and social and environmental justice. His purpose is to help people freely and fully develop in a sustainable world.Mr. Leonardo Pollettini Marcos, Purdue University Leonardo Pollettini Marcos is a 3rd-year PhD student at Purdue University’s engineering education program. He completed a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in Materials Engineering at the Federal University of S˜ao Carlos, Brazil. His research interests are in
balanced strategy for success. While it may be evident to develop short-termtechnological solutions, it is equally crucial to incorporate long-term structural and functional solutions intothe planning process. This holistic approach ensures a more robust and sustainable outcome for the project[2].Based on Gibson et al.'s analysis of data from Anderson Consulting (1993) [1], the goal developmentrepresents a small part of the total lifetime cost of a system (less than 1% in a typical software system), yet"it results in a critical commitment of recourses." When the first 8% of the project budget is spent, 80% ofthe cost of the project/system is determined.Competitiveness in professional practice requires engineers to participate in and accomplish
Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 2021, pp. 1–14.[17] D. S. Dunn and E. E. Andrews, ‘Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language’, Am. Psychol., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 255–264, 2015 [Online]. Available: 10.1037/a0038636.[18] W. Gaver, ‘What should we expect from research through design?’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp. 937–946 [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2207676.2208538.[19] J. A. Turns, ‘What If They Choose: Surfacing Insights Associated with a Pedagogy for Doctoral Education’, in
2011 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #2322, 2011.[6] Hamilton, S., “Peer Review: Modeling Civil Engineering Practice, Another Way to ImproveLearning,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005.[7] Bachnak, R., Maldonado, S., “A Flipped Classroom Experience: Approach and LessonsLearned,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #8725, 2014.[8] Brown, J., Click, P., “Collaborative Learning About the Meaning of Professionalism,”Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3661, 2001.[9] Haller, C., Gallagher, V., Felder, R. “Dynamics of Peer Interactions in CooperativeLearning,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 2630, 1999.[10] Siddique, Z., Akasheh, F., Okudan, G., “Enhancing Peer-Learning
depend on the flow type. The current problem is transient, incompressible, laminar, and isothermal flow whose physics is governed by Eq. (1) and (2). Also the fluid properties (density and viscosity), initial conditions (the initial velocity field of a fluid domain), and boundary conditions need to be prescribed. The boundary conditions used for the current problem are given in Fig. 4. The velocity of 2.8 × 10−4 m/s at the inlet and zero velocity at the cylinder surface were assigned. The slip condition was used at the top and bottom of the domain and zero stress was assigned to the outflow. Figure 4: Boundary conditions• Step 4. Discretize the governing equations to obtain solutions. In FEM, the governing
contributing to their mastery?," Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, vol. 35, 2022.[2] L. Riebe, A. Girardi, and C. Whitsed, "A systematic literature review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education," Small Group Research, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 619-664, 2016.[3] A. Planas-Lladó, L. Feliu, F. Castro, R. M. Fraguell, G. Arbat, J. Pujol, J. J. Suñol, and P. Daunis-i-Estadella, "Using peer assessment to evaluate teamwork from a multidisciplinary perspective," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 14-30, 2018.[4] D. Weaver, and A. Esposto, "Peer assessment as a method of improving student engagement," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 805-816, Nov. 2012.[5] J. S. Kane
medicine: determinants of students’ engagement and persistence,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 6, no. 2, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1355. [Accessed Jan. 25, 2024].[6] P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palinscsar, “Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning,” Education Psychology, vol. 26, pp. 369-398, 1991. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139. [Accessed Jan. 25, 2024].[7] J. S. Krajcik and P. C. Blumenfeld, “Project-based learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, R. K. Sawyer, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University
). Impact of COVID-19 on Sense of Belonging: Experiences of engineering students, faculty and staff at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Journal of Engineering Education, 112 (2), pp. 488-520. http://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20512Fletcher, T. L., & Strong, A. C., & Jefferson, J. P., & Moten, J., & Park, S. E., & Adams, D. J. (2021, July), Exploring the Excellence of HBCU Scientists and Engineers: The Development of an Alumni Success Instrument Linking Undergraduate Experiences to Graduate Pathways Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37152Freeman Jr, S., & Palmer, R. (2020). Exploring
(accessed Feb. 26, 2023). [2] S. Patel and L. Tutchenko, “The refractive index of the human cornea: A review,” Cont Lens Anterior Eye, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 575–580, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2019.04.018. [3] SmugMug, “A beginner’s guide to pinhole photography.,” Medium, Oct. 28, 2020. https://news.smugmug.com/a-beginners-guide-to-pinhole-photography-ce7cf6b06fcb (accessed Feb. 26, 2023). [4] S. D’Souza, S. Annavajjhala, P. Thakur, R. Mullick, S. Tejal, and N. Shetty, “Study of tear film optics and its impact on quality of vision,” Indian J Ophthalmol, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 2899–2902, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2629_20. [5] R. Machiele, M. J. Lopez, and C. N. Czyz, “Anatomy, Head and Neck, Eye Lacrimal
Paper ID #45033Full Paper: One Tool to Support Attendance, Engagement, Metacognition,and Exam PreparationDr. Kathleen A Harper, Case Western Reserve University Kathleen A. Harper is an associate professor and has served as the assistant director of the Roger E. Susi First-year Engineering Experience at Case Western Reserve University since 2021. Prior to that, she taught as part of the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors program at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from CWRU and her Ph. D. in physics, specializing in physics education
investigatethe intersectionality of neurodiverse students with gender and first-generation status. Researcherscould also evaluate how women and men’s perceived importance of technical and non-technicalskills differ by major.References[1] J. Redford, and K.M. Hoyer, “First generation and continuing-generation college students: Acomparison of high school and postsecondary experiences, “National Center for EducationStatistics, U. S. Department of Education, U. S. Government Printing Office (NCES 2018–009),September 2017. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018009.pdf[2] J. King Jr., L. Mahaffie, J.T. Minor and L. Byrd-Johnson, “Fast facts report for the studentsupport services program”, U.S. Department of Education, Jan. 2016. [Online]. Available:http
significance of transitioning from a 2-year toa 4-year program in cultivating a strong scientific identity. It will also enhance ourcomprehension of how advanced knowledge and broader institutional experiences can bolstereconomic and occupational resilience, ultimately paving the way for the emergence of futureSTEM leaders. More specifically, this transition from a 2-year to a 4-year degree seeks toinstigate a transformative shift within the realm of engineering technology education. Its ultimateobjective is to empower individuals, enabling them to access enhanced career prospects anddiscover untapped opportunities.References[1] K. Atkins, B. M. Dougan, M. S. Dromgold-Sermen, H. Potter, V. Sathy, and A. T. Panter, “‘Looking at Myself in the
://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9781780523873/B9781780523873-s003.xml[12] International Network of WAC Programs (INWAC). (2014) Statement of WAC principles and practices - the WAC clearinghouse. [Online]. Available: https://wac.colostate.edu/principles/[13] P. Anderson, C. M. Anson, R. M. Gonyea, and C. Paine, “The contributions of writing to learning and development: Results from a large-scale multi-institutional study,” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 199–235, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24890033[14] J. Yoritomo, N. Turnipseed, S. L. Cooper, C. Elliott, J. Gallagher, J. Popovics, P. Prior, and J. Zilles, “Examining engineering writing instruction at a large research university
. Cherng, B. Q. Li, and N. Natarajan, "Development of a Mechatronics Course for SeniorMechanical Engineering Students," in 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-26,2013[2] H. Vasquez and A. A. Fuentes, "Integration of Sensors and Low-Cost Microcontrollers intothe Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Design Sequence," in 120th ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, June 23-26, 2013[3] M. Barger and R. Gilbert, "New Mechatronics Education Initiatives in 2-year Programs," in2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Palace Convention Center, Salt Lake City, UT,June 24-27, 2018[4] S. A. Yost and D. D. Maggio, "The Mechatronics Road Show: Building on Success inMechatronics Curriculum Development," in 2004 American Society for
addition, an initial assessment indicates that students had better understand of microelectronicdevices and applications when they are learning them through visual representation methods.References[1] ABET homepage; https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-programs-2018-2019/[2] Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R. J., Merrill, J. A., Clifton, W., & DeDios, S. (2011). Assessing creativity specific to engineering with the revised creative engineering design assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 778-799.[3] Dewulf, S. & Baillie, C. (1999). CASE: How to foster creativity. London, UK: Department for Education and Employment.[4] Kazerounian, K., & Foley, S. (2007
] T. Buckmiller, R. Peters, and J. Kruse, “Questioning Points and Percentages: Standards- Based Grading (SBG) in Higher Education,” Coll. Teach., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 151–157, 2017, doi: 10.1080/87567555.2017.1302919.[5] M. E. Selbach-Allen, S. J. Greenwald, A. E. Ksir, and J. E. Thomley, “Raising the Bar with Standards-Based Grading,” PRIMUS, vol. 30, no. 8–10, pp. 1110–1126, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1695237.[6] M. Knight and R. Cooper, “Taking on a New Grading System: The Interconnected Effects of Standards-Based Grading on Teaching, Learning, Assessment, and Student Behavior,” NASSP Bull., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 65–92, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0192636519826709.[7] M. C. Lovett, M. W
complexities of LP modeling successfully. In conclusion, integrating mathematicalconcepts with applied examples can serve as a crucial bridge, linking theoretical understanding topractical application. This approach fosters a deeper comprehension of the subject matter,benefiting students across engineering disciplines. Through delving into the intricacies ofengineering education, it becomes evident that a holistic approach, encompassing factors such aseffective learning strategies, cognitive skills development, and practical application, is essentialfor nurturing well-rounded and successful engineering students.References[1] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, and K. Edstrom, “Rethinkingengineering education,” CDIO Approach, vol